Vaccines will be redefined in Australia, paving the way for emerging technologies like monoclonal antibodies and mRNA therapeutics to be listed on the National Immunisation Program (NIP) alongside traditional vaccines.
The word "vaccine" is not a biological reality but a magic trick on the minds of a population which has been psyopped for generations. Injections of foreign substances can be subcutaneous, or intramuscular, or one can use variolation or ingestion/inhalation which operate at the immune boundary - all these biologically dissimilar methods are lumped together under this pseudonym "vaccination" as if they are the same, which is rubbish.
The fact that transfection methodology is now also lumped together with all the others is even more reason to have grave reservations about these products. Why is no one calling out the mRNA platform as transfection? Could it be the Intellectual Property fiasco of rebranding an old bench technology of using mRNA to fool cells into making a foreign protein (which you would never use on an experimental animal you wanted to live a long life) so it can form the basis of a new money-spinning industry? Are the public so cognitively inoculated that they are petrified of being labelled an "antivaxxer" if they dare to question this horrible idea? Seems so. Pity the young ones.
It is indeed a horrible idea perpetrated by the most horrible people imaginable. Their magic tricks are still working on most. I despair for the young people.
I have been calling this inhumane practice out as Transgenesis, but, as you know, this global train cannot be stopped. It is up to individuals to educate themselves and refute the tech.
As with numerous other diseases for which expensive, profitable, potentially dangerous, overly-narrowly targeted interventions are researched and widely accepted, It takes less than a minute to find research on how inadequate levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D weaken immune responses and/or lead to disregulated, self-destructive, inflammatory (indiscriminate cell destruction) immune responses regarding any particular disease. The Google Scholar search for RSV and "vitamin D" is:
"Patients who developed Life Threatening Disease had significantly lower 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels: median 18.4 ng/mL (IQR, 15.1–26.9 ng/mL) versus 31.7 ng/mL (IQR, 23.6–42.0 ng/mL), P < .001; 59% of infants with LTD had 25-hydroxyvitamin D deficiency [< 20 ng/m/L] compared with 12% in those with better outcome. Multivariable regression analysis confirmed 25-hydroxyvitamin D deficiency as a risk factor (odds ratio, ____11.83____; 95% confidence interval, 3.89–35.9; P < .001)."
Please see the research on how 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels below 50 ng/mL (125 nmol/L) weaken the immune system, cited and discussed at: https://vitamindstopscovid.info/00-evi/ . This is a higher level than the 20 to 30 ng/mL (50 to 75 nmol/L) level of circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D, as measured in "vitamin D" blood tests, which most doctors and all governments think is required for full health. The only safe, all-year-round sustainable way of attaining this is proper vitamin D3 supplementation in quantities which depend on body weight and obesity status, according to the recommendations of New Jersey based Professor of Medicine Sunil Wimalawansa: https://vitamindstopscovid.info/00-evi/#00-how-much. For average weight adults, 125 micrograms (5000 IU) a day on average is a good amount. This is a gram every 22 years, and pharma grade vitamin D3 costs around USD$2.50 a gram ex-factory.
In the U.S. the definition of vaccine has been changing over many years. In May of 2021, the word “vaccination” changed in the Merriam-Webster Dictionary from: 1) a substance that provides ‘immunity’ to a specific disease, to 2) a preparation that is administered—as by injection—to stimulate the body’s immune response against a specific infectious agent or disease.” https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/vaccine
Pediatrician Dr. Elizabeth Mumper: "RSV (Respiratory Syncytial Virus) is a routine illness that the overwhelming majority of babies can handle. By the age of 2, 97% of children have been infected with RSV. Each year, the CDC tracks around 17 deaths. Based on these numbers, does it make sense to mass vaccinate babies for RSV?"
These modified mRNA injections (Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 so-called "vaccines") are the first time any such technology - involving getting modified mRNA molecules into human cells' cytosol where they program ribosomes to make proteins - has been deployed outside limited clinical trials.
Likewise the adenovirus vector injections (AstraZeneca and Johnson and Johnson COVID-19 so-called "vaccines"), in which a virus infects our cells, but is unable to reproduce there. Its DNA carries instructions which are transcribed into mRNA and so program the cell to produce novel, toxic, proteins which are somewhat modified copies of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein.
The Novavax COVID-19 vaccine is a real vaccine: it introduces one or more epitopes into the body for the purpose of stimulating strong immune responses in the future if the immune system detects similar or identical epitopes on the pathogenic bacterium or virus of the targetted disease. An epitope is a small section of a protein - up to a few dozen amino acids assembled in a particular three-dimensional shape.
