Great work, lovely summary of the evidence. Together with frame shifting DNA integration could mean a lifetime of poisonous random proteins circulating our blood. Great work by the CIA pharma military industrial complex once more.
Worst case scenario is that, in reality 🤫 dna ADDITIONS were designed to be spread through the gene pool. Initially via jab then shedding then intimacy. Spiked testes & ovaries. Which go remarkably well with 5g and scrambled eggs & roasted nuts! 🤔 Depop Express... 🚂🚂🚂 allll aboard👏
Dec 24, 2023·edited Dec 24, 2023Liked by Rebekah Barnett
Thank you for your hard work Rebecca. I wish you a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year. If genomic integration is proven, as it looks like it may be soon, is there any penalty on the statute books anywhere that would be sufficient for those who mandated the shots? Retrospective legislation and referenda may be needed in some countries. Several German Nazis were able to be held to account for crimes against humanity after the end of WW2, even though they were never in violation of the criminal law of Germany. A similar process will be warranted for those who mandated the shots. They were warned not to mandate them.
Would be interesting (although I doubt justice is coming unfortunately) if middle managers could be charged for directing people to get this medication or lose their job, especially if those people did lose their job, or worse were injured/killed because they complied. If these middle managers had letters citing medical journal research of possible injuries from an employee who didn't want the jab, yet research was ignored... If these middle managers already had a confirmed vaccine injured member of staff, yet pushed on with the mandate anyway, ignoring OH&S rules.
Even "Fairwork" mediators of judges who ruled against people standing for their basic human rights of bodily autonomy...
I'd love to see it, but I fear the odds are stacked against justice... But I wonder at what point they have to acknowledge the evidence, the injuries, the deaths and give in? Or do they just stick to the narrative forever, hoping we forget?
If proof of genomic integration emerges then the unjabbed will not allow them to cover it and its implications up. Once the public realises what has been done to them then the gates of hell will open. It won't be pretty.
You'll see a man, and a woman
Hanging upside down
Their features covered by a fallen gown
And all the lousy little poets
Coming round
Tryin' to sound like Charlie Manson
Yeah, the white man dancin'
I've seen the future, brother
It is murder
When they said (they said) repent (repent), repent (repent)
I wonder what they meant
When they said (they said) repent (repent), repent (repent)
I wonder what they meant
When they said (they said) repent (repent), repent (repent)
It will be hard to keep a lid on the information, even with their "disinformation bill", once the illnesses start, there's enough info now for people to join the dots when the injuries start... Especially if majority of jabs had the plasmids and SV40... I'm thinking V-AIDS of some sort at the very least (cancer, autoimmunity, organ tissue necrosis, stuffed hormone signalling etc)...
Thinking AIDS in its current theory...
The "virus"(let's consider the mRNA transfection "vaccines" modus operandi here too), so the virus (HIV) enters the cell and releases "viral" RNA into the cell's cytoplasm.
A DNA copy is made of the viral RNA... The DNA copy enters the cell's chromosomal DNA... After a long period, on average 8 years
(take note of time period - 8 YEARS)
So after 8 years the HIV viral genes initiate active transcription ... Then both HIV RNA (mRNA) and HIV proteins are made, and complete virus particles assembled.
Taking over the cellular machinery to do so, the cell eventually dies etc...
That process sounds an AWFUL LOT LIKE a mRNA "vaccine" and even a DNA vector vax doesn't it?
...and I'm starting to wonder now, was HIV/AIDS a "virus" or was it a bodily fluid transmissable sequence, a result of an early transfection study??
Yes, I can imagine some pretty angry folks if this genomic interference comes full circle, and they can't put a "climate change" cause to it in the media propaganda... But they did sow a seed with a virulent form of HIV story in 2022 , just after vax rollout to try cover that base...
That HIV/AIDS was the result of a needle (not just street drugs but 'legitimate' vaccines) has been proved somewhere or other, it was my first red pill about 20 years ago when I got properly online.
I started learning medicine, realised it was junk science so went to natural health, which is where I realised HIV wasn't a death sentence as media had always claimed. (Another red pill.)
