116 Comments
Aug 24, 2023Liked by Rebekah Barnett

If I ran a wellness clinic using safe and effective treatments like this, with this type of kill ratio...id have been in jail for over a year. Why are these people still in positions of authority?

Expand full comment

They need to make it really obvious that the government is sick and twisted.

A one world government will be a better option.

This is called problem, reaction, solution.

Expand full comment

The only one world government that can emerge at this point will be the one the "sick and twisted" are currently designing through the WHO, UN, Gates Fdn, Bilderberg, WEF and the rest of the plutocrats and philanthroimperialists. NOT A SOLUTION WE CAN LIVE WITH Aria.

Expand full comment

THANKS FOR POINTING THAT OUT Froggie.

I agree and am up to date on the nut job puppets. Those who refuse to acknowledge there is a problem are already injected. Those who know what you know are still alive.

Everything else is just a psyche test. Psyche is Greek for "soul".

Would you have changed anything about your life if none of this had happened? They're like a stern father who doesn't take any shit and will whack you for being lazy on a Saturday because you spent all night partying on a Friday.

You know about this stuff because you spent more time researching truth than you did sucking on Netflix. You've adopted the technology, you're still alive to do something about what you know.

So- we come up with solutions to the nut jobs. This is how it works. They know, and we know they know etc. Knowledge is power.

Expand full comment

A one world government will never be a better solution.

In case you haven't noticed - It appears that we already have a world government.

''The enemy is Western economic imperialism....a new colonialism....mental domination and domination of the media.

The greatest shock came in 2020 with the covid operation when we were able to see that we have only one global center of real power.

One center of power was obvious The WHO was able to make orders to major world powers'' [Lurie Rosca]

Expand full comment

You may have misunderstood. I wasn't saying it would be better or worse, just that that will possibly be the solution offered because it reflects the problem, reaction, solution business/political model that is so prevalent- eg. in medicine and food/water- they make you ill and offer the drugs as a solution.

We've had a world government for a while now, at least a hundred years if not longer. It's interesting to note that depending on ones point of view, we're already under total economic imperialism; we already 'own nothing' (but pay to use things and are miserable)(funny old Klaus); they already have the technology to wipe us out but they're not really doing that- our demise is in our own hands- and; God apparently has been dead for 250 years.

So- that must mean not all is as it seems.

Expand full comment

I don't think I've misunderstood - posted below is what I replied to....

''They need to make it really obvious that the government is sick and twisted. -A one world government will be a better option. - This is called problem, reaction, solution.''

A one world government is the worst possible solution.

Self rule is preferable instead of kowtowing to Washington's illogical diktat.

Expand full comment

You've misunderstood. It's the way I've written it or you got your finnkin loicense in the bottom of a cornflakes packet.. either way I humbly beg your forgiveness Sir. Or Ma'am.

Try this...

They need to make it really obvious that the government is sick and twisted: ""A one world government will be a better option!""

This is called problem, reaction, solution.

Expand full comment

Love your comment :)

Expand full comment

The problem with Australians is not that half of them are descended of convicts; the problem with Australians is that half of them are descended of prison officers.

Clive James

Expand full comment

Many migrants to Australia, especially from former Soviet countries and authoritarian regimes, the CCP, knew exactly what 'covid' was from the very beginning. The diversity of the people at the protests showed this, if the MSM cared to look and speak to the people rather than just label. For many, there is no where left to run.

Expand full comment

Same in Canada.

Many of the truckers who participated in the Freedom Convoy were immigrants from former Soviet Bloc countries in Eastern Europe who knew what the score was immediately.

Expand full comment
Aug 24, 2023Liked by Rebekah Barnett

Indeed. I have a friend from Czechoslovakia who came to the UK in the early 1970s. He too immediately sniffed out what was going on.

Expand full comment

I have been following the work of Pastor Artur Pawlowski in Canada since the beginning. Heroic.

Expand full comment
Aug 24, 2023Liked by Rebekah Barnett

Yes, at Doctors against mandates talks it was Eastern Europeans, Chinese and South Americans the saw the threat as clear as day. You have to know a bit of history to see it otherwise. It may not repeat, but it rhymes.. This is an example of our of our talks https://rumble.com/v1nxkiw-doctors-against-mandates-sunshine-coast-september-10th-2022-part-1-of-2.html

Expand full comment

God Bless you Dr M. We are in good hands with you and yours.

