Rebekah, deaths aren’t everything. As discussed in your previous post about the West Australian data on adverse events, many of those people will have lifelong disability from the jabs. That is on McGowan’s head as he pushed the vaccines maligned those who resisted. I don’t care if he was acrtng on advice of the Health Department, as the leader, he was responsible. As the say goes, “The buck stops here.”
I think we can safely assume that McGowan, his health department, and his CHO were acting on “advice” well outside the borders of this country. As you no doubt already know, anyone logical, sane and rational with a basic background in virology and medical research would have known by no later than ~July 2020 that the vast majority of us had nothing to fear from “Covid”, and that the measures implemented were insane, draconian and deeply unscientific. The question to ask is which of the resource majors lined the pockets of those in WA who called the shots. RIO, BHP, FMG and Woodside are my number one suspects.
Not true Terry. In fact, the more jabs, the more the suppression of the immune system due to increase of IgG4 antibodies. Doctors are now seeing turbo cancers. The original pfizer trial had an Absolute Risk Reduction of under 2%, meaning you had to vaccinate almost 100 people to prevent one case of Covid. That's before we even get to the adverse events.
How do you know this Terry? Is this your opinion (and if it is that’s ok) or are you looking at data? Can you point me in the direction of the data you have been following? Hopefully you are looking at independent data and not gov data. Every time I ask this question I’m either pointed to data that’s not independent or I receive no response.
I doubt whether one person ever has been saved by a vaccine of any kind anywhere at any time.
But hey let’s look at the correlation between the bio weapon rollout and disabilities - the correlation is unbelievable - record sick people unable to work and still rising.
As always, excellent article and info. So the government might not like the data and so it's revising how it's doing this modeling and presenting said data? Sounds like par for the course for me.
Jul 19, 2023·edited Jul 19, 2023Liked by Rebekah Barnett
On a topic not directly related to vaccine deaths ...
The false narratives on virus origination cooked up by the Science Mafia are starting to crumble. The main goal of course was to cover their own fingerprints. ... And all of the false narratives led to the new mRNA vaccines ... so this IS all related.
I also think it was a real (and "novel" and "man-made" virus) ... that was very contagious ... it just wasn't lethal for 99+ percent of the population. The lockdowns weren't needed to slow or stop a virus that had already spread around the world by the time they were imposed ... and we didn't need this experimental new "vaccine" because people weren't at risk of dying from this disease.
So all parts of the "authorized narrative" were bogus.
Unlike some of my Substack colleagues, I don't reject your hypothesis out of hand, Mark. I'm open to the hypothesis this "virus" was really just re-branded ILI. For too many reasons to list here, I happen to think this was a real virus ... it just wasn't lethal at all. It wasn't a "Mortality threat." This means almost all of the "Covid deaths" have to be explained by iatrogenic and panic reasons (IMO).
Both theories - mine: that the virus is nothing to panic over but it was real and yours: that there was no virus - produce the same scandal: It wasn't any novel new virus that killed millions of people. Hospitals and doctors killed all the people that ended up in the "excess death" statistics. No need for lockdowns or new experimental mRNA vaccines.
You can read numerous articles on this topic (early spread) at my Substack. One question: If there was no virus, why did so many more people get "sick" of something in the winter of 2019-2020?
a virus can be man made. SARS-CoV2 was a man-made virus. it is/was a real virus, just man-made. we can clone animals if we want. i do not understand your issue. it is not natural so can be patented. the protein spike was patented in 2014 i think. it was not made as a chemical weapon but as a biological weapon.
so what is the definition of a "virus"? as far as i am aware, a "virus" has always been defined as a natural occurrence that infects man;
your statement makes ZERO sense.
when the sick fucks of this world clone an animal, is that clone a biological animal?
where you people get your definitions of words from is a mystery;
i do not understand your issue
when any biological matter is mixed with ANY chemical it then becomes a Chemical;
anything man-made is NOT BIOLOGICAL;
it appears that many people are hoodwinked into this BioWeapon non-sense; It not only defies the very definition of the word BIOLOGICAL. it defies the science of and study of biology;
you can believe whatever you want to believe;
i will stick to dictionary definitions of the words chemical and biology, what natural science defines as biological and has done for hundreds of years and what Chemists define chemistry as.
i care not what it was "made as" and what they want to call it; if it is made of any chemicals and then released onto man, it is a chemical weapon.