The gay men who died, apparently died from their medication, not the disease. Those who lived adopted natural diets, clean water etc., and lived to tell about it. Best research tip ever.
Thought I'd go the extra distance and find some old studies, two involving/warning about HIV-inducing SV40. One from 2011: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21300566/
Wow!!! Thank you... That's gold... And as I had begun to fear... Funny how my cogs didn't start moving till this plandemic on many issues... Just makes so much sense now... Merry Christmas Aria and thanks again 🙏🌲
One of my first thoughts too, it was a well known pathway in the 80s, my old uni textbook describes the process... Even just down to the interruption of a cell's normal mRNA translation and transcription process, that establishes/maintains cellular identity (eg what makes a kidney cell a kidney cell, what makes a heart cell a heart cell), with some Frankenstein man made mRNA code is dangerous from the outset.
There are no circumstances that could justify messing with your genetics like that, especially via an injection that could dump its contents anywhere in your body.
To quote Jerry McGuire "You had me at "not safe and effective."
Does anyone see these revelations the same way we have seen "findings" regarding all these measures over the past three years. Many of us knew they wouldn't work before they were even tried not by "luck" but rather by asking questions the other side has panned as "odd." There have been many moments of vindication. The information regarding death rates. Other information regarding how the virus is transmitted. The Cochrane report on the evidence masks work. The emerging data on the effectiveness of lockdowns. And of course many revelations about the vaccine such as VAERS data, and the almost immediate finding that no, the vaccine did not stop transmission or infection.
I have thought throughout this., hoped rather than thought, that somehow "they have to see now" that these measures do not work. There is the anticipatory elation. Of finally being free of the murky clouds of the propaganda and cognitive dissonance that have like a cancer metastisized into our society.
They won't see it. They have the vaccine as part of the childhood schedule in spite of it not working or warranted on children. There are people who will still mask, still take to twitter to complain that all the ills of Covid fall to those who fail to mask early and often every time cases rise like barometric pressure before a thunderstorm.
This call to action of "taking it off the market" will probably end with not only them keeping it on the market, but bulldozing other mRNA solutions to our problems. I don't think they will see reason. I do whoever think they will hear continued disruption. And they need to hear it. These studies need to keep coming...need to keep being repeated. And let the evidence fall where it may.
PCR tests were not intended for diagnoses. They were also distributed around the world way before the plandemic was announced. Long covid is a word they are using for the damage left behind after poisoning. Detoxing the liver and blood is the only hope those affected have. Anthony Williams the medical medium has the right protocols, see his website, books, podcasts and vids.
For me, the tests I would like to see conducted are as follows (not purely as proof but to inform us as to 'next steps' for containment):
1) A DNA test specifically aimed at verification both Pfizer (BNT162b2 spike was tested) and Moderna (their shot was not mentioned and should also be sampled)
2) If 1 is verified, then a DNA test on sperm to see if it integrates. Note, given sperm is haploid ('half'), we might not strictly see a complete gene sequence signal. Testing eggs should also be considered but I am aware of the difficulties in doing so.
3) The DNA tested of children from those who received either the Pfizer or Moderna C19, with parental consent from adults who recognise the shots cause harms (braindead pro-vaccine shills may kick up a stink so it should only be conducted with parents who want to know the truth). **Note** this includes stillborn and miscarriages suspected to be caused by the shot.
For 3, my recommended selection criterion would be:
A) Prioritisation to select parents who have had the highest number of consecutive, same brand shots (so someone with 5 shots of just Pfizer, is a better candidate than someone who has had 7 shots as a mixture of both Pfizer and Moderna), both to increase the odds we will spot integration and reduce signal:noise from other confounding shots. This means *both* the mother and father, as if the father takes only Moderna and the mother takes only Pfizer, we'd likely see a noisy signal of both Moderna and Pfizer gene integration, and we will want to avoid this.
B) Only shots that were all had prior to *conception* of said child by both parents count. If any shots are had during or post-pregnancy, they obviously do not count (as we're attempting to test for pre-conception integration, not mid-pregnancy placenta crossing integration or shedding).
