Everybody with half a brain understands these vaccines are a terrible option to a disease with less than 1% fatality... being pushed to cause a 10% fatal outcomes and a 35% increase in physical and mental injuries.
The entire program should stop immediately...and the people involved in funding making ... distribution and delivery taken through the justice system... that includes governmental over reach by zealous despots because numbers are still climbing even though the pandemic is over.
And yet Malhoutra was on TV pushing them...I'm not sure why these 'freedom heroes' are being thrust in our faces after pushing the jab and everyone was injected. Now they're like 'oops it was actually a bad idea.' Really? A cursory search of the literature, which he would have been able to do before the roll out, demonstrated that the mRNA platform is extremely dangerous.
Nurse educator Dr John Campbell also promoted jabbing. Both are doing their best to make sure the mRNA jabs are shut down for good. Unjabbed people like me are in the minority.
Same for UK oncologist/vaccine developer Prof Angus Dalgleish interviewed here by another dr who really presses him to explain his u-turn https://www.bitchute.com/video/3sLIs1AckC1s/ At one stage he seems to be saying that he was forced into it. I'm not convinced. Worth watching if you have the time.
Wow this was really interesting - thank you for posting. I watched up until he described 'that' article. Like Malhoutra, he only understood there was a problem with the jabs until his son got myocarditis? Coming from a man of his background who knew in Jan/Feb 2020 about the furin cleavage site and the ENTIRE history of the GOF in Wuhan? And vitamin D? Sure he may have been bamboozled by the daily mail with the article but then goes on to talk about his son. I don't buy it. What the hell is going on with these people? Even my concreter knew the jabs were shit and didn't stop transmission early on. I'm going back to my main thesis: military operation - threats, psyops everywhere.
Don't buy it either. I think he was trying to save his reputation after he initially challenged the virus origin narrative and copped a lot of flak, then the vaccine he and his Norwegian colleague were developing attracted no interest, so he thought he'd try to get back on the right side of his funders and went overboard criticising medical personnel who refused the jabs. I think he has a very guilty conscience. Did he say whether or not he got the jab?
Up until the point I watched I did not hear him say he got the jab. Good point with the funders yet I would go further: he was threatened. He is retired and shouldn't care *that* much about funding, not enough to compromise all his scientific principles and suddenly go full-on narrative. His scientific career up until that point was pretty innovative so he would be used to getting knocked back. He seemed scared to me. Maybe I'm reading it wrong, although all these 'smart' doctors seem to have the same story: I didn't check the literature and only knew the jabs were bad until my family was hurt...um...no. They didn't suddenly forget how to do science.
I think we've got to give them a bit of credit for coming to their senses. They're a cut above the ones who are still pushing it. It takes a bit of gutsfor some of them to admit they were wrong. We actually need a lot more of them to do a full 180. They're more convincing to the normies than those of us who recognised the bullshit from the get go. It's like with Bush and Powell and their suckerbait about WMDs in Iraq. It took me half a nanosecond to realise "Hey, this is complete bullshit. It makes no sense that they'd still be stockpiling WMDs. The only way any are going to turn up is if they plant them there." I was shocked that they didn't plant any but I knew there were none there. You were probably the same butbillions ofpeople around the world fell for it just like they did for the safe and effective mRNA jabs con. There's one born every minute.
First stage of damage limitation is to cover your rear end... apparently it’s the most vulnerable part of your body when you turn your back on what is going on.
He is being too kind. There is malicious intent at some levels. Wilful blindness to that to reduce discomfort about medical homicide for financial bonuses may be occurring in some doctors but it cannot be all of them.
People misunderstand the use of the word "Decimation". Originally, it was a Ancient Roman word for culling ONE TENTH of a Legion, for grievous punishment. Each squad of 10 would draw straws, the guy with the short straw was BEATEN TO DEATH by his squaddies. Thus the unit was redeemed.
I posit THIS MECHANISM for groups of TEN GPs & Pharmacists & Nurses, ALL who profitted from this Iatrogenic Genocide. WORLDWIDE. Because "do no harm", because "do not profit from murder".
"In Dr Malhotra’s view, we did not arrive here due to a battle between good and evil, or because of a global depopulation plan. Rather, this is the result of a systemic failure that has to be fixed at the root."
