Hi friends, I’ve been quiet this week due to being pretty unwell. Unfortunately, a bad cold has slowed me down considerably. Still, I made time for trolling the West Australian Government on the only social media platform they haven’t blocked me on. See
Congratulations on the growing publicity your work is garnering Rebecca. Your making waves and drawing much needed attention to these shots.
Any accolades or followings for you are well earnt and deserved.
Respectfully, I would take a closer look at ARC, before committing to joining.
There are some serious conflicts of interest, historical machinations and political maneuvering by its founding members.
Remembering many totalitarian and dictatorships have utilised idealistic NGOs, and such groups to control growing movements. SAGE was a recent example of "controlled opposition" but they certainly did
not invent the term, it was coined decades ago.😉🤐
Your clever and I respect your ability to critically assess information but there are some serious alarm bells going off with ARC. Please do your due diligence, because globally the gloves are coming off and we are now getting down to the serious part. Things are about to get a lot more heavier handed.🙏🙏
Hi, thanks for your comment - I am covering the forum, not joining. So anything I observe will be reported to my followers and those of The Aussie Wire.
🙏🙏🤦♀️ Sorry for the misread! Thought it said you'd been asked to become a member of ARC. I'm very glad to know that your eagle eyes and courageous heart will be observing. My suggestion look for what JP is NOT saying (in between his word salads) and who is lingering around😉 BTJMO. Look at me, trying to teach you how to suck eggs!🤣😂🤣 🙏
Hi Rebekah. Douglas Murray should be asking for your autograph: he did not stand against the covid fascism and is morally in your shadow. While in London, maybe seek out Abi Roberts (Abi Daily podcast on substack): like our own Corey White, she’s a no-holds barred comedian and would be a great interview.
John Howard is of a long gone era, that supports free speech; but he's from a time when government was, for the most part, reliable. He seems someone highly unlikely to question authority. He would likely be horrified, and deem it nonsense, to be red pilled and see what we all, so plainly see now. Unfortunately he belongs to yesterday's world and sadly, that secure phase has long gone.......
Peterson is a fantastic academic and clinician for free speech — now suspended for his stance on defending such free speech.
He often quotes, " I may not agree with you, but I'll absolutely, defend your right to say it"
He is against controlling speech / controlling language - he has been fighting this in Canadian academic circles for years now and speaking publicly on same.
He is all for people living their best possible life and serves as a fantastic advisor for young men today. His lectures are legendary and worth listening to time and again.
WEFers hate him - he makes far too much sense, and supports the notion of only two genders as well - you know, like we were all taught in science. WEFers hate that, so try to shut him down, Malign. Discredit - they even make up lies.
Peterson's forte is misdirection dressed up in a pseudo-academic word salad.
He didn't work at the UN for nothing. Do you like his commie art collection.?
Howard gifted us the GST, did that help provide small government ? It certainly added a huge burden to small business ( which is the natural enemy of Government ) All these slimy characters are in favour of "hate speech" laws which is their usual method of dressing up some oppressive law in flowery sweet sounding language
Peterson's eloquence is not misdirection. His art - his business; that makes an odd judgement - I couldn't care less about his art proclivities.
Peterson was not an employee of the UN. As he edited and advised on a paper nearly 10 years ago, it was a contract. A LOT has come to light since then and many have had an epiphany with regard to the takeover of the UN. Decades ago, when in my youthful early 40's, had a brief contract with the UN - if only l had known then what l know now!
The GST was going to be initiated by either side of the political aisle - the humungous burgeoning medical blowouts were not far off — with outdated hospital structures; ancient federal nursing homes to be largely demolished, in preferece for "lifestyle villages"; mid-boomers with their fifties looming, often getting sicker with every passing year; ever mounting unemployment and disability demands....... the list went on .... and it still does.
The Austalian voter gifted us - yes, we, ourselves — the GST — Howard went to the pollls with that and won the 1998 election.
No one said the GST meant to provide small government.
How do you claim GST was "a huge burden to small business"?
Our family businesses did not find GST a burden - merely a change.
How can small business be "the natural enemy of Government" when small businesses bring in the majority of the revenue?
Howard was a REAL treasurer. Took our taxes and took care of how they were spent. A good money manager - as was Paul Keating. He left with a GENUINE surplus. NOT a deficit.
I would say that increasing various nit -pikety taxes over the last 15 years or so, make running a small business much more difficult; but those taxes are separate to GST. It does seem like the government is crushing small businesses now ....... like govt WANTS them to go... especially how they were pressured to close during the lockdowns, sadly, many went under. Marriages broke up — ALL over utter LIES — not science.
I reiterate, Peterson NOR Howard are in favour of hate speech laws.
John Hewson went to the polls with the GST, Paul Keating revved up fear on it and he won the unwinnable election - the "sweetest of victories".
John Howard said there would "never, ever" be a GST because the voters killed it at the last election. He went to the polls, won, and then he introduced it. That was the beginning of the truly shameless politician, and the failure of their being held to account.
Correct: Hewson went to the 1993 election with a GST and lost. We all remember the ridulous cake fiasco / example with Mike Willessee........
As an aside: Tax reform had been up for serious discussion, both in, and between the parties since the mid to late 70s. Labor had historically vehemently opposed it, although Keating tried to get the party behind a "consumption tax" (aka GST) back in 1985, when he failed miserably to convince his party members that tax reform was blindingly necessary, or the government would face mounting debt. Keating, being a pragmatist, could see it necessary, he failed to enrol party membership on the platform; the proposal being voted down, loyal Keating continued to carry the party line to promote party consensus on that issue.
1996: Howard WON the election with the "never ever be a GST" included in the tax reform. However it became obvious that various tax reforms were necessary for financial recovery
1998: Due to inherited debt from Labor, and the ongoing debate around complex tax reform, Howard went to the polls, standing on a GST platform and WON again.
Howard did not pass the GST as a solo effort. Parliamentary debate continued over the details. and after tax on food was withdrawn, it was passed by parliament. All sides knew tax reform was inevitable to conquer the debt.
Democracy in action.
2001 AND 2004: Howard was re-elected again, and again — as a vote of confidence in his fiscal mangement.
To this day, Howard is our longest standing Prime Minister; to the credit of that Liberal cabinet, not only was the debt repaid, but our coffers were in surplus, ready for the various federal projects planned, any of which were already underway.
Both Paul Keating and John Howard will be remembered in history, for their responsible management towards the finances of our country.
I have to say, I don't find JP pseudo-academic at all. I find him academic. Why do you think his style is pseudo-academic?
Regarding his art collection, he has talked about this a great deal in various books and interviews. Are you familiar with his telling of why he collects such art?
I'm also baffled as to why you think he's in favour of hate speech laws. He became famous for opposing compelled speech laws and policies in Canada - could you explain why you think his position is the opposite of his track record for the last 10 or so years?
All genuine questions, I'd like to understand how you arrived at your views.
This is acceptable to TPTB because his Masters who allow him to accumulate wealth are the same people who allow him a huge public profile and are the same people who ruled the early USSR
Where’s all the Nazi art since he loves banging on about evil Hitler the Totalitarian dictator
He worked for the UN a Supranational organisation, its charter written by communist Alger Hiss
His degrees are in the pseudo scientific Social Sciences
Political Science and Psychology have done very little to improve society but much to harm it
The covid scam was enabled by psychological operations
Political Science gives us what we have now as far as government goes
He self censors by careful omission
If he believed in truth he wouldn’t do this You could ask him if all those people jailed in Germany for doubting a certain narrative should be released
My question was: Are you familiar with his telling of why he collects such art?
I noticed you switched from 'pseudo academic' to 'pseudo scientific'. As I have a Social Science degree myself, I cannot agree that the discipline is not legitimate. But I'm obviously biased ;)
"... Baroness Philippa Stroud, as well as former Australian Prime Ministers John Howard and Tony Abbott..."
Any of these establishment figures, and indeed the entire establishment is inimical to humanity, as such is morally repugnant, and is therefore criminal. This applies especially to all parliamentarians of every state, and every level of government and the bureaucracy, both the active as well as the retired. If/when there will be a just and proper reckoning, the only acceptable pronouncement should be that all these criminals are found guilty of the most heinous crimes against humanity, and as such have forfeited the right and privilege to remain among us - neither freely, nor incarcerated.
Yes spot on with ARC more red flags there than a communist ball. Is it a suprise Topher interviews proud zionist avi yemeni? or that the board of ARC are most likely 100% zionist, just for the record the zionists are the ones that backstabbed the world , and sadly many so called australians don't even know what a zionist is , again for the record a new word for communist maybe they are planning a hit on someone who knows ..
Thanks for linking the videos Bob, I hadn't seen them.
That said, why do you think Topher should not interview Avi Yemeni?
If we only interview people with whom we agree on 100% of things all the time, we will become hopelessly siloed. This is the opposite of what good media/journos are supposed to do - they are supposed to engage with many aspects of an issue, test information on its merits, and allow readers/watchers to come to their own conclusions.
Not sure why but i can't find my reply ? this was a video i meant to post , I implore people to see what's going on here.. remove those rose coloured glasses..
The complete and utter hypocrisy of it all is that our government has been broadcasting false information on a regular basis for at least as long as the 9-11 false flag event - all the way through to the Sars Cov 2 plandemic and it's experimental injections all the while claiming they're safe and effective while it's perfectly clear they never were safe and effective [so there was no need to take them in the first place.]
Why do we still let these people ruin our lives and livelihoods?
Even though there are far more of us then them - Collectively we're scared of government's bullies in uniforms.
"Why do we still let these people ruin our lives and livelihoods?"
While we keep working for them and earning and spending their money on their completely worthless but extremely polluting goods and toxic faux-food substances, while we keep paying them taxes, while we keep taking out insurance policies for every risk however banal and improbable to keep enriching their insurance/financial overlords, while we willingly keep their surveillance devices and protocols monitoring our every heartbeat, and while we keep participating in their sham "democracy" and voting for them in their fraudulent elections, they just keep ruining our lives, buying their F-35s and nuclear attack submarines and generally building up their militaries to threaten us and cow us into obedience to keep milking us, fleecing us and extracting from us, and from the more thoroughly indoctrinated and habituated children whom they have been diligently cultivating to be the upcoming, more compliant generation of people to ruin even more thoroughly.
ALL the Five Eyes and more - are totally captured....
Yuri Bezmenov told us all back in 1984.