Expand full comment

My son in London met a Romanian cleaning lady right at the beginning of the COVID nonsense and she said what she'd left Romania for was all starting in the UK.

Expand full comment

Look up what happened to Nicolae Ceausescu and his wife Elena. The parallels between the economic and political factors in Romania and WA at the time are uncanny, especially with regards to the Perth Mint.

Expand full comment

I remember the TV lady saying on the news that most of the people in hospital with Covid were UNVACCINATED. My mother even quoted it to me as evidence that I should get the shot. I said “yeah but it’s a lie.” She didn’t like my answer. Why would the nice TV lady tell a fib?

Expand full comment

Once the injection roll out started in the general population in 2021, NSW Health decided to change the definition of unvaccinated for hospitalization reporting purposes. If you had a shot, were hospitalized, but were less than 14 days out from the injection, then you were lumped in with those who had no shot ar all, ie the truly unvaccinated. The reasoning given was that it took 2 weeks for protection to develop from the shot. This very clever sleight of hand enabled premiers, chief health officers & others to get up in front of cameras & declare that the unvaccinated were mostly the ones in hospital. The reporting definition also had the effect of hiding harms. It was diabolical.

Expand full comment
Aug 24, 2023·edited Aug 24, 2023

Spot on, but don’t forget the “unknowns” … I pointed out to people using those same NSW weekly reports the same dodgy definitions, that they simply lumped the “unknown status” in with the unvaccinated, notwithstanding that they were reporting +90% jabbed, which made that choice bizarre … and people just glazed over. Or the fact a covid “hospitalisation” was for anyone with a positive PCR test up to 60 days prior … and you have to convince yourself that they were doing this for “the greater good” ?????

Expand full comment
Aug 24, 2023Liked by Rebekah Barnett

Thanks Rebekah.

One wonders when WA will be forced to release this kind of information...?

Where is the 2022 vx surveillance report?

The weekly death rate?

The birth rate?

The miscarriage rate?

The cancer rate?

Gold standard transparency my ar5e 🙂🙂🙂

It's gonna be interesting watching the 🤯 when the truth we (and the world knows) makes it to the front page of theWest... We'll be here to help.

Expand full comment
Aug 24, 2023Liked by Rebekah Barnett

And remember, this is a state with a fully fledged Human Rights Act.

Expand full comment
author

What a mockery.

Expand full comment

I believe Joel Smalley summed up this article succinctly.

"The vaccines were useless at stopping infection, transmission, hospitalisation and death. Added to that, they maimed and killed innocent people.

My words here, " State Premiers, like Dan Andrews, is a bald faced liars when he said "the vaccine works".

The early data from Australia showed 80% of Covid deaths were over 80 years old and 90% were over 70. We now know that a third of alleged Covid deaths had zero to do with Covid and another 22% died within Covid contributing. So the virus was never as dangerous as advertised AND it killed old people, vaccinated, or not.

The other lie peddled by the medical profession was that you were considered fully unvaccinated for 3-months+ after your first dose. This meant that thousands who were vaccinated and who were hospitalized, or died, were placed into the unvaccinated camp. Figures show this fiddling wore off after 3-4 months and surprise, surprise: it's time to get a booster.

Expand full comment
author

Re: "You were considered fully unvaccinated for 3-months+ after your first dose. This meant that thousands who were vaccinated and who were hospitalized, or died, were placed into the unvaccinated camp."

I'm not sure that's strictly true for the purposes of record keeping. I know that for NSW and WA, they recorded hospitalisations and deaths by 'doses received', as in doses received to date, meaning you wouldn't be put back in the 'unvaccinated' bucket after your most recent dose 'expired'.

Do you have an information source that differs from NSW and WA in this regard?

Expand full comment
Aug 24, 2023·edited Aug 24, 2023

Hi Rebekah, When I challenged WA health in July 2022 for their methodology of how they were confidently tracking and reporting deaths by jab status each week, whether a death was WITH or OF “covid”, they acknowledged they did not have this data. They deferred to the ABS. The ABS makes a great display of deferring to the ICD coding system, which explicitly sets out to certifiers to include covid under a raft of weird circumstances, where covid was completely tangential to the actual cause of death. To this day, none of us should have any confidence that any one single death was explicitly due to covid, where ~95% of deaths included multiple attributions to old age, pneumonia, and upwards of 4 comorbidities in the average, with a MEDIAN age of 84-85, meaning as many deaths over that age as below.

