Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Elizabeth Hart's avatar

Referring to Ben Falconer's tweet as presented in Rebekah's article.

Ben refers to the Deputy Commissioner reading a 3-4 page summary of his reasons for the decision (to dismiss Ben Falconer) for not getting the jab in December 2021.

According to Ben, the Deputy Commissioner said "he feared I might refuse another order again under similar circumstances..."

This is very interesting to think about...

Did those police officers who submitted to vaccination under duress/coercion/mandates follow an 'unlawful order'?

As I've detailed in my previous comment, the Australian Government and AHPRA confirm that voluntary informed consent is required for vaccination, with that obviously implying that refusal of vaccination, without penalty, is also an option.

In fact it seems, crucially, the vaccinating practitioners have also followed 'unlawful orders' in collaborating with coercive and mandated vaccination.

Also, think about police officers being expected to comply with orders without question... This makes for a very dangerous police force, with officers being demanded to act as compliant drones, and critical thinkers and whistleblowers being eradicated from the service. What's the agenda here? It doesn't seem too promising for the safety of the public...

It's a dire situation, and apparently no justice to be found in the courts on in the 'leadership' of the police force.

Expand full comment
Elizabeth Hart's avatar

Meanwhile...

Reportedly over 71.5 million COVID-19 vaccine doses have been administered in this country* without valid consent.

Valid voluntary informed consent for vaccination cannot be be obtained under coercion and mandates.

It really is quite astonishing that the courts will not protect people from mandatory medical interventions in what is supposed to be a free country, where the Australian Government has confirmed: "Informed consent should be obtained for every COVID-19 vaccination, as per usual consent procedures for other vaccinations."

That was first advised to my colleague Emma McArthur in a letter from the Australian Government dated 21 December 2021, when Scott Morrison and co were running the show, see: https://humanityattheprecipice.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/doh-reply-21-12-2021.pdf

The Australian Government repeated this advice again in a letter to me dated 17 November 2022, with Anthony Albanese and co installed, see: https://vaccinationispolitical.net/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/mc22-018819-signed-highlighted-1.pdf

These letters from the Australian Government also confirm that practitioners DO NOT have specific liability protection for administering the COVID-19 vaccinations, after they were led to believe by the Morrison Government that they would be protected. (Only a vaccine claims scheme was put in place.)

Also, AHPRA, the regulator of health practitioners, personally advised me in September 2021 that: "Practitioners have an obligation to obtain informed consent for treatment, including vaccination. Informed consent is a person’s voluntary decision about health care that is made with knowledge and understanding of the benefits and risks involved." See: https://vaccinationispolitical.net/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/response-from-ahpra-re-informed-consent.pdf

Do you see the dates on this correspondence? Going back to 2021... I've shared this information over and over again, and yet it seems no-one is able to make effective use of it.

Why is that? Does Ben Falconer know about this information? Does he find it of no interest at all?

The bottom line is that nobody should have been vaccinated under coercion and mandates, because the doctors, nurses, pharmacists themselves should have done their legal and ethical duty, and refused to collaborate with coercive/mandatory vaccination.

But 71.5 million doses administered in a country where politicians and bureaucrats imposed vaccination mandates and fear-mongering and coercion shows that the doctors, nurses, pharmacists violated voluntary informed consent.

As far as I'm aware no lawyer or journalist has yet effectively used this information.

It's bewildering...

I've written up much supporting material on this matter in my detailed article: Misfeasance in Public Office? The Destruction of Voluntary Informed Consent for Vaccination: https://vaccinationispolitical.net/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/misfeasance-in-public-office-the-destruction-of-voluntary-informed-consent-for-vaccination.pdf

* Vaccination statistics as at June 2024: https://www.health.gov.au/sites/default/files/2024-06/covid-19-vaccine-rollout-update-14-june-2024.pdf

Expand full comment
14 more comments...

No posts