Using modelling over real data is a clear indicator they are bricking themselves. (perhaps engage with Gideon over at A1 [he’s in QLD I think & did epic analysis of the NSW fraudulent election]) - if I find a link I’ll send it.
I am so over govt BS : my patience with WA crew & their tepid acceptance of govt lies has evaporated.
I know I should be better ...
Why has the 2022 WAVVS report not been published???? Because it is probably worse than 2021 which was a shocker and ~7 months late.
Absolutely no doubt that WA figures are higher based on previous performance where they have lied about everything, everything. Aided & abetted by saturation MSM.
We had one of the highest compliance rates & booster uptakes in the country so adverse effects will be maxxed out.
I know someone in the WA funeral industry (we’ve lost contact now due to 🥕🥕🥕) but up to early 2022 when last we spoke : every month was busier. If you can find someone in that industry ... (and ask if we have similar to overseas where anomalous numbers of kids are dying).
They are also covering up the birth rate and miscarriage rate & turbo cancer.
This not helpful (sorry) : but WA is run by psychos who haven’t said a true thing in years : and the selected parliament is in lockstep & challenges nothing.
I’m here for the rebuild but gawwwwd it’s slow going wading through this on the daily.
There is no need for "models." In fact, there is no reason to calculate excess deaths. Just give us the raw number of deaths per month. "MODELS" are how the world is conned into thing there is a climate emergency. A "computer model" is how the Club of Rome got all this started around 1970.
Yes, changing the models used for excess deaths when the results are not to their liking makes the whole thing look inappropriate. Especially given it was faulty models which caused the massive overreaction to the disease, and the obscene government overreach we all suffered as a result. Using new models to then whitewash over the consequences is particularly distasteful.
It shouldn't even need modelling. We are talking about an average baseline from history, over discreet periods. Facts. There is nothing speculative there to model. Nothing to fork-up Fergusson-style. Which is why it has been so important as every other type of stat was twisted into unrecognisable trash.
To not be able to even trust ACM numbers as a benchmark is another egregious violation by the Orwellian Cabal.
We are so far down the 1984 rabbit hole.
I read somewhere that the EU scrubbed out their Tranche 1 bioweapon (monovalent Fizer/MurdeRNA, probably AZ also given how bad it was) SAE reports from their database - the database that has SAEs from decades of poisonings like VAERS does. How would one sell that idea, seriously? And who approves such a clearly partisan democidal move? A database/dataset that should be there forever is being curated and scrubbed in real-time.
Taking the average is also a model, it’s a simple one but it’s still a model. If you want to calculate “excess” you need a baseline for comparison. A simple 5 year average worked a treat for many years when everything was normal. It would be interesting if they remodeled the prior year excess deaths the same way to see if they’re also significantly different due to a change in modeling.
Jul 19, 2023·edited Jul 19, 2023Liked by Rebekah Barnett
Sorry, I wasn’t trying to correct you I just re-read my comment and can see how it came across that way.
Funny thing is I actually like the Serfling model for personal reasons. I laughed when I first saw it. I thought, “you bastards stole my idea” even though Serfling proposed it in 60’s and I came up with something similar late 2021 by doing a Fourier analysis on the data. I never showed it to anyone because I was afraid people would say it’s a stupid idea. Turns out my modeling method is not that different to the model the ABS are using. I was chuffed that I’d independently come up with pretty much the same thing. At the end of the day it’s just another way to fit a curve and extrapolate into the future based on past data.