Expand full comment

Originally NSW Health defined unvaccinated for hospitalization reporting purposes as being less than two weeks out from an injection, or no shot at all. This had the effect of hiding harms from the shots. The reasoning given was that it took 2 weeks for protection to develop from the injection. They could of easily broken out the categories & had a true unvaccinated category for reporting purposes, but they didn't. It would of, in my opinion, clearly shown there was a high number of hospitalizations of those who just got the shots. Later on, in the NSW Health weekly reporting the wording shifted from "unvaccinated" to "effective dose". This shift in reporting terms used & definitions was truly, in my opinion, deliberate & deceptive.

Expand full comment

Hi Rebekah. I'm basing my statement on what happens in NZ and the work done by Norman Fenton on the "Illusion of efficacy relating to vaccine trials. In all these jurisdictions you are either In the fully vaccinate camp, or you are in the not fully vaccinated camp. In order to calculate vaccine effectiveness, defined as 100(1-vaccinated patients/unvaccinated patients), the denominator includes all those who are not fully vaccinated, which includes those who became patients less than X days after their second dose of a primary course. X varied from country to country, being 7-days in NZ, but 14 in the UK, I believe. Given the length of time between primary doses was around 13 weeks early in the pandemic this gave a 14-week window for people to be placed in the denominator. Hey presto you have a 90% vaccine efficacy when in fact it was zero.

Expand full comment
Aug 24, 2023Liked by Rebekah Barnett

oh the memories…..has been quite a ride and remembering the crazy premiers and chief health officers down here brings it all back……people are insane and have succumbed to this poison……so be it

Expand full comment

This is actually a rather interesting idea, Rebekah … a substack where you publish the top ~100 best covid “memories” from your regular readers … mine will always be the ‘Mother Jones’ headline from May 12, 2020:

“Anti-Vaxxers Have a Dangerous Theory Called “Natural Immunity.” Now It’s Going Mainstream”

Expand full comment

Combine this with my FOI and I think there are strong grounds to force the C.H.O to step down.

Expand full comment

What about the previous CHO who laid all the groundwork for this travesty and was rewarded with becoming Governor of Queensland. She should be stripped of that title and face her accusers in the dock.

Is there any factoring in of the definition of “fully vaccinated,” as they weren’t counting death by Covid unless the deceased had their last shot a minimum of 14 days prior. And many deaths occurred soon after taking the jab. That would potentially skew figures if I’m not mistaken.

Expand full comment
author

There were designations of 'incomplete' and 'partially vaccinated'. I assumed the latter to mean one dose, and I wonder if the former means dosed, but not out of the 14 day window.

Expand full comment
Aug 24, 2023·edited Aug 24, 2023Liked by Rebekah Barnett

Thank you - great comment about the 14 days and the CHO. And the 'Vaccine Commander' in WA Chris Dawson who is also now the Governor of WA.

They sure have any potential Royal Commissions sewn up.

Expand full comment

They even gave a countdown if you haven’t had your 2nd shot by the end of November once restrictions start mid Dec you will be excluded under the 14 day rule

Expand full comment

Remember, the other subtle incentives to get jabbed like the internment camps at Wellcamp & next to Brisbane Airport or the Counter Insurgency police woman

Expand full comment

Prior to Gerrard taking up his appointment another person was announced as the new CHO but pulled out only days beforehand with scant information on his reasonings 🤔

Expand full comment

Absolutely, if one followed the VAERS data from as early as March 2021 & used the multiplier quoted on the CDC's website, it was clear that the jab was twice as lethal as Covid from before Qld started jabbing in earnest. If this lay person could work that out, that bag in Government House should have too.

Expand full comment
Aug 24, 2023·edited Aug 24, 2023

@10th Man Have you released this info yet? I’m Intrigued

Expand full comment

Providing the Minister a chance to respond before publishing.

Expand full comment

Preferably whilst he is standing on a trapdoor.

Expand full comment

Treason

Expand full comment

“It was a potential PR nightmare for the Queensland Government that the first locally acquired Covid case death turned out to be someone who was fully vaccinated. Luckily for them, no media reported it.”

Except it wasn’t lucky - it was a complicit cowardly MSM paid off by tax breaks initiated by Scott Morrison the most two faced lying scumbag PM we have ever had.

May he rot in hell

Expand full comment
author

I'm sure QLD didn't publish the information, and I'm equally sure that the media didn't ask for it... or if they did, took no for an answer and went on their merry way.

