It was supposedly all about saving grandma but the jab cult also justified the coercion on the false grounds that the jab prevents severe covid, hospitalisation, ICU admission and death and that the unjabbed were useless eaters who would overwhelm ICUs and take hospital beds away from non-covid patients.
The cult said we are innumerate and don't understand the base rate fallacy.
We have seen from your previous post how that is working out for the cult.
I believe that the apology was genuine, but it reveals the unethical core belief underpinning the public's readiness to accept the mandates - an unethical belief set up and reinforced by government and medical establishment. If this were my local cafe, I would walk in, thank them for the apology, and explain that though I find it encouraging, I am deeply troubled by their reasoning.
I can’t quite put my finger on it, but there is something deeply wrong about medical mandates.
A person of sound mind should be able to accept or reject any medical treatment, no matter how rational or irrational. I’m sure people reject their doctor’s advice from time to time, which must leave doctors tearing their hair out in frustration, but that’s how it goes.
The notion of subjugating one’s own interests for the communal good came to the fore during Covid. As an example, a few years ago I was playing sport with some older guys who were discussing the flu jab for that year. The only reason they were considering it was to protect themselves. The idea of protecting others wasn’t even on the radar. Yet during Covid, we were told “Roll up your sleeve Australia” and, “You wouldn’t want to be a granny killer would you?”
There is a problem when governments mandate vaccination. When the communal good, as decided by the state, over-rides personal choice there is never an end to what can be justified.
A booster shot? Sure. Another? Yep. What about mandatory organ donation? Surely that would be for the communal good. How about sterilization of all men over the age of say 40? That would be for the communal good seeing as how often we’re reminded that the world is overpopulated. What about assisted dying for those at an age when they are no longer considered productive by the state?
Someone said that they objected to vaccine mandates but added that if Covid was really bad, then mandates would be justified.
However, if Covid was really bad, such that bodies were piling up in the street, the evidence would be so stark that people would be begging for vaccines. So even then, mandates would not be necessary.
Because it was never about ours or your health - it was about control, interestingly at the g 20 summit in Bali 2 or so weeks (?) it was unanimously passed to endorse a vaccination certificate to travel ( including by Australia) - you will need more and more boosters to travel and AFAIAC these shots are poison- I won’t be getting them - but that’s what they want basically because they don’t want you to travel, they want you to stay in your zone and eat bugs.
Aside from ourselves, *the* two groups most complicit were, and still are, the medical and media industries.
The medical profession as a whole is simply the smarter and better looking - there are many babe doctors! - version of the oldest profession! Note that that profession does not have to take an oath.
"My body my choice" to rationalize baby killing is also stupid conceit. The issue is the baby's body, not mom's. People are very creative about rationalizing their sins. Thosecwho think their body is autonomous should try not paying their taxes and see what the government does to their body. It's only our body to the extent we will fight for it.
Beautifully delineated here, Rebbie. We saw a similar plan pushed in the US but so many held their ground, that stalled their efforts. But in pockets, local officials encouraged these discriminatory practices and some businesses embraced the totalitarian, anti-science fascism.
The danger ⚠️ remains for us all. Keep fighting to get out the truth.
Yes I drew the same conclusion about transmission from this paper. Incredibly, a pro-vax friend of mine sent this paper to me as proof that vaccines would reduce transmission. I asked if she had actually read the body of the paper, or only the abstract/conclusion. The conclusion was typically pro-vax and obviously political, but the body of the paper very clearly showed that the vaccines were not stopping/reducing transmission in any significant way. To be fair, most people aren't trained in how to read academic papers, and are likely to take abstracts and conclusions at face value. It's annoying.
It’s not their fault when the heart of a study is contradicted by a political conclusion. Most people don’t understand how such an inconsistency occurs let alone the grant machine persuasion.
Most ‘virus don’t exist’ arguments come down to semantics. Anyone with kids in daycare knows that viruses spread. Their next argument is always it’s the air, water, food, 5g, previous vaccination - it’s not. Also, graphene, hydras, snake venom and nano people are distractors. Pretty sure these stories are released by ‘controlled opposition’. The real danger is spike protein especially from vax. Combination of spike protein damage from vax and actual infection is also dangerous.
