May 12, 2023·edited May 12, 2023Liked by Rebekah Barnett
At this point we should all have one simple rule … if our unaccountable, ridiculous, corrupt and disingenuous government and it’s corporate enablers/sponsors/ masters are advocating for something, do the exact opposite.
Could be wrong but I haven’t seen a single positive, forward-thinking, honest and credible act or decision from our glorious leaders in 20 years, certainly not one that at its core doesn’t further centralise power, increase control, limit freedom and add to our spiralling debt.
This latest farce of a “voice” only belies the fact, if according to its benefactors it’s so so necessary and important now, how useless our existing government leadership must be, as it obviously must be failing currently in all the areas that their magic “voice” will “uplift” us all.
To then watch these despicable corporate stooges line up in “woke face” as you say to lend their own lack of credibility and honesty to the massive racket that is the “voice” is vomit-inducing. There will be no tangible benefit to a single aboriginal issue or individual, beyond the usual handouts to a handful of well-connected families and so-called charities who will continue to act as front men for the money-laundering operation that accompanies every modern woke government initiative to “uplift marginalised first Australians” … all the while offering said marginalised nothing but more excuses for why they need never be accountable for their own shit decisions, daft and backwards culture and lack of personal responsibility.
Of course - as with Bill Gates rebranding himself as a philanthropist - "the health and wellbeing of First Nations peoples" will mean "full access to vaccines & other pharmaceuticals".
We've already seen the propaganda hose directed to our indigenous communities, in the guise of providing health services.
If we do get "Yes" winning the vote, that indigenous advisory panel will be heavily stacked to supporting pharmaceuticals, just as every other government & quasi-government body has been bought.
We've all seen how this rolls - the NWO agenda is going to continue the transfer of wealth from ordinary people to the transnational corporations, and there will come a point (if we are not there already) when we can do sweet FA about it.
Most Aborigines take English language statements at face value, and the Voice exploits this. Ironically, or dare I say it, by calculated intention, not one of the Voice's architects can speak an Aboriiginal language, nor possess even a shadow of Aboriginal culture, and none have any grasp of Aboriginal needs, especially in the Centre and North.
Because in the NT and Kimberly, only a handful of Aborigines grasp more than rudimentary English language skills, articulating their needs is not possible when no goverment liaison officers speak their languages. No programmes will succeed until this happens, as was predicted by the anthropologist AP Elkin in the 1940s.
And because parenting and all social regulatory mechanisms flow from Aboriginal Law, until this is recognised, more kids will go off the rails, more will end up in prison, and more families will become dysfunctional.
Here is the rub. The Voice personnel will oppose these measures because these will transfer their power to the communities where it belongs. A "Yes" vote for the Voice will be a vote for total destruction of Aboriginal culture, and the conversion of all Aboriginal youth into a violent criminal class. The subsequent social division will terminate mainstream Australian culture, which will be replaced with the empowered immigrant invasion.
Anybody who thinks we have the power to alter this course of events with votes and peaceful protest is delusional. Rupert Murdoch, annointed successor to David Rockefeller, is the ultimate architect and manager of Australian destruction. Take him down and we have a chance. How?
Murdoch spent millions of dollars rewriting history to hide his 1970s criminal acts and the evidence of this appears in the novel "The Lost Track". Publishers are terrified of the consequences should they dare print and distribute, and so this book, written by Kato Rivera, is being distributed around the world by stealth as a PDF. Aussies can access the book free through sunstack oziz4oziz, presuming Rebekah approves.
Rebekah, I have been thinking of writing an article on this but from a different perspective. The YES campaign is being rolled out in the same way as the pro vaccination campaign for covid. Some are speculating that there will be a new manufactured crisis to keep us on our toes, but I don't think that will happen in Australia this year. This year they are squeezing in "the Voice" legislation and will not want any distractions from that because...? Well why is it so important? I haven't done the research necessary to really understand the legal implications, but others are saying that it will open the door to UN takeover of Australia. How? I have no idea.
