Kevin McKernan is the genomics scientist who first discovered plasmid DNA contamination in the mRNA Pfizer and Moderna Covid vaccines (trending as #plasmidgate). McKernan has been working in his field for 25 years, having managed R&D for the Human Genome Project at Whitehead Institute/MIT, and now heading up cannabis and hemp science company
[SLIDE 1 - Plasmid derived dsDNA contamination in mRNA vaccines]
KEVIN MCKERNAN: Thank you. I have no conflicts to disclose. I have 25 years of experience in the genomics space. I've worked as a team leader of R & D at the Human Genome Project at Whitehead and MIT* and I have 57,000 citations to publications in my space, and multiple patents on, on PCR and sequencing.
Next slide, please.
[SLIDE 2 - Conflicts]**
No conflicts.
Next slide.
[SLIDE 3 - Illumina sequencing and RT-qPCR and qPCR]***
In February I used mRNA vaccines as they can spike [unintelligible] control for some RNA sequencing libraries, and to my shock, discovered that the expression vectors for the vaccines are still in the vials. I looked at this in over a dozen vials, and it appears that this expression vector is above the EMA guidelines and the FDA guidelines. You can see this in this preprint that's described here.
Next slide.
[SLIDE 4 - Process 1 (IVT) vs Process 2 (E.coli)]****
As a, as a refresher, there's two different processes that have been discussed in this BMJ article, the clinical trials were run on Process 1 which uses in vitro transcription off of synthetic DNA, but they switched to Process 2 for scale-up which used E. coli to amplify plasmids. And those plasmids are what still remain in the vials and were not within the clinical trial.
Next slide.
[SLIDE 5 - Process 1 used in Vitro Transcription (IVT) / Process 2 used Plasmids in E. coli]*
This is another depiction of this process. You can see getting plasmids out of these E. coli is a, is a challenge and can sometimes lead to residual plasmids inside the vaccines.
Next slide.
[SLIDE 6 - Independent Illumina sequencing / What was disclosed to the EMA]**
These are the expression vectors that we discovered on the left in the Pfizer vaccines. They also exist in the Moderna vaccines, but they're a little bit different. The Pfizer vaccines specifically have this SV40 promoter which was not disclosed in the expression vector map that was given to the FDA— ah, or I'm sorry, the EMA. But the expression vector has a 344 base promoter with a nuclear localization signal known as the SV40 promoter.
Next slide.
[SLIDE 7 - Designed aPCR primers]***
So we went to verify this by designing quantitative PCR assays that target the spike sequence and the vector sequence.
Next slide.
[SLIDE 8 - How Much dsDNA?]****
And this work demonstrated that with even a 1 to 100 dilutions you could get CTs of 22 for the DNA that's in these vials for the vector, which is not part of what should be in these vials.
We did this in triplicate across 8 vials, it's very consistent, and they are over the EMA and the FDA's limits.
Next slide.
[SLIDE 9 - How Much dsDNA/RNA?]*
The EMA has a ratio metric limit that looks at RNA to DNA ratios, and you can measure, you should expect an 11.5 CT offset between the spike in-between the vector. What we see is only 5 to 7 CT difference, which means there's an 18- to 70- fold over the limit of the 330 nanogram per milligram recommended by the EMA.
Next slide.
[SLIDE 10 - Add Vaccine Directly to qPCR assays]**
You can readily assay this in any other lab around the world now. If you put these vaccines directly into quantitative PCR, you can get CTs as low as 17. This is very important to know because COVID was diagnosed with CTs less than 40, which is over a million-fold higher contamination being injected than what you might get from a nasal swab.
Next slide.
[SLIDE 11 - Limitations - Expired lots]***
We know these vials were, these vials were sent to us anonymously in the mail, so we do not have the cold chain, however we can measure the RNA integrity by putting them on electro [unintelligible] systems and do not see a substantial difference in the RNA integrity from the vials that we received versus what's been published about these in the past.
Next, next slide.
[SLIDE 12 - Reproduction]****
Various people on Twitter have now begun to reproduce this. In addition, I'd point to the EMA's documentation where they have an 815-fold variance across 10 lots of double-stranded DNA contamination documented in the EMA process.
Next slide.
[SLIDE 13 - Risks - Prothrombotic / DNA integration risk - Keith Peden /FDA]*
There are some risks to this. There's double-stranded DNA can create interferon responses and Keith Peden at the FDA has done great work demonstrating the risks of DNA integration into the genome if these things are in, in vaccines.
Next slide.
[SLIDE 14 - Call to Action]**
The call to action here is all of these primer sequences are now public and people are downloading them and trying to reproduce this work. You can reproduce this work in 60 minutes with a microliter of the vaccine, which is 1/300th of the dose for less than 10 dollars. I encourage everyone to try and do this to understand what we have at foot. [inaudible] We did not measure any of the bad lots in the Schmeling, et al paper*** that demonstrated high-adverse events in certain lots. We were measuring what seemed to be normal lots.
Next slide.
[SLIDE 15 - Thank you for your time and consideration]
I thank you for your time and consideration.
SUSSAN PAYDAR. Great, thank you so much Mr. McKernan for your presentation. Next—
We manufacture qPCR kits for the agricultural genomics space
We authored a PrePrint on dcDSNA contamination in mRNA vaccines
*** SLIDE 3.
TEXT: Illumina sequencing and RT-qPCR and qPCT
[shows screenshots from preprint "Sequencing of bivalent Moderna and Pfizer mRNA vaccines reveals nanogram to microgram quantities of expression vector dsDNA per dose" by Kevin McKernan, et al.]
**** SLIDE 4.
TEXT: Process 1 (IVT) vs Process 2 (E.coli)
The trial was run on Process 1 lots
250 people received Process 2 lots (plasmids)
The world received Process 2 lots
[shows screenshots from BMJ paper "Covid researchers face wait for patient level data from Pfizer and Moderna vaccine trials"]
* SLIDE 5.