Vaccines traditionally were inactivated (unable to infect or reproduce) viruses or bacteria or live viruses or bacteria which could infect the cells, and probably spread to other people, but which created an attenuated form of the disease which was relatively safe while stimulating strong, lasting, immunity against the targetted disease. The Novavax vaccine is based on artificial lipid nanopartlcles which resemble bacteria or viruses in that they are small, self-contained fluid vesicles which have, attached into their lipid bilayer outer membrane, proteins which present epitopes to the immune system
Both the modified mRNA and the adenovirus vector injections attempt to induce immunity by programming our cells (which cells? they could be anywhere in the body, not just near the injection site) to create these replicas of spike proteins and generally to have these migrate to the outside of the cell's membrane. Inaccurately structured proteins would also be created. All such proteins would also, to some extent, go into the bloodstream as isolated and perhaps damaged and otherwise differently structured replicas of the vital spike protein.
Never before have injections been widely deployed with the express purpose of programming our cells to sprout (close copies of) viral proteins on their cell membranes for the express purpose of giving the immune system target practice. Assuming the immune system is working correctly, all such cells will be destroyed.
It is not necessary for a treatment to alter the DNA of a cell for it to be properly classed as a gene therapy. The EU definition makes this clear.
The 2003 EU definition of "gene therapy", which still current: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/en/ALL/?uri=CELEX%3A32003L0063 classifies mRNA and other such methods (viral vector) of programming a cell's ribosomes to create specific proteins as "gene therapy" even though such treatments are not expected to alter the actual genes, in the chromosomes, of the cell.
Select the EN PDF. Find page 88, by the "159/nn" numbers at the top of each page. This PDF starts with page 46 by that system, so we want the physical PDF page 43. Part IV 1:
"For the purposes of this Annex, gene therapy medicinal product shall mean a product obtained through a set of manufacturing processes aimed at the transfer, to be performed either in vivo or ex vivo, of a prophylactic, diagnostic or therapeutic gene (i.e. a piece of nucleic acid, to human/animal cells and its subsequent expression in vivo. The gene transfer involves an expression system contained in a delivery system known as a vector, which can be of viral, as well as non-viral origin. The vector can also be included in a human or animal cell."
"a piece of nucleic acid" includes DNA or RNA. "to human/animal cells and its subsequent expression in vivo". This includes mRNA introduced by a lipid nanoparticle delivery system or viral RNA or DNA from a viral vector which, in either case, programs ribosomes to manufacture the protein according to the amino acid sequence contained in that RNA or DNA.
Nowhere does this definition of "gene therapy" require that the therapy alter the genes in the chromosomal DNA of the cell.
Doctors should also be aware that every disease which vaccines and quasi-vaccines (such as these modified mRNA and adenovirus vector) injections are intended to protect against causes more harm and is transmitted more readily than it would be if everyone had at least the 50 ng/mL 125 nmol/L circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D their immune system needs to work properly. Please see the research on vitamin D and the immune system, cited and discussed at: https://vitamindstopscovid.info/00-evi/ .
I'll be voting One Nation to have this reversed. If this was a good idea, it would never have been rushed through. Morrison made the investment during Covid & Mark Butler couldn't wait to sign the WHO agreement Allowing all this to happen. We need to leave the UN & the WHO. So while Australia goes down the path of destruction, other countries question mRNA technology & are leaving the WHO. Once again our politicians have sold us out.
I suggest people listen to Mike Yeadon explain pretty well the virus fraud from about 1 hr 10 minutes onward on this podcast
He can talk the leg off a table and makes good common sense points easy to understand
The more people who see through the virus fraud the quicker we can dispense with vaccines which are a blight on humanity and the ever decreasing health of our children who are lumped with a ever increasing poison schedule
"Children who are supported to work through these healing crises are invariably healthier and more resilient than children in whom these inflammatory crises have been suppressed with vaccines, antibiotics, and anti-inflammatory drugs."
..."autoimmune suppressors" . I guess that will generate much $$ since they are causing much autoimmune diseases with covid shots and all the rest!
Trouble brewing 😈
The word "vaccine" is not a biological reality but a magic trick on the minds of a population which has been psyopped for generations. Injections of foreign substances can be subcutaneous, or intramuscular, or one can use variolation or ingestion/inhalation which operate at the immune boundary - all these biologically dissimilar methods are lumped together under this pseudonym "vaccination" as if they are the same, which is rubbish.
The fact that transfection methodology is now also lumped together with all the others is even more reason to have grave reservations about these products. Why is no one calling out the mRNA platform as transfection? Could it be the Intellectual Property fiasco of rebranding an old bench technology of using mRNA to fool cells into making a foreign protein (which you would never use on an experimental animal you wanted to live a long life) so it can form the basis of a new money-spinning industry? Are the public so cognitively inoculated that they are petrified of being labelled an "antivaxxer" if they dare to question this horrible idea? Seems so. Pity the young ones.
It is indeed a horrible idea perpetrated by the most horrible people imaginable. Their magic tricks are still working on most. I despair for the young people.