Russia had no idea it would be so easy, to infiltrate, r-educate and dominate. It's so easy to control the curriculum, then the minds of future generations. The subversion has been so successful and so easy since WW2
Good points - In the end our taxes are wasted on lie based wars for corporate profits while young lives are needlessly sent into harms ways just like they did during the first world war - see - Policy of Deceit: Britain’s Treachery Over Palestine Laid Bare - https://www.globalresearch.ca/britain-treachery-palestine-laid-bare/5830893 ]
Which goes to show that our ''government'' has been lying to us on a ongoing basis.
Truth is the first casualty in any war is certainly true.
Government has a suspicious reluctance to tax the financial elite like they ought to be - instead they borrow from them and then promise to repay that amount with interest which is impossible.
''....Whenever a business firm borrows big money - the creditor obtains - an influence in management to protect its investment - like a business - no government can borrow big money unless that government is willing to surrender - to the creditor - some of its sovereignty - suddenly international bankers who have loaned hundreds of Billions of dollars to governments around the world command considerable influence in the policies of such government''.[ From a speech by MLK jr]
It only appears logical that this is why our Western government[s] are pimping the defense forces in order to please the insatiable greed of the financial elite.
However - how do we turn this around when we do not have the support of the uniformed?
In a way we're just as spineless as the Canberra poodle club's inability unwillingness reluctance to stand up to Washington's dog's of war.
Collectively we're scared of the uniformed bullies.
Watch what petersen does not say, he is paid well to control things, and he will never say who it is behind this, because he is a liar by omission much the same as all media these days, this site excluded, John Howard pedophile enabler Traitor and Criminal , ask him about the supression orders on 28 government pedos ? 5G causing corona virus ? What is the corona effect ? I'd take a parachute just in case the pilots sort of passout or something, not withstanding that good luck..
Can't see who finances ARC. No info on website. JP was influential in persuading many naive young 12-rules-for-lifers to take the experimental jabs, many of whom now probably have damaged hearts. He's also clearly a globalist. Crenshaw is a snake. The environmentalists still believe in man-made global warming. Wouldn't trust any of them. Don't like over-use of term "controlled opposition" but I suspect they are just that.
Could you provide a link to JP persuading young people to take jabs? I never saw this.
Also, why do you think there is no man made global warming? My understanding is that some of the moderates eg: Michael Shellenberger and Bjorn Lomborg believe that there is a man made element but it's nowhere near the apocalypse that the climate activists say it is. Hence, they take a more environmentalist approach and tend to prefer nuclear for stable Western energy. I'm interested to know why you don't trust people who hold this position?
As a public influencer with millions of naive young followers, especially males, announcing publicly you're going to get the jab would have led many of those young people to follow his example don't you think?
My views on why AGW is not happening, off the top of my head in a few sentences:
- rate on the whole decreasing since 2000s, despite a few peaks here and there
- satellite data since 1978 show 0,13 C increase per decade in troposphere and no identifiable hotspot (ICCP AR 5) as predicted
- mild since beginning of industrial era (+0,85 Celsius only since 1850)
In other words, despite huge increase in CO2 emissions since 1850 (=baseline they use). there has been no significant warming and probably none at all (if they stopped fudging the figures). Moreover,
- GW = normal in interglacial period
- Relationship between CO2 and temp = logarithmic - curve flattens at a point so 800ppms - i.e. doubling present CO2 levels (which is not going to happen) would mean 1,2 degree Celsius increase in temp, no more, i.e. nothing to worry about.
- CO2 lags temperature, not the opposite.
- Change the baseline to, say, Roman times, you'd get global cooling.
Last but not least, AGW invented by same as those who invented pandemic. Two agendas inextricably linked.
Re the last line - agree. A power group had suddenly found the way to profit and control. As our Chief Health Officer said during the massive Melbourne lockdown, these lockdowns were going to help us get used to the climate lockdowns that were to come.
An ultruistic (if you like) response to intentionally generated fear.
No, I don't agree that a person stating what medical treatment they want to get for themselves is the same thing as "persuading young people" to take the same treatment.
Your argument is what the hate speech censors use to hold random twitter users responsible for the actions of other unrelated randoms, thereby justifying censorship of all sorts of speech that 'might influence people' to do this, that or the other.
I'd also be looking for a public acknowledgement of his change of position, and reasoning. As this is new information to me, I don't have the context yet, but will be keeping an eye out!
Initially he didn't invoke that argument - i.e. get vax to get your freedom back - but because he was in poor shape & had "low antibody levels". That was when he was coming off the booze.
"Persuade" is both a transitive and intransitive verb. I was not claiming he made a deliberate effort to persuade people to get the jabs, but that as a public influencer with millions of followers his message was likely to persuade many to get it. Re. 2nd para, you are arguing for self-censorship.
To understand your second point I would need you to explain it, as I cannot see a logical through line from my opposition of censorship to your conclusion that I am arguing for censorship.
Correction: I said you were arguing for SELF-censorship.
My initial claim (not argument):
"JP was influential in persuading many naive young 12-rules-for-lifers to take the experimental jabs, many of whom now probably have damaged hearts."
Your response:
"Your argument is what the hate speech censors use to hold random twitter users responsible for the actions of other unrelated randoms, thereby justifying censorship of all sorts of speech that 'might influence people' to do this, that or the other."
My interpretation of your response:
An irresponsible false claim is good fodder for hate speech censors to discredit others. So logically, I should be careful what I say.
Always interested in your work, you're success is deservedly growing. You're getting the word out even though they're trying to slow you and others down.
They're actually conditioning us not to be lazy and accept what they throw at us. We have to go looking for truth and interesting information.
We’ve been shadow banned on YouTube for a few years now, our subscribers have only grown marginally in this time. Filtered to invisibility is probably a gift, though. We are still uploading content there but we’re building new communities and strengthening old ones outside the industrial media complex.
Hope your cold brings you the gift of deep rest, Rebekah. You have an incredible energy to your outputs and missives.
Sep 1, 2023·edited Sep 1, 2023Liked by Rebekah Barnett
I'm sick too. We got 'thraxed!
High-octane speculation: the US election variant is circulating.
In any case, I am having the same symptoms I had in Feb 2020 when my friend was stretchered off the plane from Barcelona and EXPERTS SAID 'covid was not in Australia.' No respiratory issues, just headache and tired. Last time though I lost my sense of smell and taste for 6 months and had an exanthem like a smallpox victim. Now, the horsepaste and vitamins have made it mild and I'm good to go. Thank you Drs Zelenko and Immanuel.
But yeah. This is exactly the same.
Edit: can you ask Howard about the WMDs, Julian Assange and fiream laws as they relate to us being kidnapped from our homes and put in 'medi-hotels' during the state of emergency? While many of us are armed, if we were better armed they would not have tried that. His opinion on what he has ushered in would be most interesting. Can the old coot see what he has done now that the social compact is utterly shattered? Maybe play him composite videos of citizens being kidnappend and bashed.
Everyone knows about the US election fraud and can see it. The evidence is overwhelming. Unfortunately there is no mechanism for peaceful justice when the judicary is captured - even Justice Thomas opined as such in his ruling, and when he says so, you know there are severe issues. The US will have to start here: https://www.archives.gov/founding-docs/declaration-transcript
Sep 2, 2023·edited Sep 2, 2023Liked by Rebekah Barnett
It's worth delving deeper into the climate hoax matter..........I understand, it's hard to take on board if you've swallowed the propaganda, box and dice....... so think of a bunch of people who think of us as their pawns... it will come easier to imagine...... when WEFers KNOW.... the very BEST and EASIEST way to manipulate behaviour is to make people dead scared — nay, terrified...... It's easier to control people who are Casualties.Of.Terror, or, C.O.T. cases
This creation has been a long time in the making......... but it was at Rio's 1992 Earth Summit that got it's skates on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earth_Summit the UN hands it's dirty hands in every pie now
Many scientists said the claims were false from the get go.
Forget tenure ; forget funding; forget any debate of science - that was thrown out the window and scientist too (so to speak) if you dared - or to THIS DAY, dare, speak out. Those retired, or nearly so, who spoke out, were just ghosted.......
you could lay the plans of Climate Change and the pandemic side by side — same template.
Along with it, came the eradicating via, ghosting, as mentioned, maligning and smearing any credibility, by anyone of sound ethics merely seeking robust discussion.
Due to lack of co-operation by the weather, the term "Global Warming" had to be deleted without fanfare, and immediately replaced with "Climate Change" (like none of us would notice) Gotta wonder what dunderhead came up with such a stupid heading - like the climate never changes....... but I get it was embrassing that those dam Maldives, just. would. not go. under. water......... nor any of the Pacidic Islands that were predicted to by 2012.
My position on these things is usually moderate. eg: Covid. Beat up out of all proportion, largely gross propaganda, deadly protocols, harmful interventions. Nevertheless, some people did get sick, probably from a virus called SARS-Cov-2 (I know some ppl refute this and I have been attacked as 'controlled opposition' for not firmly staking my flag in the land of 'no virus'). So, the fact that it was a beat up doesn't mean that there was no Covid. I take a similar view with Climate ideology. Ridiculous modelling, illusion of consensus where there is none, but at the same time environmentalism is an admirable aim (a la Shellenberger, Lombor). I really like Shellenberger's book Apocalypse Never, have you read it? All my views are loosely held, so I will change them if I am exposed to better information and thoroughly convinced.
Re: C19....... I stand in the same camp, and prefer to have the "no virus" argument later; to waste our time on this matter now? ....while they STILL pushing Experimental Gene Tech(enology)..... aka "vax" is, IMO, rearranging the proverbial deck chairs while people are horrendously maimed and dying.
Dr Judy Mikovits was interviewed by Epoch Times, March 2020........ it seems there was likely a leak due to ongoing shabby practices - the main reason why the GOF Lab at Fort Detrick was taken off shore.... As WEFer Klaus said, what an opportunity! We must take advantage of (manufacturing and enhancing) the crisis to accelerate our Agenda.
For my part, I think they muddied the waters about the leak, while claiming seasonal flu "was gone - not here" - as Brett Sutton CHO Victoria said. By insisting on high PCR cycle thresholds, they got their burgeoning numbers of false positives, thereby manufacturing "proof" by decption of their "deadly" pandemic to leverage mass behaviours of the public.
Esteemed USA pathologist, Dr Ryan Cole, says he CAN differentiate pathology samples in cadavers, to denote whether they died of C19 infection, the circulating virus in some tissues can be identified as S1 ( or, Spike 1) or the vaccination spike, know as S2. As there is a distinct clinical difference, SARS Cov2 infection therefore must surely exist - though hardly the cause of every death they claimed.