Expand full comment

On 12 March 2022 George J Milne and Julian Carrivick published their advice to deliberately spread Covid19 as fast as possible because the jabs were clearly not working. They were paid by the Queensland and Western Australia governments to model the resultant cases, Hospitalizations and Deaths.

https://geoffpain.substack.com/p/australias-plan-to-deliberately-spread

Expand full comment

They should have gone with a natural response in the first place, as I argued in my BMJ rapid response in March 2020…

Please see below, and at this link: https://www.bmj.com/content/368/bmj.m1089/rr-6

Is it ethical to impede access to natural immunity? The case of SARS-CoV2

Dear Editor

If children, young adults and others can mount their own effective immune response to SARS-CoV2, is it ethical to impede their ability to access natural immunity by interfering with the natural progression of the virus? 

According to the WHO, "Illness due to COVID-19 infection is generally mild, especially for children and young adults."[1] 

Is the focus on future fast-tracked vaccine products blocking full consideration of the opportunity for natural herd immunity? Who is Neil Ferguson to say "The only exit strategy [in the] long term for this is really vaccination or other forms of innovative technology that allows us to control transmission".[2]

In regards to young people's and others' right to natural immunity, it's also vital to consider the startling admission by Heidi Larson, Director of The Vaccine Confidence Project, during the recent WHO Global Vaccine Safety Summit, i.e. "...We've shifted the human population...to dependency on vaccine-induced immunity...We're in a very fragile state now. We have developed a world that is dependent on vaccinations".[3]

This is a very alarming statement by Professor Larson, particularly with the prospect of other epidemics emerging in the future. We have to learn to deal with epidemics and illnesses as they emerge, it's not feasible to vaccinate the global population against every threat.

In a recent article raising concern about making decisions about this pandemic without reliable data, John Ioannidis notes that "School closures may also diminish the chances of developing herd immunity in an age group that is spared serious disease".[4] The UK's chief scientific adviser, Sir Patrick Vallance, raised the prospect of developing natural herd immunity[5], but this idea was subsequently howled down by Matt Hancock, the UK secretary of state for health and social care[6], and others such as Willem van Schaik, a professor of microbiology and infection, as reported by the Science Media Centre.[7]   

Again, is it ethical to deny children, young people and others their opportunity for natural immunity, and to plan to make them dependent on vaccine-induce immunity, to in effect make them dependent on the vaccine industry? 

This is even more serious to consider in light of emerging vaccine product failures, e.g. pertussis and mumps.

The international community must be assured that independent and objective thinkers are carefully considering the way ahead on this matter.

References:


1. WHO Q&A on coronaviruses (COVID-19) - Should I worry about COVID-19. 9 March 2020. 


2. Elisabeth Mahase. Covid-19: UK starts social distancing after new model points to 260 000 potential deaths. BMJ2020;368:m1089


3. Heidi Larson. Vaccine safety in the next decade. Why we need new modes of trust building? WHO Global Vaccine Safety Summit, 2-3 December 2019.


4. John P.A. Ioannidis. A fiasco in the making? As the coronavirus pandemic takes hold, we are making decisions without reliable data. STAT, 17 March 2020.


5. Coronavirus: 60% of UK population need to become infected so country can build 'herd immunity', government's chief scientist says. Independent, 13 March 2020.


6. The UK backs away from "herd immunity" coronavirus proposal amid blowback. Vox, 15 March 2020.


7. Expert comments about herd immunity. Science Media Centre, 13 March 2020.

Competing interests: No competing interests

25 March 2020

Elizabeth M Hart

Independent citizen investigating the over-use of vaccine products and conflicts of interest in vaccination policy

Adelaide, Australia

Expand full comment

Excellent contribution.

Expand full comment

Thanks Geoff.

The mind boggles at what they have done with this ‘PHEIC’ Covid response…medically, politically, economically, and socially.

It really is the biggest crime of all time.

And in the planning for a long time…

Interesting to look back on the establishment of the Australian Biosecurity Act 2015 - who initiated that I wonder, and who were the actual authors of that draconian Act, which was used to control us via the ‘Covid emergency’.

Similarly the state emergency laws that came out of nowhere and disenfranchised us in 2020, with ‘our elected representatives’ deserting us, and leaving us prey to unelected ‘medical/health officers’, and rogue premiers and territory chief ministers, who emerged as tyrants.

