hmm i think my comment disappeared.
This is great news and gives some scope to have my FWC unfair dismissal claim revisited. Deputy President Cross is who rejected my claim initially too.
This is great news and gives some scope to have my FWC unfair dismissal claim revisited. Deputy President Cross is who rejected my claim initially too.
Commission Matter Number # C2022/419 Decision Number [2022] FWC 1188
I was going to get involved with arkmedic's effort to collate a list of the unfair dismissal / general protections applications lodged with the FWC and IR that related to workplace vaccines mandates. Haven't the time at the moment to start another massive project but I still intend to pursue or contribute to it.
When i'm ready to, I'll also review my case and decision in detail. I suspected that my case and subsequent FWC decision caused the definition of "Financial Institution" referred to in the WA Workplace Vaxx Mandates Group 2 Cohort & Critical Businesses Worker (Restrictions on Access) to be amended.
My hearing was listed 27/4/22 but was rescheduled to 3/5/22. The WA Health Dept published Critical Businesses Worker (Restrictions on Access) Directions (No 2) Exemption and Temporary Exemption application form, and Critical Businesses Worker (Restrictions on Access) Directions (No 2) Exemption Guidelines on 29/4/22, and I think this was done because my main argument was that I wasn't provided any information from the Office of the WA CHO on how "Financial Institution" and "critical business worker" are defined specifically. I requested the same in writing and NEVER received a response.
Gosh I get angry just writing out this legislative nonsense. Happy to provide any further information :-) Thanks!
hmm i think my comment disappeared.
This is great news and gives some scope to have my FWC unfair dismissal claim revisited. Deputy President Cross is who rejected my claim initially too.
Sorry to hear your claim was denied. So many have been!
Can I have your FWC judgement number please? I am collating these cases for a future article exploring why the many seem to fail.
Would like to read this.
Commission Matter Number # C2022/419 Decision Number [2022] FWC 1188
I was going to get involved with arkmedic's effort to collate a list of the unfair dismissal / general protections applications lodged with the FWC and IR that related to workplace vaccines mandates. Haven't the time at the moment to start another massive project but I still intend to pursue or contribute to it.
When i'm ready to, I'll also review my case and decision in detail. I suspected that my case and subsequent FWC decision caused the definition of "Financial Institution" referred to in the WA Workplace Vaxx Mandates Group 2 Cohort & Critical Businesses Worker (Restrictions on Access) to be amended.
My hearing was listed 27/4/22 but was rescheduled to 3/5/22. The WA Health Dept published Critical Businesses Worker (Restrictions on Access) Directions (No 2) Exemption and Temporary Exemption application form, and Critical Businesses Worker (Restrictions on Access) Directions (No 2) Exemption Guidelines on 29/4/22, and I think this was done because my main argument was that I wasn't provided any information from the Office of the WA CHO on how "Financial Institution" and "critical business worker" are defined specifically. I requested the same in writing and NEVER received a response.
Gosh I get angry just writing out this legislative nonsense. Happy to provide any further information :-) Thanks!