This is my thinking also at this point. I'm happy to be proven wrong, but the 'no virus' crowd really needs to work on their argument. Dropping links to 3 hour videos is not going to convince anyone unless they have nothing else to do.
My GP, who runs a Pfizer clinic and recently called the police to remove an "anti-vaxxer" who was pleading unsuccessfully with his girlfriend to not get jabbed, uses the fact that some of us don't believe the virus exists to mock all of us as tin foil hat wearing nut jobs and to discredit our objections to the jab.
It’s a far better argument and proof than sticking 30 needles in kids over a few years.
Just show us the isolated virus from a sick person under a microscope rather than a Petri dish of monkey kidney cells poisoned to the max to break down and produce what they claim are ‘viruses’ it’s as fraudulent as the PCR test they use.
Viruses are too small to be seen by optical microscopes. By that misguided logic, oxygen doesn't exist either. Stop breathing a few minutes to find out.
No they are not, they can produce them and point them out under a microscope in Petri dishes or test tubes but only after putting (using) monkey kidney cell tissue through a series of ridiculous stages, poisoning, freezing, staining, more antibiotics etc etc but they can’t see them after taking snot etc from a sick person and placing that under a microscope.
Why is that ? - because like the plandemic the industry is a fraud and based around lies and money - and oh - poisoning our kids.
We have been conditioned to believe in viruses due to blanket brainwashing education including the language we use to the movies we watch.
Thank you. It is never ok to force a medical procedure, and mandating to "stop transmission" is not ok, not "part of the social compact" and a violation of civil rights, bodily autonomy and religious liberty. And yet, in WA they can hold you down and inject you by force under the Health Act. We are a brutal, captured, ignorant, fearful society led by feckless cowards.
the link for ".....This article provides a compilation of every Australian state health minister and premier claiming that Covid vaccines would prevent transmission...."
Yes, prevention of transmission is a red herring because the mRNA injections cannot possibly prevent transmission of symptoms because the symptoms are not caused by invective agents. Nor can the experimental jabs prevent the likelihood of testing positive for 'covid' because a positive result is not correlated with having symptoms. Nor have the RNA sequences the PCR is primed to recognise been shown to come from infectious agents.
Um yes - transmission!!, THE POISONED NEEDLE A book by Eleanor McBean who worked helping the victims of the ‘Spanish Flu’ she and her family were never jabbed however the people dying were, she was never sick or her family.
The outbreak of the Spanish flu started at military bases in the US where through the Rockefeller foundation were putting lots of needles in people - SOUND FAMILIAR!!
The media then panicked people to get needles by stating the soldiers returning from WW1 were bringing strange diseases home from Europe.
It was supposedly all about saving grandma but the jab cult also justified the coercion on the false grounds that the jab prevents severe covid, hospitalisation, ICU admission and death and that the unjabbed were useless eaters who would overwhelm ICUs and take hospital beds away from non-covid patients.
The cult said we are innumerate and don't understand the base rate fallacy.
We have seen from your previous post how that is working out for the cult.
Good points about the nuance of the sign outside the cafe, which at first glance looks like an apology...
I believe that the apology was genuine, but it reveals the unethical core belief underpinning the public's readiness to accept the mandates - an unethical belief set up and reinforced by government and medical establishment. If this were my local cafe, I would walk in, thank them for the apology, and explain that though I find it encouraging, I am deeply troubled by their reasoning.
I can’t quite put my finger on it, but there is something deeply wrong about medical mandates.
A person of sound mind should be able to accept or reject any medical treatment, no matter how rational or irrational. I’m sure people reject their doctor’s advice from time to time, which must leave doctors tearing their hair out in frustration, but that’s how it goes.
The notion of subjugating one’s own interests for the communal good came to the fore during Covid. As an example, a few years ago I was playing sport with some older guys who were discussing the flu jab for that year. The only reason they were considering it was to protect themselves. The idea of protecting others wasn’t even on the radar. Yet during Covid, we were told “Roll up your sleeve Australia” and, “You wouldn’t want to be a granny killer would you?”
There is a problem when governments mandate vaccination. When the communal good, as decided by the state, over-rides personal choice there is never an end to what can be justified.