Respectfully, I used to be like him. It's terrifying to think otherwise. Dr Yeadon understands what is happening. I think Dr M is trying to 'retain credibility' by taking the middle road. Here is what Abi Roberts thinks of him: https://abiroberts.substack.com/p/malhotra-v-leather-girl
You know what's funny, I was just looking at an article published a year ago debating forced vaccination in Australia. One of the top comments was this: "I agree that everyone should be vaccinated, however compusory vaccination cannot work without laws enabling people to be forcibly held down whilst given a jab. Much as I love the idea of seeing this happen to anti-vaxxers, I can't see it happening."
Second most liked comment "Should be mandatory. If you opt out then you also need to opt out of free hospital treatment when you get infected."
Bonus: my neighbour of many years who said I should be "liquidated in a camp."
Bonus McClown dog whistle "short of holding people down and forcing them there isn't much more I can do."
That's our 'broad middle.' There are no data that can overcome this real-time fear response and visceral hatred of people who do not conform in the middle of an active propaganda campaign when people fear for their lives. Next we will probably be jailed for being "UFO deniers."
Now they're just watching sportsball and going on holiday. They don't know about the excess deaths - the staffers at the Senators' offices don't even know about the excess deaths.
The low booster uptake is really the only good news at the moment but if the government mandated it they would probably all queue up again.
I don’t agree that those commenters are the broad middle. I work alongside the broad middle a couple of days a week in our family business. They were a tad uncomfortable with the situation but wanted to ‘do the right thing’. Now, they think the whole thing is dumb, but are incurious as to how or why it happened, and woefully uninformed (due to getting news from ABC and the television).
"He also showed not an ounce of remorse, or any sign that he, a doctor, had played any part in this ongoing ethical disgrace."
- Dr Malhotra addressed this head on in our interview. It's in the article but will also be in the video, to be released. I don't think it's fair to take this statement as indicative of his position, because he has repeatedly and explicitly addressed his part in this in public.
" Odd then that Dr Malhotra should implicitly trust the very same Big Pharma who were creating the ‘vaccines’ so hurriedly, to be thrust into the arms of the global population."
- This was also addressed in our interview, per the article. You might not agree with his explanation for why he considered vaccines to be a 'special category', but he did give it.
"This included a particularly patronising NHS-style section about how the obese were more at risk, so diet and lifestyle was paramount. That must be why they closed the gyms, and exercise was limited to an hour a day, whilst people sat at home watching Masterchef and stuffing their faces."
- It seems particularly disingenuous to a) read Malhotra's advocacy for metabolic health (his work of the past decade) as patronising and, b) to insinuate that he is somehow responsible for gyms being closed. Were Malhotra not famous for advocating for metabolic health in the face of institutional opposition, maybe I'd be more inclined to take this point seriously. But he is, so I'm not.
"over time I’ve come to realise that this is actually a PR exercise in whitewashing the medical profession, without the accountability, contrition or justice."
- This is the direct opposite of what Malhotra said with his own words in our interview. I wonder if her leaving early meant she missed the good bit? Or he just didn't address this in the talk on that night. We don't know, because she left.
"What I had in fact witnessed was a doctor whose aim was not to humbly beg forgiveness, and say mea culpa for going on TV to praise and promote these jabs, but rather to swerve any culpability at all by seemingly saying ‘it wasn’t my fault, the evidence has changed’"
- That's a fair point. Dr Malhotra addressed it in our interview. I think some will be satisfied with his explanation and some won't.
"Majorie and Joan’s beloved grandchildren may have life-changing cardiac issues for life, but let’s give the nice doctor a wink and a smile cos he’s said he didn’t know the risks, but recommended the injections anyway."
- To the best of my knowledge, and by Malhotra's testimony, he never recommended vaccines for children, nor for healthy adults.
"Yesterday, Malhotra tweeted praise to *checks notes* Piers Morgan, who, without question, would happily have squeezed into his SS-Covid uniform, and shoved the unvaccinated into camps with the butt of a rifle, if things had progressed the way they were going. And they did go in that direction in many countries."
- I think this person doesn't understand how campaigning works. She seems very fixated on being right, and being vindicated. I understand that, but it's counter productive to the primary goal in this context, which is getting the shots off the market.
"There’s no contrition, anger, humility, or passion in his demeanour."
- This is highly subjective. From my conversation with him, I cannot agree with the whole of this statement. But then my perception is also subjective.