I have been calling this inhumane practice out as Transgenesis, but, as you know, this global train cannot be stopped. It is up to individuals to educate themselves and refute the tech.
Yes, no doubt Pfizzer and Moderna are still dealing with GMO`s without a licence.
Well Moderna didn't build a factory in Melbourne recently for no reason! Ironically across the road from the Heart Hospital also recently built.
RSV monoclonal antibody injections (widely but incorrectly referred to as "vaccines") have significant dangers: https://www.trialsitenews.com/a/rsv-global-prevalence-are-rsv-incidence-and-fatality-statistics-worth-nirsevimabs-safety-risks-e965582d .
As with numerous other diseases for which expensive, profitable, potentially dangerous, overly-narrowly targeted interventions are researched and widely accepted, It takes less than a minute to find research on how inadequate levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D weaken immune responses and/or lead to disregulated, self-destructive, inflammatory (indiscriminate cell destruction) immune responses regarding any particular disease. The Google Scholar search for RSV and "vitamin D" is:
https://scholar.google.com.au/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=RSV+%22vitamin+D%22&btnG=
Here is one of the results:
https://academic.oup.com/jid/article/226/6/958/6519589
"Patients who developed Life Threatening Disease had significantly lower 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels: median 18.4 ng/mL (IQR, 15.1–26.9 ng/mL) versus 31.7 ng/mL (IQR, 23.6–42.0 ng/mL), P < .001; 59% of infants with LTD had 25-hydroxyvitamin D deficiency [< 20 ng/m/L] compared with 12% in those with better outcome. Multivariable regression analysis confirmed 25-hydroxyvitamin D deficiency as a risk factor (odds ratio, ____11.83____; 95% confidence interval, 3.89–35.9; P < .001)."
Please see the research on how 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels below 50 ng/mL (125 nmol/L) weaken the immune system, cited and discussed at: https://vitamindstopscovid.info/00-evi/ . This is a higher level than the 20 to 30 ng/mL (50 to 75 nmol/L) level of circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D, as measured in "vitamin D" blood tests, which most doctors and all governments think is required for full health. The only safe, all-year-round sustainable way of attaining this is proper vitamin D3 supplementation in quantities which depend on body weight and obesity status, according to the recommendations of New Jersey based Professor of Medicine Sunil Wimalawansa: https://vitamindstopscovid.info/00-evi/#00-how-much. For average weight adults, 125 micrograms (5000 IU) a day on average is a good amount. This is a gram every 22 years, and pharma grade vitamin D3 costs around USD$2.50 a gram ex-factory.
Gross and disappointing, but not surprising.
There is no RSV virus
They invented it to add to the childhood schedule
There is no RSV virus properly isolated using their own industry gold standard with a proper scientific control
They use of course the PCR test which is a complete fraud to signify you have it
It is quite obvious that the neo-Malthusians are in full control of the Australian parliaments.
In the U.S. the definition of vaccine has been changing over many years. In May of 2021, the word “vaccination” changed in the Merriam-Webster Dictionary from: 1) a substance that provides ‘immunity’ to a specific disease, to 2) a preparation that is administered—as by injection—to stimulate the body’s immune response against a specific infectious agent or disease.” https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/vaccine
More about RSV Jabs
https://geoffpain.substack.com/p/pfizer-appoints-chris-boshoff-who
and
https://geoffpain.substack.com/p/deaths-from-rsv-jabs-synagis-palivizumab
"New Speak" (Orwell), allows a lot of "Definitions" to be changed in convenience.
-Pandemic??
-Democracy??
-The Common Good??
-The rule of law??
-Freedom??
-Patriotism??
-Medical Professional??
Pediatrician Dr. Elizabeth Mumper: "RSV (Respiratory Syncytial Virus) is a routine illness that the overwhelming majority of babies can handle. By the age of 2, 97% of children have been infected with RSV. Each year, the CDC tracks around 17 deaths. Based on these numbers, does it make sense to mass vaccinate babies for RSV?"
https://theylied.ca/RSVchildren.shtml
.
These modified mRNA injections (Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 so-called "vaccines") are the first time any such technology - involving getting modified mRNA molecules into human cells' cytosol where they program ribosomes to make proteins - has been deployed outside limited clinical trials.
Likewise the adenovirus vector injections (AstraZeneca and Johnson and Johnson COVID-19 so-called "vaccines"), in which a virus infects our cells, but is unable to reproduce there. Its DNA carries instructions which are transcribed into mRNA and so program the cell to produce novel, toxic, proteins which are somewhat modified copies of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein.
The Novavax COVID-19 vaccine is a real vaccine: it introduces one or more epitopes into the body for the purpose of stimulating strong immune responses in the future if the immune system detects similar or identical epitopes on the pathogenic bacterium or virus of the targetted disease. An epitope is a small section of a protein - up to a few dozen amino acids assembled in a particular three-dimensional shape.
