This article compliments a recent one by Alison Bevege. It's begs the question, how is the misinformation bill a boon for the corporate world? I can't work out the angle for the amount of dollars dropped by big business into the yes campaign. What's the short term gain for them? I don't see them playing a too longer game on this, given current global instability.
This article compliments a recent one by Alison Bevege. It's begs the question, how is the misinformation bill a boon for the corporate world? I can't work out the angle for the amount of dollars dropped by big business into the yes campaign. What's the short term gain for them? I don't see them playing a too longer game on this, given current global instability.
"The owners have a problem. The United Nations has claimed for decades to care about indigenous peoples and their rights. How to get around this?
The first end run is psychological. In politics if you control language, you control ideas. Put the indigenous at the heart of government policy, and blend their interests with the State. “Homeland” was once understood as tribal lands. Now the homeland is the State. In terms of language, it has appropriated tribal lands.
The second end run is legal. Give the indigenous people the right to their ancestral lands, including the right to reclaim them from settlers — or at least to demand payment or compensation from those who have built homes and factories on the land.
The third end run is bureaucratic. Create a special assembly for the indigenous — who in the future can be given a puppet leadership. They can effectively then be swept out of the way and their land and resources be “managed” or allocated by the State, through the Great Reset, to stakeholders or guardians."
Indeed, it's all part of a documented plan to subvert our constitution by creating a new body outside of the constitutional balance. Also, opening up the constitution to modification without explicitly stating all the changes that will be made by politicians who have demonstrated repeatedly that they cannot be trusted, that should be warning enough. I do recommend reading the full Uluru Statement with its addendums, which make it very clear that 'recognition' is not enough, but the first step on a path to a treaty, reparations and reclamation of sovereignty over the country, and a guaranteed % of gross national product diverted the Voice (not the aboriginal people). I.e., it's about the money, which explains why all the banks and corporate interests are behind it. They all stand to get a cut of the windfall.
"I do recommend reading the full Uluru Statement with its addendums ..."
This is probably the best advice there is for all Australians, and it probably also should be considered the solemn duty of all citizens.
I'd hazard a guess that there would be lessons and insight in those documents of relevance and erudition for all humans in every land, not just in Australia.
All donors will get favourable treatment under the voice, Rio Tinto will be approved to mine, Pfizer will get control of your autonomy (as you must have an mRNA jab to keep first nations people safe, as no details were given to you re "The Voice", you suddenly find out the Voice can override other sections of the constitution - your current rights under law - if it is to protect first nations people - all voice members are selected not elected, bet there's a lot of UN WEF characters lined up too)... So corporations have a lot to gain by the voice, in fact I'd guess it's an angle to get corporate power into government, along the WEF lines...
This lady has done some great work (as has Rebekah!), this plays on the back of other work done to highlight the fact we are in a coup... There's a thin veneer of democracy, but we've been infiltrated by WEF graduates, highly brainwashed to their corporate world government narrative, most of us have been blissfully unaware of this for years (I know I was), but now, it's so obvious once you know... It's wrapped in confusing terms, sometimes presented as weaponised compassion, but this is the push, we're in the middle of it... Covid was just the start, the excuse to incur on your rights and freedom...
That the Post Modernist ?Cultural Marxist leftist cancellation crew are so incredibly vocal that they can turn Coon cheese into Cheer cheese, and they've scared the companies into donating?
Imagine you're Marcia Langton talking to Big Mining: "Give us money to get this through, and we'll see that you get an easy path to some land to mine".
Perhaps the mining companies know of other purposes of the voice, and consider they stand to profit by it passing.
Maybe the companies have created most of the problems, blowing up sacred sites, etc, and they've been ordered to put in money.
The re-engineered constitution could give the global players better access points to Australian policy - WEF+ could be demanding that corporate money be given to the Yes campaign?
This article compliments a recent one by Alison Bevege. It's begs the question, how is the misinformation bill a boon for the corporate world? I can't work out the angle for the amount of dollars dropped by big business into the yes campaign. What's the short term gain for them? I don't see them playing a too longer game on this, given current global instability.
https://open.substack.com/pub/lettersfromaustralia/p/australia-to-vote-on-a-constitutional?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=1ko5qv
Well for big businesses, there's budget for ESG.