C) Any mother who received a shot during pregnancy is excluded. We're attempting to test for pre-conception integration, not mid-pregnancy placenta crossing integration. The father may receive any shot post-conception; the mother may receive any shot post-pregnancy, as once the pregnancy period is over it isn't relevant.
D) When sampling biopsy of child, three samples from distinct sites should be taken. Optionally, if the child has a pre-shots sibling, if the parents and/or child (depending on age) are okay with it, a voluntary genetic sample from the pre-shot sibling should be taken *only* if the child has never received any of the shots. This is likely to be someone who is >=18 years old who has independently refused the shots.
The reason being is their genetics can be used as a comparison baseline to the post-shots sibling.
These are quite difficult criterion to follow. Selection doesn't strictly exclude a no-shots parent with shots parent coupling, but prioritisation should be given to those most likely to express integration, which is likely to be both-parents-take-shots coupling.
In terms of 'in what situation would the parents get the shot but not the child', unfortunately it will be mainly in cases where the child has died prematurely. In alternate cases, it will be where one or both parents have suffered harms from the shots and have decided against administering any shots to their child.
I hope I'm wrong about it integrating into the next generation.
This may be the first disclosure and admission from any government health dept that these covid injections are so dangerous that they must be stopped.
Please tell me I am wrong when I hear the TGA had no authority to approve use of this product in Australia because of its genetic and DNA altering substances. But with so much of their funding coming from the industry they're supposed to be regulating is it any wonder? Why did our past governments allow this massive conflict of interest? We need to reform our authorities so there is no corruption by big pharma!!
And why were we told it was safe and effective? Ignorance is no excuse. It never stopped transmission and more people are maimed by it than helped. There is so much evidence to prove this.
Have you seen the ABS report in 2023 proving massive excess deaths in Australia since the roll out of these injections? Between 6% and 17% above the 5 year average of deaths. This is a national crisis yet our government keeps a lid on it.
I implore you to become a shining light on this shocking crime against humanity.
Is everyone aware that the surgeon General of Florida has called for an immediate stop to these experimental injections?. See it on Robert Malones substack.
Rebecca I have written to my member of Parliament about this and the WHO takeover. Are you interested in creating a resource of peoples letters to politicians and letters to family and friends so we can see how others are taking action?
Thanks Mike, I have been directing people to Stand Up, who are the best I know of for community organising on this issue. They are running a letter writing campaign in collaboration with Australia Exits the W.H.O. You can find them here:
Note SarsCov 2 the alleged novel virus has never been proven to exist by anyone anywhere then by the same standard that doesn't leave any room for alleged variations such as long Covid.
Discovery identifies a highly efficient human reverse transcriptase that can write RNA sequences into DNA
Date: June 11, 2021
Source: Thomas Jefferson University
Summary: Researchers show that polymerase theta can efficiently convert RNA sequences back into DNA, a feat more common in viruses than eukaryotic cells.
Great work, lovely summary of the evidence. Together with frame shifting DNA integration could mean a lifetime of poisonous random proteins circulating our blood. Great work by the CIA pharma military industrial complex once more.
They move from one fear driven agenda to another
Covid
Ukraine
Gaza
And in all that time media driven new deadlier ‘virus’ found and of course climate change with a bit of trans this and that thrown in
Keep up to date with your boosters though!!.
The agenda is very transparent
It all points to control and depopulation.
And despite all that I would like to wish everyone a merry Xmas and the hope of a great NY
Live your life as full as you can whilst also safeguarding you and your families future as best you can.
They want you to live in fear - refuse, do not comply.
Worst case scenario is that, in reality 🤫 dna ADDITIONS were designed to be spread through the gene pool. Initially via jab then shedding then intimacy. Spiked testes & ovaries. Which go remarkably well with 5g and scrambled eggs & roasted nuts! 🤔 Depop Express... 🚂🚂🚂 allll aboard👏
Thank you for your hard work Rebecca. I wish you a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year. If genomic integration is proven, as it looks like it may be soon, is there any penalty on the statute books anywhere that would be sufficient for those who mandated the shots? Retrospective legislation and referenda may be needed in some countries. Several German Nazis were able to be held to account for crimes against humanity after the end of WW2, even though they were never in violation of the criminal law of Germany. A similar process will be warranted for those who mandated the shots. They were warned not to mandate them.