A booster shot? Sure. Another? Yep. What about mandatory organ donation? Surely that would be for the communal good. How about sterilization of all men over the age of say 40? That would be for the communal good seeing as how often we’re reminded that the world is overpopulated. What about assisted dying for those at an age when they are no longer considered productive by the state?
Someone said that they objected to vaccine mandates but added that if Covid was really bad, then mandates would be justified.
However, if Covid was really bad, such that bodies were piling up in the street, the evidence would be so stark that people would be begging for vaccines. So even then, mandates would not be necessary.
Because it was never about ours or your health - it was about control, interestingly at the g 20 summit in Bali 2 or so weeks (?) it was unanimously passed to endorse a vaccination certificate to travel ( including by Australia) - you will need more and more boosters to travel and AFAIAC these shots are poison- I won’t be getting them - but that’s what they want basically because they don’t want you to travel, they want you to stay in your zone and eat bugs.
Aside from ourselves, *the* two groups most complicit were, and still are, the medical and media industries.
The medical profession as a whole is simply the smarter and better looking - there are many babe doctors! - version of the oldest profession! Note that that profession does not have to take an oath.
"My body my choice" to rationalize baby killing is also stupid conceit. The issue is the baby's body, not mom's. People are very creative about rationalizing their sins. Thosecwho think their body is autonomous should try not paying their taxes and see what the government does to their body. It's only our body to the extent we will fight for it.
I understand your point, I'm not sure if you read the embedded piece, but I acknowledged it in that article.
It looks like the "Spike protein is the new miracle cure for everything. You can never have too much Spike" campaign is ramping up.
Could COVID hold key to curing cancer? Virus' notorious spike protein kills hard-to-treat lung tumors in lab studies
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-11509441/Covids-spike-protein-kills-aggressive-hard-treat-lung-tumors-lab-studies.html?ico=topics_pagination_mobile
"The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command."
Good stuff Rebekah, love your work 👍
Beautifully delineated here, Rebbie. We saw a similar plan pushed in the US but so many held their ground, that stalled their efforts. But in pockets, local officials encouraged these discriminatory practices and some businesses embraced the totalitarian, anti-science fascism.
The danger ⚠️ remains for us all. Keep fighting to get out the truth.
Didn’t know or didn’t want to know? When Lancet report was published last year I naively thought that now we have evidence it doesn’t stop transmission all the mandates will be dropped. I was such a fool. https://www.thelancet.com/journals/laninf/article/PIIS1473-3099(21)00648-4/fulltext
Yes I drew the same conclusion about transmission from this paper. Incredibly, a pro-vax friend of mine sent this paper to me as proof that vaccines would reduce transmission. I asked if she had actually read the body of the paper, or only the abstract/conclusion. The conclusion was typically pro-vax and obviously political, but the body of the paper very clearly showed that the vaccines were not stopping/reducing transmission in any significant way. To be fair, most people aren't trained in how to read academic papers, and are likely to take abstracts and conclusions at face value. It's annoying.
It’s not their fault when the heart of a study is contradicted by a political conclusion. Most people don’t understand how such an inconsistency occurs let alone the grant machine persuasion.
contagion is a myth so of course they won't stop transmission since it never occurs in the first place. fake11.com/cm
I hear this argument but remain unconvinced. Whoever is leading the 'there is no virus' faction needs to refine the elevator pitch, IMO.
Most ‘virus don’t exist’ arguments come down to semantics. Anyone with kids in daycare knows that viruses spread. Their next argument is always it’s the air, water, food, 5g, previous vaccination - it’s not. Also, graphene, hydras, snake venom and nano people are distractors. Pretty sure these stories are released by ‘controlled opposition’. The real danger is spike protein especially from vax. Combination of spike protein damage from vax and actual infection is also dangerous.
This is my thinking also at this point. I'm happy to be proven wrong, but the 'no virus' crowd really needs to work on their argument. Dropping links to 3 hour videos is not going to convince anyone unless they have nothing else to do.
They have also never worked in a Level 4 lab...or used CRISPR...
3 hours!!
I dropped a 1 minute one from Mike Yeadon -here it is again.
Pretty sure Mike Yeadon is NOT controlled opposition!