TEXT: Process 1 used in Vitro Transcription (IVT) / Synthetic DNA tempolate
Process 2 used Plasmids in E. coli / cloned DNA template]
[illustrations of the two different processes]
** SLIDE 6.
TEXT: Independent Illumina sequencing / What was disclosed to the EMA]
[Illustrations: Raw reads public / No sequencing provided]
*** SLIDE 7.
TEXT: Designed qPCR primers
[illustration showing difference between spike assay and vector assay]
**** SLIDE 8.
TEXT: How Much dsDNA?
[graph and chart]
* SLIDE 9.
TEXT: How Much dsDNA&RNA?
[graph and chart]
** SLIDE 10.
TEXT: Add Vaccine Directly to qPCR assays
No Dilution - 1 hour assay on 5 ul (1/60th of vaccine)
CTs as low as 17.5
[two tables and two graphs]
*** SLIDE 11.
TEXT: Limitations - Expired lots
Cold chain on the vials cannot be confirmed
The RNA integrity on arrival can be confirmed
[6 graphs]
*** SLIDE 12.
TEXT: Reproduction
[Screenshots of 4 Tweets]
* SLIDE 13.
TEXT: Risks - Prothrombotic / DNA integration risk - Keith Peden /FDA
[screenshots of two papers:
"Double-stranded DNA induces a prothrombotic phenotype in the vascular endothelium"
DESCRIPTION: "University of South Carolina Professor Dr. Phillip Buckhaults testifies before South Carolina Senate Medical Affairs Ad-Hoc Committee on DHEC." [Department of Health and Environmental Control]
DR. PHILLIP BUCKHAULTS: So a little bit of what am I doing here, for those of you don't, don't know me, my name is Phillip Buckhaults, I'm a, I have a PhD in biochemistry and molecular biology. I'm a, I'm a cancer gene jock, basically. I do cancer genomics research at the University of South Carolina. And what that means is that I'm kind of an expert on all the ways that the human genome can get futzed with during your lifetime, and which of those things cause cancer and which ones don't. OK?
So technically, that means that I'm very, very skilled in, in the art of DNA sequencing, OK? I can figure out the sequence of things that I didn't know what I was looking for. And I'm also pretty good— when I say I, I mean the people in my laboratory that you're not going to hear their names, but there's a group of people that do this excellent work, we're really good at, at detecting foreign pieces of DNA in places where they're not supposed to be, even if they're real low levels.
And we used those skills during the pandemic to, we invented the covid test that many of you did a spit test, OK? That came out of my lab because we were really good at that kind of stuff. And so I've earned a fair amount of respect in the state of South Carolina and in this body because we did a ton of covid testing in the middle of the night when people were afraid, and we told them, no, you don't have covid in your home, or, yes, you do. So my qualifications to comment on this are both technical and kind of relational in the state of South Carolina.
I'll cut to a very narrow theme here, but it does touch on lots of these regulatory issues, and I'll leave it to you to expand on those if you want to. I'll try to stay in this narrow lane of some problems in the Pfizer vaccine as a case study for places in which regulatory oversight could be improved. Alright?
So, first of all, let me say that my interpretation of the literature is that the Pfizer vaccine did a pretty good job of keeping people from dying, but it did a terrible job of stopping the pandemic. The early publications showed that it stopped infection, but that only lasted for like a month.
SENATOR TOM CORBIN: Dr. Buckhaults, could you pull the mic a little closer to you? Staff's telling me they're having trouble getting you on the recording.
DR. PHILLIP BUCKHAULTS: OK.
SENATOR TOM CORBIN: OK, thank you.
DR. PHILLIP BUCKHAULTS: In,in my professional evaluation of the literature, the Pfizer vaccine did a pretty good job of keeping people out of the cemetery, but it sucked at stopping the pandemic. And it was the best of sucky options that we had. And I still believe that it was deployed mostly in good faith, but there were a lot of shortcuts taken because the house was on fire, and we could do a better job next time from the lessons that we're going to learn here. That's my own personal view of this.
But I'm also, my philosophical bent here is, I'm sure many of you have heard of a Occam's Razor, right? Choose the simplest of explanations. Well there's another one called Hanlon's Razor, which is, never attribute malice to that which can be better explained by incompetence. And so I'm trying to be gracious here, in many, in circumstances there could be malice underneath, but I'm trying to see just incompetence to be gracious. So.
The Pfizer vaccine is contaminated with plasmid DNA. It's not just mRNA. It's got bits of DNA in it. This DNA is the DNA vector that was used as the template for the in vitro transcription reaction when they made the mRNA.
I know this is true because I sequenced it in my own lab.
The vials of Pfizer vaccine that were given out here in Colombia, one of my colleagues was in charge of that vaccination program in the College of Pharmacy, and for reasons that I still don't understand, he kept every single vial. So he had a whole freezer full of the empty vials. Well the empty vials have a little tiny bit in the bottom of them, he gave them all to me, and I looked at them. We had two batches that were given out here in Colombia, and I checked these two batches, and I checked them by sequencing. And I sequenced all the DNA that was in the vaccine. And I can see what's in there. And it's surprising that there's any DNA in there. And you can kind of work out what it is, and how it got there.
And I'm kind of alarmed about the possible consequences of this, both in terms of human health and biology, but you should be alarmed about the regulatory process that allowed it to get there.
So this DNA, in my view, it could be causing some of the rare but serious side effects like death from cardiac arrest. There's a lot of cases now, of people having suspicious death after vaccine. It's hard to prove what caused it, it's just, you know, temporally associated, and this DNA is a plausible mechanism. OK?
This DNA can and likely will integrate into the genomic DNA of cells that got transfected with the vaccine mix. This is just the way it works. We do this in the lab all the time. We take pieces of DNA, we mix them up with a lipid complex like the Pfizer vaccine is in, we pour it onto cells, and, and a lot of it gets into the cells, and a lot of it gets into the DNA of those cells, and it becomes a permanent fixture of the cell. It's not just a temporary, a temporary thing, it is in that cell and all of its progeny from now on, forever more, amen.
