Re: "You were considered fully unvaccinated for 3-months+ after your first dose. This meant that thousands who were vaccinated and who were hospitalized, or died, were placed into the unvaccinated camp."
I'm not sure that's strictly true for the purposes of record keeping. I know that for NSW and WA, they recorded hospitalisations and dea…
Re: "You were considered fully unvaccinated for 3-months+ after your first dose. This meant that thousands who were vaccinated and who were hospitalized, or died, were placed into the unvaccinated camp."
I'm not sure that's strictly true for the purposes of record keeping. I know that for NSW and WA, they recorded hospitalisations and deaths by 'doses received', as in doses received to date, meaning you wouldn't be put back in the 'unvaccinated' bucket after your most recent dose 'expired'.
Do you have an information source that differs from NSW and WA in this regard?
Hi Rebekah, When I challenged WA health in July 2022 for their methodology of how they were confidently tracking and reporting deaths by jab status each week, whether a death was WITH or OF “covid”, they acknowledged they did not have this data. They deferred to the ABS. The ABS makes a great display of deferring to the ICD coding system, which explicitly sets out to certifiers to include covid under a raft of weird circumstances, where covid was completely tangential to the actual cause of death. To this day, none of us should have any confidence that any one single death was explicitly due to covid, where ~95% of deaths included multiple attributions to old age, pneumonia, and upwards of 4 comorbidities in the average, with a MEDIAN age of 84-85, meaning as many deaths over that age as below.
Originally NSW Health defined unvaccinated for hospitalization reporting purposes as being less than two weeks out from an injection, or no shot at all. This had the effect of hiding harms from the shots. The reasoning given was that it took 2 weeks for protection to develop from the injection. They could of easily broken out the categories & had a true unvaccinated category for reporting purposes, but they didn't. It would of, in my opinion, clearly shown there was a high number of hospitalizations of those who just got the shots. Later on, in the NSW Health weekly reporting the wording shifted from "unvaccinated" to "effective dose". This shift in reporting terms used & definitions was truly, in my opinion, deliberate & deceptive.
Hi Rebekah. I'm basing my statement on what happens in NZ and the work done by Norman Fenton on the "Illusion of efficacy relating to vaccine trials. In all these jurisdictions you are either In the fully vaccinate camp, or you are in the not fully vaccinated camp. In order to calculate vaccine effectiveness, defined as 100(1-vaccinated patients/unvaccinated patients), the denominator includes all those who are not fully vaccinated, which includes those who became patients less than X days after their second dose of a primary course. X varied from country to country, being 7-days in NZ, but 14 in the UK, I believe. Given the length of time between primary doses was around 13 weeks early in the pandemic this gave a 14-week window for people to be placed in the denominator. Hey presto you have a 90% vaccine efficacy when in fact it was zero.
Re: "You were considered fully unvaccinated for 3-months+ after your first dose. This meant that thousands who were vaccinated and who were hospitalized, or died, were placed into the unvaccinated camp."
I'm not sure that's strictly true for the purposes of record keeping. I know that for NSW and WA, they recorded hospitalisations and deaths by 'doses received', as in doses received to date, meaning you wouldn't be put back in the 'unvaccinated' bucket after your most recent dose 'expired'.
Do you have an information source that differs from NSW and WA in this regard?
Hi Rebekah, When I challenged WA health in July 2022 for their methodology of how they were confidently tracking and reporting deaths by jab status each week, whether a death was WITH or OF “covid”, they acknowledged they did not have this data. They deferred to the ABS. The ABS makes a great display of deferring to the ICD coding system, which explicitly sets out to certifiers to include covid under a raft of weird circumstances, where covid was completely tangential to the actual cause of death. To this day, none of us should have any confidence that any one single death was explicitly due to covid, where ~95% of deaths included multiple attributions to old age, pneumonia, and upwards of 4 comorbidities in the average, with a MEDIAN age of 84-85, meaning as many deaths over that age as below.
Originally NSW Health defined unvaccinated for hospitalization reporting purposes as being less than two weeks out from an injection, or no shot at all. This had the effect of hiding harms from the shots. The reasoning given was that it took 2 weeks for protection to develop from the injection. They could of easily broken out the categories & had a true unvaccinated category for reporting purposes, but they didn't. It would of, in my opinion, clearly shown there was a high number of hospitalizations of those who just got the shots. Later on, in the NSW Health weekly reporting the wording shifted from "unvaccinated" to "effective dose". This shift in reporting terms used & definitions was truly, in my opinion, deliberate & deceptive.
Hi Rebekah. I'm basing my statement on what happens in NZ and the work done by Norman Fenton on the "Illusion of efficacy relating to vaccine trials. In all these jurisdictions you are either In the fully vaccinate camp, or you are in the not fully vaccinated camp. In order to calculate vaccine effectiveness, defined as 100(1-vaccinated patients/unvaccinated patients), the denominator includes all those who are not fully vaccinated, which includes those who became patients less than X days after their second dose of a primary course. X varied from country to country, being 7-days in NZ, but 14 in the UK, I believe. Given the length of time between primary doses was around 13 weeks early in the pandemic this gave a 14-week window for people to be placed in the denominator. Hey presto you have a 90% vaccine efficacy when in fact it was zero.