2020 was the year it was exposed that ‘our governments’ are our enemy, they’ve been captured by elements who are very much working against our best interests.

Also consider the coercive No Jab, No Pay law for vaccination of children put in place in January 2016, a concept we’ve seen develop more recently into No Jab, No Job…No Jab, No Life…

It was Scott Morrison who helped to get this in place when he raised the No Jab, No Pay bill in 2015, when he was Social Services Minister.

This was in response to the No Jab, No Play media campaign run by the Murdoch media in its tabloids during 2013-2015, with vicious articles attacking ‘anti-vaxxers’.

It wasn’t disclosed at the time that News Corp Australia is a corporate partner with the Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, which is involved with vaccine research, including more recently Covid-19 vaccine research with the Doherty Institute…quite a conflict of interest…

See more background in my email to then prime minister Scott Morrison in February 2021: No Jab, No Pay/No Play - coercive coronavirus vaccination in Australia - PM Scott Morrison and the Murdoch Media: https://vaccinationispolitical.files.wordpress.com/2021/02/no-jab-no-pay-no-play-coercive-vaccination-in-australia.pdf

Expand full comment

And Greg Hunt has found a nice little sinecure at the University of Melbourne…otherwise known as the heart darkness, along with the Doherty Institute…

Greg Hunt named Honorary Melbourne Enterprise Professor

https://about.unimelb.edu.au/news-resources/awards-and-achievements/announcements2/honorary-enterprise-professor-greg-hunt

As Honorary Melbourne Enterprise Professor, Mr Hunt will chair the Advisory Board for Innovation and Enterprise at the Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, where his experience as a legislator, negotiator, strategic thinker, stakeholder manager and administrator will be valuable.

The University also looks forward to his participation in student programs including the Melbourne Entrepreneurial Centre, the Melbourne Accelerator Program (MAP), the Translating Research at Melbourne program (TRAM) and faculty events.

The Honorary Melbourne Enterprise Professor position is shared across MDHS, the Faculty of Business and Economics and the Melbourne Business School.

Expand full comment

It will be an interesting Royal Commission

Expand full comment

What virus?

I got the impression that you believe that the alleged virus exist even though it has never been proven to exist.

Expand full comment

A wonderful friend had covid at the beginning of the plandemic. She was not in great health, age 88. However after a hospitalisation when she was covid positive, she was sent home and really had what most people would call “a really bad cold”. She survived quite happily. My brother who has a defibrillator and pacemaker buried in his chest, is diabetic, obese and has congestive heart failure was hospitalised with covid. After three days on O2 and steroids, he took himself home. He survived. The only people covid killed were the ones who were denied antibiotics when they developed pneumonia. Like influenza, it is the pneumonia that kills people. Not flu nor covid.

Expand full comment
Aug 24, 2023·edited Aug 24, 2023Liked by Rebekah Barnett

Freedom2Choose, I’m very sorry to hear you’ve suffered adversely after the Covid vaccine products.

This entire Covid situation is a debacle, and all planned. They’ve been wanting to set in place a ‘vaccine passport/digital ID’ for years, and the ‘PHEIC’ Covid scam is the device they’ve used.

There is much too be investigated…

But as you’ve experienced, the practitioners administering the injections are not obtaining authentic voluntary informed consent, it’s all a sham, and I include discussion about this in my presentation to PANDA on voluntary informed consent and vaccination mandates, in the links included in my previous comment, see here again:

https://twitter.com/PanData19/status/1693664393500803534?s=20

https://t.co/3KG71MrocJ

It’s mind-boggling to think about what lies ahead, when the penny drops and it’s realised valid consent was not obtained for these medical interventions.

Since 2021, I have written to AHPRA, and the Royal Australian College of General Practitioners, the Royal Australasian College of Physicians, the Australian Medical Association and others, pleading with them to uphold the legal and ethical principle of voluntary informed consent, but they took no notice, they treat people in the community with contempt.

Similarly I have written to the main medical insurers, they’ve refused to deal with the matter too.

Meanwhile practitioners keep jabbing away, and clueless that they may have medical indemnity issues in future if they are not properly obtaining voluntary informed consent, which I argue they cannot get anyway, because they are not qualified to do so.

Freedom2Choose, I hope you can find relief from your health issues, and justice for the intrusion we’ve all experienced with the grossly disproportionate and ill-targeted Covid response.