It is no problem, Ivo. I'm here to learn, having lived and worked in quite a sheltered domain for a long time. Modelling types, for example, are well outside my wheelhouse.
I do tend to assume the worst when I look at their BS these days, and I can easily miss nuances. But I also feel sometimes we miss the dystopian forest for the trees, hence my original post in this thread referencing a 747 a week of our brothers and sisters dead - to try to hammer home the scale of this crime.
Seriously, where is the stopping condition? And when do we stand and say: "Enough!"
They are using " Teams " to hide behind. Even the Medical establishment doing this.
We need signatures.
Not really difficult to find if you start at the top and work the connections down. Also that is where to start pecking them off for best results and preservation of life.
Jul 19, 2023·edited Jul 19, 2023Liked by Rebekah Barnett
There is a really good paper somewhere which goes into the details of the different type of models used, their strengths and weaknesses, but can't recall who it was by. I think it was by a German group and I think Joel Smalley highlighted it. I will see if I can find it.... here it is https://metatron.substack.com/p/excess-mortality-in-germany-2020
Couldn’t find it but remember reading that Pfizer’s own documents state they use GMO’s in the ‘vaccine’.
Then I read this below today, I imagine it’s the TGA responsibility to check!!!!, how many deaths are they responsible for in all this ?
“A HEARING date is yet to be set for a Wangaratta doctor’s consumer protection application, after he alleged Moderna and Pfizer had been operating without an appropriate licence to deal with genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in their COVID vaccines.”
If you don’t like the data, you change the assumptions and model you use to analyse it. It’s an old trick to get data to say what you want. It’s also unethical but as we have seen from government over the last few years, it is a science denier, untrustworthy and untruthful.
Strange thing. I haven’t seen any analysis of excess deaths stratified by vax status. Surely the Government would want to clearly demonstrate to the community how “safe and effective” these wonder drugs are by showing the difference in death rates by vax status? I wonder why they aren’t doing this?
initially yes but if it contributed to their death i would not mind if they kept the same definition. from july 2022 they dropped the 'with' to run the next narrative that covid has gone, but either way 100-300 still died from covid with 400-600 excess deaths. i like to call the sum 'pandemic' deaths, many are #aftervax but some are #aftercovid or aftercovidandvax. they stopped collecting good data.
I disagree completely because the FROM covid lie was used to add fear to their campaign and was FRAUDULENT . There were very few people who died FROM CV only in WA. Some people arrived in hospital without covid and contracted CV there (arising from dodgy testing as per Paul Della's comment below). So they've arrived with an already failing body / immune system & then catch CV. They were then refused antibiotics and often put on a ventilator and/or give remdesivir.
Any death certificate that put CV as a primary cause of death when 2,3,4,5 comorbidities existed is FRAUDULENT
Where are the death certificates that attribute the VX as primary cause of death: heart failure, aneurysm, turbo cancer? By your reasoning Pfizer / Moderna should be on all those death certificates : but are not : further FRAUD
They lied : people died & will continue to die from side effects of the gene therapy.
Some while ago, Joel Smalley (Metatron substance) noted the the ABS was manipulating the upper & lower bounds to reduce the stated rate of excess deaths. How does Australia compare with other countries with similar jabbing rates? From the little I've read, Australia's excess mortality rates are comparatively low.
Rebekah, deaths aren’t everything. As discussed in your previous post about the West Australian data on adverse events, many of those people will have lifelong disability from the jabs. That is on McGowan’s head as he pushed the vaccines maligned those who resisted. I don’t care if he was acrtng on advice of the Health Department, as the leader, he was responsible. As the say goes, “The buck stops here.”
I think we can safely assume that McGowan, his health department, and his CHO were acting on “advice” well outside the borders of this country. As you no doubt already know, anyone logical, sane and rational with a basic background in virology and medical research would have known by no later than ~July 2020 that the vast majority of us had nothing to fear from “Covid”, and that the measures implemented were insane, draconian and deeply unscientific. The question to ask is which of the resource majors lined the pockets of those in WA who called the shots. RIO, BHP, FMG and Woodside are my number one suspects.