But the similarity in the way they are manufacturing consent is a red flag. Where I am in NSW the only TV advertising left for the jabs is pitched squarely at Aboriginals. And then there is all this Voice stuff with a barage of "good people will vote yes" and "bad people will vote no", going on. At this stage I don't have the courage to admit openly to being a "bad person" over this, even though I happily admitted to being a "bad person" over not having the vaxx. I so admire the Aboriginal voices who are having the courage to argue No. And with the No campaign being nominally led by Peter Dutton, the most despised Liberal leader ever, what hope is there for it?
They succeeded with covid so will they succeed by using the same techniques with The Voice?
This is all feelings at the moment, and I am squirming. Sooner or later I will have to do the research to confirm why this is making me feel so uncomfortable. Stephen Reason has published a few articles here on Substack, on the voice, which I confess, I have not yet read. Better get to it.
They're poking fun at us Rebekah or rather, in the vernacular, they're taking the piss. Phizer; supporting Yes vote makes the campaign a Phizzer, ONLY if you've got a brain that actually thinks.
May 12, 2023·edited May 12, 2023Liked by Rebekah Barnett
Hello Rebekah, Pfizer's endorsement of The Voice is certainly the reddest of red flags. I've written extensively on the subject of the true agenda behind the Indigenous Voice to Parliament. My research has been corroborated with the extensive research of Josephine Cashman.
Cashman was a former Indigenous Advisor to Prime Minister, Tony Abbot, and had the privilege of viewing high-level documents in the consultation of what was to become The Uluru Statement (upon which The Voice is based.) In the process, Cashman discovered that the UN was plotting (via Agenda 21, and Agenda 2030) to exploit the Indigenous to literally thieve Australian land, to use Native Title, then The Voice, and then ratify Treaty by an executive "Aboriginal Parliament" to place our entire continent under a Communistic collectivism that they control. Nominally, it will be "returned to the Aboriginals" who will own everything, but truly nothing, while ALL Australians (including the Indigenous) will forfeit their private land rights.
The Transnational Corporatocracy/Globalists will OWN everything (especially resources such as lithium and uranium, and our farmlands). This is the insidious gambit that is being attempted - "You will own nothing, and be happy."
It is not surprising that Pfizer is at the forefront of endorsing this insidious Voice. The UN project is global, and it certainly involves a conglomerate of transnational mega-corporations (such as Pfizer) that are owned by a cabal of oligarchical billionaires. The Voice is their regional attempt to steal Australian land in the service of the overarching Great Reset agenda. The United Nations are synonymous with the Corporatocracy.
I want to see the changes. The exact wording! It is my concern that this will remove the important bit stating the Aboriginal people are the ‘custodians of this land’. If this is the case, could open the gate for land to be sold off more easily that perhaps, this piece of our constitution prevents. I’m suspicious and Pfizer’s interest is just another red flag for me. How dare they use Aboriginal art motif! WHO do they think they are? 👿
Edit: and people need to sign up to work at the referendum. They will steal it. AEC wants jabbed and masked people out at Aboriginal communities. "It is a condition of employment for temporary workers in certain positions (Mobile Polling and Remote teams) to have COVID-19 vaccination, or a medical exemption." I'm signing up with my unvaccinated self and will report back.
very much obliged to you Rebekah for these postings - and your readers - thank you .
the spin keeps on coming - our family determined a no vote after the sickening stench we endured over the last 3 years - I have been fortunate for many years to sit with a wirrloo and learn womens law . there is little to zero interest from these strong independent women for a 'voice' in that world. They already have a voice living it under the radar in plain sight and I have been listening and learning - preparing for these times. next to the wisdom of this culture the government the corporations look puny and pathetic - there is an other world going on beyond all their machinations and that is the world we will bequeath to our grandchildren.
At this point we should all have one simple rule … if our unaccountable, ridiculous, corrupt and disingenuous government and it’s corporate enablers/sponsors/ masters are advocating for something, do the exact opposite.
Could be wrong but I haven’t seen a single positive, forward-thinking, honest and credible act or decision from our glorious leaders in 20 years, certainly not one that at its core doesn’t further centralise power, increase control, limit freedom and add to our spiralling debt.