Expand full comment
Aug 24, 2023Liked by Rebekah Barnett

Love your commitment 🙏

Expand full comment
Aug 25, 2023Liked by Rebekah Barnett

Got it, thanks Rebekah

Expand full comment
Aug 25, 2023Liked by Rebekah Barnett

Too hard and tricky to get a good estimate for Qld as you’ve asked. Australian population was “weird” at the time. I don’t believe the ABS’s population estimates at the time either. The ABS figures are probably “O.K” but the population was varying rapidly at the time so pinning down a “good estimate” for Qld would be very difficult due to interstate and national border opening etc.

See my footnote 5 to see what I mean by weird.

https://krap.substack.com/p/australian-vaccination-rate

“If someone wants to do the maths by finding the best population estimate for Queensland at the end of 2021 and deducting the total number of Queenslanders vaccinated in each age group per the Australian Government vaccination stats from the same period, please leave your workings in the comments! Extra points if you can isolate the proportion of the population 80+ that had not received any dose of vaccination.”

Expand full comment

According to government statistics, 68.5 million Covid-19 needles and contents have been administered to children and adults in Australia.

I suggest voluntary informed consent has not been obtained before one single dose of these unnecessary medical interventions, as no-one was properly informed.

People were pressured, coerced and manipulated, and even MANDATED, to submit to these injections.

Mandated medical interventions in a so-called free country, an absolute disgrace.

And who is most at fault for this crime? Apart from the politicians, the academics, the legal system and the mainstream media… It’s the wretched medical ‘profession’ who went along with this scam.

Voluntary informed consent has been trashed, because the medical profession failed to stand up and refuse to participate in mandated medical interventions.

And the practitioners who stuck the needle in, they do not have specific medical indemnity for this action, as admitted to me by the Department of Health and Aged Care in November 2022, along with this department confirming: “Informed consent should be obtained for every COVID-19 vaccination, as per usual consent procedures for other vaccinations.”

See: https://vaccinationispolitical.files.wordpress.com/2022/11/mc22-018819-signed-highlighted-1.pdf

That hasn’t been happening…they haven’t been getting informed consent for every vaccination, it’s a travesty. There is no valid consent.

There’s more detail in my presentation to the international PANDA group, see: Considering jab mandates: Voluntary informed consent and mass population Covid-19 vaccination:

https://twitter.com/PanData19/status/1693664393500803534?s=20

https://t.co/3KG71MrocJ

Expand full comment

I’m 72, injured by Pfizer, dose 2, and still suffering from neuropathy, sound hypersensitivity, musculoskeletal pain and new onset severe osteoarthritis in a lumbar facet joint, with severe lower back pain starting the night of my second dose. When I expressed some anxiety over this new CoVid vaccine, the doctor administering the jab, asked me, “You’ve had vaccines before haven’t you?” It was more of a statement, meaning, “Nothing’s happened before, so why are you worrying?” If that was informed consent, it doesn’t seem to be the slightest bit adequate! I took the jabs because I was sucked in by the propaganda of fear, with TV ads showing horrific scenes of people struggling for air. I wanted to stay alive for my grandchildren. I shouldn’t have been so influenced, because I’ve always been conscious of the nutritional status I need to stay healthy, but we didn’t hear anything about that from the authorities. Shame on them. They should be very, very ashamed. I can’t express how disappointed, let down and angry I am that they didn’t talk about Vitamin D, for instance as well as other strategies for minimising the effects of CoVid or any other infection.

When I got CoVid this year, it was relatively mild, but with a horrible sore throat. Following the FLCCC protocol, including Ivermectin, (from a friend,) helped me overcome it 2 days faster than another member of the family who had it at the same time. Overcoming it with two doses in 2021 has given me confidence that at 72, I can still overcome ill health without the vaccines that were pushed onto us by manipulating us with fear, coercion, and preying on our desire to be community-minded. Even many families joined the governments with cries of “You’re selfish” if people avoided these experimental vaccines. We’re left with huge divisions in our society which will take a lot to heal.

Shame on all the authorities for their wickedness.

Expand full comment

So sorry you are injured. I’m glad you are awake to what has happened and hope you live a long healthy life

Expand full comment

Thank you so much! I never supported mandates for vaccines, and never will. They’re evil. I’ve marched in Melbourne against mandates, and I’ll continue to fight with so many others against the erosion of our basic rights. I’m getting lots of great help from an integrative doctor. 😊

Expand full comment

Freedom2Choose, please see my response to you on the main thread, I must have clicked in the wrong box.

Expand full comment