Pfizer’s Bait and Switch a ‘Gut Punch’ for Informed Consent
If you took the Pfizer Covid vaccine, would you be surprised to learn that the product you were injected with was never tested at scale in a randomised controlled trial before being approved for use?
Believe it or not, this is not a hypothetical question. It all comes down to a bait and switch.
The ‘bait’ is the Pfizer’s vaccine manufactured by ‘Process 1’, which involved high quality In Vitro Transcription of synthetic DNA to make the spike-producing mRNA. Process 1 doses were administered to almost all of the participants in Pfizer’s landmark randomised controlled trial (RCT) on which regulatory approvals for its COVID vaccine were based.
The ‘switch’ occurred when Pfizer changed to ‘Process 2’ to mass manufacture billions of vaccines for the worldwide rollout. Process 2 involves growing DNA plasmids in E. coli bacteria, from which the vaccine mRNA is then produced. Only 252 RCT participants received this version of the vaccine before it was rolled out…
Read my latest article for Umbrella News,
Pfizer’s Bait and Switch a ‘Gut Punch’ for Informed Consent
Researching for this article, I came across a stunning statement from vaccine and public health policy Czar, Dr. Paul Offit, who wrote a book on the infamous Cutter Incident. The Cutter polio vaccine inadvertently gave thousands of children polio, paralysed hundreds, and killed 10 kids.
The problem, said Dr. Offit, was not that the Cutter lab did anything wrong. It was that in adapting the manufacture process for mass rollout of the vaccine, they didn’t realise that the product would be marginally different (and therefore dangerous).
“It shouldn’t have been called the Cutter Incident, it should have been called the ‘scale up incident’, because that was really what the problem was. We just had trouble scaling up that vaccine,” said Dr. Offit.
Read on to spot the similarities…
Pfizer’s Bait and Switch a ‘Gut Punch’ for Informed Consent
This article features Dr. Josh Guetzkow and Prof. Retsef Levi, who brought international attention to the bait and switch with a letter published in the British Medical Journal, and who continue to work tirelessly in bringing attention to anomalies in the Covid vaccine trials and to safety concerns.
Watch Dr. Guetzkow discuss the bait and switch with Dr. John Campbell, below.
To support my work, make a one-off contribution to DDU via my Kofi account and/or subscribe. Thanks!
By way of analogy, it's as if injectees thought Pfizer was serving them a mushroom beef wellington made with fresh field mushrooms when unbeknown to them Pfizer had used death caps instead.
Meanwhile…when is the elephant in the room going to be addressed?
Why was there a global mass population ‘vaccine solution’ against a disease it was known from the beginning wasn’t a serious threat to most people?
How was this ‘vaccine solution’ evaluated? Where are the minutes of the meetings for the approval of this project?
I’ve asked questions, but no answers, see for example my email to Andrew Pollard, Chair of the UK Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI), and Chief Investigator on the Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine trials…that’s a conflict of interest.
Who initiated the plan to vaccinate the entire global population against SARS- CoV-2? 30 June 2021: https://vaccinationispolitical.files.wordpress.com/2021/06/who-initiated-the-plan-to-vaccinate-the-entire-global-population-against-sars-cov-2.pdf