Vaccines traditionally were inactivated (unable to infect or reproduce) viruses or bacteria or live viruses or bacteria which could infect the cells, and probably spread to other people, but which created an attenuated form of the disease which was relatively safe while stimulating strong, lasting, immunity against the targetted disease. The Novavax vaccine is based on artificial lipid nanopartlcles which resemble bacteria or viruses in that they are small, self-contained fluid vesicles which have, attached into their lipid bilayer outer membrane, proteins which present epitopes to the immune system
Both the modified mRNA and the adenovirus vector injections attempt to induce immunity by programming our cells (which cells? they could be anywhere in the body, not just near the injection site) to create these replicas of spike proteins and generally to have these migrate to the outside of the cell's membrane. Inaccurately structured proteins would also be created. All such proteins would also, to some extent, go into the bloodstream as isolated and perhaps damaged and otherwise differently structured replicas of the vital spike protein.
Never before have injections been widely deployed with the express purpose of programming our cells to sprout (close copies of) viral proteins on their cell membranes for the express purpose of giving the immune system target practice. Assuming the immune system is working correctly, all such cells will be destroyed.
It is not necessary for a treatment to alter the DNA of a cell for it to be properly classed as a gene therapy. The EU definition makes this clear.
The 2003 EU definition of "gene therapy", which still current: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/en/ALL/?uri=CELEX%3A32003L0063 classifies mRNA and other such methods (viral vector) of programming a cell's ribosomes to create specific proteins as "gene therapy" even though such treatments are not expected to alter the actual genes, in the chromosomes, of the cell.
Select the EN PDF. Find page 88, by the "159/nn" numbers at the top of each page. This PDF starts with page 46 by that system, so we want the physical PDF page 43. Part IV 1:
"For the purposes of this Annex, gene therapy medicinal product shall mean a product obtained through a set of manufacturing processes aimed at the transfer, to be performed either in vivo or ex vivo, of a prophylactic, diagnostic or therapeutic gene (i.e. a piece of nucleic acid, to human/animal cells and its subsequent expression in vivo. The gene transfer involves an expression system contained in a delivery system known as a vector, which can be of viral, as well as non-viral origin. The vector can also be included in a human or animal cell."
"a piece of nucleic acid" includes DNA or RNA. "to human/animal cells and its subsequent expression in vivo". This includes mRNA introduced by a lipid nanoparticle delivery system or viral RNA or DNA from a viral vector which, in either case, programs ribosomes to manufacture the protein according to the amino acid sequence contained in that RNA or DNA.
Nowhere does this definition of "gene therapy" require that the therapy alter the genes in the chromosomal DNA of the cell.
In 2021, Stefan Oelrich, President of Bayer’s Pharmaceuticals Division, said "… ultimately the mRNA vaccines are an example for that cell and gene therapy. I always like to say: if we had surveyed two years ago in the public – ‘would you be willing to take a gene or cell therapy and inject it into your body?’ – we probably would have had a 95% refusal rate." https://expose-news.com/2021/11/06/bayer-pharmaceuticals-president-admits-mrna-vaccines-are-cell-and-gene-therapy-and-the-public-would-not-have-agreed-to-take-them-if-it-were-not-for-the-pandemic/
Doctors should also be aware that every disease which vaccines and quasi-vaccines (such as these modified mRNA and adenovirus vector) injections are intended to protect against causes more harm and is transmitted more readily than it would be if everyone had at least the 50 ng/mL 125 nmol/L circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D their immune system needs to work properly. Please see the research on vitamin D and the immune system, cited and discussed at: https://vitamindstopscovid.info/00-evi/ .
I'll be voting One Nation to have this reversed. If this was a good idea, it would never have been rushed through. Morrison made the investment during Covid & Mark Butler couldn't wait to sign the WHO agreement Allowing all this to happen. We need to leave the UN & the WHO. So while Australia goes down the path of destruction, other countries question mRNA technology & are leaving the WHO. Once again our politicians have sold us out.
I suggest people listen to Mike Yeadon explain pretty well the virus fraud from about 1 hr 10 minutes onward on this podcast
He can talk the leg off a table and makes good common sense points easy to understand
The more people who see through the virus fraud the quicker we can dispense with vaccines which are a blight on humanity and the ever decreasing health of our children who are lumped with a ever increasing poison schedule
https://www.sheepfarm.co.uk/music/sf275-mike-yeadon/
"Children who are supported to work through these healing crises are invariably healthier and more resilient than children in whom these inflammatory crises have been suppressed with vaccines, antibiotics, and anti-inflammatory drugs."
~ Dr. Thomas Cowan
https://theylied.ca/Vaccines.shtml
.