Would be interesting (although I doubt justice is coming unfortunately) if middle managers could be charged for directing people to get this medication or lose their job, especially if those people did lose their job, or worse were injured/killed because they complied. If these middle managers had letters citing medical journal research of possible injuries from an employee who didn't want the jab, yet research was ignored... If these middle managers already had a confirmed vaccine injured member of staff, yet pushed on with the mandate anyway, ignoring OH&S rules.
Even "Fairwork" mediators of judges who ruled against people standing for their basic human rights of bodily autonomy...
I'd love to see it, but I fear the odds are stacked against justice... But I wonder at what point they have to acknowledge the evidence, the injuries, the deaths and give in? Or do they just stick to the narrative forever, hoping we forget?
If proof of genomic integration emerges then the unjabbed will not allow them to cover it and its implications up. Once the public realises what has been done to them then the gates of hell will open. It won't be pretty.
You'll see a man, and a woman
Hanging upside down
Their features covered by a fallen gown
And all the lousy little poets
Coming round
Tryin' to sound like Charlie Manson
Yeah, the white man dancin'
I've seen the future, brother
It is murder
When they said (they said) repent (repent), repent (repent)
I wonder what they meant
When they said (they said) repent (repent), repent (repent)
I wonder what they meant
When they said (they said) repent (repent), repent (repent)
I wonder what they meant
It will be hard to keep a lid on the information, even with their "disinformation bill", once the illnesses start, there's enough info now for people to join the dots when the injuries start... Especially if majority of jabs had the plasmids and SV40... I'm thinking V-AIDS of some sort at the very least (cancer, autoimmunity, organ tissue necrosis, stuffed hormone signalling etc)...
Thinking AIDS in its current theory...
The "virus"(let's consider the mRNA transfection "vaccines" modus operandi here too), so the virus (HIV) enters the cell and releases "viral" RNA into the cell's cytoplasm.
A DNA copy is made of the viral RNA... The DNA copy enters the cell's chromosomal DNA... After a long period, on average 8 years
(take note of time period - 8 YEARS)
So after 8 years the HIV viral genes initiate active transcription ... Then both HIV RNA (mRNA) and HIV proteins are made, and complete virus particles assembled.
Taking over the cellular machinery to do so, the cell eventually dies etc...
That process sounds an AWFUL LOT LIKE a mRNA "vaccine" and even a DNA vector vax doesn't it?
...and I'm starting to wonder now, was HIV/AIDS a "virus" or was it a bodily fluid transmissable sequence, a result of an early transfection study??
Yes, I can imagine some pretty angry folks if this genomic interference comes full circle, and they can't put a "climate change" cause to it in the media propaganda... But they did sow a seed with a virulent form of HIV story in 2022 , just after vax rollout to try cover that base...
https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.abk1688
Time will tell... That Leonard Cohen song was a good fit...
That HIV/AIDS was the result of a needle (not just street drugs but 'legitimate' vaccines) has been proved somewhere or other, it was my first red pill about 20 years ago when I got properly online.
I started learning medicine, realised it was junk science so went to natural health, which is where I realised HIV wasn't a death sentence as media had always claimed. (Another red pill.)
The gay men who died, apparently died from their medication, not the disease. Those who lived adopted natural diets, clean water etc., and lived to tell about it. Best research tip ever.
Thought I'd go the extra distance and find some old studies, two involving/warning about HIV-inducing SV40. One from 2011: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21300566/
Another from 2000:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10743284/
And one from all the way back in 1994: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7935079/
Ho ho ho! Merrrry Christmas from Satans Claws Clause.
Wow!!! Thank you... That's gold... And as I had begun to fear... Funny how my cogs didn't start moving till this plandemic on many issues... Just makes so much sense now... Merry Christmas Aria and thanks again 🙏🌲
Nice tracks. Thanks for sharing.