Re: the Environment. Yes, I have his book - it's next in my pile to read. Toatal greenie here for 6 decades. Read Rachel Carson's "Silent Spring" as a child, and became an immediate active advocate. Vinegar and bi-carb for cleaning, a swat instead of fly spray.... many, many, things.... Our household embraced green practices before they became "a thing" and was a point of discussion over many meals with people. Some changed their practices as well, others not.... Also, from the 60s, we understood, and prefered the stability of glass over toxic unstable plastics, while also avoiding any fluoride and teflon products. Now my children teach theirs the same..... my endless and oft annoying motto being "We must do all we can to take care of our precious Earth - good planets are hard to find!"
To this day, I still love the American Indian tribal philosophy, that
"None of us inherit the land, we borrow it from our children".
We were totally sucked in by all the Global Warming propaganda to begin with - but we had already retro-fitted our house, recycling water n everything we possibly could, then were exposed to retired Nordic scientist who outlined "the capture" of his UN team - none of whem he considered adequately qualified for the job. He resigned in disgust...... then we dug deeper.... what a rabbit hole!
A couple of things that defy reason.....
Here in Victoria, as you know, the lockdowns went to absurd, Attila-The-Hun levels. Couldn't travel beyond 5 ks from home. Outdoor excercise limited to one hour a day. No visitors to your home ect., BUT.....and I am seriously NOT kidding.......
brothels remained open!
Meanwhile, all first world countries, going hand over fist to shut down coal, while there are NO demands on China's reduction of CO2. I read, China, now opens an average of 10 MORE coal fired stations year thus far!
If anyone knew anything about modern coal fired plants, their improvements for environmental protection HAS been immense, when first installed 50 years ago, with those huge bell shaped, electro-static converter chimneys, meant that those big bell shaped chimneys that the media, to this day, often footage promoted as "evidence of pollution" — it is well known that the "smoke" is largely STEAM with extremely low levels of ANY pollution at all.
We should commit to improving things all the time — to enhance our environment and keep it clean, but to lobby for net zero, is sad proof of how poorly educated school leavers have become. Zero carbon dioxide = Death.
Carbon dioxide IS THE STUFF OF LIFE......... plants and trees will thrive on it and give us our bounty..... temps may rise a little again - just as the ice cores have proven this is by no means a disaster as portrayed.
AGW is very much a moot argument, according to many scientists.
All our youth are being misled with this new "religico-pseudo-science" and frightened to the point of despair; too many now denying themselves the joy of a lovely family.
Our msm schedule WAS named TV "Programming" for a reason.
But as we all know, never spoil a good story with the facts - especially when WEFers have to corale us into certain beliefs, then behaviours, for THEIR desired outcomes.
Thanks Rebekah for all you are doing. I just read in the comments you mentioned you are not joining, just covering it. Good news to hear.
Some of my misgivings about 'ARC'...
What a play on words - get on board the ARC. But I thought it wasn’t an emergency? And is it everyone, or just the 'influential' people that are approved for the saving? ARC, the Alliance for Responsible Citizenry. Now if that doesn't sound like social engineering, totalitarian, meddling then what does? How to train people to be responsible...alas not even people, but citizens...
The ARC seems like a palatable narrative for the fourth industrial revolution. I feel like you can tell this by looking at the people involved. The Great Reset can't go through without Climate change... JP pushing a 'nicer' narrative here, but not a true narrative. Bjorn Lomberg, that JP keeps flogging as the greatest knowledge on climate change...in fact believes in and pushes the idea of man-made global warming, which is a patent lie...so what is going on? Clearly NOT such an expert when the basic lie of man-made climate change is not only not discounted but embraced.
But who runs ARC?
Paul Marshall is one of the three directors...the previous company was 'Prosperity UK' before changing its name to ARC, and was involved in Brexit. That is some influence. Marshall started the first and now largest UK hedge fund - his idea? Not likely, as it was half funded by none other than George Soros, an unquestionable veritable cancer on the face of every country in the world, the one responsible for colour riots throughout the world, among many many other civilisation destroying activities. Paul Marshall's other companies are heavily involved in UK education policy - think woke, social justice agenda. Paul Marshall was also heavily involved in the setup, and financing of Legatum, a social engineering company, several representatives of which are, on the ARC. And who is Legatum? Basically, a company investing in slavery, among other initiatives such as open borders, and family interference – Soros again. And associated via its directorship with The End Fund, backed by, Gates foundation, Rothschilds, and all the other arch villains. All geared for government interference in lives, and particularly in the family. But isn’t JP against that? There are even WEF global young leaders on ARC. But where are the regular peasants, the people without money, without connections?
And isn't it ever so interesting how we are to believe that JP just 'organically' came up with this idea? All on his own.
What does JP say toward the end…”probably we’re interested in” [clambering up the power hierarchy and take all the control for yourself] “to the degree that we are all unrepentant narcissists”. But don't we all know (and JP most definitely does know) that (we are all unrepentant narcissists) is to a very high degree. And almost no-one is immune. This seems like the same shell game. It looks like the WEF narrative of fear and terror has been decommissioned in favour of the ARC vision of soft glove stranglehold totalitarianism.
ARC mostly sounds great on the face of it. Is it not supposed to? After-all, they want to provide a ‘compelling’ narrative. Unfortunately, the whole thing is backed by all the same bad guys, the same tyrants. So, what is really happening here?
For more information see Amazing Polly vids on this topic...
Hi Diane, I put this question to Kerrylyn above and would like to put it to you too:
Why do you think there is no man made global warming? My understanding is that some of the moderates eg: Michael Shellenberger and Bjorn Lomborg believe that there is a man made element but it's nowhere near the apocalypse that the climate activists say it is. Hence, they take a more environmentalist approach and tend to prefer nuclear for stable Western energy.
Also wondering, where was it said that JP came up with ARC on his own? I've never come across that before, although I do recall him talking about responsible citizenship explicitly in November last year (I mention it in The Aussie Wire video).
Apologies in advance for my long-winded response to your questions...
Indeed, you are correct. I don’t believe it has been said that JP came up with ARC on his own. In fact from memory he makes reference to ‘we’ right the way through. Everything (from memory) in the ARC seem like concepts JP has mentioned in varying forms in interviews with people over time. Therefore, to me, it seems (on the face of it) that the ARC ‘concepts’ are mostly his idea and are being promoted as mostly his ideas (of how things ought to work). What I was trying (very badly) to convey is that while, despite the references to ‘we’, the ARC concepts seem to be the brainchild mainly of JP, thought up over time. And yet, it also seems evident that there is a force behind this ARC and the whole arrangement feels contrived and orchestrated. The upshot is the same ‘royal ‘we’’ have GOBSAT (Good old boys sat around a table) for the good of the world. Are we to accept that an organisation chock full of politicians, influencers, entrepreneurs, and ‘Climate change’ ‘experts’ (but zero peasant representation) has organically sprung up, is a benevolent force for good, with Jordan Peterson as the frontman. Comfortingly JP states emphatically at one point that depopulation is ‘off the table’. Nice, but there is no way I expect him to stand by that, and it will be reneged quicker than you can blink. Even if he really cared, (and it is not at all evident that JP cares more about people then about fame, money or his ego) he is only the frontman for this ARC after-all.
Regarding Climate change. To clarify, I mention ‘manmade climate change’ as synonymous with the current branding capital ‘C’ ‘Climate change’ as distinct from ‘native’ climate change which is a real phenomenon. As far as I have read we don’t have the science to know whether or not earth warming (or cooling) can be attributed to the activities of man.
I don’t think any actual scientist believes the climate models to be remotely accurate. We have the ice cores that apparently show that CO2 follows warming by around 800 years, not the other way round, as has been erroneously promoted. We have temperature measurements, but based on what I have read any change measured is not accurate to within the uncertainty. Not only is the measurement not meaningfully representative of its locale but even less so of the entire earth at any given time. We just don’t understand atmospheric science enough to be able to confidently say what is actually happening or what it really means. Even-so, the relatively recent measurements we do have – think a hundred years – do not in any way show that there is warming (or cooling) happening that is particularly different from temperatures that occurred in history. The ice cores show that the earth heats up and cools down periodically. We don’t understand why. It seems that solar flares play a major role which makes sense because the sun is our only source of external energy. Based on the template of life we observe in living things, it also makes sense that the earth would have its own ‘biological clock’. We don’t remotely understand our own biological rhythms, that occurs in every cell, let alone what the earth might be doing.
In relation to CO2 specifically, if it can keep heat in, then it keeps heat out at a similar rate. If our main source of energy is the sun, how are we heating up? Dr John Clauser is an atmospheric physicist, who, unlike so many others is actually an expert in the relevant field. To the extent possible, he understands that climate (changes) occur as a function of cloud cover, which is self-regulating.
If I asserted the sky is falling, in a sane world I would be asked for evidence. If I had no evidence, except to say that it 'seems the sky periodically drops a few feet every so often', rightly, my claim would be fully dismissed. We wouldn’t stand around discussing it as though somehow my imaginings could be a possibility. Of the four ways of learning, Devine revelation, Intuition, Experience, or Logic and Reason, Climate change was discovered via none of these. It is a merely a belief. Maybe I ought not have stated ‘Climate change is a patent lie’ rather that ‘Climate change’ is in no way proven, or even reasonable, therefore whoever is promoting any form of it is patently lying.
Like most other people (I suppose) I thought man was obviously destroying the planet. We are polluting the earth without restraint, so of course we must be causing Climate change. I hadn’t thought it through. Everyone said Climate change was real, so that must be true, right? I learned in primary school there was a hole in the ozone layer. I remember the scare mongering. BTW where did the hole go? But like the theory of evolution – if you throw in enough time, anything can evolve. But if we see a TV in the middle of nowhere, our first thought is ‘someone was here’, not ‘how many millions of years did it take for this TV to evolve?’ As was evident in the case of Covid, where many people accepted that an injection given to one person would somehow protect another person, people’s brains often simply accept an erroneous connection that is fed to them. That we are disgusting polluters, doesn’t at all mean the pollution is changing the climate. They are two separate things. But I didn’t realise that through science. It was when the Covid fraud happened, I was inadvertently and suddenly red-pilled on ‘Climate change’ by realising that the people pushing the Climate movement – staging people like Greta Thunberg, a WEF puppet for fake arrests for example - are the very same people behind Covid, the very same people behind Ukraine, the very same monsters behind the WHO, the UN and most of this world’s misery. In the 1970s they pushed Global freezing. A few decades later it became Global warming. Now it is ‘Climate change’. They keep rebranding. What are the chances of there being an active psyop AND a genuine emergency? They had to advertise Covid 24/7.
There are plenty of scientists denying ‘Climate change’ (man-made change). But if the spectre is removed, we are free. Whoever controls the spectres controls the narrative.
