Rebekah, deaths aren’t everything. As discussed in your previous post about the West Australian data on adverse events, many of those people will have lifelong disability from the jabs. That is on McGowan’s head as he pushed the vaccines maligned those who resisted. I don’t care if he was acrtng on advice of the Health Department, as the leader, he was responsible. As the say goes, “The buck stops here.”
As always, excellent article and info. So the government might not like the data and so it's revising how it's doing this modeling and presenting said data? Sounds like par for the course for me.
Using modelling over real data is a clear indicator they are bricking themselves. (perhaps engage with Gideon over at A1 [he’s in QLD I think & did epic analysis of the NSW fraudulent election]) - if I find a link I’ll send it.
I am so over govt BS : my patience with WA crew & their tepid acceptance of govt lies has evaporated.
I know I should be better ...
Why has the 2022 WAVVS report not been published???? Because it is probably worse than 2021 which was a shocker and ~7 months late.
Absolutely no doubt that WA figures are higher based on previous performance where they have lied about everything, everything. Aided & abetted by saturation MSM.
We had one of the highest compliance rates & booster uptakes in the country so adverse effects will be maxxed out.
I know someone in the WA funeral industry (we’ve lost contact now due to 🥕🥕🥕) but up to early 2022 when last we spoke : every month was busier. If you can find someone in that industry ... (and ask if we have similar to overseas where anomalous numbers of kids are dying).
They are also covering up the birth rate and miscarriage rate & turbo cancer.
This not helpful (sorry) : but WA is run by psychos who haven’t said a true thing in years : and the selected parliament is in lockstep & challenges nothing.
I’m here for the rebuild but gawwwwd it’s slow going wading through this on the daily.
There is no need for "models." In fact, there is no reason to calculate excess deaths. Just give us the raw number of deaths per month. "MODELS" are how the world is conned into thing there is a climate emergency. A "computer model" is how the Club of Rome got all this started around 1970.
Jul 19, 2023·edited Jul 19, 2023Liked by Rebekah Barnett
There is a really good paper somewhere which goes into the details of the different type of models used, their strengths and weaknesses, but can't recall who it was by. I think it was by a German group and I think Joel Smalley highlighted it. I will see if I can find it.... here it is https://metatron.substack.com/p/excess-mortality-in-germany-2020
Couldn’t find it but remember reading that Pfizer’s own documents state they use GMO’s in the ‘vaccine’.
Then I read this below today, I imagine it’s the TGA responsibility to check!!!!, how many deaths are they responsible for in all this ?
“A HEARING date is yet to be set for a Wangaratta doctor’s consumer protection application, after he alleged Moderna and Pfizer had been operating without an appropriate licence to deal with genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in their COVID vaccines.”
If you don’t like the data, you change the assumptions and model you use to analyse it. It’s an old trick to get data to say what you want. It’s also unethical but as we have seen from government over the last few years, it is a science denier, untrustworthy and untruthful.
Strange thing. I haven’t seen any analysis of excess deaths stratified by vax status. Surely the Government would want to clearly demonstrate to the community how “safe and effective” these wonder drugs are by showing the difference in death rates by vax status? I wonder why they aren’t doing this?
Some while ago, Joel Smalley (Metatron substance) noted the the ABS was manipulating the upper & lower bounds to reduce the stated rate of excess deaths. How does Australia compare with other countries with similar jabbing rates? From the little I've read, Australia's excess mortality rates are comparatively low.
Rebekah, deaths aren’t everything. As discussed in your previous post about the West Australian data on adverse events, many of those people will have lifelong disability from the jabs. That is on McGowan’s head as he pushed the vaccines maligned those who resisted. I don’t care if he was acrtng on advice of the Health Department, as the leader, he was responsible. As the say goes, “The buck stops here.”
As always, excellent article and info. So the government might not like the data and so it's revising how it's doing this modeling and presenting said data? Sounds like par for the course for me.
Thank you for your excellent work. A great catch.
Using modelling over real data is a clear indicator they are bricking themselves. (perhaps engage with Gideon over at A1 [he’s in QLD I think & did epic analysis of the NSW fraudulent election]) - if I find a link I’ll send it.