"I can't work out the angle for the amount of dollars dropped by big business into the yes campaign."
Moneycircus explains it quite clearly ( https://moneycircus.substack.com/p/crisis-update-indigenous-people-under ):
"The owners have a problem. The United Nations has claimed for decades to care about indigenous peoples and their rights. How to get around this?
The first end run is psychological. In politics if you control language, you control ideas. Put the indigenous at the heart of government policy, and blend their interests with the State. “Homeland” was once understood as tribal lands. Now the homeland is the State. In terms of language, it has appropriated tribal lands.
The second end run is legal. Give the indigenous people the right to their ancestral lands, including the right to reclaim them from settlers — or at least to demand payment or compensation from those who have built homes and factories on the land.
The third end run is bureaucratic. Create a special assembly for the indigenous — who in the future can be given a puppet leadership. They can effectively then be swept out of the way and their land and resources be “managed” or allocated by the State, through the Great Reset, to stakeholders or guardians."
Indeed, it's all part of a documented plan to subvert our constitution by creating a new body outside of the constitutional balance. Also, opening up the constitution to modification without explicitly stating all the changes that will be made by politicians who have demonstrated repeatedly that they cannot be trusted, that should be warning enough. I do recommend reading the full Uluru Statement with its addendums, which make it very clear that 'recognition' is not enough, but the first step on a path to a treaty, reparations and reclamation of sovereignty over the country, and a guaranteed % of gross national product diverted the Voice (not the aboriginal people). I.e., it's about the money, which explains why all the banks and corporate interests are behind it. They all stand to get a cut of the windfall.
"I do recommend reading the full Uluru Statement with its addendums ..."
This is probably the best advice there is for all Australians, and it probably also should be considered the solemn duty of all citizens.
I'd hazard a guess that there would be lessons and insight in those documents of relevance and erudition for all humans in every land, not just in Australia.
Thanks for your elaborations.
I read it and what a mind numbing document it is. My year 8 remedial English class could have done better.
All donors will get favourable treatment under the voice, Rio Tinto will be approved to mine, Pfizer will get control of your autonomy (as you must have an mRNA jab to keep first nations people safe, as no details were given to you re "The Voice", you suddenly find out the Voice can override other sections of the constitution - your current rights under law - if it is to protect first nations people - all voice members are selected not elected, bet there's a lot of UN WEF characters lined up too)... So corporations have a lot to gain by the voice, in fact I'd guess it's an angle to get corporate power into government, along the WEF lines...
https://open.substack.com/pub/josephinecashman/p/the-empire-20-un-veiling-the-global?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=tymb5
https://open.substack.com/pub/josephinecashman/p/the-empire-20-un-veiling-the-global-91d?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=tymb5
This lady has done some great work (as has Rebekah!), this plays on the back of other work done to highlight the fact we are in a coup... There's a thin veneer of democracy, but we've been infiltrated by WEF graduates, highly brainwashed to their corporate world government narrative, most of us have been blissfully unaware of this for years (I know I was), but now, it's so obvious once you know... It's wrapped in confusing terms, sometimes presented as weaponised compassion, but this is the push, we're in the middle of it... Covid was just the start, the excuse to incur on your rights and freedom...
big business is not Australian and cares nothing for National boundaries, human beings or anything that makes life worthwhile.
Fact checked. You are correct sir.
Possible ideas:
That the Post Modernist ?Cultural Marxist leftist cancellation crew are so incredibly vocal that they can turn Coon cheese into Cheer cheese, and they've scared the companies into donating?
Imagine you're Marcia Langton talking to Big Mining: "Give us money to get this through, and we'll see that you get an easy path to some land to mine".
Perhaps the mining companies know of other purposes of the voice, and consider they stand to profit by it passing.
Maybe the companies have created most of the problems, blowing up sacred sites, etc, and they've been ordered to put in money.
The re-engineered constitution could give the global players better access points to Australian policy - WEF+ could be demanding that corporate money be given to the Yes campaign?