Yes, maybe we just have to give him time - I will give him the benefit of doubt for now. If this is the case he has a lot of catching up to do. Admittedly - Drs like him I respected and had been following for yrs - so they were my go to in early 2020, as they were already questioning the narrative in other areas of health/medicine. Unfortunately they failed me - what was I seeing that they weren't, it made me research harder, -in this time Ivor Cummins was my sanity check until others started coming out. I hope he has learnt his lesson - at least do the research, look at the research trials before going on TV - it was all available for everyone to see, I hope he sees this as a BIG mistake. Peter Doshi from BMJ was also writing re his concerns in 2020 way before the roll-out. Everything was in plain sight.
Dr Yeadon is very aware. That substack link was great.
You need to drag the fence sitters or middle Australia with you.
He does not even get much MSM traction despite his mostly diplomatic language.
It matters not whether every Covid conspiracy has become established fact.
Middle Australia will not rock the boat, they believe the MSM and the Government- they have been programmed over generations and also rely on them for lots of their needs.
Read abiroberts substack which voices my misgivings about Malhotra. I’m very suss on people who change sides. I remember when he was pushing the vaccines. Mike Yeardon has been consistent from the start. I printed his early article of April 7 2021 “Your Govt is lying to you...” and refer back to it a lot. A lot of people jumping on the bandwagon now...and yes, a book will be in the pipeline.
However, if we don’t allow people to change their mind and join the cause in advocating to stop the shots, then we’ll never get anywhere. I understand people wanting an apology and wanting to feel vindicated, but personally I feel very frustrated by people’s unwillingness to accept those who have ‘come to see’ and are trying to pitch in now. Most of us, at some time, did not see. I didn’t catch on to what was going on til 2021 because like Malhotra, I’m more inclined to need to see the evidence before I make the full mental shift. I spent 3-4 months reading studies, watching academic presentations and parliamentary hearings, etc and finally clicked. I was lucky I had the time to do that - most don’t. My partner was onto it way before me (he’s a gut feeling guy) but he didn’t cast me aside just because I didn’t see everything exactly his way at exactly the same time as him!
Point taken. However for anyone in the medical profession to have been advocating an untested vaccine before reliable data was acquired, was unusual. Particularly since the shortest development time for a vaccine was 4 years (measles) and the longest 40 years (polio). This factor, plus Professor Frasers early comment that there had never been a successful vaccine for a respiratory disease rung alarm bells for me.
The big picture is better understood by Peter Breggin. Breggin was early in his understanding and it would benefit us all if you were to interview him about the big picture. This would help with clarification of the big picture, which Malhotra doesn't provide, as he was late to the party.
Malhotra misses the mark with this comment, because it muddies the water: "Dr Malhotra puts this blindness down to indoctrination rather than malicious intent." With respect to health care workers, many were indoctrinated, but developed malicious intent against the unjabbed. With respect to pharma...stop! Pharma includes not only Pfizer & Moderna, but their financial partners: NIH, CIA, CEPI, GAVI, BMGF, DOD. This must be made clear. Malhotra fails to clarify.
Hey Rebekah, the Shrestha et al study showing that the covid infection rate increases in direct proportion to the number of prior jabs has been peer reviewed and published and the BS methodological criticism that it is confounded by indication/higher risk people getting more jabs has been addressed and refuted. Igor Chudov has analysed VA data and shown in the VA sample that the same relationship exists between deaths from covid and number of prior jabs. The study on class switch from IgG3 to IgG4 after the 3rd mRNA jab has been corroborated by a new paper that shows IgG4 soars with repeated vaccination, including for failed HIV and malaria jabs as well as the covid mRNA jabs, and that for an unknown, but probably large, number of susceptible individuals this means turbocancer, autoimmune myocarditis and other autommune disease. McGowan got the triple jabbed rate for 16yo+ up to >80% by May 2023 and based on the Shrestha et al study this would have been responsible for why so many people in WA got infected after McGowan opened the borders. Getting infected with covid is a prerequisite for dying from it so McGowan is responsible for deaths as well as infections, which is also an implication of Igor Chudov's findings. It was predictable from the BigData Bayesian causal impact analysis of the relationship between jab rates and infections in 145 countries conducted by Kyle Beattie from UOttawa that this would happen and I know for a fact that his study was brought to McGowan's attention before he opened up and he just ignored it. It was also brought to Gunner's and Dan Andrews' and other Premiers attention right after it came out and they ignored it too. The IgG4 findings suggest that WA with its 80%+ triple jabbed rate for the 16yo+ population is going to be experiencing a tsunami of turbocancer, autoimmune disease and other disease that's coming down the pipeline. Was McGowan aware of what these newly published papers are indicating when he decided to cut and run? Is anyone going to hold him to account? Are the results of these studies and their implications going to be explained to WA's covid inquiry? Or is McGowan instead going to get some grand award like Dame Jacinda Ardern?