I am so over govt BS : my patience with WA crew & their tepid acceptance of govt lies has evaporated.
I know I should be better ...
Why has the 2022 WAVVS report not been published???? Because it is probably worse than 2021 which was a shocker and ~7 months late.
Absolutely no doubt that WA figures are higher based on previous performance where they have lied about everything, everything. Aided & abetted by saturation MSM.
We had one of the highest compliance rates & booster uptakes in the country so adverse effects will be maxxed out.
I know someone in the WA funeral industry (we’ve lost contact now due to 🥕🥕🥕) but up to early 2022 when last we spoke : every month was busier. If you can find someone in that industry ... (and ask if we have similar to overseas where anomalous numbers of kids are dying).
They are also covering up the birth rate and miscarriage rate & turbo cancer.
This not helpful (sorry) : but WA is run by psychos who haven’t said a true thing in years : and the selected parliament is in lockstep & challenges nothing.
I’m here for the rebuild but gawwwwd it’s slow going wading through this on the daily.
I should be better 🙂🙏
There is no need for "models." In fact, there is no reason to calculate excess deaths. Just give us the raw number of deaths per month. "MODELS" are how the world is conned into thing there is a climate emergency. A "computer model" is how the Club of Rome got all this started around 1970.
There is a really good paper somewhere which goes into the details of the different type of models used, their strengths and weaknesses, but can't recall who it was by. I think it was by a German group and I think Joel Smalley highlighted it. I will see if I can find it.... here it is https://metatron.substack.com/p/excess-mortality-in-germany-2020
Couldn’t find it but remember reading that Pfizer’s own documents state they use GMO’s in the ‘vaccine’.
Then I read this below today, I imagine it’s the TGA responsibility to check!!!!, how many deaths are they responsible for in all this ?
“A HEARING date is yet to be set for a Wangaratta doctor’s consumer protection application, after he alleged Moderna and Pfizer had been operating without an appropriate licence to deal with genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in their COVID vaccines.”
https://www.wangarattachronicle.com.au/doctors-vaccine-application-adjourned?fbclid=IwAR0heGAZzOZwmzB2oNHh1OirJVZ4flslENFakTVAPohpQmY156RyhsH8-4Y_aem_AX7mY-C4IUVX5OUxxwgKNGNE7s5nmm9wuENG5W3j4IRbDw1oNCZUTTQH7b9rW7rqioc
I've restacked this brilliant expose' Rebekah;
may God keep a watchful and guiding eye over you.
If you don’t like the data, you change the assumptions and model you use to analyse it. It’s an old trick to get data to say what you want. It’s also unethical but as we have seen from government over the last few years, it is a science denier, untrustworthy and untruthful.
Strange thing. I haven’t seen any analysis of excess deaths stratified by vax status. Surely the Government would want to clearly demonstrate to the community how “safe and effective” these wonder drugs are by showing the difference in death rates by vax status? I wonder why they aren’t doing this?
Brilliant reporting Rebekah
Next month this data will 'accidentally' get hosted on a new server and not make the transition.
We've republished you again. Really great work. All the best. https://asenseofplacemagazine.com/excess-deaths-australia-2020-2023-rebekah-barnett-dystopian-down-under/
Every excess death is a tragedy for an individual and their family.
Good work, Rebbie.
i follow rebekah's work. my contribution to covid and WA is in mainly in my FB group. https://www.facebook.com/groups/2909281562725698
today's post was that dogs detect covid better than PCR tests.
WA did best with covid but probably worst with vaccines. I have contended for awhile now that the number of covid deaths in australia is comparable to the number of vaccine deaths. that is because the coronavirus went from delta (3% CFR) to omicron (CFR 0.15%). he is a copy of a blog i did last year. https://blog.justgeorgeous.net/justgeorgeous/current-research/sars-cov-2/tga-database-adverse-event-notification-says-935-deaths-after-covid-vaccine-but-total-is-2631-x10-means-26000-could-have-died-from-the-jab-in-australia/
Some while ago, Joel Smalley (Metatron substance) noted the the ABS was manipulating the upper & lower bounds to reduce the stated rate of excess deaths. How does Australia compare with other countries with similar jabbing rates? From the little I've read, Australia's excess mortality rates are comparatively low.