[END OF EXCERPT]
# # #
TRANSCRIBER'S NOTES:
Dr. Phillip Buckhaults
University of South Carolina, Professor of Molecular Biology and Genetics
Thanks, mary-lou. I couldn't get that bitchute video to play, either, however. I did find this-- an interview with McKernan on rumble from a while ago. I have not listened to it, but from the description it sounds like it covers the same issue.
SENATOR TOM CORBIN: Next is Dr. Janci Lindsay. I hope you can—
DR. JANCI LINDSAY: I hope you realize what a hero this man is [referring to previous speaker, Dr. Phillip Buckhaults]*
SENATOR TOM CORBIN: Yes.
DR. JANCI LINDSAY: I have spoken with many scientists about checking for this months and months and months ago. None of them would do it. I spoke at the U.S Senate in December of 2022 about the risk of this being passed to our children because of it being reverse transcribed simply from the RNA, before we knew that there was DNA in the shots. As soon as I found out there was DNA in the shots, I went all over every social media platform I could get to and started ringing the alarm bell.
[Loud Music]
[to woman assisting with the set up of the audio visual presentation] Exactly, don't, you don't have to play that at this point. I have little time so I'm going to follow up to what he said, well just show the one, the one slide.
WOMAN ASSISTING WITH AUDIO VISUAL PRESENTATION: The one slide. OK.
DR. JANCI LINDSAY: The one VAERS slide.
So I disagree with Dr. Buckhaults in that I think that this is the most dangerous platform that has ever been released on mankind. That is very easy to see in the VAERS** database where you have more deaths in just the couple months after the roll-out than you have in the past 30 years for all the other vaccines combined.
[to woman assisting with audio visual presentation] You would have to shrink that and go up. So there we go.
[away from microphone, pointing to slide on screen which is off camera] So these are all the other vaccines for the past 30 years combined. This is what happened, sorry— [back at microphone], and this is what happened during covid to deaths from vaccines.
[SLIDE: Bar chart, reports of death following vaccine by year, 1990-2023.]
Do you see? We're at over 35,000 deaths. Typically you would get no more than 200 deaths in a year for all 30 vaccine— or for all of the vaccines combined.
This is the past 30 years of deaths from vaccines reported into the VEARS database. You've already heard earlier that this represents only 1 to 13 percent of the cases that are normally reported. This is a safety signal. This is a safety signal. This is the platform itself, OK?
In the clinical trials we saw deaths. We definitely had deaths. That was used in Process 1, without the contamination, OK? What may not have been clear is that the, the shots tested on the people in the clinical trials were vastly different than the shots tested or given to people released on the population. I'm short on time so I'm trying to fit this in. Basically, people were given in the clinical trial a clean shot. People, everybody else was given these contaminated shots. Every single vial that's been tested by every scientist around the world is contaminated with these plasmids.
And there can, just, some are contaminated when, when Kevin McKernan*** first tested the vials, he found that one of the vials contained up to about 30% of the nucleic acid material was in fact DNA. So this is not some residual contamination that's carrying over. This is significant contamination.
Why does that matter? Gene therapy was never brought to market even though it's been over 40 years in development because in the past it caused latent cancers that developed two to four years after these were given, because it caused lethal autoimmune reactions, even when you were producing human proteins, not viral proteins, not bacterial proteins that you are displaying on the surface of your cells.
Think about the logic of this. In traditional gene therapies, and these are gene therapies, they would be classified as gene therapies, in traditional gene therapies you send in a genetic message to make a missing protein. That protein is identical to the protein that should have been in your body, but you're missing. This time we're sending in a sequence and asking it to make a piece of a viral protein and we're displaying it on our cells and then our body is attacking it and killing those cells. It doesn't stay in your arm, they said it would stay in your arm, it goes to every single cell in your body, every tissue in your body, it goes to your brain, it goes to your bone marrow, where then your body is able to attack these cells.
It is not a healthy platform for this. There's a difference between using this technology for cancer or for fixing inborn errors and metabolism, as compared to using it in a vaccine. There you understand the risk. Here the risks were not told to people. What this DNA being present, what Phillip [Buckhaults] did not touch on, is that there are sequences within these plasmids— I personally feel that this is an intentional, I believe that there is nefarious intent.
And I'm going to tell you why, and it's something that he didn't touch on.
DR. JANCI LINDSAY: And I'm going to tell you why, and it's something that he didn't touch on. There are SV40 sequences [clears throat], excuse me, there are there are SV40 sequences within the plasmids that were not disclosed to the regulators. The SV40 sequences, if you'll recall, the SV40 virus was a contaminant of the polio vaccines. It is thought that that contamination of the virus, which is on—, oncogenic, caused many of the cancers for the next several decades from the people, in the people that receive these vaccines.
Now the whole the whole SV40 virus is not in the shots, but what is in the shots is a special sequence, it's called a nuclear localization sequence, which is in the shots to take the plasmid DNA directly to the nucleus of human cells. It is not needed to grow these in bacteria, you would not have to use this to grow it in bacteria for the purpose that they said it was for, to make lots of copies. This sequence takes the DNA to the nucleus of human cells where it can then be integrated or where, as Phillip said, it is most likely to be integrated.
So all this about there's no DNA in the shots, they will not go to the nucleus, they will not integrate with your DNA, is not true. And they knew it from the beginning because they knew the plasmids were there.
That's a problem.
There's also an SV40 promoter only designed to be expressed in human cells, not bacteria cells.
Now Phillip has checked in something he didn't say, which is good news for people— Dr. Buckhaults, I keep saying Phillip— which is good news for people, is that most of the sequences were broken. Had they been intact, and if there are any that are intact, and this is something he should have said, we have to check, they can infect the E. coli in your gut. That's what they're designed to do, to infect the E. co—, to, to infect E. coli, which means you can be a perpetual spike factory because they're self-replicating and they would self-replicate in the bacteria of your gut and then make spike over and over and over again.
That's a problem.