When evil Andrews was practically inciting violence, stating that the uninjected could not be part of the economy, he wanted us dead. At that moment it occurred to me there will come a day when the public will be asked to choose who ought to be sacrificed to keep the earth alive, for the greater good. Most of the population chose poorly during Covid, a ‘virus’ not proven to exist, for a disease with a 0.3% IFR. If people believe the earth is dying because it is overpopulated how much more willing will they be to go along with plans to eradicate those who don’t comply?
For me the lies make the science redundant. But of course, the science doesn’t add up. The story is a fiction. Apart from that, I am a Chistian. God told us to ‘go and multiply’. He didn’t tell us to second guess how much room there was to work with. We have more than enough land. It is our understanding that is limited, not the earth.
Having said all of that, I do believe that we can ultimately cause earth’s destruction, just not in the way those that want to control the narrative say. The Bible tells us that ‘the whole creation has been groaning as in the pains of childbirth right up to the present time’ and in the last days there will be many earthquakes. I believe our moral decay has led us to this place, and the consequences we see. I believe the earth is turning on the back of our relationship to, and acknowledgement of, our creator, and that this relationship is being undermined now more than ever. Will our own disowner-ship of God directly break the earth apart or will it instead play out as the evil of unfettered murderous technology that our Godlessness allowed? Certainly, the problem is not ‘Climate change’ and most certainly not an excess of CO2.
Thanks for taking the time to share your reasoning Diane, I appreciate the insight. I think we agree on a lot of details but probably arrive at somewhat divergent conclusions.
When you say, "ARC and the whole arrangement feels contrived and orchestrated", I would say, well yes. If you want to get any organisation off the ground, you have to organise and co-ordinate it. In a past life I was an operations manager, so I know how much 'contrivance' and 'orchestration' goes in to achieving small things, let alone big things! I find the expectation that global movements, especially resistance movements, can consistently spring up out of nowhere and sustain themselves indefinitely without organisation or financing somewhat naive.
When you say it's not evident that JP 'cares', I would argue that his professional history going back at least 20 years indicates that he does, and that he typically puts principle over personal gain. As it happens, this has worked out quite well for him, although he may lose his professional licence for it. I'm happy to be wrong on that, I suppose we will see. But as he has been so consistent over time (albeit human), in my estimation, I think the least likely scenario is one where he suddenly is revealed to be a disingenuous shill motivated purely by self interest.
I am certain there is a lot we agree on, and at the core of it, want the same outcome. Of course, a global organisation, or any organisation for that matter that gets off the ground is more than likely contrived.
If ARC had come about via an organisation that has fought tooth and nail for freedom, and against injections such as Organic consumers association to name but one example, then motives wouldn’t be in question. But these organisations bank accounts get closed, their activities are constantly interfered with, they are incessantly vilified by MSM, and every step they take is a feat. Instead we have an organisation made up effectively solely of politicians, influencers, and wealthy people. What possible excuse can there be for this? It is already corrupted before it begins. The trajectory cannot be anywhere good for the common man. Considering the people behind it, and funding sources being ultimately one and the same as the current tyrants surely this demonstrates ARC’s nefarious nature.
I would say partnering with the devil to beat the devil is highly misguided. I would expect an esteemed psychology professor such as JP to eat this concept for breakfast. And I find it beyond belief that he knows so little of his business partners as to not connect the dots here. After-all he has numerous friends from all walks, and he is a smart and genuine guy, right? So then, is JP in league with the devil, or does he somehow think the movement can pull itself up by its own bootstraps out of the mire from which it was formed to in fact do good, or is he simply a lacky frontman promised a front row seat?
Conceivably this is exactly what these monsters would do. It is a sales tactic. Provide people two options to give the impression of choice, and they will be happy choose one of them.
I sincerely hope I’m wrong about JP. It was devastating for me when he fell from my grace, and not an easy thing to accept.
Great post Diane. On CC/AGW, as I replied to Rebekah, you only need a few simple facts to demonstrate that CO2 emissions are having negligible to no effect on earth's climate. You may be aware that one of JP's claim to fame is his role as editor of IPCC reports. My guess is that he co-edited the policy statements. He is not qualified to edit chapters of the report itself, unless he was a copy-editor - and no way he'd admit that. I'd be interested to see whether his edits dialled up or down the fear-mongering. The IPCC reports are not so alarmist really, maybe more in recent years. (I used to work for OECD which made extensive contributions to the reports and participated actively in Rio Summit & follow-up.) I am thinking JP may be more of a puppet than anything else; tptb, aware of his weaknesses/vulnerability, latched onto him from the start; and - as smart as he thinks he is - he hasn't yet cottoned on; or maybe I'm being too kind!
The increase in temperature predated the increase in CO2. Also, climate science seems about as honest as covid "science", in addition to having the same supporters. It's quite the coincidence that the globalists who want a lower population also support reducing plant food (CO2).
The climate is being increasingly engineered & manipulated. The focus & promotion of "climate change" as being caused by carbon emissions is a distraction away from the real causes. The same entities are behind both the creation of the problem, & providers of the "solution".
Anthropogenic warming was/is a very interesting academic idea, but I recognised the idea had been captured by large power in December 2006, at the moment that John Howard proposed nuclear power for Australia. The rhetoric flipped. Suddenly "anthropogenic warming" became absolutely real in the mainstream media, where prior, it was an interesting discussion. Big power had suddenly found a way to profit, and all that was needed was the engineering of public opinion. At that point, although I was always in favour of non-harmful risk mitigation, I began to look for reasons for it to be a scam. I read the 3rd Climate model, found basic reasons to doubt "the science", and my balance of doubt has only grown. Have you read The Ethical Skeptic's piece on the subject - rather compelling case for the oceans being warmed from below?
Yeah, I don't vibe with JP. John Howard, who coincidentally happened to be in Washington DC on 911, is in the ARC? And Tony Abbott, who coincidentally happened to be in Bali during the second Bali bombings, is in the ARC? Maybe they were both set up to ensure they joined in with wars ;)
Of course I'm desperate for pro-freedom voices after what we've just been through, but the way you paint that looks like just another arm of power.
I absolutely loved JP until I realised something was off and inconsistent with his messaging. He appears to get cancelled but really doesn't - his utubes are never cancelled rather promoted, his tours are never cancelled - he had zero problem in Australia and even spoke to Australian parliament - and is more popular than ever. He went to Russia ostensibly to get saved from a benzo addiction sickness but also apparently due to a diet of meat and vegetables...(?) When he came back he suddenly becomes the voice of the world. He explores the bible in depth but is not a Christian. He's a poster boy for free speech yet wants people censored on Twitter, and got quite nasty about it. He exudes humility until he is questioned, then basically morphs into the biggest dick imaginable. He collected, and had a house full of Communist art for years until his recent fame...apparently to remind him of the atrocities Communism causes. Who does that? Too many things that don't add up. I don't exactly know who JP is, but I do know he is not quite what he purports to be hence I have distanced myself.
Your comments are spot on. I appreciated him in the beginning when he was some obscure prof at McGill opposing gender pronoun bs., but his sudden rise to fame seems to have gone to his head. As for his benzo addiction, load of crap I say. He was on much more than that. Benzos are easy to get off. 2 weeks cold turkey and you're fine. I think the diet was extreme keto which you can't survive on especially if you're already a skinny little wimp like him. Wimp, wanker & word-salader would be my way to describe him, married to a wearer-of-the-pants-woman - his biggest problem imo.
And it provides water as well, during the same catabolic process. But let's not over-generalize. Gluconeogenesis is a great and even ample reserve resource, but I'm not so sure it should be the primary one.
But I'll gladly welcome being put right if I'm mistaken, of course.
What if he wasn't addicted to anything but was being reprogrammed overseas by his handlers? Did he look well when he returned like his problems were behind him?
Remember when Dan Andrews disappeared for months after "falling down stairs" and returned more tyrannical than ever? What happened during that time and why wasn't the media curious?
That he and his ilk are still there in office, and still allowed to move freely should be a gushing fountain of humiliation to Melburnians (Melbournites? Melbournonians?), and to Victorians, and to all Australians as well.
I think Labor only got something like 30% of the vote. But there's complicated rigging of preferences and there were reports of unusual processes in vote counting by observers who didn't seem to have any way to report cheating. Perhaps the concept of scrutinineers depends on having a vote counters who are too ashamed to cheat when being watched. So it's obsolete now.
P.S. In case anyone misinterprets my last comment, I'm all for women's rights but not for dominating one's partner, whether that person be male or female.
Congratulations on the growing publicity your work is garnering Rebecca. Your making waves and drawing much needed attention to these shots.
Any accolades or followings for you are well earnt and deserved.
Respectfully, I would take a closer look at ARC, before committing to joining.
There are some serious conflicts of interest, historical machinations and political maneuvering by its founding members.
Remembering many totalitarian and dictatorships have utilised idealistic NGOs, and such groups to control growing movements. SAGE was a recent example of "controlled opposition" but they certainly did
not invent the term, it was coined decades ago.😉🤐
Your clever and I respect your ability to critically assess information but there are some serious alarm bells going off with ARC. Please do your due diligence, because globally the gloves are coming off and we are now getting down to the serious part. Things are about to get a lot more heavier handed.🙏🙏
Hi, thanks for your comment - I am covering the forum, not joining. So anything I observe will be reported to my followers and those of The Aussie Wire.
🙏🙏🤦♀️ Sorry for the misread! Thought it said you'd been asked to become a member of ARC. I'm very glad to know that your eagle eyes and courageous heart will be observing. My suggestion look for what JP is NOT saying (in between his word salads) and who is lingering around😉 BTJMO. Look at me, trying to teach you how to suck eggs!🤣😂🤣 🙏
Hi Rebekah. Douglas Murray should be asking for your autograph: he did not stand against the covid fascism and is morally in your shadow. While in London, maybe seek out Abi Roberts (Abi Daily podcast on substack): like our own Corey White, she’s a no-holds barred comedian and would be a great interview.
Very well said. 100%
Howard is no Australian patriot and Peterson is a globalist shill
I bet they both support laws against “hate speech “
No they do not.
John Howard is of a long gone era, that supports free speech; but he's from a time when government was, for the most part, reliable. He seems someone highly unlikely to question authority. He would likely be horrified, and deem it nonsense, to be red pilled and see what we all, so plainly see now. Unfortunately he belongs to yesterday's world and sadly, that secure phase has long gone.......
Peterson is a fantastic academic and clinician for free speech — now suspended for his stance on defending such free speech.
He often quotes, " I may not agree with you, but I'll absolutely, defend your right to say it"
He is against controlling speech / controlling language - he has been fighting this in Canadian academic circles for years now and speaking publicly on same.