Pretty sure Mike Yeadon knows what he is talking about.
Big pharma knows there are no viruses and their ‘experiments’ to find them are dodgy and fraudulent - it’s the ultimate
Insult on us.
https://earthnewspaper.com/2022/08/06/dr-mike-yeadon-respiratory-viruses-dont-exist-146/
17 minute video, if you think how big pharma ‘finds’ the virus is indeed above board then you just ain’t paying attention!!
https://odysee.com/@drsambailey:c/the-truth-about-viruses:a
My GP, who runs a Pfizer clinic and recently called the police to remove an "anti-vaxxer" who was pleading unsuccessfully with his girlfriend to not get jabbed, uses the fact that some of us don't believe the virus exists to mock all of us as tin foil hat wearing nut jobs and to discredit our objections to the jab.
Except there is actually really no virus -ever.
Great podcast - do yourself a favour - or don’t!
https://t.me/jermwarfare/16072
I'll check it out. Thanks.
There is no evidence of a virus or contagion is more precise IMO https://georgiedonny.substack.com/p/seeing-is-believing
Jo
🐒
It’s a far better argument and proof than sticking 30 needles in kids over a few years.
Just show us the isolated virus from a sick person under a microscope rather than a Petri dish of monkey kidney cells poisoned to the max to break down and produce what they claim are ‘viruses’ it’s as fraudulent as the PCR test they use.
Viruses are too small to be seen by optical microscopes. By that misguided logic, oxygen doesn't exist either. Stop breathing a few minutes to find out.
No they are not, they can produce them and point them out under a microscope in Petri dishes or test tubes but only after putting (using) monkey kidney cell tissue through a series of ridiculous stages, poisoning, freezing, staining, more antibiotics etc etc but they can’t see them after taking snot etc from a sick person and placing that under a microscope.
Why is that ? - because like the plandemic the industry is a fraud and based around lies and money - and oh - poisoning our kids.
We have been conditioned to believe in viruses due to blanket brainwashing education including the language we use to the movies we watch.
https://odysee.com/@drsambailey:c/the-truth-about-viruses:a
Your cynicism is amusing. Your ignorance is not. Maybe someday you'll overcome it.
So I guess that’s it - a personal attack?.
Thank you. It is never ok to force a medical procedure, and mandating to "stop transmission" is not ok, not "part of the social compact" and a violation of civil rights, bodily autonomy and religious liberty. And yet, in WA they can hold you down and inject you by force under the Health Act. We are a brutal, captured, ignorant, fearful society led by feckless cowards.
the link for ".....This article provides a compilation of every Australian state health minister and premier claiming that Covid vaccines would prevent transmission...."
is
https://www.news.com.au/technology/science/human-body/yes-they-claimed-the-vaccines-would-prevent-transmission/news-story/a176eb002c29e603fc29ef9fe0b33b18
Yes, prevention of transmission is a red herring because the mRNA injections cannot possibly prevent transmission of symptoms because the symptoms are not caused by invective agents. Nor can the experimental jabs prevent the likelihood of testing positive for 'covid' because a positive result is not correlated with having symptoms. Nor have the RNA sequences the PCR is primed to recognise been shown to come from infectious agents.
The whole pandemic is a red herring or to be more precise a phantom made by a man in a white coat with some phosphorescence and a projector https://georgiedonny.substack.com/p/there-is-no-covid
🐒
Yes um - transmission!!
No vaccine, in human history, has successfully vaccinated against any virus.
https://jermwarfare.com/red-pills/vaccine-history
Um yes - transmission!!, THE POISONED NEEDLE A book by Eleanor McBean who worked helping the victims of the ‘Spanish Flu’ she and her family were never jabbed however the people dying were, she was never sick or her family.
The outbreak of the Spanish flu started at military bases in the US where through the Rockefeller foundation were putting lots of needles in people - SOUND FAMILIAR!!
The media then panicked people to get needles by stating the soldiers returning from WW1 were bringing strange diseases home from Europe.
Guess who owned the media!
History repeats and repeats.
https://books.google.com.au/books/about/The_Poisoned_Needle.html?id=31QtmHLg77IC&redir_esc=y