That was logical thinking but of course, that has been in short supply.
Take away logic then and just go with basic innate Common Sense. Reflexive.
Anything forced on one's body or given for a " free beer " or " five dollars " is got to be bad.
Someone(s) are behind it. You don't even need to know a stitch of Science.
Now I understand why the African populations murder the white Man " Medical workers " when they come. They have been killing them.
We also need to look at hospitalisations and disabilities. Far more people are saved from death from the jab, than die.
Not true Terry. In fact, the more jabs, the more the suppression of the immune system due to increase of IgG4 antibodies. Doctors are now seeing turbo cancers. The original pfizer trial had an Absolute Risk Reduction of under 2%, meaning you had to vaccinate almost 100 people to prevent one case of Covid. That's before we even get to the adverse events.
https://elylazar.substack.com/p/take-the-covid-vaccine-you-do-so
How do you know this Terry? Is this your opinion (and if it is that’s ok) or are you looking at data? Can you point me in the direction of the data you have been following? Hopefully you are looking at independent data and not gov data. Every time I ask this question I’m either pointed to data that’s not independent or I receive no response.
I doubt whether one person ever has been saved by a vaccine of any kind anywhere at any time.
But hey let’s look at the correlation between the bio weapon rollout and disabilities - the correlation is unbelievable - record sick people unable to work and still rising.
I would love to hear your explanation!!
https://kirschsubstack.com/p/can-anyone-explain-the-alarming-rise/comments?utm_source=substack%2Csubstack&publication_id=548354&post_id=135232788&utm_medium=email%2Cemail&isFreemail=true&comments=true
I think Kirsch has done a great job doing that
As always, excellent article and info. So the government might not like the data and so it's revising how it's doing this modeling and presenting said data? Sounds like par for the course for me.
On a topic not directly related to vaccine deaths ...
The false narratives on virus origination cooked up by the Science Mafia are starting to crumble. The main goal of course was to cover their own fingerprints. ... And all of the false narratives led to the new mRNA vaccines ... so this IS all related.
https://billricejr.substack.com/p/fauci-busted-for-pushing-bogus-virus?utm_source=profile&utm_medium=reader2
the vaccine was even made before the virus it seems. this is looking worse by the day. BUT article says bogus virus. it was a real virus.
I also think it was a real (and "novel" and "man-made" virus) ... that was very contagious ... it just wasn't lethal for 99+ percent of the population. The lockdowns weren't needed to slow or stop a virus that had already spread around the world by the time they were imposed ... and we didn't need this experimental new "vaccine" because people weren't at risk of dying from this disease.
So all parts of the "authorized narrative" were bogus.
Bill, don't be tricked by words;
How can a "virus" be man-made" if anything "contagious" is man-made, it defies definition of being of nature, by nature or naturally occurring;
we are told that "viruses" are from Nature yet many so-called "viruses" have US Patents attached to them;
this FACT defies the given definition of the word "virus";
stick to your guns mate....there was No Cov19 Virus.
Unlike some of my Substack colleagues, I don't reject your hypothesis out of hand, Mark. I'm open to the hypothesis this "virus" was really just re-branded ILI. For too many reasons to list here, I happen to think this was a real virus ... it just wasn't lethal at all. It wasn't a "Mortality threat." This means almost all of the "Covid deaths" have to be explained by iatrogenic and panic reasons (IMO).
Both theories - mine: that the virus is nothing to panic over but it was real and yours: that there was no virus - produce the same scandal: It wasn't any novel new virus that killed millions of people. Hospitals and doctors killed all the people that ended up in the "excess death" statistics. No need for lockdowns or new experimental mRNA vaccines.