This latest farce of a “voice” only belies the fact, if according to its benefactors it’s so so necessary and important now, how useless our existing government leadership must be, as it obviously must be failing currently in all the areas that their magic “voice” will “uplift” us all.
To then watch these despicable corporate stooges line up in “woke face” as you say to lend their own lack of credibility and honesty to the massive racket that is the “voice” is vomit-inducing. There will be no tangible benefit to a single aboriginal issue or individual, beyond the usual handouts to a handful of well-connected families and so-called charities who will continue to act as front men for the money-laundering operation that accompanies every modern woke government initiative to “uplift marginalised first Australians” … all the while offering said marginalised nothing but more excuses for why they need never be accountable for their own shit decisions, daft and backwards culture and lack of personal responsibility.
Sorry, not sorry.
Just as adopting Chinese pandemic protocols is an indicator, so is following a drug companies constitutional suggestions. HOW ABOUT NO?!?!?
Of course - as with Bill Gates rebranding himself as a philanthropist - "the health and wellbeing of First Nations peoples" will mean "full access to vaccines & other pharmaceuticals".
We've already seen the propaganda hose directed to our indigenous communities, in the guise of providing health services.
If we do get "Yes" winning the vote, that indigenous advisory panel will be heavily stacked to supporting pharmaceuticals, just as every other government & quasi-government body has been bought.
We've all seen how this rolls - the NWO agenda is going to continue the transfer of wealth from ordinary people to the transnational corporations, and there will come a point (if we are not there already) when we can do sweet FA about it.
ANYTHING Phizzer produces or supports is a firm NO from me.
Phark off Pfizzer!
Most Aborigines take English language statements at face value, and the Voice exploits this. Ironically, or dare I say it, by calculated intention, not one of the Voice's architects can speak an Aboriiginal language, nor possess even a shadow of Aboriginal culture, and none have any grasp of Aboriginal needs, especially in the Centre and North.
Because in the NT and Kimberly, only a handful of Aborigines grasp more than rudimentary English language skills, articulating their needs is not possible when no goverment liaison officers speak their languages. No programmes will succeed until this happens, as was predicted by the anthropologist AP Elkin in the 1940s.
And because parenting and all social regulatory mechanisms flow from Aboriginal Law, until this is recognised, more kids will go off the rails, more will end up in prison, and more families will become dysfunctional.
Here is the rub. The Voice personnel will oppose these measures because these will transfer their power to the communities where it belongs. A "Yes" vote for the Voice will be a vote for total destruction of Aboriginal culture, and the conversion of all Aboriginal youth into a violent criminal class. The subsequent social division will terminate mainstream Australian culture, which will be replaced with the empowered immigrant invasion.
Anybody who thinks we have the power to alter this course of events with votes and peaceful protest is delusional. Rupert Murdoch, annointed successor to David Rockefeller, is the ultimate architect and manager of Australian destruction. Take him down and we have a chance. How?
Murdoch spent millions of dollars rewriting history to hide his 1970s criminal acts and the evidence of this appears in the novel "The Lost Track". Publishers are terrified of the consequences should they dare print and distribute, and so this book, written by Kato Rivera, is being distributed around the world by stealth as a PDF. Aussies can access the book free through sunstack oziz4oziz, presuming Rebekah approves.
While here, may I offer my thanks to Rebekah Barnett. This is a great site and much-needed.
Rebekah, I have been thinking of writing an article on this but from a different perspective. The YES campaign is being rolled out in the same way as the pro vaccination campaign for covid. Some are speculating that there will be a new manufactured crisis to keep us on our toes, but I don't think that will happen in Australia this year. This year they are squeezing in "the Voice" legislation and will not want any distractions from that because...? Well why is it so important? I haven't done the research necessary to really understand the legal implications, but others are saying that it will open the door to UN takeover of Australia. How? I have no idea.
But the similarity in the way they are manufacturing consent is a red flag. Where I am in NSW the only TV advertising left for the jabs is pitched squarely at Aboriginals. And then there is all this Voice stuff with a barage of "good people will vote yes" and "bad people will vote no", going on. At this stage I don't have the courage to admit openly to being a "bad person" over this, even though I happily admitted to being a "bad person" over not having the vaxx. I so admire the Aboriginal voices who are having the courage to argue No. And with the No campaign being nominally led by Peter Dutton, the most despised Liberal leader ever, what hope is there for it?