Better late than never, but how many have been injured or killed because men like this didn't do their due diligence? Also, nurse Campbell ... He just swallowed the lies and promoted the fear even whilst the death data (lack of covid deaths) was available for analysis.
They are doing the right thing by speaking out. I just can't forgive them for their lack of due diligence. I'm not a scientist or a doctor of medicine but even I was aware of the actual figures/data when Dr. Campbell was still on board with presenting the narrative - in detail - as though it were fact. We have been subjected to a campaign of government sponsored terror that forced us into compliance. Men like them should have been our protectors. Instead they were enablers of democide. Gross negligence on their part.
I understand where you’re coming from. For me, I’m choosing to forgive (but not forget) because
A) it’s a religious/spiritual tradition that I think is profoundly wise
B) it sets me free from resentment
C) who am I to judge? You only know what you know, and you don’t know what you don’t know. I know ppl who ‘woke up’ in the 2008 GFC. I didn’t understand what they were trying to say and I didn’t see it til 2021.
I do see a distinction between naively ‘not knowing’ vs. ‘wilful blindness’
I really do want to believe that Malhotra amongst others are honest, ethical actors in this great play being acted out in front of us but I have my doubts. It helps me to think that there remain certain ethical actors on the chessboard, but those who have sought the limelight and seek to join the “alterna-conserva-liberty-lite” speaking circuit do not exactly fill me with confidence.
I don't trust Malhotra nor his kind. Many ordinary public knew they were dangerous and something didn't add up right from the start. That's because the illness story didn't add up either. He only ever mentions the mRNA type as do all like him. Well they are ALL harmful and the AZ has been killing and maiming plenty so much so it was quietly withdrawn in the UK with no publicity. If he were genuine , whilst it's no longer being offered, why not mention this one too? I wonder how much he gets paid for doing "the circuit". He is hardly ever in the UK these days and is globetrotting around to speak at events to basically the already awake. I for one wouldn't give him the time of day and wouldn't part with $1 to attend in Perth. I have more respect for those who have their boots on the ground trying to help humanity and Malhotra isn't one of them. The normies haven't even heard of him. Also it's might y strange as he doesn't seem to be censored nor getting the same hassles as all the other good Drs etc who have been speaking out since day 1.
"Dr Malhotra puts this blindness down to indoctrination rather than malicious intent." lol (and remains pro magic-injections). Darn, how unlucky for everyone... this time! But stay him citizen, keep on track. Keep believing The Science. The next bio-crisis and injections will be better. They'll fix the mistakes. They'll keep us safe.
Be better than this Rebekah. Tell the truth. Not these phoney false prophets.
It’s an interview in which Dr Malhotra gave his opinion. It’s not my place to insert my opinion into an article like this. Great thing about Substack is you all get to disagree in the comments!
It no longer matters whether you got the injection or not. You are being vaccinated via the water supply and most likely other ingestible pathways now.
Further, the purpose of this is clear and indisputable at this point, and anyone saying it's anything other than this is a fool and not worth listening to (let alone paying to listen to...!) We are being connected to the internet;
Everybody with half a brain understands these vaccines are a terrible option to a disease with less than 1% fatality... being pushed to cause a 10% fatal outcomes and a 35% increase in physical and mental injuries.
The entire program should stop immediately...and the people involved in funding making ... distribution and delivery taken through the justice system... that includes governmental over reach by zealous despots because numbers are still climbing even though the pandemic is over.
And yet Malhoutra was on TV pushing them...I'm not sure why these 'freedom heroes' are being thrust in our faces after pushing the jab and everyone was injected. Now they're like 'oops it was actually a bad idea.' Really? A cursory search of the literature, which he would have been able to do before the roll out, demonstrated that the mRNA platform is extremely dangerous.
Nurse educator Dr John Campbell also promoted jabbing. Both are doing their best to make sure the mRNA jabs are shut down for good. Unjabbed people like me are in the minority.
https://petermcculloughmd.substack.com/p/the-novelty-of-mrna-viral-vaccines
Freedom hero Dr Peter McCullough: mRNA Off to a Bad Start but Future May be Brighter
Same for UK oncologist/vaccine developer Prof Angus Dalgleish interviewed here by another dr who really presses him to explain his u-turn https://www.bitchute.com/video/3sLIs1AckC1s/ At one stage he seems to be saying that he was forced into it. I'm not convinced. Worth watching if you have the time.