He is all for people living their best possible life and serves as a fantastic advisor for young men today. His lectures are legendary and worth listening to time and again.
WEFers hate him - he makes far too much sense, and supports the notion of only two genders as well - you know, like we were all taught in science. WEFers hate that, so try to shut him down, Malign. Discredit - they even make up lies.
Peterson's forte is misdirection dressed up in a pseudo-academic word salad.
He didn't work at the UN for nothing. Do you like his commie art collection.?
Howard gifted us the GST, did that help provide small government ? It certainly added a huge burden to small business ( which is the natural enemy of Government ) All these slimy characters are in favour of "hate speech" laws which is their usual method of dressing up some oppressive law in flowery sweet sounding language
Peterson's eloquence is not misdirection. His art - his business; that makes an odd judgement - I couldn't care less about his art proclivities.
Peterson was not an employee of the UN. As he edited and advised on a paper nearly 10 years ago, it was a contract. A LOT has come to light since then and many have had an epiphany with regard to the takeover of the UN. Decades ago, when in my youthful early 40's, had a brief contract with the UN - if only l had known then what l know now!
The GST was going to be initiated by either side of the political aisle - the humungous burgeoning medical blowouts were not far off — with outdated hospital structures; ancient federal nursing homes to be largely demolished, in preferece for "lifestyle villages"; mid-boomers with their fifties looming, often getting sicker with every passing year; ever mounting unemployment and disability demands....... the list went on .... and it still does.
The Austalian voter gifted us - yes, we, ourselves — the GST — Howard went to the pollls with that and won the 1998 election.
No one said the GST meant to provide small government.
How do you claim GST was "a huge burden to small business"?
Our family businesses did not find GST a burden - merely a change.
How can small business be "the natural enemy of Government" when small businesses bring in the majority of the revenue?
Howard was a REAL treasurer. Took our taxes and took care of how they were spent. A good money manager - as was Paul Keating. He left with a GENUINE surplus. NOT a deficit.
I would say that increasing various nit -pikety taxes over the last 15 years or so, make running a small business much more difficult; but those taxes are separate to GST. It does seem like the government is crushing small businesses now ....... like govt WANTS them to go... especially how they were pressured to close during the lockdowns, sadly, many went under. Marriages broke up — ALL over utter LIES — not science.
I reiterate, Peterson NOR Howard are in favour of hate speech laws.
No, that's not what happened with the GST at all.
John Hewson went to the polls with the GST, Paul Keating revved up fear on it and he won the unwinnable election - the "sweetest of victories".
John Howard said there would "never, ever" be a GST because the voters killed it at the last election. He went to the polls, won, and then he introduced it. That was the beginning of the truly shameless politician, and the failure of their being held to account.
Respectfully, I disagree........
Correct: Hewson went to the 1993 election with a GST and lost. We all remember the ridulous cake fiasco / example with Mike Willessee........
As an aside: Tax reform had been up for serious discussion, both in, and between the parties since the mid to late 70s. Labor had historically vehemently opposed it, although Keating tried to get the party behind a "consumption tax" (aka GST) back in 1985, when he failed miserably to convince his party members that tax reform was blindingly necessary, or the government would face mounting debt. Keating, being a pragmatist, could see it necessary, he failed to enrol party membership on the platform; the proposal being voted down, loyal Keating continued to carry the party line to promote party consensus on that issue.
1996: Howard WON the election with the "never ever be a GST" included in the tax reform. However it became obvious that various tax reforms were necessary for financial recovery
1998: Due to inherited debt from Labor, and the ongoing debate around complex tax reform, Howard went to the polls, standing on a GST platform and WON again.
Howard did not pass the GST as a solo effort. Parliamentary debate continued over the details. and after tax on food was withdrawn, it was passed by parliament. All sides knew tax reform was inevitable to conquer the debt.
Democracy in action.
2001 AND 2004: Howard was re-elected again, and again — as a vote of confidence in his fiscal mangement.
To this day, Howard is our longest standing Prime Minister; to the credit of that Liberal cabinet, not only was the debt repaid, but our coffers were in surplus, ready for the various federal projects planned, any of which were already underway.
Both Paul Keating and John Howard will be remembered in history, for their responsible management towards the finances of our country.
I have to say, I don't find JP pseudo-academic at all. I find him academic. Why do you think his style is pseudo-academic?
Regarding his art collection, he has talked about this a great deal in various books and interviews. Are you familiar with his telling of why he collects such art?
I'm also baffled as to why you think he's in favour of hate speech laws. He became famous for opposing compelled speech laws and policies in Canada - could you explain why you think his position is the opposite of his track record for the last 10 or so years?
All genuine questions, I'd like to understand how you arrived at your views.
Hello Rebekah
Peterson has Bolshevik art
This is acceptable to TPTB because his Masters who allow him to accumulate wealth are the same people who allow him a huge public profile and are the same people who ruled the early USSR
Where’s all the Nazi art since he loves banging on about evil Hitler the Totalitarian dictator
He worked for the UN a Supranational organisation, its charter written by communist Alger Hiss
His degrees are in the pseudo scientific Social Sciences
Political Science and Psychology have done very little to improve society but much to harm it
The covid scam was enabled by psychological operations
Political Science gives us what we have now as far as government goes
He self censors by careful omission
If he believed in truth he wouldn’t do this You could ask him if all those people jailed in Germany for doubting a certain narrative should be released
Hi Stefanatus,
My question was: Are you familiar with his telling of why he collects such art?
I noticed you switched from 'pseudo academic' to 'pseudo scientific'. As I have a Social Science degree myself, I cannot agree that the discipline is not legitimate. But I'm obviously biased ;)
Yes. Jordan Peterson wants to end internet anonymity, which is the same as being against free speech.
Well at least he's not a gun grabber. Some of the "conservatives" on the ARC are role models for the US Democrats and RINO neocons.
Apart from using a Tor browser none of us are anonymous to the data harvest.
"... Baroness Philippa Stroud, as well as former Australian Prime Ministers John Howard and Tony Abbott..."
Any of these establishment figures, and indeed the entire establishment is inimical to humanity, as such is morally repugnant, and is therefore criminal. This applies especially to all parliamentarians of every state, and every level of government and the bureaucracy, both the active as well as the retired. If/when there will be a just and proper reckoning, the only acceptable pronouncement should be that all these criminals are found guilty of the most heinous crimes against humanity, and as such have forfeited the right and privilege to remain among us - neither freely, nor incarcerated.
I am most certainly not overstating this.
There is something about a noose and a lamppost that springs to mind !
Yes spot on with ARC more red flags there than a communist ball. Is it a suprise Topher interviews proud zionist avi yemeni? or that the board of ARC are most likely 100% zionist, just for the record the zionists are the ones that backstabbed the world , and sadly many so called australians don't even know what a zionist is , again for the record a new word for communist maybe they are planning a hit on someone who knows ..
Thanks for linking the videos Bob, I hadn't seen them.
That said, why do you think Topher should not interview Avi Yemeni?
If we only interview people with whom we agree on 100% of things all the time, we will become hopelessly siloed. This is the opposite of what good media/journos are supposed to do - they are supposed to engage with many aspects of an issue, test information on its merits, and allow readers/watchers to come to their own conclusions.
Not sure why but i can't find my reply ? this was a video i meant to post , I implore people to see what's going on here.. remove those rose coloured glasses..
https://www.bitchute.com/video/wU5HfrTGH9Mz/
💯
How is Avi Yemeni "a zionist"?
I have been following the quest of the zionists for a good 50 years...... I don't get a whiff of zionism from him.....
Can you illuminate your thoughts with details?
Sorry avi yemeni is a self proclaimed (zionist) jew. as pere video above ..
https://odysee.com/@NO_EYES_ON_ME:2/Zionists:2 Avi is a self proclaimed jew, who brags about shooting palestinians in the face and heart , ignorance is not bliss, you may need some new channels to view i think? Max Igan avi yemeni is a zionist stooge..https://www.bitchute.com/video/CY0qbyu43V9k/
Thank you Bob. I will look at these soon.
No worries thanks for asking ..
The complete and utter hypocrisy of it all is that our government has been broadcasting false information on a regular basis for at least as long as the 9-11 false flag event - all the way through to the Sars Cov 2 plandemic and it's experimental injections all the while claiming they're safe and effective while it's perfectly clear they never were safe and effective [so there was no need to take them in the first place.]
Why do we still let these people ruin our lives and livelihoods?
Even though there are far more of us then them - Collectively we're scared of government's bullies in uniforms.
"Why do we still let these people ruin our lives and livelihoods?"
While we keep working for them and earning and spending their money on their completely worthless but extremely polluting goods and toxic faux-food substances, while we keep paying them taxes, while we keep taking out insurance policies for every risk however banal and improbable to keep enriching their insurance/financial overlords, while we willingly keep their surveillance devices and protocols monitoring our every heartbeat, and while we keep participating in their sham "democracy" and voting for them in their fraudulent elections, they just keep ruining our lives, buying their F-35s and nuclear attack submarines and generally building up their militaries to threaten us and cow us into obedience to keep milking us, fleecing us and extracting from us, and from the more thoroughly indoctrinated and habituated children whom they have been diligently cultivating to be the upcoming, more compliant generation of people to ruin even more thoroughly.
ALL the Five Eyes and more - are totally captured....
Yuri Bezmenov told us all back in 1984.
Russia had no idea it would be so easy, to infiltrate, r-educate and dominate. It's so easy to control the curriculum, then the minds of future generations. The subversion has been so successful and so easy since WW2
Good points - In the end our taxes are wasted on lie based wars for corporate profits while young lives are needlessly sent into harms ways just like they did during the first world war - see - Policy of Deceit: Britain’s Treachery Over Palestine Laid Bare - https://www.globalresearch.ca/britain-treachery-palestine-laid-bare/5830893 ]
Which goes to show that our ''government'' has been lying to us on a ongoing basis.
Truth is the first casualty in any war is certainly true.
Government has a suspicious reluctance to tax the financial elite like they ought to be - instead they borrow from them and then promise to repay that amount with interest which is impossible.
''....Whenever a business firm borrows big money - the creditor obtains - an influence in management to protect its investment - like a business - no government can borrow big money unless that government is willing to surrender - to the creditor - some of its sovereignty - suddenly international bankers who have loaned hundreds of Billions of dollars to governments around the world command considerable influence in the policies of such government''.[ From a speech by MLK jr]
It only appears logical that this is why our Western government[s] are pimping the defense forces in order to please the insatiable greed of the financial elite.
However - how do we turn this around when we do not have the support of the uniformed?