They also carry an antibiotic resistant gene cassette to kanamysin and neomycin. Kanamycin is the main antibiotic used to treat tuberculosis. Neomycin is another antibiotic that's widely used. People that receive these, if it transfects the E. coli in your gut, it can make the, your gut and other bacteria not just that, it can make them resistant to those antibiotics. That is a huge, huge risk. And it's something that's known for plasmids, it's something that they've, they're careful to make sure that you don't have these antibiotic resistance genes if they're making something that should go into gene therapy. And now it's here, now it's present.
I've worked for several months to try to get these shots recalled. Completely recalled. They're dangerous. Excuse me I need to get a drink of water but, um, they're dangerous we're injecting these in our kids. We don't inject contaminated medical products in our kids.
Something Dr. Buckhaults didn't touch on as well, is if there's that much plasmid in the shots, there's a very good chance that there's bacterial endotoxin in the shots, which means bacterial proteins which can cause anaphylaxis and even death. And that may be what caused some of the, the rapid deaths that occurred right after people got these shots.
There's so much more to touch on. We've seen massive cases of miscarriage and stillbirth. Normally during years we wouldn't see more than 25 cases of miscarriage or stillbirth for all the vaccines combined. In 2021 we saw 3,428 cases of stillbirth and miscarriage reported into the VAERS system. Remember, no more than, than 25 typically in a year is normal for all the vaccines combined.
3,428 in 2021. In 2022 we saw 1,525 stillbirths and miscarriage. And in halfway through that year, the FDA, or the CDC said they would stop reporting on, they would stop making all their information public because they did not want to encourage vaccine hesitancy or misinformation or misinterpret—, misinterpretation of the data. So all of a sudden we saw what was, what was going like this [holds hand up, slant up], go like this [hand up, slant down] in February. That's artificial. We can't even trust the data coming out of the, the CDC anymore.
The FDA, the FDA knows about this contamination, they're not doing anything.
I'm sorry this is so rushed, I just wanted to address what Dr. Buckhaults was not able to. He and I have the same degrees, I have a degree in biochemistry and molecular biology and I'm a toxicologist and an expert witness as a profession nationally and internationally.
This is outrageous. I've never seen anything like this in my entire career. We have got to pull these shots and restrict them from our children. We cannot inject these into babies and children. These are contaminated, dangerous, lethal products. I don't agree with Dr. Buckhaults. But I believe that he's just seeing a lot of this data, I feel like he is where we were three years ago.
So that's basically [looks at wristwatch] if I don't leave now, I won't catch my plane. I may not catch it anyway. So.
SENATOR BILLY GARRETT: You had said earlier nefarious. You felt like this was more nefarious than Dr Burkhaults. In what sense are you saying that?
DR. JANCI LINDSAY: The SV40 sequences, they should not be there. They don't need to be there to grow this into bac—, to grow this in bacteria. I don't think it's an accident, they could have chosen another plasmid that did not have the SV40 sequences. If these sequences sit above an oncogene and, and they're promiscuous, that means they are likely to, to integrate in places more likely than other genetic inserts.
[taking a bottle of water] Thank you so much. [drinking water]
Then they can cause cancer. Insertional mutagenesis anyway causes cancer. And that's the risk, that's why gene therapies were not brought to market for so many years, because there was a risk of causing cancer from the insertional mutagenesis.
We never needed these vaccines. We had treatments that worked. One of our doctors here is going to tell you about that. Hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin, I can tell you, as a toxicologist, they are not toxic. They are, they are some of the safest drugs you can use.
I— There's no reason once the FDA found out about this contamination, OK? And we looked to see endotoxin levels, but they've got them all redacted. Why would you redact them if you were trying to be transparent? Why would you hold the data for 75 years, all of the clinical data for 75 years from these if you were trying to be transparent? Tell me why.
There is something very unusual going on here that is being done differently than it's ever been done before. We don't give experimental products to pregnant women. We don't give experimental products to babies that have a death profile like this. It's not done. It's never been done before.
Please protect your citizens. Please. I am begging you to protect your citizens. We've got to get one state to stand up and do the right thing. Do whatever you can so that other states will follow.
From that page: "Dr. Janci Chunn Lindsay is the Director of Toxicology and Molecular Biology for Toxicology Support Services, LLC. She holds a doctorate (PhD) in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology from the University of Texas Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center-Houston. Dr. Lindsay has extensive experience in analyzing the molecular profile of pharmacologic responses as they pertain to the dose/response relationship. Her expertise centers on evaluating the complex dynamics of toxicity, such as toxicant pharmacology, exposure route, host metabolism, and subsequent cellular effects as they relate to the contribution of specific substances to impairment, health risk, or human disease.
Dr. Lindsay has over 30 years of scientific experience with an emphasis on the study of inhalation (pulmonary) toxicology involving pulmonary pathologies such as asthma, reactive airway disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), asbestosis, mesothelioma and pulmonary fibrosis—that may be claimed following chemical, drug, or particulate exposure. Dr. Lindsay also has experience in performing health risk assessments and evaluating the toxicological profile of a variety of consumer and industrial products, chemicals, biologics, genetic biologics and pollutants. Dr. Lindsay also has experience in analyzing and evaluating molecular markers of disease in the modern field of “Toxicogenomics”, particularly with respect to benzene and asbestos and differential drug metabolism dynamics."
Senator Tom Corbin (Republican, Greenville, District 5)
* University of South Carolina Professor Dr. Phillip Buckhaults was the speaker just before Dr. Janci Lindsay. To view his testimony before the South Carolina Senate: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IEWHhrHiiTY&t=44s
Great interview and kudos to you for the reach that you are getting and the impact you are making.
Leaving aside the covid politics and the propaganda, it is simply unfathomable that those who designed, planned, promoted and mandated these genetic therapies could have done so in any more irresponsible and cavalier way if they had tried. Which leaves us all with Occam’s Razor and the path of least resistance here ... NONE of this was about covid, none of it was about Wuhan, none of it was about health, “saving” the vulnerable, getting back to normal ... it was, and always will have been, about a “Great Leap Forward” in medical experimentation using the entire world as a Petrie dish to figure out whether their new mRNA toy was adequate or viable as the new healthcare platform.
