The first independent testing of Australian vials confirms findings from the US, Canada and Germany, highlighting that oncogenic and genomic integration risks are a global concern
I think it is safe to assume, from your article, that the TGA will always and forever say "safe and effective". No matter the evidence, no matter the cost.
It's interesting that the only testing protocol for DNA levels is pre-LNP packaging - no independent scientist can therefore test the product posthoc and have that test deemed valid by a regulator.
I remember a few of Substack Scientist Authors here have stated the testing protocols and limits on DNA contamination are set for "naked". The LNP coatings negate those values, and must be retested/recalibrated to much lower values due to LNP coatings.
That is possibly true. But only if people like Rebekah, you and me stop calling them out with material factual evidence, that shows they are either incompetent or lying. One will have them unemployed, and the other will have them sitting in a small room, worried his or her room-mate will have their way with them! The contamination of the injectable drugs almost certainly will result in health issues (including death!) This will eventually have people asking; why? And they will not accept the brush-off explanations we are currently getting today! Keep at them.
The TGA that discounts this study is the same TGA that bent over backwards to accept Pfizer's heavily doctored initial Covid "vaccine" study despite its gaping flaws.
And considering that the entire concept of mRNA agents encased in lipid nanoparticles with hugely varying quantities of DNA plasmids has been around for 5 minutes, on what grounds does the TGA state they are "safe"?
And on what grounds do they provide a 10ng cut off limit for a "safe" level in a novel treatment?
And where is the curiosity from the medical colleges, AMA, individual doctors, the media, the health departments, CMO's and politicians in at least taking an interest in this?
Rebekah, thanks for reporting compelling evidence that Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 injectable drugs are contaminated. It seems obvious to me that the Australian authorities are engaging in misleading language or "doublespeak," (https://open.substack.com/pub/oxgmcxo/p/the-art-of-doublespeak?r=pf0i9&utm_medium=ios) regarding the denial anything is wrong! Of course (and sadly), this situation raises significant concerns for those who have received these contaminated ‘vaccinations.’
Brilliant summary of very complex subject matter, Rebekah, thank you. I can't fathom the audacity of the TGA in dismissing these findings as unreliable and invalid when they will not do the bare minimum due diligence testing themselves. They are a disgrace.
Will publicever gain truth from these elusive bodies who claim honest dealings of their products supported by gullible or allied sources Where does the line end when this attitude is thrust on the mass with expectations that they will be accepted & believed. Sadly they achieve some credence so the story proceeds Prove your complaint is their catch cry while covering up any possible loopholes
Wonderful reporting again, Rebekah, it is great to see that investigative journalism is still alive, if somewhat battered.
On the subject matter, what a dreadful state of affairs, eh. Multiple labs confirming a clear and present risk (among several others) from these novel and poorly tested shots - and the 'regulators', who promoted them *as if they were chasing bonuses themselves, don't want to know... or worse, shoots the messenger.
Thanks for this detailed update! The regulators need to coordinate and get their stories straight. So, Health Canada is looking to remove the SV40 promoter sequences from future vaccines. The TGA is happy that everything conforms to international standards. While the European Medicines Agency are looking to establish an actual (and belated), manufacturing quality guideline for mRNA vaccines https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/development-guideline-quality-aspects-mrna-vaccines-scientific-guideline.
I saw this posted somewhere else a few days ago. However, it's unclear if it is being progressed or whether it has been quietly shelved? It also says that it won't retrospectively apply to already approved products (so Pfizer & Moderna don't need to improve existing C-19 shots).
I think it is safe to assume, from your article, that the TGA will always and forever say "safe and effective". No matter the evidence, no matter the cost.
It's interesting that the only testing protocol for DNA levels is pre-LNP packaging - no independent scientist can therefore test the product posthoc and have that test deemed valid by a regulator.
I remember a few of Substack Scientist Authors here have stated the testing protocols and limits on DNA contamination are set for "naked". The LNP coatings negate those values, and must be retested/recalibrated to much lower values due to LNP coatings.
That is possibly true. But only if people like Rebekah, you and me stop calling them out with material factual evidence, that shows they are either incompetent or lying. One will have them unemployed, and the other will have them sitting in a small room, worried his or her room-mate will have their way with them! The contamination of the injectable drugs almost certainly will result in health issues (including death!) This will eventually have people asking; why? And they will not accept the brush-off explanations we are currently getting today! Keep at them.
True.
Perhaps this repeatability will be their downfall? And the farce of their standard responses will cause people to say "huh?"
Great work (again) Rebekah!
So many issues raised with this.
The TGA that discounts this study is the same TGA that bent over backwards to accept Pfizer's heavily doctored initial Covid "vaccine" study despite its gaping flaws.
And considering that the entire concept of mRNA agents encased in lipid nanoparticles with hugely varying quantities of DNA plasmids has been around for 5 minutes, on what grounds does the TGA state they are "safe"?
And on what grounds do they provide a 10ng cut off limit for a "safe" level in a novel treatment?
And where is the curiosity from the medical colleges, AMA, individual doctors, the media, the health departments, CMO's and politicians in at least taking an interest in this?
Rebekah, thanks for reporting compelling evidence that Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 injectable drugs are contaminated. It seems obvious to me that the Australian authorities are engaging in misleading language or "doublespeak," (https://open.substack.com/pub/oxgmcxo/p/the-art-of-doublespeak?r=pf0i9&utm_medium=ios) regarding the denial anything is wrong! Of course (and sadly), this situation raises significant concerns for those who have received these contaminated ‘vaccinations.’
[highlighting that this is a global concern]..... clearly not to the establishment.
🙏 for continuing to question
Brilliant summary of very complex subject matter, Rebekah, thank you. I can't fathom the audacity of the TGA in dismissing these findings as unreliable and invalid when they will not do the bare minimum due diligence testing themselves. They are a disgrace.
Will publicever gain truth from these elusive bodies who claim honest dealings of their products supported by gullible or allied sources Where does the line end when this attitude is thrust on the mass with expectations that they will be accepted & believed. Sadly they achieve some credence so the story proceeds Prove your complaint is their catch cry while covering up any possible loopholes
Wonderful reporting again, Rebekah, it is great to see that investigative journalism is still alive, if somewhat battered.
On the subject matter, what a dreadful state of affairs, eh. Multiple labs confirming a clear and present risk (among several others) from these novel and poorly tested shots - and the 'regulators', who promoted them *as if they were chasing bonuses themselves, don't want to know... or worse, shoots the messenger.
Thanks for this detailed update! The regulators need to coordinate and get their stories straight. So, Health Canada is looking to remove the SV40 promoter sequences from future vaccines. The TGA is happy that everything conforms to international standards. While the European Medicines Agency are looking to establish an actual (and belated), manufacturing quality guideline for mRNA vaccines https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/development-guideline-quality-aspects-mrna-vaccines-scientific-guideline.
Thanks for the link I didn't know about that.
I saw this posted somewhere else a few days ago. However, it's unclear if it is being progressed or whether it has been quietly shelved? It also says that it won't retrospectively apply to already approved products (so Pfizer & Moderna don't need to improve existing C-19 shots).
Breaking news: TGA says experts investigating Mossad possible contamination of vials en route to Canada.