The Future
Live
https://youtu.be/8WlbQRoz3o4?si=72mPlOKR4E8DYpxO
Studio version
https://youtu.be/LYzPVKg3wyo?si=32fH0ENsnHKUzN8o
Yes I can see it all being attributed to evolutionary impact of climate change.
Reverse Transcriptase.
No one in Gov or manufacturing these products ever addressed this issue. It was one of the primary drivers for me to say no to the jab.
One of my first thoughts too, it was a well known pathway in the 80s, my old uni textbook describes the process... Even just down to the interruption of a cell's normal mRNA translation and transcription process, that establishes/maintains cellular identity (eg what makes a kidney cell a kidney cell, what makes a heart cell a heart cell), with some Frankenstein man made mRNA code is dangerous from the outset.
There are no circumstances that could justify messing with your genetics like that, especially via an injection that could dump its contents anywhere in your body.
To quote Jerry McGuire "You had me at "not safe and effective."
Does anyone see these revelations the same way we have seen "findings" regarding all these measures over the past three years. Many of us knew they wouldn't work before they were even tried not by "luck" but rather by asking questions the other side has panned as "odd." There have been many moments of vindication. The information regarding death rates. Other information regarding how the virus is transmitted. The Cochrane report on the evidence masks work. The emerging data on the effectiveness of lockdowns. And of course many revelations about the vaccine such as VAERS data, and the almost immediate finding that no, the vaccine did not stop transmission or infection.
I have thought throughout this., hoped rather than thought, that somehow "they have to see now" that these measures do not work. There is the anticipatory elation. Of finally being free of the murky clouds of the propaganda and cognitive dissonance that have like a cancer metastisized into our society.
They won't see it. They have the vaccine as part of the childhood schedule in spite of it not working or warranted on children. There are people who will still mask, still take to twitter to complain that all the ills of Covid fall to those who fail to mask early and often every time cases rise like barometric pressure before a thunderstorm.
This call to action of "taking it off the market" will probably end with not only them keeping it on the market, but bulldozing other mRNA solutions to our problems. I don't think they will see reason. I do whoever think they will hear continued disruption. And they need to hear it. These studies need to keep coming...need to keep being repeated. And let the evidence fall where it may.
https://boriquagato.substack.com/p/yes-the-vaccines-were-supposed-to
Their lies listed here! From DEC 30, 2021
Theyve just doubled down on their lies and the MSM follow
PCR tests were not intended for diagnoses. They were also distributed around the world way before the plandemic was announced. Long covid is a word they are using for the damage left behind after poisoning. Detoxing the liver and blood is the only hope those affected have. Anthony Williams the medical medium has the right protocols, see his website, books, podcasts and vids.
In this case, the PCR test isn't being used to diagnose.
It's being used to detect if DNA exists. It is arguably one of the few correct usage instances of PCR.
There is some great reading here for free you can read and/or download: thelightaustralia.com
For me, the tests I would like to see conducted are as follows (not purely as proof but to inform us as to 'next steps' for containment):
1) A DNA test specifically aimed at verification both Pfizer (BNT162b2 spike was tested) and Moderna (their shot was not mentioned and should also be sampled)
2) If 1 is verified, then a DNA test on sperm to see if it integrates. Note, given sperm is haploid ('half'), we might not strictly see a complete gene sequence signal. Testing eggs should also be considered but I am aware of the difficulties in doing so.
3) The DNA tested of children from those who received either the Pfizer or Moderna C19, with parental consent from adults who recognise the shots cause harms (braindead pro-vaccine shills may kick up a stink so it should only be conducted with parents who want to know the truth). **Note** this includes stillborn and miscarriages suspected to be caused by the shot.
For 3, my recommended selection criterion would be:
A) Prioritisation to select parents who have had the highest number of consecutive, same brand shots (so someone with 5 shots of just Pfizer, is a better candidate than someone who has had 7 shots as a mixture of both Pfizer and Moderna), both to increase the odds we will spot integration and reduce signal:noise from other confounding shots. This means *both* the mother and father, as if the father takes only Moderna and the mother takes only Pfizer, we'd likely see a noisy signal of both Moderna and Pfizer gene integration, and we will want to avoid this.
