22 Comments
⭠ Return to thread

Vaccines* are “safe and effective” the NSW Premier kept telling us in 2021. Well if the vaccines were so effective, how come a booster shot was recommended, or in some cases made mandatory? If the vaccines were so effective, how come they made no difference to the rate of transmission? Did or did not the pharmaceutical companies know that vaccines would lose their efficacy? If they DID know, then we have been lied to. And if they did not, if the loss of efficacy took them by surprise, how could they have possibly foreseen any long term effects?

* Experimental gene therapies.

Expand full comment

TGA Guidance on applying the Advertising Code rules

"Claims that a good is 'safe' or have 'no side effects' are specifically prohibited."

https://www.tga.gov.au/how-we-regulate/advertising/how-advertise/advertising-guidance/resources/resource/guidance/guidance-applying-advertising-code-rules

Expand full comment

They sure did fail in this upholding the purpose of this legislation...

Gene Technology (Queensland) Act 2016

"3 Purpose of Act

(1)The purpose of this Act is to—

(a)protect the health and safety of people, and to protect the environment, by identifying risks posed by, or as a result of, gene technology; and

(b)manage those risks through regulating certain dealings with genetically modified organisms."

https://www.legislation.qld.gov.au/view/whole/html/inforce/current/act-2016-054

Expand full comment

SHIFTING GOALPOSTS.

It's always effective if you keep changing the criteria for what is considered 'effective'.

Expand full comment