The argument for Collective Good is on shaky ground
The brilliant statistician Mathew Crawford makes a compelling argument for zero vax efficacy and instead that wealth is the main factor determining outcomes. It and his other many articles diving deep into the US data are some of the best I’ve come across throughout the plandemonium
just on statistics ....
Have the CDC, FDA, the WHO or even our very own CSIRO or any other scientific or academic labs on this planet in the last 2.5 years ever have a isolated sars cov 2 ( the virus ) that causes covid 19 ?
THE ANSWER IS NO
No one has ever seen it and no records exist.
Literally hundreds linked to this page
nice article. keep punching. i have written about same. i do not know why it is not obvious that the vaccine is help the virus now. negative efficacy. ADE. lots die from jab too. all up they are killing the elderly even quicker and potentially harming anyone young and healthy with vaccine.
Personally, if you print out and read the stuff I have posted at the end of Robert O.young's introduction, by the author, he thinks that super computers are behind this and he explains why, it makes sense to me, but what about you?
Richard Noakes also has a cure, he thinks, would probably short out the nanoprocessor and kill off the nanobots and other uglies in the blood, of the body. It is risky, it might bring on a heart attack which could kill you, but the alternative is to get called up and go for modification, so at days end, which is it to be - let them have your body, or keep it yourself and potentially go on living your life, the way it was intended to be and live to a ripe old age, because that is what Richard Noakes wants for each and every one of you - you can contact him via Robert O.young's webpage and see if he is willing to give you his method, bearing in mind that there is the above risk involved - it is free, feedback essential, if your body is too far gone, then you are going to have a heart attack anyway, it just has not happened yet!!
Putting It Altogether. (Below) Moderna & Pfizer and others, have made a 19 nucleotide sequence and 19 nucleotide Moderna specific chimeric (CGG for AGA) furin cleavage site mRNA (between 2010 and 2016) to modify the human body with a 19 nucleotide Moderna specific chimeric (CGG for AGA) furin cleavage site, 99% Graphene Oxide injection, which makes a nanoprocessor driven by a 5G antenna that goes directly to the workings of our brain, with a 10 digit call sign, which goes where - human or computer - which is totally illegal medical/scientific research for secret use on humans, as is the Pfizer contract (I have a secret Pfizer copy) and presumably the Moderna contract, that governments knowingly, illegally signed, understanding the ramifications involved, to make electronic/computerised/modified advanced humans, after those not suitable, have been exterminated - I wonder if DARPA is involved with this - Bill Gates - I would say, certainly.
Which is NOT the mRNA vaccine, that we were told it is, or its purpose, which removes their blanket immunity from prosecution and holds them all accountable in any Court Of Law.
Then there this pearl: An alarming number of vaccine recipients suffered from severe and debilitating complications. Growing increasingly concerned, the physician decided to study messenger RNA (mRNA) and its effects on DNA. After speaking with colleagues and conducting numerous experiments, she made a startling discovery. When the Bluetooth setting was activated near immunized individuals, a "unique identification code" appeared on her smartphone’s screen. Each person seemingly contained an internal technological device. During an interview transcribed by Orwell City, Dr. Brandolino shared her startling findings: Mónica Calcedo: The chip. Is that real or a lie? Dr. Brandolino: It’s a nanoprocessor. I say again that it is in plain view for those who want to see the micrographs of the electron microscope study made by Dr. Kalcker. It’s clearly seen in the magnification: a small, perfect, quadrangular, precise-edged, metallic corpuscle which is the same as any nanoprocessor in nanotechnology-responsive devices. That nanoprocessor is driven from a 4G Plus or 5G antenna. That is, all G technology is the same. The difference lies in that the packet of information that an antenna can transmit, is much larger in 4G Plus and 5G, 6G, and 7G. All that compact information is handled by a nanoprocessor— in a device which will be just inside our cells. By having Morgellons in the polyethylene glycol, they’re self-reproducing, it’s self-replicating. But because it’s in graphene… Graphene is a catalyst and, as I explained to you, makes that cell resonate with the 5G antenna and the microwaves of human thought. Can you understand that? There’s a nanoprocessor driven by a 5G antenna that goes directly to the workings of our brain.
Link here for the electrom microscope research of Dr Robert O Young which supports the above: See Link here: https://www.drrobertyoung.com/post/dr-deborah-birx-admits-the-biden-admin-s-vaccine-efficacy-claims-were-based-on-hope-not-science?postId=a3d057d7-ac1b-42bc-a7fe-c024bd287569&utm_campaign=199f646b-68a5-41f7-82de-8a549f823c43&utm_source=so&utm_medium=mail&utm_content=ceae1640-2bfb-4a34-af39-02b55e4aecee&cid=8bec1d4c-3773-415a-83c2-1694daa095a4
My full text is in the comments section for the above article, at the end of Dr Robert O Young's blurb with what he found on an electron microscope. He named this webpage over what I discovered in my researches, he was so impressed with the above content