You can read numerous articles on this topic (early spread) at my Substack. One question: If there was no virus, why did so many more people get "sick" of something in the winter of 2019-2020?
how can a "virus" be real if it was man-made?;
is the definition of a "virus" now to include a man-made, artificial, un-natural infectious substance?;
"The Virus" that stopped the world was, or IS NOT a "virus", it is a chemical weapon designed to injure and kill people;
this has been proven by the FACT that there are many US PATENTS office REGISTRATIONS relating to the design and manufacture of SARS2-COV19;
International PATENT LAW dictates that: Anything of nature, by nature or is a natural occurrence CAN-NOT be Patented.
a virus can be man made. SARS-CoV2 was a man-made virus. it is/was a real virus, just man-made. we can clone animals if we want. i do not understand your issue. it is not natural so can be patented. the protein spike was patented in 2014 i think. it was not made as a chemical weapon but as a biological weapon.
so what is the definition of a "virus"? as far as i am aware, a "virus" has always been defined as a natural occurrence that infects man;
your statement makes ZERO sense.
when the sick fucks of this world clone an animal, is that clone a biological animal?
where you people get your definitions of words from is a mystery;
i do not understand your issue
when any biological matter is mixed with ANY chemical it then becomes a Chemical;
anything man-made is NOT BIOLOGICAL;
it appears that many people are hoodwinked into this BioWeapon non-sense; It not only defies the very definition of the word BIOLOGICAL. it defies the science of and study of biology;
you can believe whatever you want to believe;
i will stick to dictionary definitions of the words chemical and biology, what natural science defines as biological and has done for hundreds of years and what Chemists define chemistry as.
i care not what it was "made as" and what they want to call it; if it is made of any chemicals and then released onto man, it is a chemical weapon.
A virus is an infectious microbe consisting of a segment of nucleic acid (either DNA or RNA) surrounded by a protein coat.
It is a biological weapon as it infects your cells, and it transmitted between living things. It needs your DNA to replicate.
A chemical weapon (in my mind) is just some toxic chemical that directly attacks you.
Even though a virus is not a living thing, it almost is. It is a bit like a parasite.
Thank you for your excellent work. A great catch.
Using modelling over real data is a clear indicator they are bricking themselves. (perhaps engage with Gideon over at A1 [he’s in QLD I think & did epic analysis of the NSW fraudulent election]) - if I find a link I’ll send it.
I am so over govt BS : my patience with WA crew & their tepid acceptance of govt lies has evaporated.
I know I should be better ...
Why has the 2022 WAVVS report not been published???? Because it is probably worse than 2021 which was a shocker and ~7 months late.
Absolutely no doubt that WA figures are higher based on previous performance where they have lied about everything, everything. Aided & abetted by saturation MSM.
We had one of the highest compliance rates & booster uptakes in the country so adverse effects will be maxxed out.
I know someone in the WA funeral industry (we’ve lost contact now due to 🥕🥕🥕) but up to early 2022 when last we spoke : every month was busier. If you can find someone in that industry ... (and ask if we have similar to overseas where anomalous numbers of kids are dying).
They are also covering up the birth rate and miscarriage rate & turbo cancer.
This not helpful (sorry) : but WA is run by psychos who haven’t said a true thing in years : and the selected parliament is in lockstep & challenges nothing.
I’m here for the rebuild but gawwwwd it’s slow going wading through this on the daily.
I should be better 🙂🙏
2022 WAVS will just be blamed on 'covid.' 2021 is the smoking gun.
They can try : they won’t succeed 💪💪💪
Gideon Jacobs is the data analyst : https://rumble.com/v2s7hfi-australiaone-party-make-em-famous-monday.html
Sarah Youll : National Coordinator : email via contact us on webpage
Joyce Bok (?) : WA coordinator
There is no need for "models." In fact, there is no reason to calculate excess deaths. Just give us the raw number of deaths per month. "MODELS" are how the world is conned into thing there is a climate emergency. A "computer model" is how the Club of Rome got all this started around 1970.
100% Lloyd... They get statistics to fit the model designed to show whatever they want.