They succeeded with covid so will they succeed by using the same techniques with The Voice?
This is all feelings at the moment, and I am squirming. Sooner or later I will have to do the research to confirm why this is making me feel so uncomfortable. Stephen Reason has published a few articles here on Substack, on the voice, which I confess, I have not yet read. Better get to it.
https://stephenreason.substack.com/
They're poking fun at us Rebekah or rather, in the vernacular, they're taking the piss. Phizer; supporting Yes vote makes the campaign a Phizzer, ONLY if you've got a brain that actually thinks.
Hello Rebekah, Pfizer's endorsement of The Voice is certainly the reddest of red flags. I've written extensively on the subject of the true agenda behind the Indigenous Voice to Parliament. My research has been corroborated with the extensive research of Josephine Cashman.
Cashman was a former Indigenous Advisor to Prime Minister, Tony Abbot, and had the privilege of viewing high-level documents in the consultation of what was to become The Uluru Statement (upon which The Voice is based.) In the process, Cashman discovered that the UN was plotting (via Agenda 21, and Agenda 2030) to exploit the Indigenous to literally thieve Australian land, to use Native Title, then The Voice, and then ratify Treaty by an executive "Aboriginal Parliament" to place our entire continent under a Communistic collectivism that they control. Nominally, it will be "returned to the Aboriginals" who will own everything, but truly nothing, while ALL Australians (including the Indigenous) will forfeit their private land rights.
The Transnational Corporatocracy/Globalists will OWN everything (especially resources such as lithium and uranium, and our farmlands). This is the insidious gambit that is being attempted - "You will own nothing, and be happy."
It is not surprising that Pfizer is at the forefront of endorsing this insidious Voice. The UN project is global, and it certainly involves a conglomerate of transnational mega-corporations (such as Pfizer) that are owned by a cabal of oligarchical billionaires. The Voice is their regional attempt to steal Australian land in the service of the overarching Great Reset agenda. The United Nations are synonymous with the Corporatocracy.
I invite you to read my latest piece:
https://open.substack.com/pub/stephenreason/p/the-voice-of-deception-how-the-voice?r=17nqkb&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
I want to see the changes. The exact wording! It is my concern that this will remove the important bit stating the Aboriginal people are the ‘custodians of this land’. If this is the case, could open the gate for land to be sold off more easily that perhaps, this piece of our constitution prevents. I’m suspicious and Pfizer’s interest is just another red flag for me. How dare they use Aboriginal art motif! WHO do they think they are? 👿
The fist is closing in everywhere, and most people don't see it.
Pfizer had more than a voice in Australia in last 3 years.
LOL.
For any readers interested, here is the Novavax contract: https://vicparkpetition.substack.com/p/australias-novavax-contract
Here are reader reactions and my interpretation: https://vicparkpetition.substack.com/p/the-banality-of-evil
(second link is for you R.)
I'm waiting on the other contracts.
Edit: and people need to sign up to work at the referendum. They will steal it. AEC wants jabbed and masked people out at Aboriginal communities. "It is a condition of employment for temporary workers in certain positions (Mobile Polling and Remote teams) to have COVID-19 vaccination, or a medical exemption." I'm signing up with my unvaccinated self and will report back.
Connect the dots (clots?)
https://www.aec.gov.au/employment/working-at-elections/
Great article just more to add to the No list, FYI I haven’t got anything on the yes list so far
very much obliged to you Rebekah for these postings - and your readers - thank you .
the spin keeps on coming - our family determined a no vote after the sickening stench we endured over the last 3 years - I have been fortunate for many years to sit with a wirrloo and learn womens law . there is little to zero interest from these strong independent women for a 'voice' in that world. They already have a voice living it under the radar in plain sight and I have been listening and learning - preparing for these times. next to the wisdom of this culture the government the corporations look puny and pathetic - there is an other world going on beyond all their machinations and that is the world we will bequeath to our grandchildren.