52 Comments
Apr 26, 2023Liked by Rebekah Barnett

What about Greg Hunt - chief vaccine salesman? And all the Premiers who literally forced people to choose between paying their bills and getting jabbed. So far as I am concerned all of them need jail time and I will never feel that justice is done until at the very least Greg Hunt is behind bars. The way he pushed the vaccines incessantly - it was just an abomination and needs to be treated as such.

Expand full comment
Apr 26, 2023Liked by Rebekah Barnett

Thanks for this update, I have followed the Crowd Funding link.

I wish the Class Action success, it is important for this to get as far as possible.

And about time the TGA was in the firing line.

But the Premiers are not named? Their mandates deserve a time in Court too.

Expand full comment
Apr 26, 2023Liked by Rebekah Barnett

Thank you Rebekah. We can only hope these people & their families see justice, goodness knows billions of others haven't....

Expand full comment
Apr 26, 2023Liked by Rebekah Barnett

I want to be optimistic but I have utterly no hope in our injustice system to right this wrong. At least they cannot simply dismiss the case on standing, like they did to AVN.

Expand full comment

A military grade operation that used specific legislation to sidestep any and all safety, efficacy and manufacturing standards.

And it doesn’t stop until THEY say it stops, it doesn’t matter whether the ‘countermeasures’ are killing or maiming millions of people as the legislation used does not require them to pay attention to any trial or study data no matter what it says. In fact they didn’t need any to start with- because it is not a vaccine.

This was not a mistake, this was a deliberate killing, maiming and sterilisation of as many people as possible.

Expand full comment

Justice for all!! My blood boils when I read of systemic, bureaucratic indifference and the wilful malfeasance of medical professionals, many of whom MUST know what they are doing … is there a word in the English language that better describes this blend of corruption, malice and politically-enabled mendacity? What recourse however for those injured, maimed or killed by these toxic experimental injections and the government stooges who forced them on the public, when those same stooges are protected by the very courts we assume are there to hold them to account??

Expand full comment
Apr 26, 2023Liked by Rebekah Barnett

For what it's worth does anyone remember this from around June 2021 (can't find the original I had) Senate Select Committee on C-19: Jacqui Lambie (before she sold her soul) questioning Brendan Murphy on jab injuries, compensation and courts. In her words " ... if something goes wrong your're stuffed" -(link below) How true are those words today and the difficulties these jab injured face with these Class Actions ahead of them. No-one should have to go through this... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZatNkY9qfIs

Expand full comment

Fantastic story, well done Rebekah

Expand full comment
Apr 27, 2023Liked by Rebekah Barnett

Well, sincere good luck with this attempt at justice. I agree with Meryl - have done, ever since the AVN was declined "standing" in the Federal Court. Surely they can't continually keep protecting themselves and denying real, ongoing support to all those victims? There are no secrets now. There is no reason for not knowing - unless some people do not want to know. No respect. No trust. Lots of anger.

Expand full comment
Apr 26, 2023Liked by Rebekah Barnett

Thank you Rebekah. Great article.

Expand full comment
Apr 28, 2023Liked by Rebekah Barnett

British research/forensic scientist here.

It was known -- by Pharma corporations, regulators, governments et al. -- that these injections: (1) were not vaccines; (2) had been inadequately tested; (3) were designed badly (e.g. target antigen was both toxic and similar structurally to a human protein etc.); (4) were wholly ineffective (i.e. blood-borne immunoglobulins cannot reach respiratory mucosae); and (5) lethal and/or permanently debilitating in many different ways (e.g. cardiac inflammation, infertility, ADE, vAIDS, neuropathy, haemorrhagic/thrombotic events).

Nevertheless, they were not only permitted, but mandated/pushed. This is, beyond doubt, the most serious crime against humanity ever committed -- the 2020s democide.

Nuremberg 2.0, and nothing less, must follow.

https://paulspradbery.blogspot.com contains almost one hundred short articles posted since early 2020, most of which are about 'COVID', and barely a word of which I would now retract/amend.

Very best wishes to all who are determined to bring about justice.