Wow this was really interesting - thank you for posting. I watched up until he described 'that' article. Like Malhoutra, he only understood there was a problem with the jabs until his son got myocarditis? Coming from a man of his background who knew in Jan/Feb 2020 about the furin cleavage site and the ENTIRE history of the GOF in Wuhan? And vitamin D? Sure he may have been bamboozled by the daily mail with the article but then goes on to talk about his son. I don't buy it. What the hell is going on with these people? Even my concreter knew the jabs were shit and didn't stop transmission early on. I'm going back to my main thesis: military operation - threats, psyops everywhere.
Don't buy it either. I think he was trying to save his reputation after he initially challenged the virus origin narrative and copped a lot of flak, then the vaccine he and his Norwegian colleague were developing attracted no interest, so he thought he'd try to get back on the right side of his funders and went overboard criticising medical personnel who refused the jabs. I think he has a very guilty conscience. Did he say whether or not he got the jab?
Up until the point I watched I did not hear him say he got the jab. Good point with the funders yet I would go further: he was threatened. He is retired and shouldn't care *that* much about funding, not enough to compromise all his scientific principles and suddenly go full-on narrative. His scientific career up until that point was pretty innovative so he would be used to getting knocked back. He seemed scared to me. Maybe I'm reading it wrong, although all these 'smart' doctors seem to have the same story: I didn't check the literature and only knew the jabs were bad until my family was hurt...um...no. They didn't suddenly forget how to do science.
Yes, that makes more sense.
Just like Malone
I think we've got to give them a bit of credit for coming to their senses. They're a cut above the ones who are still pushing it. It takes a bit of gutsfor some of them to admit they were wrong. We actually need a lot more of them to do a full 180. They're more convincing to the normies than those of us who recognised the bullshit from the get go. It's like with Bush and Powell and their suckerbait about WMDs in Iraq. It took me half a nanosecond to realise "Hey, this is complete bullshit. It makes no sense that they'd still be stockpiling WMDs. The only way any are going to turn up is if they plant them there." I was shocked that they didn't plant any but I knew there were none there. You were probably the same butbillions ofpeople around the world fell for it just like they did for the safe and effective mRNA jabs con. There's one born every minute.
First stage of damage limitation is to cover your rear end... apparently it’s the most vulnerable part of your body when you turn your back on what is going on.
Used be preferred area for jabbing
Oh no no no no! A cursory search of the literature? You can't suggest people do that! That really isn't on! It's just not on at all!
https://twitter.com/RobertKennedyJr/status/1665078398828576769
So much ignorance out here. Talking to people at church that lined for their fifth booster.
He is being too kind. There is malicious intent at some levels. Wilful blindness to that to reduce discomfort about medical homicide for financial bonuses may be occurring in some doctors but it cannot be all of them.
Its great that they are all coming to speak here. Thank you for the interview
Thanks Rebekah,
People misunderstand the use of the word "Decimation". Originally, it was a Ancient Roman word for culling ONE TENTH of a Legion, for grievous punishment. Each squad of 10 would draw straws, the guy with the short straw was BEATEN TO DEATH by his squaddies. Thus the unit was redeemed.
I posit THIS MECHANISM for groups of TEN GPs & Pharmacists & Nurses, ALL who profitted from this Iatrogenic Genocide. WORLDWIDE. Because "do no harm", because "do not profit from murder".
One in TEN. Or WE inject them.
"In Dr Malhotra’s view, we did not arrive here due to a battle between good and evil, or because of a global depopulation plan. Rather, this is the result of a systemic failure that has to be fixed at the root."
Respectfully, I used to be like him. It's terrifying to think otherwise. Dr Yeadon understands what is happening. I think Dr M is trying to 'retain credibility' by taking the middle road. Here is what Abi Roberts thinks of him: https://abiroberts.substack.com/p/malhotra-v-leather-girl
What I like about what Dr Malhotra is doing is that
A) it shows that people can change their position (essential if we’re ever to recover from this)
B) he speaks to the broad middle
C) he only speaks on things he can 100% verify to the satisfaction of the broad middle
That’s a combo for changing minds.
You know what's funny, I was just looking at an article published a year ago debating forced vaccination in Australia. One of the top comments was this: "I agree that everyone should be vaccinated, however compusory vaccination cannot work without laws enabling people to be forcibly held down whilst given a jab. Much as I love the idea of seeing this happen to anti-vaxxers, I can't see it happening."
