As always, very thoughtful. Two interesting coincidences for me or are they? Firstly, I was thinking about the good Doctor seriously for the first time just an hour ago and then this post pops up evaluating Dr. Malhorta. He and a certain Rav Auroa have been taking off like a rocket on Substack. Rav was even mentioned on a rare Rogan twee…
As always, very thoughtful. Two interesting coincidences for me or are they? Firstly, I was thinking about the good Doctor seriously for the first time just an hour ago and then this post pops up evaluating Dr. Malhorta. He and a certain Rav Auroa have been taking off like a rocket on Substack. Rav was even mentioned on a rare Rogan tweet !!!!!! The man writes very well, no doubt, but is on par with many others here on Substack but, what a coincidence, Dr. Malone endorsed him in a very recent note too as "a leading young thought leader". Hmmm. So I am a) getting all suspicious and b) wondering why Rav is suddenly the chosen one? Or did I miss something about Rav? Or is this the necessary shoulder rubbing to push each other up the influezer ladder? Hail Joe Rogan. I know I sound like an old fart that doesn't get it or want it. I think I slowly get it and as more I get it as less I want it. But it is happening. We all know it from mainstream. But is it also happening here? In the freedom movement? I know it is a fucking paradox - to be someone and to have any positive power to guide people to a better life, you need to be seen and adored and liked by the many. So you have to appeal to the average majority. And they know themselves. You can't pretend to be one of them, they sniff you out. Only average leaders will appeal to them - they are too scared and mistrusting to follow higher better ideas they don't understand. And they are used to suffer from millenia's of submission so it feels normal and as long it doesn't get worse they reject any change. But those dependent
Same for Dr. Malhorta although he has been active for almost a year now. I remember a longish interview with C. Tucker and came away underwhelmed. It's great he did the U-turn and so got public about it. But I don't think he should be a thought leader. Why? In short: Too soft, too naive, too much medical and scientific establishment. And he loves publicity too much for my taste (Like the other Dr., Malone).Yes, I know - we need more publicity to make an impact on the big fat lazy group in the middle - for that they work well. But I think we already won that group over - at least reg. vaccines. Trust me, I did something akin to a pub test. I am thinking already a step further - how and who will and can radically transform the medical and scientific paradigm. Having read two articles of the famed R. Dawkins made me aware what total arrogant and ignorant dickheads are considered thought leaders leading science. While Malone and Malhorta are significantly more critical of science and medicine than Dawkins, they still think that science still should lead the way as the only top authority on all matters human. Don't worry - I don't want to elevate back organized religions to an equal staus. I propose proper non-dual spirituality and related concepts as the new thought leading inspirations. Since has to come down from its high horse and needs a proper spiritual, ethical and inspirational godfather. And therefore we need brilliant fringe scientists and doctors that see the need for that to step up and convince the scientific field that they can't self-regulate their tremendous curiosity in an ethical way and therefore need to hand over leadership and oversight to a higher more holisticly intelligent mentor. And I feel these two doctors dont see the bigger picture My sense is that they think reform is enough and science should be on top. The second coincidence is the Jesus quote, which I also used in my next draft. So how do we get these geniuses that exist who, by definition are not interested in average mass adoration, ever into meaningful positions to create a more balanced and loving planet? When it was word of mouth and universities weren't corrupted they had an outsider chance. But now? First and foremost you have to be great in Web marketing, but even then, still talk to the average mass, not the intelligent individual. Interestingly, when intelligent individuals come together, the average intelligent level of the group is always lower than the mathematical average of all individuals. I just made that up, by the way. Didn't Google. Googled my common sense instead. The most intelligent ones will find it hard to inspire the majority of lower ones because you can't be inspired by something you don't fully understand. If you don't see the genius energy in it and don't get ignited by it.
Lol - got carried away a bit and low on battery. Aprupt end. Sorry or "God bless " more likely.
As always, very thoughtful. Two interesting coincidences for me or are they? Firstly, I was thinking about the good Doctor seriously for the first time just an hour ago and then this post pops up evaluating Dr. Malhorta. He and a certain Rav Auroa have been taking off like a rocket on Substack. Rav was even mentioned on a rare Rogan tweet !!!!!! The man writes very well, no doubt, but is on par with many others here on Substack but, what a coincidence, Dr. Malone endorsed him in a very recent note too as "a leading young thought leader". Hmmm. So I am a) getting all suspicious and b) wondering why Rav is suddenly the chosen one? Or did I miss something about Rav? Or is this the necessary shoulder rubbing to push each other up the influezer ladder? Hail Joe Rogan. I know I sound like an old fart that doesn't get it or want it. I think I slowly get it and as more I get it as less I want it. But it is happening. We all know it from mainstream. But is it also happening here? In the freedom movement? I know it is a fucking paradox - to be someone and to have any positive power to guide people to a better life, you need to be seen and adored and liked by the many. So you have to appeal to the average majority. And they know themselves. You can't pretend to be one of them, they sniff you out. Only average leaders will appeal to them - they are too scared and mistrusting to follow higher better ideas they don't understand. And they are used to suffer from millenia's of submission so it feels normal and as long it doesn't get worse they reject any change. But those dependent
Same for Dr. Malhorta although he has been active for almost a year now. I remember a longish interview with C. Tucker and came away underwhelmed. It's great he did the U-turn and so got public about it. But I don't think he should be a thought leader. Why? In short: Too soft, too naive, too much medical and scientific establishment. And he loves publicity too much for my taste (Like the other Dr., Malone).Yes, I know - we need more publicity to make an impact on the big fat lazy group in the middle - for that they work well. But I think we already won that group over - at least reg. vaccines. Trust me, I did something akin to a pub test. I am thinking already a step further - how and who will and can radically transform the medical and scientific paradigm. Having read two articles of the famed R. Dawkins made me aware what total arrogant and ignorant dickheads are considered thought leaders leading science. While Malone and Malhorta are significantly more critical of science and medicine than Dawkins, they still think that science still should lead the way as the only top authority on all matters human. Don't worry - I don't want to elevate back organized religions to an equal staus. I propose proper non-dual spirituality and related concepts as the new thought leading inspirations. Since has to come down from its high horse and needs a proper spiritual, ethical and inspirational godfather. And therefore we need brilliant fringe scientists and doctors that see the need for that to step up and convince the scientific field that they can't self-regulate their tremendous curiosity in an ethical way and therefore need to hand over leadership and oversight to a higher more holisticly intelligent mentor. And I feel these two doctors dont see the bigger picture My sense is that they think reform is enough and science should be on top. The second coincidence is the Jesus quote, which I also used in my next draft. So how do we get these geniuses that exist who, by definition are not interested in average mass adoration, ever into meaningful positions to create a more balanced and loving planet? When it was word of mouth and universities weren't corrupted they had an outsider chance. But now? First and foremost you have to be great in Web marketing, but even then, still talk to the average mass, not the intelligent individual. Interestingly, when intelligent individuals come together, the average intelligent level of the group is always lower than the mathematical average of all individuals. I just made that up, by the way. Didn't Google. Googled my common sense instead. The most intelligent ones will find it hard to inspire the majority of lower ones because you can't be inspired by something you don't fully understand. If you don't see the genius energy in it and don't get ignited by it.
Lol - got carried away a bit and low on battery. Aprupt end. Sorry or "God bless " more likely.