Yes, changing the models used for excess deaths when the results are not to their liking makes the whole thing look inappropriate. Especially given it was faulty models which caused the massive overreaction to the disease, and the obscene government overreach we all suffered as a result. Using new models to then whitewash over the consequences is particularly distasteful.
It shouldn't even need modelling. We are talking about an average baseline from history, over discreet periods. Facts. There is nothing speculative there to model. Nothing to fork-up Fergusson-style. Which is why it has been so important as every other type of stat was twisted into unrecognisable trash.
To not be able to even trust ACM numbers as a benchmark is another egregious violation by the Orwellian Cabal.
We are so far down the 1984 rabbit hole.
I read somewhere that the EU scrubbed out their Tranche 1 bioweapon (monovalent Fizer/MurdeRNA, probably AZ also given how bad it was) SAE reports from their database - the database that has SAEs from decades of poisonings like VAERS does. How would one sell that idea, seriously? And who approves such a clearly partisan democidal move? A database/dataset that should be there forever is being curated and scrubbed in real-time.
Peace.
Taking the average is also a model, it’s a simple one but it’s still a model. If you want to calculate “excess” you need a baseline for comparison. A simple 5 year average worked a treat for many years when everything was normal. It would be interesting if they remodeled the prior year excess deaths the same way to see if they’re also significantly different due to a change in modeling.
Fair enough.
I took model to be forecasting some aspect. Rather than being just about the facts.
Regardless, they are diddling the numbers. Again.
Peace.
Sorry, I wasn’t trying to correct you I just re-read my comment and can see how it came across that way.
Funny thing is I actually like the Serfling model for personal reasons. I laughed when I first saw it. I thought, “you bastards stole my idea” even though Serfling proposed it in 60’s and I came up with something similar late 2021 by doing a Fourier analysis on the data. I never showed it to anyone because I was afraid people would say it’s a stupid idea. Turns out my modeling method is not that different to the model the ABS are using. I was chuffed that I’d independently come up with pretty much the same thing. At the end of the day it’s just another way to fit a curve and extrapolate into the future based on past data.
It is no problem, Ivo. I'm here to learn, having lived and worked in quite a sheltered domain for a long time. Modelling types, for example, are well outside my wheelhouse.
I do tend to assume the worst when I look at their BS these days, and I can easily miss nuances. But I also feel sometimes we miss the dystopian forest for the trees, hence my original post in this thread referencing a 747 a week of our brothers and sisters dead - to try to hammer home the scale of this crime.
Seriously, where is the stopping condition? And when do we stand and say: "Enough!"
Peace.
While it’s frustrating they are lying : we know and recognise it 💪💪💪
This means that much more powerful people than us also know 💪💪💪
And the data manipulators are sealing their own fate by engaging in fraud out in the open.
Heads must roll and names must be taken.
They are using " Teams " to hide behind. Even the Medical establishment doing this.
We need signatures.
Not really difficult to find if you start at the top and work the connections down. Also that is where to start pecking them off for best results and preservation of life.
There is a really good paper somewhere which goes into the details of the different type of models used, their strengths and weaknesses, but can't recall who it was by. I think it was by a German group and I think Joel Smalley highlighted it. I will see if I can find it.... here it is https://metatron.substack.com/p/excess-mortality-in-germany-2020
Thanks Gary I’ll take a look.
Hail the Metatron!
Couldn’t find it but remember reading that Pfizer’s own documents state they use GMO’s in the ‘vaccine’.
Then I read this below today, I imagine it’s the TGA responsibility to check!!!!, how many deaths are they responsible for in all this ?
