Cover up and protection of the SATANIC PHARMA CULT!--------TIMELINE OF PEOPLES HEALTH IMPROVEMENT DEBATE REQUIRED!?
There needs to be a proper open and honest debate about where the big improvements came from in peoples health!? Also a timeline of events and improvements. I say it was the improvement in water/housing/sewage etc
. People living in less cramped spaces and on top of one another. But governments/MSM/WEF/WHO/FULL FACTS/medics etc all claim it was PHARMA. Who pays them millions of pounds/dollars etc
If the VAERS data is essentially free of bogus reports (I imagined a lodgement was far from straightforward, for instance) and if it represents a big understatement of vaccine damage then the only reasonable ground for suppression is that it is in the public's interest to be kept in ignorance. And at face value, this is plausible, given the relative rarity of SIDS and the purported benefits of vaccination.
However, the cynical part of me is doubting that government authorities have, as their overriding driver, the welfare of the public (and not personal financial and career prospects) and another part of me is doubting the necessity and efficacy of the vaccines.
I have often wondered how much clout big pharma has. Interesting and complex. Much room for debate.
vaccines are not related to SIDS. I have a theory that covers every aspect of SIDS. i also published a couple of books on it too. i had to convince the 2 world's leading experts to get published as i am a physicist. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VTiyShic5NU
The point of this Substack article is not to prove whether vaccines are or are not related to SIDS. It's that science should not be deleted from the record because it arrives at a different conclusion to the mainstream accepted view.
yes, i understand, but i thought it would be good to promote my theory anyhow. i did a lot of research when i came up with my theory. vaccines were never really a serious contender for SIDS. there are more known facts about SIDS than what most people realise that vaccines do not have any hope of explaining, eg SIDS is lower if the baby sleeps in the same room as the parents but higher if in same bed as parents, sleep position of baby, etc., etc..
Lost count of the number of times I have written this over the past six years:
The only safe vaccine is the one never used. The only immunity provided by vaccination is to Harma, from prosecution for the countless deaths and injuries caused by its toxic products. The true purpose of vaccination is to weaken and sicken the populace to facilitate control...and to cull when they desire.
Another peg in the 'public trust' coffin.
Cover up and protection of the SATANIC PHARMA CULT!--------TIMELINE OF PEOPLES HEALTH IMPROVEMENT DEBATE REQUIRED!?
There needs to be a proper open and honest debate about where the big improvements came from in peoples health!? Also a timeline of events and improvements. I say it was the improvement in water/housing/sewage etc
. People living in less cramped spaces and on top of one another. But governments/MSM/WEF/WHO/FULL FACTS/medics etc all claim it was PHARMA. Who pays them millions of pounds/dollars etc
If the VAERS data is essentially free of bogus reports (I imagined a lodgement was far from straightforward, for instance) and if it represents a big understatement of vaccine damage then the only reasonable ground for suppression is that it is in the public's interest to be kept in ignorance. And at face value, this is plausible, given the relative rarity of SIDS and the purported benefits of vaccination.
However, the cynical part of me is doubting that government authorities have, as their overriding driver, the welfare of the public (and not personal financial and career prospects) and another part of me is doubting the necessity and efficacy of the vaccines.
I have often wondered how much clout big pharma has. Interesting and complex. Much room for debate.
vaccines are not related to SIDS. I have a theory that covers every aspect of SIDS. i also published a couple of books on it too. i had to convince the 2 world's leading experts to get published as i am a physicist. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VTiyShic5NU
The point of this Substack article is not to prove whether vaccines are or are not related to SIDS. It's that science should not be deleted from the record because it arrives at a different conclusion to the mainstream accepted view.
yes, i understand, but i thought it would be good to promote my theory anyhow. i did a lot of research when i came up with my theory. vaccines were never really a serious contender for SIDS. there are more known facts about SIDS than what most people realise that vaccines do not have any hope of explaining, eg SIDS is lower if the baby sleeps in the same room as the parents but higher if in same bed as parents, sleep position of baby, etc., etc..
Lost count of the number of times I have written this over the past six years:
The only safe vaccine is the one never used. The only immunity provided by vaccination is to Harma, from prosecution for the countless deaths and injuries caused by its toxic products. The true purpose of vaccination is to weaken and sicken the populace to facilitate control...and to cull when they desire.
Set up to be a rigged game. Bastards