Second most liked comment "Should be mandatory. If you opt out then you also need to opt out of free hospital treatment when you get infected."
Bonus: my neighbour of many years who said I should be "liquidated in a camp."
Bonus McClown dog whistle "short of holding people down and forcing them there isn't much more I can do."
That's our 'broad middle.' There are no data that can overcome this real-time fear response and visceral hatred of people who do not conform in the middle of an active propaganda campaign when people fear for their lives. Next we will probably be jailed for being "UFO deniers."
Now they're just watching sportsball and going on holiday. They don't know about the excess deaths - the staffers at the Senators' offices don't even know about the excess deaths.
The low booster uptake is really the only good news at the moment but if the government mandated it they would probably all queue up again.
I don’t agree that those commenters are the broad middle. I work alongside the broad middle a couple of days a week in our family business. They were a tad uncomfortable with the situation but wanted to ‘do the right thing’. Now, they think the whole thing is dumb, but are incurious as to how or why it happened, and woefully uninformed (due to getting news from ABC and the television).
This is what the broad middle say when no one is watching.
Edit: or in McClown's case...everyone watching :/
His fear propaganda campaign was incredible.
I read the substack:
"He also showed not an ounce of remorse, or any sign that he, a doctor, had played any part in this ongoing ethical disgrace."
- Dr Malhotra addressed this head on in our interview. It's in the article but will also be in the video, to be released. I don't think it's fair to take this statement as indicative of his position, because he has repeatedly and explicitly addressed his part in this in public.
" Odd then that Dr Malhotra should implicitly trust the very same Big Pharma who were creating the ‘vaccines’ so hurriedly, to be thrust into the arms of the global population."
- This was also addressed in our interview, per the article. You might not agree with his explanation for why he considered vaccines to be a 'special category', but he did give it.
"This included a particularly patronising NHS-style section about how the obese were more at risk, so diet and lifestyle was paramount. That must be why they closed the gyms, and exercise was limited to an hour a day, whilst people sat at home watching Masterchef and stuffing their faces."
- It seems particularly disingenuous to a) read Malhotra's advocacy for metabolic health (his work of the past decade) as patronising and, b) to insinuate that he is somehow responsible for gyms being closed. Were Malhotra not famous for advocating for metabolic health in the face of institutional opposition, maybe I'd be more inclined to take this point seriously. But he is, so I'm not.
"over time I’ve come to realise that this is actually a PR exercise in whitewashing the medical profession, without the accountability, contrition or justice."
- This is the direct opposite of what Malhotra said with his own words in our interview. I wonder if her leaving early meant she missed the good bit? Or he just didn't address this in the talk on that night. We don't know, because she left.
"What I had in fact witnessed was a doctor whose aim was not to humbly beg forgiveness, and say mea culpa for going on TV to praise and promote these jabs, but rather to swerve any culpability at all by seemingly saying ‘it wasn’t my fault, the evidence has changed’"
- That's a fair point. Dr Malhotra addressed it in our interview. I think some will be satisfied with his explanation and some won't.
"Majorie and Joan’s beloved grandchildren may have life-changing cardiac issues for life, but let’s give the nice doctor a wink and a smile cos he’s said he didn’t know the risks, but recommended the injections anyway."
- To the best of my knowledge, and by Malhotra's testimony, he never recommended vaccines for children, nor for healthy adults.
"Yesterday, Malhotra tweeted praise to *checks notes* Piers Morgan, who, without question, would happily have squeezed into his SS-Covid uniform, and shoved the unvaccinated into camps with the butt of a rifle, if things had progressed the way they were going. And they did go in that direction in many countries."
- I think this person doesn't understand how campaigning works. She seems very fixated on being right, and being vindicated. I understand that, but it's counter productive to the primary goal in this context, which is getting the shots off the market.
"There’s no contrition, anger, humility, or passion in his demeanour."
- This is highly subjective. From my conversation with him, I cannot agree with the whole of this statement. But then my perception is also subjective.
Yes, maybe we just have to give him time - I will give him the benefit of doubt for now. If this is the case he has a lot of catching up to do. Admittedly - Drs like him I respected and had been following for yrs - so they were my go to in early 2020, as they were already questioning the narrative in other areas of health/medicine. Unfortunately they failed me - what was I seeing that they weren't, it made me research harder, -in this time Ivor Cummins was my sanity check until others started coming out. I hope he has learnt his lesson - at least do the research, look at the research trials before going on TV - it was all available for everyone to see, I hope he sees this as a BIG mistake. Peter Doshi from BMJ was also writing re his concerns in 2020 way before the roll-out. Everything was in plain sight.