Expand full comment

I thought for a moment "harm" was a dodging side step of lethality. Pleased to see it was not.

The class action should be coupled to a requirement to reinstate a rainbow coloured, green renewable electric chair.

Expand full comment

Where are the GPs and specialists and hospital staff who are seeing the carnage from the vaccines?

I can’t believe they aren’t ready to say something by now at 5 to midnight

When it strikes midnight they will be held to account

It went to hell on their watch

No excuses

Expand full comment

Thank for at least doing a Class Action suit!

But allow me to get you and all those, whom are so far, working with you in the suit, to UPGRADE that to an INTERNATIONAL Criminal Complaint!

Reason.....as you know in a law suit, the CRIMINALS, walk away and do the CRIMES again!

SO.... to start with....

1. https://nurembergtrials.net/nuremberg-trials-2-0/f/nurembergtrialsnet---legal-cases-citing-nuremberg-for-covid-19

That is the BOOSTER SHOT for winning the same exact CRIMINAL CASE at the Hague!

I've studied LAW, for 44.8 years and without any Lawyer, OR without any Attorney,, I've won 2 of 2 Filed FEDERAL RICO ACTIONS, without walking into a court ROOM!

I've also studied the Magna Carta that RULES to this day in Australia and ALL other countries that have the COMMON LAW, and were RULED by Britain at any time in their HISTORY! That amounts to at LEASE 40 countries, and as I stated, Australia!

Since that is a LEGAL FACT, and not some "Back in History" thing, U'll can do PUT the KILLERS in PRISON on their DIME and to stay there for all time!

IF any of you can 1. READ... 2. COPY.... And 3. PASTE into a document. YOU can WIN in any CRIMINAL COURT in the world, (that speaks ENGLISH.... or if you have a translator.)

Please READ my keystrokes..... IT DOES NOT TAKE ANY LAWYER, NOR ANY ATTORNEY TO WIN in any court. THEY did not have any LICENCED anyone before the 1880s or a bit earlier in any country except BRITAIN! So.... contemplate this....

either they did NOT have any COURT case before that time, or THE PEOPLE DID THEIR OWN CASES WITHOUT ANY "money hungry" suey, suey sutor!

I don't have the Supreme Court cases for Australia, BUT I do have them for our incorporated system called the United Stated of America...

That was the beginning, of the WIN against the "genocidalists!"

https://www.oas.org/en/sla/iajc/docs/themes_recently_concluded_International_Criminal_Court_CJI-doc_293-08_rev1.pdf

https://www.oas.org/en/sla/iajc/docs/themes_recently_concluded_International_Criminal_Court_CJI-doc_293-08_rev1.pdf

http://www.cirp.org/library/ethics/UN-covenant/

https://ask.un.org/faq/14425

THE BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS CONVENTION 1972

https://www.un.org/disarmament/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/BWS-brochure.pdf

AND NO you don't have to FILE there... that's International EVIDENCE!

NOTICE.... Australia is in the COE ... yes or NO?

IF you are IN the Counsel Of Europe than they ALSO GUARANTEE, and can HOLD COURT for YOUR RIGHT to NOT be jabbed without your Fully Informed CONSENT!

https://pace.coe.int/en/files/29004/html

IF you are stuck in only Australia there is this....

https://humanrights.gov.au/about/covid19-and-human-rights/covid-19-vaccinations-and-federal-discrimination-law

I use THESE cases that AUSTRIALIA should also have under different names in YOUR HISTORY..

1 EASY READ COPY AND PASTE

https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/528/549/

And again you should have THOSE STYLED TRIAL IN AUSTRALIA in the 1700 or 1800s.

2. LONGER READ, but well worth the LEARNING...

https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/201/43.html

Than there is the Rome_Statute_English.pdf

https://www.icc-cpi.int/sites/default/files/NR/rdonlyres/ADD16852-AEE9-4757-ABE7-9CDC7CF02886/283503/RomeStatutEng1.pdf

ALL the ABOVE pertain DIRECTLY to anyone on EARTH!