One could argue that perhaps there were positives to emerge from this, honest actors looking for advances in cancer treatments and the like may have overlooked the process in the hopes of miracle cures etc, maybe those who were prepared to break a few eggs to perfect the *all new* omelette recipe so to speak, but it’s unavoidable now that at best we could call this mass human experimentation.
Hence the “at best” disclaimer ... at worst, we all can only guess at the worst excesses of the depravity, malevolence, fascism and worse behind this, at all of the bad actors and useful idiots involved at every level of the cabal, but there does come a point where saying such things becomes cliche, so I prefer on this occasion to stick closer to the topic at hand.
I listed the most important articles I’ve published at my Substack site and provided brief text explaining WHY I thought they were important. I’d love to see more Substack authors do the same thing. I think some of our “best stories” are missed or don’t get the attention they warrant.
Thanks for recording your conversation with Kevin. I've listened to a couple of his interviews and had to slow down the speed. What a pity he wasn't onto this earlier. Would have saved many lives potentially. Better late than never I suppose. Sorry to hear you were sick. Keep up the great work.
Meanwhile, as if to prove that there are in fact medical people in Australia who are capable of comprehending that the Convid Scamdemic contains Chemical Engineering and Materials Science as subjects and not just Molecular Biology and Biochemistry and Medicine......Dr David Nixon in Brisbane beavers away at analysing blood and the contents of "vaccine" vials using dark and light-field microscopy. He is on Substack.
But who interviews him? Test question, btw: is injectable electronics a thing? Presumed answer: "no, we, (meaning McKernan, McCulloch, Kory, Cole, Malhotra, etc.) did not learn about it at med school or in our biochem or mol. biol degrees, so it cannot exist. And if it does, it is not our field, and so we cannot say anything about it."
But as the wiki article on Charles Lieber notes, "Scientific American named injectable electronics one of 2015's top ten world changing ideas.[65] Chemical & Engineering News called it "the most notable chemistry research advance of 2015"
Well, at least Dr Altman here on the Aust. Substack has referred to the central role played by the US Dept of Defense in this crime, although he does not mention the evidence furnished by Sasha Latypova and Katherine Watts by name.
Nor of course, the name of Dr Mihalcea or Drs Morgan and Giordano when it comes to nanotech.
The phrase "wliful blindness" occurs in the McKernan interview, ...yes, indeed.
You forgot to mention Prof. Ian F. Akyildiz, "These Covid Vaccines Are Nothing More Than Bio-Nano Machines, They Are Programmed And Then Injected Into The Body" https://rumble.com/v38na5i-august-17-2023.html - 1m 28s - 17Aug23 - nonvaxer420
Yes thanks, I had not forgotten Akyildiz, I had just decided out of mercy to halt my list of persons who are evidently quite unknown and/or unmentioned here.
But then as Dr Mihalcea wrote on her Substack on 2. 10, "Some people question the credibility of our findings because they are not published in peer reviewed literature. My goal is not to be accepted by scientists or the establishment, as I have lost all faith and respect in them."
Makes you wonder when McKernan in the interview refers to the PCR test having been used at 35-40 cycles to show Covid infection on his way to mentioning the plasmid contamination shown up at 15 cycles. he behaves by omission as if Covid is a thing and as if 20 immunologists had not called in an open letter on Eurosurveillance to withdraw Drosten's publication there of his PCR test for Sars Cov 2 in Jan, 2020. They are still waiting for an answer.
And then we have the folks at COMUSAV, with their film Blue Truth https://www.bitchute.com/video/07rUgNbNCIjz/, showing beople and corpses emitting MAC addresses, which implies nanotech in the jabs.
The makers of the film are all Latin American doctors.
Of course, McKernan knows perfectly well using PCR to detect infections - let alone imaginary ones - is a total scam. However, identifying DNA-contaminated plasmids using PCR is the sort of thing it was designed for, so it seems valid in this instance. But yes, he's a hypocrite and well aware Drosten's a fraud and this whole thing is a scam. He didn't speak out about it beforehand because he's obviously in favour of mRNA technology whether for vaccine platforms, cancer treatment or whatever and probably invests in it heavily. His attitude seems to be that all will be fine if we just clean out the crap ... then start again.
On COMUSAV film, yes I watched it long ago. Something that intrigues me is why we are no longer seeing magnets sticking to vaxxed individuals. Still MAC addresses though. You may know the Pfizer (Cominarty) formula was changed in October 2021 (when it was shown that their PBS buffer containing inorganic electrolytes were apparently highly toxic in a cationic nanoparticle system). If interested, see this vid by Prof/Dr. Gabriele Segalla https://vimeo.com/807279310 Segalla is independent research biochemist, specialist in chemistry of microemulsions and colloidal systems, author of Pandora's Vaccine.
Not so sure about Mihalcea. She's making people panic without offering viable solution (chelation therapy is expensive, needs to be repeated regularly and can be dangerous). She is also promoting the idea that vaxxed & unvaxxed have exactly same contamination in their blood, like we're all in the same boat which is obviously false as we know those dropping dead are mostly vaxxed. I am ready to acknowledge all the same that there may be no "purebloods" left.
Btw. given what the chemtrail geoeng. crowd say about the metals found in e.g. Rockies snowpack after aerial spraying, do you have an opinion about aluminium?
Because if aluminium as a metal is addressable by 5G or other DEWs on the Internet of (nanoteched) Bodies. flushing it out seems advisable.
And Mr. Aluminium, ex-chem prof. Dr Chris Exley (see his Substack) drinks and recommends 1l per day of a mineral water that has at least 30mg/l silicic acid.
In this way ,one can alleviate autism, Alzheimers, multiple sclerosis, etc. by urinating out the aluminium that has been bound by the slicic acid.
Exley has not (yet) tackled the subject of such drinking to counteract body aluminium as a 5G or DEW target, however.