Dr Yeadon is very aware. That substack link was great.
Yes of course he is middle of the road.
You need to drag the fence sitters or middle Australia with you.
He does not even get much MSM traction despite his mostly diplomatic language.
It matters not whether every Covid conspiracy has become established fact.
Middle Australia will not rock the boat, they believe the MSM and the Government- they have been programmed over generations and also rely on them for lots of their needs.
Read abiroberts substack which voices my misgivings about Malhotra. I’m very suss on people who change sides. I remember when he was pushing the vaccines. Mike Yeardon has been consistent from the start. I printed his early article of April 7 2021 “Your Govt is lying to you...” and refer back to it a lot. A lot of people jumping on the bandwagon now...and yes, a book will be in the pipeline.
However, if we don’t allow people to change their mind and join the cause in advocating to stop the shots, then we’ll never get anywhere. I understand people wanting an apology and wanting to feel vindicated, but personally I feel very frustrated by people’s unwillingness to accept those who have ‘come to see’ and are trying to pitch in now. Most of us, at some time, did not see. I didn’t catch on to what was going on til 2021 because like Malhotra, I’m more inclined to need to see the evidence before I make the full mental shift. I spent 3-4 months reading studies, watching academic presentations and parliamentary hearings, etc and finally clicked. I was lucky I had the time to do that - most don’t. My partner was onto it way before me (he’s a gut feeling guy) but he didn’t cast me aside just because I didn’t see everything exactly his way at exactly the same time as him!
Point taken. However for anyone in the medical profession to have been advocating an untested vaccine before reliable data was acquired, was unusual. Particularly since the shortest development time for a vaccine was 4 years (measles) and the longest 40 years (polio). This factor, plus Professor Frasers early comment that there had never been a successful vaccine for a respiratory disease rung alarm bells for me.
Yep I get it.
Agree totally with Abi Roberts. I also wonder whether Malhotra really got the jabs.
Wow this is all very encouraging...Australians are waking up hard and fast to the carefully controlled 'freedom hero' worship.
The big picture is better understood by Peter Breggin. Breggin was early in his understanding and it would benefit us all if you were to interview him about the big picture. This would help with clarification of the big picture, which Malhotra doesn't provide, as he was late to the party.
Malhotra misses the mark with this comment, because it muddies the water: "Dr Malhotra puts this blindness down to indoctrination rather than malicious intent." With respect to health care workers, many were indoctrinated, but developed malicious intent against the unjabbed. With respect to pharma...stop! Pharma includes not only Pfizer & Moderna, but their financial partners: NIH, CIA, CEPI, GAVI, BMGF, DOD. This must be made clear. Malhotra fails to clarify.
Please, bring on Peter Breggin.
Thanks for the advice. Just ordered Breggins book. All 5 star reviews.
Hey Rebekah, the Shrestha et al study showing that the covid infection rate increases in direct proportion to the number of prior jabs has been peer reviewed and published and the BS methodological criticism that it is confounded by indication/higher risk people getting more jabs has been addressed and refuted. Igor Chudov has analysed VA data and shown in the VA sample that the same relationship exists between deaths from covid and number of prior jabs. The study on class switch from IgG3 to IgG4 after the 3rd mRNA jab has been corroborated by a new paper that shows IgG4 soars with repeated vaccination, including for failed HIV and malaria jabs as well as the covid mRNA jabs, and that for an unknown, but probably large, number of susceptible individuals this means turbocancer, autoimmune myocarditis and other autommune disease. McGowan got the triple jabbed rate for 16yo+ up to >80% by May 2023 and based on the Shrestha et al study this would have been responsible for why so many people in WA got infected after McGowan opened the borders. Getting infected with covid is a prerequisite for dying from it so McGowan is responsible for deaths as well as infections, which is also an implication of Igor Chudov's findings. It was predictable from the BigData Bayesian causal impact analysis of the relationship between jab rates and infections in 145 countries conducted by Kyle Beattie from UOttawa that this would happen and I know for a fact that his study was brought to McGowan's attention before he opened up and he just ignored it. It was also brought to Gunner's and Dan Andrews' and other Premiers attention right after it came out and they ignored it too. The IgG4 findings suggest that WA with its 80%+ triple jabbed rate for the 16yo+ population is going to be experiencing a tsunami of turbocancer, autoimmune disease and other disease that's coming down the pipeline. Was McGowan aware of what these newly published papers are indicating when he decided to cut and run? Is anyone going to hold him to account? Are the results of these studies and their implications going to be explained to WA's covid inquiry? Or is McGowan instead going to get some grand award like Dame Jacinda Ardern?