Again... YOU CAN DO THAT,, because We All have been 1. TREATENDED with murder, or 100s of DEADLY SIDE EFFECTS by ALL of the 2. Patented fake vaccine manufactures, and 3. by OUR supposed government officers. 4. We the PEOPLE have RIGHTS NOT to take POISONS into our, or our children's BODIES!"

SO... COPY...... PASTE ..... WIN!

NOW MORE on the NUREMBERG CODE....

The Nuremberg Code provides legal justification to litigate violations of informed consent. The first and foremost principle is unequivocal: "The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential". The United States Military Tribunal established the Nuremberg Code as a standard against which applies to all citizens soldiers as well as civilians." "the universally accepted norm in customary international law regarding non-consensual medical experimentation." The 4thReich members and their aiders and abettors are responsible, whether they know it or not, violating the Nuremberg Code as a Crime Against Humanity.

"a surgeon who performs an operation without his patient's consent commits an assault for which he is liable in damages."

"responsibility for violations of informed consent rests upon individual doctors, government officials and their aiders and abettors each of who can be prosecuted for crimes against humanity"

"any compelled intrusion into the human body implicates significant, constitutionally protected privacy interests

"All actors, however, are bound by the Nuremberg Code"

"Of special interest to this Court, the Nuremberg Code, at least in significant part, was the result of legal thought and legal principles, as opposed to medical or scientific principles, and thus should be the preferred standard for assessing the legality of scientific research on human subjects. Under it, duties to research subjects arise. The Nuremberg code [i]s a summary of the legal requirements for experimentation on humans The Code requires that the informed, voluntary, competent, and understanding consent of the research subject be obtained. Although this principle is placed first in the Code's ten points, the other nine points must be satisfied before it is even appropriate to ask the subject to consent. The Nuremberg Code is the 'most complete and authoritative statement of the law of informed consent to human experimentation.' It is also 'part of international common law and may be applied, in both civil and criminal cases, by state, federal and municipal courts in the United States."

The Nuremberg Code prohibits human experimentation of the very kind being endorsed and defended by the EMA. Even under the terms of their own original FDA authorization, COVID-19 vaccines are deemed "investigational" and their recipients "human subjects", who are, by definition, entitled to informed consent. Misleading populations into accepting investigational agents such as the gene-based COVID-19 "vaccines", or coercing them through "vaccine passports", constitutes clear and egregious violations of the Nuremberg Code. The Nuremberg Code mandates voluntary informed consent "without the intervention of any element of #force, #fraud, #deceit [or] #duress". In other words, citizens have the right under the Nuremberg Code and related protections not to be subject involuntarily to medical experiments. It is clear that these experimental agents should be CONTRA-INDICATED in individuals not at elevated risk of serious illness & death if infected by SARS-CoV-2. Furthermore, the use of the experimental agents must also be withheld in the elderly population until a risk-benefit assessment has been properly conducted. In any event, the vaccine label must be revised to reflect the recently emerged serious adverse events addressed here.

We remind the EMA that Nuremberg violations constitute crimes against humanity under the Geneva Convention. Crimes against humanity are deemed "the worst atrocities known to mankind", and are prosecuted under the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court."

https://nurembergtrials.net/nuremberg-trials-2-0/f/nurembergtrialsnet---legal-cases-citing-nuremberg-for-covid-19

NOW... the Little Train that Can is and was the GREATEST HOW TO BOOK in the WORLD, so please REVIEW IT no matter HOW OLD you thought your were, than...

TAKE NAMES

And

KICK BUTT!

FACT For HUMAN EXISTENCE.

Those "things" that do what they did to OTHER beings.... BELONG in PRISON **ON THEIR DIME,** or HUNG!

Expand full comment

Smarter people than me will need to explain this to make any sort of sense out of it.....but,

The US government rolled out these vaccines under the same methodology as a 'military response to an imminent threat'. Therefore, able sidestep most all regulations and safeguards. Pfizer will fallback on 'we manufactured on behalf of DoD'.

If push ever comes to shove, which it won't, it'll be a similar premise the TGA will smokescreen themselves with. These people have built a very big fort, and now they own MSM and most socials, they are literally untouchable.

Expand full comment