other Substackers recently have shown the Jab is not up to product Spec (eg WalNut). Can they go back and apeal the apeal based on the Quality control issues? And what a sordid trick this is... "However, in the appeal, Sydney Trains successfully argued that they had never actually begun an investigation into the drivers, and that therefo…
other Substackers recently have shown the Jab is not up to product Spec (eg WalNut).
Can they go back and apeal the apeal based on the Quality control issues?
And what a sordid trick this is...
"However, in the appeal, Sydney Trains successfully argued that they had never actually begun an investigation into the drivers, and that therefore Clause 33.5 did not apply."
So another lesson here is, if an investigation is supposed to happen, make sure it happens.
other Substackers recently have shown the Jab is not up to product Spec (eg WalNut).
Can they go back and apeal the apeal based on the Quality control issues?
And what a sordid trick this is...
"However, in the appeal, Sydney Trains successfully argued that they had never actually begun an investigation into the drivers, and that therefore Clause 33.5 did not apply."
So another lesson here is, if an investigation is supposed to happen, make sure it happens.