In a way we're just as spineless as the Canberra poodle club's inability unwillingness reluctance to stand up to Washington's dog's of war.
Collectively we're scared of the uniformed bullies.
The tiny dot - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H6b70TUbdfs
Watch what petersen does not say, he is paid well to control things, and he will never say who it is behind this, because he is a liar by omission much the same as all media these days, this site excluded, John Howard pedophile enabler Traitor and Criminal , ask him about the supression orders on 28 government pedos ? 5G causing corona virus ? What is the corona effect ? I'd take a parachute just in case the pilots sort of passout or something, not withstanding that good luck..
https://youtube.com/watch?v=r8tAMzYu1Mg&si=oMChtPyVjIpX9H9f
Jordan Peterson dismantled.
Can't see who finances ARC. No info on website. JP was influential in persuading many naive young 12-rules-for-lifers to take the experimental jabs, many of whom now probably have damaged hearts. He's also clearly a globalist. Crenshaw is a snake. The environmentalists still believe in man-made global warming. Wouldn't trust any of them. Don't like over-use of term "controlled opposition" but I suspect they are just that.
Could you provide a link to JP persuading young people to take jabs? I never saw this.
Also, why do you think there is no man made global warming? My understanding is that some of the moderates eg: Michael Shellenberger and Bjorn Lomborg believe that there is a man made element but it's nowhere near the apocalypse that the climate activists say it is. Hence, they take a more environmentalist approach and tend to prefer nuclear for stable Western energy. I'm interested to know why you don't trust people who hold this position?
https://youtu.be/Szcvhy0cp4A?si=_SNvrNPF-daNXCqW
"Get the damn vaccine".
Ooh I had not seen this. Thank you. That's disappointing.
As a public influencer with millions of naive young followers, especially males, announcing publicly you're going to get the jab would have led many of those young people to follow his example don't you think?
My views on why AGW is not happening, off the top of my head in a few sentences:
- rate on the whole decreasing since 2000s, despite a few peaks here and there
- satellite data since 1978 show 0,13 C increase per decade in troposphere and no identifiable hotspot (ICCP AR 5) as predicted
- mild since beginning of industrial era (+0,85 Celsius only since 1850)
In other words, despite huge increase in CO2 emissions since 1850 (=baseline they use). there has been no significant warming and probably none at all (if they stopped fudging the figures). Moreover,
- GW = normal in interglacial period
- Relationship between CO2 and temp = logarithmic - curve flattens at a point so 800ppms - i.e. doubling present CO2 levels (which is not going to happen) would mean 1,2 degree Celsius increase in temp, no more, i.e. nothing to worry about.
- CO2 lags temperature, not the opposite.
- Change the baseline to, say, Roman times, you'd get global cooling.
Last but not least, AGW invented by same as those who invented pandemic. Two agendas inextricably linked.
Re the last line - agree. A power group had suddenly found the way to profit and control. As our Chief Health Officer said during the massive Melbourne lockdown, these lockdowns were going to help us get used to the climate lockdowns that were to come.
An ultruistic (if you like) response to intentionally generated fear.
Hi Kerrylyn,
No, I don't agree that a person stating what medical treatment they want to get for themselves is the same thing as "persuading young people" to take the same treatment.
Your argument is what the hate speech censors use to hold random twitter users responsible for the actions of other unrelated randoms, thereby justifying censorship of all sorts of speech that 'might influence people' to do this, that or the other.
Having said that, I've just seen this, shared by RFC. 'Get the damn vaccine'. So, perhaps I am wrong. Disappointing to see that he said this.
https://youtu.be/Szcvhy0cp4A?si=_SNvrNPF-daNXCqW
I'm no JP fan but that's quite a cut video where he says 'get the damn vaccine'. I'd be looking for the context.
I'd also be looking for a public acknowledgement of his change of position, and reasoning. As this is new information to me, I don't have the context yet, but will be keeping an eye out!
Initially he didn't invoke that argument - i.e. get vax to get your freedom back - but because he was in poor shape & had "low antibody levels". That was when he was coming off the booze.
"Persuade" is both a transitive and intransitive verb. I was not claiming he made a deliberate effort to persuade people to get the jabs, but that as a public influencer with millions of followers his message was likely to persuade many to get it. Re. 2nd para, you are arguing for self-censorship.
I understand what you’re saying (first point).
To understand your second point I would need you to explain it, as I cannot see a logical through line from my opposition of censorship to your conclusion that I am arguing for censorship.
Correction: I said you were arguing for SELF-censorship.
My initial claim (not argument):
"JP was influential in persuading many naive young 12-rules-for-lifers to take the experimental jabs, many of whom now probably have damaged hearts."
Your response:
"Your argument is what the hate speech censors use to hold random twitter users responsible for the actions of other unrelated randoms, thereby justifying censorship of all sorts of speech that 'might influence people' to do this, that or the other."
My interpretation of your response:
An irresponsible false claim is good fodder for hate speech censors to discredit others. So logically, I should be careful what I say.
https://ia601605.us.archive.org/35/items/WeatherAsAForceMultiplier/WeatherAsAForceMultiplier.pdf
😀 Are you sure you want to follow? 🤣
Get better soon.
Always interested in your work, you're success is deservedly growing. You're getting the word out even though they're trying to slow you and others down.
They're actually conditioning us not to be lazy and accept what they throw at us. We have to go looking for truth and interesting information.
We’ve been shadow banned on YouTube for a few years now, our subscribers have only grown marginally in this time. Filtered to invisibility is probably a gift, though. We are still uploading content there but we’re building new communities and strengthening old ones outside the industrial media complex.
Hope your cold brings you the gift of deep rest, Rebekah. You have an incredible energy to your outputs and missives.
Get well mate, we need you fighting fit.
Keep up with the disinformation Rebekah.
I'm sick too. We got 'thraxed!
High-octane speculation: the US election variant is circulating.
In any case, I am having the same symptoms I had in Feb 2020 when my friend was stretchered off the plane from Barcelona and EXPERTS SAID 'covid was not in Australia.' No respiratory issues, just headache and tired. Last time though I lost my sense of smell and taste for 6 months and had an exanthem like a smallpox victim. Now, the horsepaste and vitamins have made it mild and I'm good to go. Thank you Drs Zelenko and Immanuel.
But yeah. This is exactly the same.
Edit: can you ask Howard about the WMDs, Julian Assange and fiream laws as they relate to us being kidnapped from our homes and put in 'medi-hotels' during the state of emergency? While many of us are armed, if we were better armed they would not have tried that. His opinion on what he has ushered in would be most interesting. Can the old coot see what he has done now that the social compact is utterly shattered? Maybe play him composite videos of citizens being kidnappend and bashed.
"High-octane speculation" 😅
Re - US election variant.
Can you see how crucial it is to expose the fraud behind it all?
Everyone knows about the US election fraud and can see it. The evidence is overwhelming. Unfortunately there is no mechanism for peaceful justice when the judicary is captured - even Justice Thomas opined as such in his ruling, and when he says so, you know there are severe issues. The US will have to start here: https://www.archives.gov/founding-docs/declaration-transcript
I wasn't referring to the election fraud but the fraudulent means of testing for Sars Cov 2 and now yet another ''variant''.
Nice trolling...
It's worth delving deeper into the climate hoax matter..........I understand, it's hard to take on board if you've swallowed the propaganda, box and dice....... so think of a bunch of people who think of us as their pawns... it will come easier to imagine...... when WEFers KNOW.... the very BEST and EASIEST way to manipulate behaviour is to make people dead scared — nay, terrified...... It's easier to control people who are Casualties.Of.Terror, or, C.O.T. cases
This creation has been a long time in the making......... but it was at Rio's 1992 Earth Summit that got it's skates on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earth_Summit the UN hands it's dirty hands in every pie now
Many scientists said the claims were false from the get go.
Forget tenure ; forget funding; forget any debate of science - that was thrown out the window and scientist too (so to speak) if you dared - or to THIS DAY, dare, speak out. Those retired, or nearly so, who spoke out, were just ghosted.......
you could lay the plans of Climate Change and the pandemic side by side — same template.
Along with it, came the eradicating via, ghosting, as mentioned, maligning and smearing any credibility, by anyone of sound ethics merely seeking robust discussion.
Due to lack of co-operation by the weather, the term "Global Warming" had to be deleted without fanfare, and immediately replaced with "Climate Change" (like none of us would notice) Gotta wonder what dunderhead came up with such a stupid heading - like the climate never changes....... but I get it was embrassing that those dam Maldives, just. would. not go. under. water......... nor any of the Pacidic Islands that were predicted to by 2012.
Scientists still fight on.........
https://clintel.org
Scroll down on this link to read a little more from G. Edward Griffin's site:
https://realityzone.com/product/inconvenientlie/ref/24/
Or just relax, grab a cuppa, and watch wahat is by now an old doco:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?app=desktop&v=oYhCQv5tNsQ
Lots of eminent scientists attempted / attempting to speak/ing out, but not given a platform
And Patrick Moore - the founder of Greenpeace, who witnessed it's infiltration and takeover - has several interviews on other social media
My position on these things is usually moderate. eg: Covid. Beat up out of all proportion, largely gross propaganda, deadly protocols, harmful interventions. Nevertheless, some people did get sick, probably from a virus called SARS-Cov-2 (I know some ppl refute this and I have been attacked as 'controlled opposition' for not firmly staking my flag in the land of 'no virus'). So, the fact that it was a beat up doesn't mean that there was no Covid. I take a similar view with Climate ideology. Ridiculous modelling, illusion of consensus where there is none, but at the same time environmentalism is an admirable aim (a la Shellenberger, Lombor). I really like Shellenberger's book Apocalypse Never, have you read it? All my views are loosely held, so I will change them if I am exposed to better information and thoroughly convinced.
Re: C19....... I stand in the same camp, and prefer to have the "no virus" argument later; to waste our time on this matter now? ....while they STILL pushing Experimental Gene Tech(enology)..... aka "vax" is, IMO, rearranging the proverbial deck chairs while people are horrendously maimed and dying.
Dr Judy Mikovits was interviewed by Epoch Times, March 2020........ it seems there was likely a leak due to ongoing shabby practices - the main reason why the GOF Lab at Fort Detrick was taken off shore.... As WEFer Klaus said, what an opportunity! We must take advantage of (manufacturing and enhancing) the crisis to accelerate our Agenda.
For my part, I think they muddied the waters about the leak, while claiming seasonal flu "was gone - not here" - as Brett Sutton CHO Victoria said. By insisting on high PCR cycle thresholds, they got their burgeoning numbers of false positives, thereby manufacturing "proof" by decption of their "deadly" pandemic to leverage mass behaviours of the public.