I imagine he will be rewarded and awarded.
Better late than never, but how many have been injured or killed because men like this didn't do their due diligence? Also, nurse Campbell ... He just swallowed the lies and promoted the fear even whilst the death data (lack of covid deaths) was available for analysis.
What should people like Dr Malhotra and John Campbell do once they realise the error, in your view? Is there no path to redemption?
They are doing the right thing by speaking out. I just can't forgive them for their lack of due diligence. I'm not a scientist or a doctor of medicine but even I was aware of the actual figures/data when Dr. Campbell was still on board with presenting the narrative - in detail - as though it were fact. We have been subjected to a campaign of government sponsored terror that forced us into compliance. Men like them should have been our protectors. Instead they were enablers of democide. Gross negligence on their part.
I understand where you’re coming from. For me, I’m choosing to forgive (but not forget) because
A) it’s a religious/spiritual tradition that I think is profoundly wise
B) it sets me free from resentment
C) who am I to judge? You only know what you know, and you don’t know what you don’t know. I know ppl who ‘woke up’ in the 2008 GFC. I didn’t understand what they were trying to say and I didn’t see it til 2021.
I do see a distinction between naively ‘not knowing’ vs. ‘wilful blindness’
I feel more harsh about the latter.
Oh so you wouldn’t want them to help save lives? I find that an odd position to take.
I really do want to believe that Malhotra amongst others are honest, ethical actors in this great play being acted out in front of us but I have my doubts. It helps me to think that there remain certain ethical actors on the chessboard, but those who have sought the limelight and seek to join the “alterna-conserva-liberty-lite” speaking circuit do not exactly fill me with confidence.
I don't trust Malhotra nor his kind. Many ordinary public knew they were dangerous and something didn't add up right from the start. That's because the illness story didn't add up either. He only ever mentions the mRNA type as do all like him. Well they are ALL harmful and the AZ has been killing and maiming plenty so much so it was quietly withdrawn in the UK with no publicity. If he were genuine , whilst it's no longer being offered, why not mention this one too? I wonder how much he gets paid for doing "the circuit". He is hardly ever in the UK these days and is globetrotting around to speak at events to basically the already awake. I for one wouldn't give him the time of day and wouldn't part with $1 to attend in Perth. I have more respect for those who have their boots on the ground trying to help humanity and Malhotra isn't one of them. The normies haven't even heard of him. Also it's might y strange as he doesn't seem to be censored nor getting the same hassles as all the other good Drs etc who have been speaking out since day 1.
"Dr Malhotra puts this blindness down to indoctrination rather than malicious intent." lol (and remains pro magic-injections). Darn, how unlucky for everyone... this time! But stay him citizen, keep on track. Keep believing The Science. The next bio-crisis and injections will be better. They'll fix the mistakes. They'll keep us safe.
Be better than this Rebekah. Tell the truth. Not these phoney false prophets.
It’s an interview in which Dr Malhotra gave his opinion. It’s not my place to insert my opinion into an article like this. Great thing about Substack is you all get to disagree in the comments!
I think you did a great job giving Malhoutra an interview so we can better understand his motivations.
I would love to interview McGowan. I promise not to call him McClown even.
Edit: I may have to do it from behind perspex though Hannibal Lecter-style. Hopefully with him on the naughty side.
.
cc: Rebekah
You Broke The World Bob.
If Not You - Solely
You And Yours Like You.
This Is Our Home.
.
It no longer matters whether you got the injection or not. You are being vaccinated via the water supply and most likely other ingestible pathways now.
https://watermagnet.substack.com/p/cottesloe-water-test
Further, the purpose of this is clear and indisputable at this point, and anyone saying it's anything other than this is a fool and not worth listening to (let alone paying to listen to...!) We are being connected to the internet;
https://anamihalceamdphd.substack.com/p/hydrogel-and-graphene-oxide-used
https://jwilderness.substack.com/p/the-nasa-document-that-reveals-everything
There will never be any justice for those responsible. We will have to take it upon ourselves to avenge those injured and killed by these injections.