B) Only shots that were all had prior to *conception* of said child by both parents count. If any shots are had during or post-pregnancy, they obviously do not count (as we're attempting to test for pre-conception integration, not mid-pregnancy placenta crossing integration or shedding).
C) Any mother who received a shot during pregnancy is excluded. We're attempting to test for pre-conception integration, not mid-pregnancy placenta crossing integration. The father may receive any shot post-conception; the mother may receive any shot post-pregnancy, as once the pregnancy period is over it isn't relevant.
D) When sampling biopsy of child, three samples from distinct sites should be taken. Optionally, if the child has a pre-shots sibling, if the parents and/or child (depending on age) are okay with it, a voluntary genetic sample from the pre-shot sibling should be taken *only* if the child has never received any of the shots. This is likely to be someone who is >=18 years old who has independently refused the shots.
The reason being is their genetics can be used as a comparison baseline to the post-shots sibling.
These are quite difficult criterion to follow. Selection doesn't strictly exclude a no-shots parent with shots parent coupling, but prioritisation should be given to those most likely to express integration, which is likely to be both-parents-take-shots coupling.
In terms of 'in what situation would the parents get the shot but not the child', unfortunately it will be mainly in cases where the child has died prematurely. In alternate cases, it will be where one or both parents have suffered harms from the shots and have decided against administering any shots to their child.
I hope I'm wrong about it integrating into the next generation.
Here is my letter to my local member Rick Wilson
Hi Rick
This may be the first disclosure and admission from any government health dept that these covid injections are so dangerous that they must be stopped.
Please tell me I am wrong when I hear the TGA had no authority to approve use of this product in Australia because of its genetic and DNA altering substances. But with so much of their funding coming from the industry they're supposed to be regulating is it any wonder? Why did our past governments allow this massive conflict of interest? We need to reform our authorities so there is no corruption by big pharma!!
And why were we told it was safe and effective? Ignorance is no excuse. It never stopped transmission and more people are maimed by it than helped. There is so much evidence to prove this.
Have you seen the ABS report in 2023 proving massive excess deaths in Australia since the roll out of these injections? Between 6% and 17% above the 5 year average of deaths. This is a national crisis yet our government keeps a lid on it.
I implore you to become a shining light on this shocking crime against humanity.
https://open.substack.com/pub/rwmalonemd/p/florida-surgeon-general-calls-for?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=18nvpy
Is everyone aware that the surgeon General of Florida has called for an immediate stop to these experimental injections?. See it on Robert Malones substack.
Rebecca I have written to my member of Parliament about this and the WHO takeover. Are you interested in creating a resource of peoples letters to politicians and letters to family and friends so we can see how others are taking action?
Thanks Mike, I have been directing people to Stand Up, who are the best I know of for community organising on this issue. They are running a letter writing campaign in collaboration with Australia Exits the W.H.O. You can find them here:
https://www.standupnowaustralia.com.au/yoursay
Note SarsCov 2 the alleged novel virus has never been proven to exist by anyone anywhere then by the same standard that doesn't leave any room for alleged variations such as long Covid.
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2021/06/210611174037.htm
Discovery identifies a highly efficient human reverse transcriptase that can write RNA sequences into DNA
Date: June 11, 2021
Source: Thomas Jefferson University
Summary: Researchers show that polymerase theta can efficiently convert RNA sequences back into DNA, a feat more common in viruses than eukaryotic cells.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33330870/
and this bit of "psy-ants" from the pro jab Eng degree credentialed useful ijits
https://thedispatch.com/article/could-the-mrna-vaccines-permanently/
who say "no" because we say so...
Thanks for the latest summaries, very easy to navigate.
Merry Christmas to you and yours too. :)
When are the arrests and criminal charges going to start worldwide? Everyone who's awake knows that this is a genocide programme.
.
If You Are Vaccine Injured
You Are Not Alone.
It’s Worse Than That.
If You Were Alone No One Would Know.
The People Most Like You
- Are Pretending Not To Know
Because They Don’t Give A Shit.
That’s How Bad It Is For You.
.