Esteemed USA pathologist, Dr Ryan Cole, says he CAN differentiate pathology samples in cadavers, to denote whether they died of C19 infection, the circulating virus in some tissues can be identified as S1 ( or, Spike 1) or the vaccination spike, know as S2. As there is a distinct clinical difference, SARS Cov2 infection therefore must surely exist - though hardly the cause of every death they claimed.
Re: the Environment. Yes, I have his book - it's next in my pile to read. Toatal greenie here for 6 decades. Read Rachel Carson's "Silent Spring" as a child, and became an immediate active advocate. Vinegar and bi-carb for cleaning, a swat instead of fly spray.... many, many, things.... Our household embraced green practices before they became "a thing" and was a point of discussion over many meals with people. Some changed their practices as well, others not.... Also, from the 60s, we understood, and prefered the stability of glass over toxic unstable plastics, while also avoiding any fluoride and teflon products. Now my children teach theirs the same..... my endless and oft annoying motto being "We must do all we can to take care of our precious Earth - good planets are hard to find!"
To this day, I still love the American Indian tribal philosophy, that
"None of us inherit the land, we borrow it from our children".
We were totally sucked in by all the Global Warming propaganda to begin with - but we had already retro-fitted our house, recycling water n everything we possibly could, then were exposed to retired Nordic scientist who outlined "the capture" of his UN team - none of whem he considered adequately qualified for the job. He resigned in disgust...... then we dug deeper.... what a rabbit hole!
A couple of things that defy reason.....
Here in Victoria, as you know, the lockdowns went to absurd, Attila-The-Hun levels. Couldn't travel beyond 5 ks from home. Outdoor excercise limited to one hour a day. No visitors to your home ect., BUT.....and I am seriously NOT kidding.......
brothels remained open!
Meanwhile, all first world countries, going hand over fist to shut down coal, while there are NO demands on China's reduction of CO2. I read, China, now opens an average of 10 MORE coal fired stations year thus far!
If anyone knew anything about modern coal fired plants, their improvements for environmental protection HAS been immense, when first installed 50 years ago, with those huge bell shaped, electro-static converter chimneys, meant that those big bell shaped chimneys that the media, to this day, often footage promoted as "evidence of pollution" — it is well known that the "smoke" is largely STEAM with extremely low levels of ANY pollution at all.
We should commit to improving things all the time — to enhance our environment and keep it clean, but to lobby for net zero, is sad proof of how poorly educated school leavers have become. Zero carbon dioxide = Death.
Carbon dioxide IS THE STUFF OF LIFE......... plants and trees will thrive on it and give us our bounty..... temps may rise a little again - just as the ice cores have proven this is by no means a disaster as portrayed.
AGW is very much a moot argument, according to many scientists.
All our youth are being misled with this new "religico-pseudo-science" and frightened to the point of despair; too many now denying themselves the joy of a lovely family.
Our msm schedule WAS named TV "Programming" for a reason.
But as we all know, never spoil a good story with the facts - especially when WEFers have to corale us into certain beliefs, then behaviours, for THEIR desired outcomes.
Congrats on your increased exposure and reach, Rebekah, it’s well deserved!
Douglas Murray is the man ! :)
Thanks Rebekah for all you are doing. I just read in the comments you mentioned you are not joining, just covering it. Good news to hear.
Some of my misgivings about 'ARC'...
What a play on words - get on board the ARC. But I thought it wasn’t an emergency? And is it everyone, or just the 'influential' people that are approved for the saving? ARC, the Alliance for Responsible Citizenry. Now if that doesn't sound like social engineering, totalitarian, meddling then what does? How to train people to be responsible...alas not even people, but citizens...
The ARC seems like a palatable narrative for the fourth industrial revolution. I feel like you can tell this by looking at the people involved. The Great Reset can't go through without Climate change... JP pushing a 'nicer' narrative here, but not a true narrative. Bjorn Lomberg, that JP keeps flogging as the greatest knowledge on climate change...in fact believes in and pushes the idea of man-made global warming, which is a patent lie...so what is going on? Clearly NOT such an expert when the basic lie of man-made climate change is not only not discounted but embraced.
But who runs ARC?
Paul Marshall is one of the three directors...the previous company was 'Prosperity UK' before changing its name to ARC, and was involved in Brexit. That is some influence. Marshall started the first and now largest UK hedge fund - his idea? Not likely, as it was half funded by none other than George Soros, an unquestionable veritable cancer on the face of every country in the world, the one responsible for colour riots throughout the world, among many many other civilisation destroying activities. Paul Marshall's other companies are heavily involved in UK education policy - think woke, social justice agenda. Paul Marshall was also heavily involved in the setup, and financing of Legatum, a social engineering company, several representatives of which are, on the ARC. And who is Legatum? Basically, a company investing in slavery, among other initiatives such as open borders, and family interference – Soros again. And associated via its directorship with The End Fund, backed by, Gates foundation, Rothschilds, and all the other arch villains. All geared for government interference in lives, and particularly in the family. But isn’t JP against that? There are even WEF global young leaders on ARC. But where are the regular peasants, the people without money, without connections?
And isn't it ever so interesting how we are to believe that JP just 'organically' came up with this idea? All on his own.
What does JP say toward the end…”probably we’re interested in” [clambering up the power hierarchy and take all the control for yourself] “to the degree that we are all unrepentant narcissists”. But don't we all know (and JP most definitely does know) that (we are all unrepentant narcissists) is to a very high degree. And almost no-one is immune. This seems like the same shell game. It looks like the WEF narrative of fear and terror has been decommissioned in favour of the ARC vision of soft glove stranglehold totalitarianism.
ARC mostly sounds great on the face of it. Is it not supposed to? After-all, they want to provide a ‘compelling’ narrative. Unfortunately, the whole thing is backed by all the same bad guys, the same tyrants. So, what is really happening here?
For more information see Amazing Polly vids on this topic...
https://rumble.com/v291zoi-jordan-petersons-wef-dreams.html
https://rumble.com/v29zxuu-listen-bucko-peterson-is-controlled-op-answer-comments-and-going-in-to-more.html
https://rumble.com/v29zxuu-listen-bucko-peterson-is-controlled-op-answer-comments-and-going-in-to-more.html
Hi Diane, I put this question to Kerrylyn above and would like to put it to you too:
Why do you think there is no man made global warming? My understanding is that some of the moderates eg: Michael Shellenberger and Bjorn Lomborg believe that there is a man made element but it's nowhere near the apocalypse that the climate activists say it is. Hence, they take a more environmentalist approach and tend to prefer nuclear for stable Western energy.
Also wondering, where was it said that JP came up with ARC on his own? I've never come across that before, although I do recall him talking about responsible citizenship explicitly in November last year (I mention it in The Aussie Wire video).
Hi Rebekah,
Apologies in advance for my long-winded response to your questions...
Indeed, you are correct. I don’t believe it has been said that JP came up with ARC on his own. In fact from memory he makes reference to ‘we’ right the way through. Everything (from memory) in the ARC seem like concepts JP has mentioned in varying forms in interviews with people over time. Therefore, to me, it seems (on the face of it) that the ARC ‘concepts’ are mostly his idea and are being promoted as mostly his ideas (of how things ought to work). What I was trying (very badly) to convey is that while, despite the references to ‘we’, the ARC concepts seem to be the brainchild mainly of JP, thought up over time. And yet, it also seems evident that there is a force behind this ARC and the whole arrangement feels contrived and orchestrated. The upshot is the same ‘royal ‘we’’ have GOBSAT (Good old boys sat around a table) for the good of the world. Are we to accept that an organisation chock full of politicians, influencers, entrepreneurs, and ‘Climate change’ ‘experts’ (but zero peasant representation) has organically sprung up, is a benevolent force for good, with Jordan Peterson as the frontman. Comfortingly JP states emphatically at one point that depopulation is ‘off the table’. Nice, but there is no way I expect him to stand by that, and it will be reneged quicker than you can blink. Even if he really cared, (and it is not at all evident that JP cares more about people then about fame, money or his ego) he is only the frontman for this ARC after-all.
Regarding Climate change. To clarify, I mention ‘manmade climate change’ as synonymous with the current branding capital ‘C’ ‘Climate change’ as distinct from ‘native’ climate change which is a real phenomenon. As far as I have read we don’t have the science to know whether or not earth warming (or cooling) can be attributed to the activities of man.
I don’t think any actual scientist believes the climate models to be remotely accurate. We have the ice cores that apparently show that CO2 follows warming by around 800 years, not the other way round, as has been erroneously promoted. We have temperature measurements, but based on what I have read any change measured is not accurate to within the uncertainty. Not only is the measurement not meaningfully representative of its locale but even less so of the entire earth at any given time. We just don’t understand atmospheric science enough to be able to confidently say what is actually happening or what it really means. Even-so, the relatively recent measurements we do have – think a hundred years – do not in any way show that there is warming (or cooling) happening that is particularly different from temperatures that occurred in history. The ice cores show that the earth heats up and cools down periodically. We don’t understand why. It seems that solar flares play a major role which makes sense because the sun is our only source of external energy. Based on the template of life we observe in living things, it also makes sense that the earth would have its own ‘biological clock’. We don’t remotely understand our own biological rhythms, that occurs in every cell, let alone what the earth might be doing.
In relation to CO2 specifically, if it can keep heat in, then it keeps heat out at a similar rate. If our main source of energy is the sun, how are we heating up? Dr John Clauser is an atmospheric physicist, who, unlike so many others is actually an expert in the relevant field. To the extent possible, he understands that climate (changes) occur as a function of cloud cover, which is self-regulating.
If I asserted the sky is falling, in a sane world I would be asked for evidence. If I had no evidence, except to say that it 'seems the sky periodically drops a few feet every so often', rightly, my claim would be fully dismissed. We wouldn’t stand around discussing it as though somehow my imaginings could be a possibility. Of the four ways of learning, Devine revelation, Intuition, Experience, or Logic and Reason, Climate change was discovered via none of these. It is a merely a belief. Maybe I ought not have stated ‘Climate change is a patent lie’ rather that ‘Climate change’ is in no way proven, or even reasonable, therefore whoever is promoting any form of it is patently lying.