@Mary-Lou: Dr Nixon has his own Substack too, called Nixonlab.
Yes I watched the interview he did with French journalist - brilliant. And I also noted his recommendation on silicon rich mineral water. I also wish he would tackle subjects you raise. Have you posed those questions to him directly? I have read that boron/borax helps eliminate toxic metals etc from the body. Good video here on the subject: https://rumble.com/vdczi5-a-solution-they-do-not-want-you-to-know.-by-dana-ashlie.html dating back to August 2019. It's not just about boron. Dana Ashlie interviews a guy called Terral. I learnt a lot from this. I'm about to watch it again to refresh my memory.
Thanks for any pub of this unique subscription drive ... which is really trying to pound home the message that Substack READERS are the key to our ability to fight back against captured forces.
Can Substack readers increase the “paid” ratio of Substack writers to, say, 10 percent? Right now it’s about 1 to 4 percent paid. What we have is about 100 fairly well-known “Covid writers” taking on 40,000 salaried MSM “journalists” …. It’s the “1 percent of the 1 percent” who are actually subsidizing the world’s “freedom” writers.
I have written a book chapter for AMPS and will be talking about Endotoxin in Canberra.
Hope to have some exciting news around that time as various labs are looking at getting proper Endotoxin measurements done. All TGA lab test results so far are invalid due to LNPs interfering with standard Horseshoe Crab Blood assays.
This so called vaccine was designed and implemented for one sole reason. To KILL .All involved need to be charged with genocide, and crimes against humanity.
Maybe Kevin would have been a more worthy recipient of the Nobel prize?
Boom.
Great work again, we have some amazing aussies producing brilliant substacks- to all of you a huge 🙏
Thank you for this. For those who don't do video:
Kevin McKernan Testifies Before the FDA
182nd Meeting of Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee
Open Public Hearing Session
U.S. Food and Drug Administration, livestream June 15, 2023
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gBOyPREXGh8
TRANSCRIBER'S NOTE: See McKernan's post about this presentation:
https://anandamide.substack.com/p/executive-summary-of-the-fda-vrbpac
and tweet (with just the clip of his presentation taken from the longer video):
https://twitter.com/TheChiefNerd/status/1669443898547003399
See also the preprint about his discovery:
"Sequencing of bivalent Moderna and Pfizer mRNA vaccines reveals nanogram to microgram quantities of expression vector dsDNA per dose."
McKernan, K., Helbert, Y., Kane, L. T., & McLaughlin, S. (2023, April 10).
https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/b9t7m
TRANSCRIPT
4:58:45
SUSSAN PAYDAR: Next is Mr. Kevin McKernan.
[SLIDE 1 - Plasmid derived dsDNA contamination in mRNA vaccines]
KEVIN MCKERNAN: Thank you. I have no conflicts to disclose. I have 25 years of experience in the genomics space. I've worked as a team leader of R & D at the Human Genome Project at Whitehead and MIT* and I have 57,000 citations to publications in my space, and multiple patents on, on PCR and sequencing.
Next slide, please.
[SLIDE 2 - Conflicts]**
No conflicts.
Next slide.
[SLIDE 3 - Illumina sequencing and RT-qPCR and qPCR]***
In February I used mRNA vaccines as they can spike [unintelligible] control for some RNA sequencing libraries, and to my shock, discovered that the expression vectors for the vaccines are still in the vials. I looked at this in over a dozen vials, and it appears that this expression vector is above the EMA guidelines and the FDA guidelines. You can see this in this preprint that's described here.
Next slide.
[SLIDE 4 - Process 1 (IVT) vs Process 2 (E.coli)]****
As a, as a refresher, there's two different processes that have been discussed in this BMJ article, the clinical trials were run on Process 1 which uses in vitro transcription off of synthetic DNA, but they switched to Process 2 for scale-up which used E. coli to amplify plasmids. And those plasmids are what still remain in the vials and were not within the clinical trial.
Next slide.
[SLIDE 5 - Process 1 used in Vitro Transcription (IVT) / Process 2 used Plasmids in E. coli]*
This is another depiction of this process. You can see getting plasmids out of these E. coli is a, is a challenge and can sometimes lead to residual plasmids inside the vaccines.
Next slide.
[SLIDE 6 - Independent Illumina sequencing / What was disclosed to the EMA]**
These are the expression vectors that we discovered on the left in the Pfizer vaccines. They also exist in the Moderna vaccines, but they're a little bit different. The Pfizer vaccines specifically have this SV40 promoter which was not disclosed in the expression vector map that was given to the FDA— ah, or I'm sorry, the EMA. But the expression vector has a 344 base promoter with a nuclear localization signal known as the SV40 promoter.
Next slide.
[SLIDE 7 - Designed aPCR primers]***
So we went to verify this by designing quantitative PCR assays that target the spike sequence and the vector sequence.
Next slide.
[SLIDE 8 - How Much dsDNA?]****
And this work demonstrated that with even a 1 to 100 dilutions you could get CTs of 22 for the DNA that's in these vials for the vector, which is not part of what should be in these vials.
We did this in triplicate across 8 vials, it's very consistent, and they are over the EMA and the FDA's limits.
Next slide.
[SLIDE 9 - How Much dsDNA/RNA?]*
The EMA has a ratio metric limit that looks at RNA to DNA ratios, and you can measure, you should expect an 11.5 CT offset between the spike in-between the vector. What we see is only 5 to 7 CT difference, which means there's an 18- to 70- fold over the limit of the 330 nanogram per milligram recommended by the EMA.
Next slide.
[SLIDE 10 - Add Vaccine Directly to qPCR assays]**
You can readily assay this in any other lab around the world now. If you put these vaccines directly into quantitative PCR, you can get CTs as low as 17. This is very important to know because COVID was diagnosed with CTs less than 40, which is over a million-fold higher contamination being injected than what you might get from a nasal swab.
Next slide.
