If you took the Pfizer Covid vaccine, would you be surprised to learn that the product you were injected with was never tested at scale in a randomised controlled trial before being approved for use? Believe it or not, this is not a hypothetical question. It all comes down to a bait and switch.
By way of analogy, it's as if injectees thought Pfizer was serving them a mushroom beef wellington made with fresh field mushrooms when unbeknown to them Pfizer had used death caps instead.
Meanwhile…when is the elephant in the room going to be addressed?
Why was there a global mass population ‘vaccine solution’ against a disease it was known from the beginning wasn’t a serious threat to most people?
How was this ‘vaccine solution’ evaluated? Where are the minutes of the meetings for the approval of this project?
I’ve asked questions, but no answers, see for example my email to Andrew Pollard, Chair of the UK Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI), and Chief Investigator on the Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine trials…that’s a conflict of interest.
The whole premise of vaccinating into a pandemic of a respiratory virus was wrong. It was bound to lead to mutations with perpetuation of the disease, not to mention vaccine injury at an unprecedented rate. The trouble is no one has paid a price and I doubt anyone will.
...was never tested at scale in a randomised controlled trial...
Neither was the original one; the malfeasants destroyed the control group by giving them the injection anyway - justified by the laughable 'it was unethical to let them be unprotected against the deadly covid'. Even so, there were massive safety signals which they buried. Maybe the bacterial version is more dangerous, bit like jumping out of the 58th floor instead of the 50th (floor = storey(US)).
Whether prepared according to process 1 or 2, they're processing a poison plus the trials were fraudulent and records after roll-out can't be trusted either. Apart from that, I thought you might find this vax quiz interesting - https://vaccinequiz.org/ Only 15 questions but lots of useful info. in the answers section. An Australian version would be useful. Needless to say my score was 15/15 - as would be the score of any DDU subscribers I imagine!
When the State of Emergency was activated, informed consent no longer existed. There was only the emergency, at which point your survival was in your hands alone. Time for people to stop looking to the government to save them. https://vicparkpetition.substack.com/p/placebo-wins-and-getting-pharma
I know this sounds very simplistic but I've found many times that when I cook a dish using a single recipe it works perfectly. Once I try to double or increase it to feed a large number of people it never looks or tastes the same.
As always you’re right over the target, Rebekah, indeed I recall reading very early on in 2020 speculation of this exact issue I.e the inability to ramp up production from the so-called lab test phase and still meet the alleged cold chain supply criteria that were initially advertised for the novel mRNA excipient, as the reason it would unlikely that any “vaccines” would be made available en masse within years let alone months ... and now we know the answer, an adulterated concoction sold to the ignorant and the narcissists as their panacea
It doesn't get worse because it was always bad, real bad. 23 hours in solitary, 1 hour of exercise, 3 meals a day, protection from society for the rest of their miserable lives,loss of ALL of their assets,seems way too good an offer to me.
I believe that the average person doesn’t give 2 twigs about trials and even informed consent, just give me the thing so I can get back to normal. The folk who didn’t take it don’t give 2 twigs about trials because they weren’t going to take for any reason... it’s a pointless argument really, unless the givers and the lawmakers who are ultimately responsible to understand it are held to account, in my mind that’s very unlikely, as we all know that they’re still at it!
Pfizer’s Bait and Switch a ‘Gut Punch’ for Informed Consent
By way of analogy, it's as if injectees thought Pfizer was serving them a mushroom beef wellington made with fresh field mushrooms when unbeknown to them Pfizer had used death caps instead.
Meanwhile…when is the elephant in the room going to be addressed?
Why was there a global mass population ‘vaccine solution’ against a disease it was known from the beginning wasn’t a serious threat to most people?
How was this ‘vaccine solution’ evaluated? Where are the minutes of the meetings for the approval of this project?
I’ve asked questions, but no answers, see for example my email to Andrew Pollard, Chair of the UK Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI), and Chief Investigator on the Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine trials…that’s a conflict of interest.
Who initiated the plan to vaccinate the entire global population against SARS- CoV-2? 30 June 2021: https://vaccinationispolitical.files.wordpress.com/2021/06/who-initiated-the-plan-to-vaccinate-the-entire-global-population-against-sars-cov-2.pdf
The whole premise of vaccinating into a pandemic of a respiratory virus was wrong. It was bound to lead to mutations with perpetuation of the disease, not to mention vaccine injury at an unprecedented rate. The trouble is no one has paid a price and I doubt anyone will.
...was never tested at scale in a randomised controlled trial...
Neither was the original one; the malfeasants destroyed the control group by giving them the injection anyway - justified by the laughable 'it was unethical to let them be unprotected against the deadly covid'. Even so, there were massive safety signals which they buried. Maybe the bacterial version is more dangerous, bit like jumping out of the 58th floor instead of the 50th (floor = storey(US)).
Whether prepared according to process 1 or 2, they're processing a poison plus the trials were fraudulent and records after roll-out can't be trusted either. Apart from that, I thought you might find this vax quiz interesting - https://vaccinequiz.org/ Only 15 questions but lots of useful info. in the answers section. An Australian version would be useful. Needless to say my score was 15/15 - as would be the score of any DDU subscribers I imagine!
When the State of Emergency was activated, informed consent no longer existed. There was only the emergency, at which point your survival was in your hands alone. Time for people to stop looking to the government to save them. https://vicparkpetition.substack.com/p/placebo-wins-and-getting-pharma
When will the evil ever end? When will Justice come? Liars that cost millions of lives
I know this sounds very simplistic but I've found many times that when I cook a dish using a single recipe it works perfectly. Once I try to double or increase it to feed a large number of people it never looks or tastes the same.
Gut punch is apt. If only we had a microbiome approach instead of a poison economy response.
Thank you for your extremely necessary investigative work. Much gratitude 🙏
Still pushing the PCR technique as a valid test.
Pure evil😢
Thanks for this
As always you’re right over the target, Rebekah, indeed I recall reading very early on in 2020 speculation of this exact issue I.e the inability to ramp up production from the so-called lab test phase and still meet the alleged cold chain supply criteria that were initially advertised for the novel mRNA excipient, as the reason it would unlikely that any “vaccines” would be made available en masse within years let alone months ... and now we know the answer, an adulterated concoction sold to the ignorant and the narcissists as their panacea
It doesn't get worse because it was always bad, real bad. 23 hours in solitary, 1 hour of exercise, 3 meals a day, protection from society for the rest of their miserable lives,loss of ALL of their assets,seems way too good an offer to me.
I believe that the average person doesn’t give 2 twigs about trials and even informed consent, just give me the thing so I can get back to normal. The folk who didn’t take it don’t give 2 twigs about trials because they weren’t going to take for any reason... it’s a pointless argument really, unless the givers and the lawmakers who are ultimately responsible to understand it are held to account, in my mind that’s very unlikely, as we all know that they’re still at it!