“A HEARING date is yet to be set for a Wangaratta doctor’s consumer protection application, after he alleged Moderna and Pfizer had been operating without an appropriate licence to deal with genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in their COVID vaccines.”
https://www.wangarattachronicle.com.au/doctors-vaccine-application-adjourned?fbclid=IwAR0heGAZzOZwmzB2oNHh1OirJVZ4flslENFakTVAPohpQmY156RyhsH8-4Y_aem_AX7mY-C4IUVX5OUxxwgKNGNE7s5nmm9wuENG5W3j4IRbDw1oNCZUTTQH7b9rW7rqioc
I've restacked this brilliant expose' Rebekah;
may God keep a watchful and guiding eye over you.
If you don’t like the data, you change the assumptions and model you use to analyse it. It’s an old trick to get data to say what you want. It’s also unethical but as we have seen from government over the last few years, it is a science denier, untrustworthy and untruthful.
Strange thing. I haven’t seen any analysis of excess deaths stratified by vax status. Surely the Government would want to clearly demonstrate to the community how “safe and effective” these wonder drugs are by showing the difference in death rates by vax status? I wonder why they aren’t doing this?
I believe Letters From Australia has a put a lot of effort into getting this info and has received nothing.
That would break their BS absolutely.
Can they even report 0,1,2,3x 🥕🥕🥕
Brilliant reporting Rebekah
Next month this data will 'accidentally' get hosted on a new server and not make the transition.
We've republished you again. Really great work. All the best. https://asenseofplacemagazine.com/excess-deaths-australia-2020-2023-rebekah-barnett-dystopian-down-under/
Every excess death is a tragedy for an individual and their family.
Good work, Rebbie.
i follow rebekah's work. my contribution to covid and WA is in mainly in my FB group. https://www.facebook.com/groups/2909281562725698
today's post was that dogs detect covid better than PCR tests.
WA did best with covid but probably worst with vaccines. I have contended for awhile now that the number of covid deaths in australia is comparable to the number of vaccine deaths. that is because the coronavirus went from delta (3% CFR) to omicron (CFR 0.15%). he is a copy of a blog i did last year. https://blog.justgeorgeous.net/justgeorgeous/current-research/sars-cov-2/tga-database-adverse-event-notification-says-935-deaths-after-covid-vaccine-but-total-is-2631-x10-means-26000-could-have-died-from-the-jab-in-australia/
Covid deaths were heavily manipulated by using WITH not FROM...
Co morbidity’s abound in the dead.
They lied : people died
initially yes but if it contributed to their death i would not mind if they kept the same definition. from july 2022 they dropped the 'with' to run the next narrative that covid has gone, but either way 100-300 still died from covid with 400-600 excess deaths. i like to call the sum 'pandemic' deaths, many are #aftervax but some are #aftercovid or aftercovidandvax. they stopped collecting good data.
I disagree completely because the FROM covid lie was used to add fear to their campaign and was FRAUDULENT . There were very few people who died FROM CV only in WA. Some people arrived in hospital without covid and contracted CV there (arising from dodgy testing as per Paul Della's comment below). So they've arrived with an already failing body / immune system & then catch CV. They were then refused antibiotics and often put on a ventilator and/or give remdesivir.
Any death certificate that put CV as a primary cause of death when 2,3,4,5 comorbidities existed is FRAUDULENT
Where are the death certificates that attribute the VX as primary cause of death: heart failure, aneurysm, turbo cancer? By your reasoning Pfizer / Moderna should be on all those death certificates : but are not : further FRAUD
They lied : people died & will continue to die from side effects of the gene therapy.
Just out of interest how many paws paws and samples of lemonade, jackfruits and goats, motor oil etc who all tested positive to Covid died from it?.
No Covid test = no Covid
The desperation was to inject people with the bio weapon clot shot
Everything before hand was most likely a lie.
Bat soup
Deliberate or not deliberate ‘virus’ released from GOF
The only thing they really censored was - there was and is no virus!!.
Some while ago, Joel Smalley (Metatron substance) noted the the ABS was manipulating the upper & lower bounds to reduce the stated rate of excess deaths. How does Australia compare with other countries with similar jabbing rates? From the little I've read, Australia's excess mortality rates are comparatively low.