[SLIDE 11 - Limitations - Expired lots]***
We know these vials were, these vials were sent to us anonymously in the mail, so we do not have the cold chain, however we can measure the RNA integrity by putting them on electro [unintelligible] systems and do not see a substantial difference in the RNA integrity from the vials that we received versus what's been published about these in the past.
Next, next slide.
[SLIDE 12 - Reproduction]****
Various people on Twitter have now begun to reproduce this. In addition, I'd point to the EMA's documentation where they have an 815-fold variance across 10 lots of double-stranded DNA contamination documented in the EMA process.
Next slide.
[SLIDE 13 - Risks - Prothrombotic / DNA integration risk - Keith Peden /FDA]*
There are some risks to this. There's double-stranded DNA can create interferon responses and Keith Peden at the FDA has done great work demonstrating the risks of DNA integration into the genome if these things are in, in vaccines.
Next slide.
[SLIDE 14 - Call to Action]**
The call to action here is all of these primer sequences are now public and people are downloading them and trying to reproduce this work. You can reproduce this work in 60 minutes with a microliter of the vaccine, which is 1/300th of the dose for less than 10 dollars. I encourage everyone to try and do this to understand what we have at foot. [inaudible] We did not measure any of the bad lots in the Schmeling, et al paper*** that demonstrated high-adverse events in certain lots. We were measuring what seemed to be normal lots.
Next slide.
[SLIDE 15 - Thank you for your time and consideration]
I thank you for your time and consideration.
SUSSAN PAYDAR. Great, thank you so much Mr. McKernan for your presentation. Next—
5:03:02
[END]
...continued in reply...
# # #
TRANSCRIBER'S NOTES:
(Footnotes below)
Sussan Paydar, Ph.D., Designated Federal Officer, Center for Biologics, Evaluation and Research, FDA
Kevin McKernan is a microbiologist, CEO and founder of Medicinal Genomics
https://medicinalgenomics.com/team/kevin-mckernan/
His Substack is Anandamide at https://substack.com/@kevinmckernan
See various interviews with Kevin McKernan and discussion of his investigation:
"Interview with Kevin McKernan, scientist who discovered DNA contamination in mRNA shots"
by Rebekah Barnett, Dystopian Down Under, October 3, 2023
https://news.rebekahbarnett.com.au/p/interview-with-kevin-mckernan-scientist
"Contamination of mRNA Vaccine, the Threat of 'SV40'”
America Out Loud, Dr. Peter McCullough, August 14, 2023
https://www.americaoutloud.news/contamination-of-mrna-vaccine-the-threat-of-sv40/
"Contamination of mRNA COVID Products"
Host: Jessica Rose, Ph.D and Guest Kevin McKernan
March 24, 2023
https://live.childrenshealthdefense.org/chd-tv/shows/good-morning-chd/contamination-of-mrna-covid-products/
"The Man Who Found DNA Toxins in Pfizer & Moderna Vials"
Guest: Kevin McKernan 5/19/23 Conservative Review with Daniel Horowitz
https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-man-who-found-dna-toxins-in-pfizer-moderna-vials/id1065050908?i=1000613696167
"The Vax-Gene Files: An Accidental Discovery"
by Julie Sladden and Julian Gillespie, May 27, 2023
https://brownstone.org/articles/vax-gene-files-accidental-discovery/
FOOTNOTES:
* The Whitehead Institute specializes in biomedical research.
See https://wi.mit.edu/
** SLIDE 2.
TEXT: Conflicts
We do not participate in any C19 related business
We manufacture qPCR kits for the agricultural genomics space
We authored a PrePrint on dcDSNA contamination in mRNA vaccines
*** SLIDE 3.
TEXT: Illumina sequencing and RT-qPCR and qPCT
[shows screenshots from preprint "Sequencing of bivalent Moderna and Pfizer mRNA vaccines reveals nanogram to microgram quantities of expression vector dsDNA per dose" by Kevin McKernan, et al.]
**** SLIDE 4.
TEXT: Process 1 (IVT) vs Process 2 (E.coli)
The trial was run on Process 1 lots
250 people received Process 2 lots (plasmids)
The world received Process 2 lots
[shows screenshots from BMJ paper "Covid researchers face wait for patient level data from Pfizer and Moderna vaccine trials"]
* SLIDE 5.
TEXT: Process 1 used in Vitro Transcription (IVT) / Synthetic DNA tempolate
Process 2 used Plasmids in E. coli / cloned DNA template]
[illustrations of the two different processes]
** SLIDE 6.
TEXT: Independent Illumina sequencing / What was disclosed to the EMA]
[Illustrations: Raw reads public / No sequencing provided]
*** SLIDE 7.
TEXT: Designed qPCR primers
[illustration showing difference between spike assay and vector assay]
**** SLIDE 8.
TEXT: How Much dsDNA?
[graph and chart]
* SLIDE 9.
TEXT: How Much dsDNA&RNA?
[graph and chart]
** SLIDE 10.
TEXT: Add Vaccine Directly to qPCR assays
No Dilution - 1 hour assay on 5 ul (1/60th of vaccine)
CTs as low as 17.5
[two tables and two graphs]
*** SLIDE 11.
TEXT: Limitations - Expired lots
Cold chain on the vials cannot be confirmed
The RNA integrity on arrival can be confirmed
[6 graphs]
*** SLIDE 12.
TEXT: Reproduction
[Screenshots of 4 Tweets]
* SLIDE 13.
TEXT: Risks - Prothrombotic / DNA integration risk - Keith Peden /FDA
[screenshots of two papers:
"Double-stranded DNA induces a prothrombotic phenotype in the vascular endothelium"
Scientific Reports, April 25, 2017
https://doaj.org/article/3223fb986f184a3bb004e31aaba168a0
"Issues associated with residual cell-substrate DNA in viral vaccines"
Science Direct, June 2009
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1045105609000293 ]
** SLIDE 14 - Call to Action
TEXT: In 60 minutes, dsDNA contamination can be measured with direct qPCR of the vaccine vials for less than $10/vial
Using 1/300th of a dose.