Like most other people (I suppose) I thought man was obviously destroying the planet. We are polluting the earth without restraint, so of course we must be causing Climate change. I hadn’t thought it through. Everyone said Climate change was real, so that must be true, right? I learned in primary school there was a hole in the ozone layer. I remember the scare mongering. BTW where did the hole go? But like the theory of evolution – if you throw in enough time, anything can evolve. But if we see a TV in the middle of nowhere, our first thought is ‘someone was here’, not ‘how many millions of years did it take for this TV to evolve?’ As was evident in the case of Covid, where many people accepted that an injection given to one person would somehow protect another person, people’s brains often simply accept an erroneous connection that is fed to them. That we are disgusting polluters, doesn’t at all mean the pollution is changing the climate. They are two separate things. But I didn’t realise that through science. It was when the Covid fraud happened, I was inadvertently and suddenly red-pilled on ‘Climate change’ by realising that the people pushing the Climate movement – staging people like Greta Thunberg, a WEF puppet for fake arrests for example - are the very same people behind Covid, the very same people behind Ukraine, the very same monsters behind the WHO, the UN and most of this world’s misery. In the 1970s they pushed Global freezing. A few decades later it became Global warming. Now it is ‘Climate change’. They keep rebranding. What are the chances of there being an active psyop AND a genuine emergency? They had to advertise Covid 24/7.
There are plenty of scientists denying ‘Climate change’ (man-made change). But if the spectre is removed, we are free. Whoever controls the spectres controls the narrative.
When evil Andrews was practically inciting violence, stating that the uninjected could not be part of the economy, he wanted us dead. At that moment it occurred to me there will come a day when the public will be asked to choose who ought to be sacrificed to keep the earth alive, for the greater good. Most of the population chose poorly during Covid, a ‘virus’ not proven to exist, for a disease with a 0.3% IFR. If people believe the earth is dying because it is overpopulated how much more willing will they be to go along with plans to eradicate those who don’t comply?
For me the lies make the science redundant. But of course, the science doesn’t add up. The story is a fiction. Apart from that, I am a Chistian. God told us to ‘go and multiply’. He didn’t tell us to second guess how much room there was to work with. We have more than enough land. It is our understanding that is limited, not the earth.
Having said all of that, I do believe that we can ultimately cause earth’s destruction, just not in the way those that want to control the narrative say. The Bible tells us that ‘the whole creation has been groaning as in the pains of childbirth right up to the present time’ and in the last days there will be many earthquakes. I believe our moral decay has led us to this place, and the consequences we see. I believe the earth is turning on the back of our relationship to, and acknowledgement of, our creator, and that this relationship is being undermined now more than ever. Will our own disowner-ship of God directly break the earth apart or will it instead play out as the evil of unfettered murderous technology that our Godlessness allowed? Certainly, the problem is not ‘Climate change’ and most certainly not an excess of CO2.
Thanks for taking the time to share your reasoning Diane, I appreciate the insight. I think we agree on a lot of details but probably arrive at somewhat divergent conclusions.
When you say, "ARC and the whole arrangement feels contrived and orchestrated", I would say, well yes. If you want to get any organisation off the ground, you have to organise and co-ordinate it. In a past life I was an operations manager, so I know how much 'contrivance' and 'orchestration' goes in to achieving small things, let alone big things! I find the expectation that global movements, especially resistance movements, can consistently spring up out of nowhere and sustain themselves indefinitely without organisation or financing somewhat naive.
When you say it's not evident that JP 'cares', I would argue that his professional history going back at least 20 years indicates that he does, and that he typically puts principle over personal gain. As it happens, this has worked out quite well for him, although he may lose his professional licence for it. I'm happy to be wrong on that, I suppose we will see. But as he has been so consistent over time (albeit human), in my estimation, I think the least likely scenario is one where he suddenly is revealed to be a disingenuous shill motivated purely by self interest.
I am certain there is a lot we agree on, and at the core of it, want the same outcome. Of course, a global organisation, or any organisation for that matter that gets off the ground is more than likely contrived.
If ARC had come about via an organisation that has fought tooth and nail for freedom, and against injections such as Organic consumers association to name but one example, then motives wouldn’t be in question. But these organisations bank accounts get closed, their activities are constantly interfered with, they are incessantly vilified by MSM, and every step they take is a feat. Instead we have an organisation made up effectively solely of politicians, influencers, and wealthy people. What possible excuse can there be for this? It is already corrupted before it begins. The trajectory cannot be anywhere good for the common man. Considering the people behind it, and funding sources being ultimately one and the same as the current tyrants surely this demonstrates ARC’s nefarious nature.
I would say partnering with the devil to beat the devil is highly misguided. I would expect an esteemed psychology professor such as JP to eat this concept for breakfast. And I find it beyond belief that he knows so little of his business partners as to not connect the dots here. After-all he has numerous friends from all walks, and he is a smart and genuine guy, right? So then, is JP in league with the devil, or does he somehow think the movement can pull itself up by its own bootstraps out of the mire from which it was formed to in fact do good, or is he simply a lacky frontman promised a front row seat?
Conceivably this is exactly what these monsters would do. It is a sales tactic. Provide people two options to give the impression of choice, and they will be happy choose one of them.
I sincerely hope I’m wrong about JP. It was devastating for me when he fell from my grace, and not an easy thing to accept.
Great post Diane. On CC/AGW, as I replied to Rebekah, you only need a few simple facts to demonstrate that CO2 emissions are having negligible to no effect on earth's climate. You may be aware that one of JP's claim to fame is his role as editor of IPCC reports. My guess is that he co-edited the policy statements. He is not qualified to edit chapters of the report itself, unless he was a copy-editor - and no way he'd admit that. I'd be interested to see whether his edits dialled up or down the fear-mongering. The IPCC reports are not so alarmist really, maybe more in recent years. (I used to work for OECD which made extensive contributions to the reports and participated actively in Rio Summit & follow-up.) I am thinking JP may be more of a puppet than anything else; tptb, aware of his weaknesses/vulnerability, latched onto him from the start; and - as smart as he thinks he is - he hasn't yet cottoned on; or maybe I'm being too kind!
Agree with your summation Kerrylyn.
The increase in temperature predated the increase in CO2. Also, climate science seems about as honest as covid "science", in addition to having the same supporters. It's quite the coincidence that the globalists who want a lower population also support reducing plant food (CO2).
The climate is being increasingly engineered & manipulated. The focus & promotion of "climate change" as being caused by carbon emissions is a distraction away from the real causes. The same entities are behind both the creation of the problem, & providers of the "solution".
Anthropogenic warming was/is a very interesting academic idea, but I recognised the idea had been captured by large power in December 2006, at the moment that John Howard proposed nuclear power for Australia. The rhetoric flipped. Suddenly "anthropogenic warming" became absolutely real in the mainstream media, where prior, it was an interesting discussion. Big power had suddenly found a way to profit, and all that was needed was the engineering of public opinion. At that point, although I was always in favour of non-harmful risk mitigation, I began to look for reasons for it to be a scam. I read the 3rd Climate model, found basic reasons to doubt "the science", and my balance of doubt has only grown. Have you read The Ethical Skeptic's piece on the subject - rather compelling case for the oceans being warmed from below?
Yeah, I don't vibe with JP. John Howard, who coincidentally happened to be in Washington DC on 911, is in the ARC? And Tony Abbott, who coincidentally happened to be in Bali during the second Bali bombings, is in the ARC? Maybe they were both set up to ensure they joined in with wars ;)
Of course I'm desperate for pro-freedom voices after what we've just been through, but the way you paint that looks like just another arm of power.
Great research Diane. Saved me a lot of time.
Thanks Kerrylyn...though not really my research. Mainly Amazing Polly and Jordanetics by Vox Day https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O7u3Lu-kzgg
I absolutely loved JP until I realised something was off and inconsistent with his messaging. He appears to get cancelled but really doesn't - his utubes are never cancelled rather promoted, his tours are never cancelled - he had zero problem in Australia and even spoke to Australian parliament - and is more popular than ever. He went to Russia ostensibly to get saved from a benzo addiction sickness but also apparently due to a diet of meat and vegetables...(?) When he came back he suddenly becomes the voice of the world. He explores the bible in depth but is not a Christian. He's a poster boy for free speech yet wants people censored on Twitter, and got quite nasty about it. He exudes humility until he is questioned, then basically morphs into the biggest dick imaginable. He collected, and had a house full of Communist art for years until his recent fame...apparently to remind him of the atrocities Communism causes. Who does that? Too many things that don't add up. I don't exactly know who JP is, but I do know he is not quite what he purports to be hence I have distanced myself.
Did you see him squirm when asked to comment on Solzhenitsyn’s ‘200 years Together ‘. ?
No, but I can imagine! Once you see behind his curtain you can't unsee it, and everything he says starts to feel cringey.
Yes. Jordan Peterson, like Brett Weinstein, exists to neutralise the right. https://youtube.com/watch?v=r8tAMzYu1Mg&si=oMChtPyVjIpX9H9f
Thank you for that.
Your comments are spot on. I appreciated him in the beginning when he was some obscure prof at McGill opposing gender pronoun bs., but his sudden rise to fame seems to have gone to his head. As for his benzo addiction, load of crap I say. He was on much more than that. Benzos are easy to get off. 2 weeks cold turkey and you're fine. I think the diet was extreme keto which you can't survive on especially if you're already a skinny little wimp like him. Wimp, wanker & word-salader would be my way to describe him, married to a wearer-of-the-pants-woman - his biggest problem imo.
Excellent description of JP but as a small aside and with respect there is no requirement for carbohydrates in the human diet
Gluconeogenesis provides glucose if needed
Carbs can provide calories and are survival foods but are not essential
"Gluconeogenesis provides glucose if needed "
And it provides water as well, during the same catabolic process. But let's not over-generalize. Gluconeogenesis is a great and even ample reserve resource, but I'm not so sure it should be the primary one.
But I'll gladly welcome being put right if I'm mistaken, of course.
Thanks for that information
My main point which I would like everyone to be aware of is that dietary carbohydrates (including fruit and vegetables) are not essential
Carbs are sugar
What if he wasn't addicted to anything but was being reprogrammed overseas by his handlers? Did he look well when he returned like his problems were behind him?
Remember when Dan Andrews disappeared for months after "falling down stairs" and returned more tyrannical than ever? What happened during that time and why wasn't the media curious?
That he and his ilk are still there in office, and still allowed to move freely should be a gushing fountain of humiliation to Melburnians (Melbournites? Melbournonians?), and to Victorians, and to all Australians as well.
I think Labor only got something like 30% of the vote. But there's complicated rigging of preferences and there were reports of unusual processes in vote counting by observers who didn't seem to have any way to report cheating. Perhaps the concept of scrutinineers depends on having a vote counters who are too ashamed to cheat when being watched. So it's obsolete now.
Good points.
P.S. In case anyone misinterprets my last comment, I'm all for women's rights but not for dominating one's partner, whether that person be male or female.
Take care, Rebekah. Hope you're feeling better soon! :)