[2 figure, 2 sets of bullet points, and a graph]
*** See:
"Batch-dependent safety of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine"
by Max Schmeling, Vibeke Manniche, Peter Riis Hansen, Research letter to the European Journal of Clinical Investigation, 30 March 2023
https://doi.org/10.1111/eci.13998
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/eci.13998
SC Senate Hearing - USC Professor Dr. Phillip Buckhaults
SC 4 FREEDOM, posted September 13, 2023
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IEWHhrHiiTY&t=44s
DESCRIPTION: "University of South Carolina Professor Dr. Phillip Buckhaults testifies before South Carolina Senate Medical Affairs Ad-Hoc Committee on DHEC." [Department of Health and Environmental Control]
Hat tip: https://jessicar.substack.com/p/south-carolina-senate-hearing-usc
TRANSCRIPT - EXCERPT
DR. PHILLIP BUCKHAULTS: So a little bit of what am I doing here, for those of you don't, don't know me, my name is Phillip Buckhaults, I'm a, I have a PhD in biochemistry and molecular biology. I'm a, I'm a cancer gene jock, basically. I do cancer genomics research at the University of South Carolina. And what that means is that I'm kind of an expert on all the ways that the human genome can get futzed with during your lifetime, and which of those things cause cancer and which ones don't. OK?
So technically, that means that I'm very, very skilled in, in the art of DNA sequencing, OK? I can figure out the sequence of things that I didn't know what I was looking for. And I'm also pretty good— when I say I, I mean the people in my laboratory that you're not going to hear their names, but there's a group of people that do this excellent work, we're really good at, at detecting foreign pieces of DNA in places where they're not supposed to be, even if they're real low levels.
And we used those skills during the pandemic to, we invented the covid test that many of you did a spit test, OK? That came out of my lab because we were really good at that kind of stuff. And so I've earned a fair amount of respect in the state of South Carolina and in this body because we did a ton of covid testing in the middle of the night when people were afraid, and we told them, no, you don't have covid in your home, or, yes, you do. So my qualifications to comment on this are both technical and kind of relational in the state of South Carolina.
I'll cut to a very narrow theme here, but it does touch on lots of these regulatory issues, and I'll leave it to you to expand on those if you want to. I'll try to stay in this narrow lane of some problems in the Pfizer vaccine as a case study for places in which regulatory oversight could be improved. Alright?
So, first of all, let me say that my interpretation of the literature is that the Pfizer vaccine did a pretty good job of keeping people from dying, but it did a terrible job of stopping the pandemic. The early publications showed that it stopped infection, but that only lasted for like a month.
SENATOR TOM CORBIN: Dr. Buckhaults, could you pull the mic a little closer to you? Staff's telling me they're having trouble getting you on the recording.
DR. PHILLIP BUCKHAULTS: OK.
SENATOR TOM CORBIN: OK, thank you.
DR. PHILLIP BUCKHAULTS: In,in my professional evaluation of the literature, the Pfizer vaccine did a pretty good job of keeping people out of the cemetery, but it sucked at stopping the pandemic. And it was the best of sucky options that we had. And I still believe that it was deployed mostly in good faith, but there were a lot of shortcuts taken because the house was on fire, and we could do a better job next time from the lessons that we're going to learn here. That's my own personal view of this.
But I'm also, my philosophical bent here is, I'm sure many of you have heard of a Occam's Razor, right? Choose the simplest of explanations. Well there's another one called Hanlon's Razor, which is, never attribute malice to that which can be better explained by incompetence. And so I'm trying to be gracious here, in many, in circumstances there could be malice underneath, but I'm trying to see just incompetence to be gracious. So.
The Pfizer vaccine is contaminated with plasmid DNA. It's not just mRNA. It's got bits of DNA in it. This DNA is the DNA vector that was used as the template for the in vitro transcription reaction when they made the mRNA.
I know this is true because I sequenced it in my own lab.
The vials of Pfizer vaccine that were given out here in Colombia, one of my colleagues was in charge of that vaccination program in the College of Pharmacy, and for reasons that I still don't understand, he kept every single vial. So he had a whole freezer full of the empty vials. Well the empty vials have a little tiny bit in the bottom of them, he gave them all to me, and I looked at them. We had two batches that were given out here in Colombia, and I checked these two batches, and I checked them by sequencing. And I sequenced all the DNA that was in the vaccine. And I can see what's in there. And it's surprising that there's any DNA in there. And you can kind of work out what it is, and how it got there.
And I'm kind of alarmed about the possible consequences of this, both in terms of human health and biology, but you should be alarmed about the regulatory process that allowed it to get there.
So this DNA, in my view, it could be causing some of the rare but serious side effects like death from cardiac arrest. There's a lot of cases now, of people having suspicious death after vaccine. It's hard to prove what caused it, it's just, you know, temporally associated, and this DNA is a plausible mechanism. OK?
This DNA can and likely will integrate into the genomic DNA of cells that got transfected with the vaccine mix. This is just the way it works. We do this in the lab all the time. We take pieces of DNA, we mix them up with a lipid complex like the Pfizer vaccine is in, we pour it onto cells, and, and a lot of it gets into the cells, and a lot of it gets into the DNA of those cells, and it becomes a permanent fixture of the cell. It's not just a temporary, a temporary thing, it is in that cell and all of its progeny from now on, forever more, amen.
[END OF EXCERPT]
# # #
TRANSCRIBER'S NOTES:
Dr. Phillip Buckhaults
University of South Carolina, Professor of Molecular Biology and Genetics
https://www.sc.edu/study/colleges_schools/pharmacy/faculty-staff/buckhaults_phillip.php
His Twitter is https://twitter.com/P_J_Buckhaults
Senator Tom Corbin (Republican, Greenville, District 5)
https://www.scstatehouse.gov/member.php?code=0402272679
awesome, big TQ. as an extra helping of goodies, here is a Dec. 2020 interview with McKernan, also very impressive - https://www.bitchute.com/video/NDaCSkWgG9ch/
Thanks, mary-lou. Tried to watch the video on two different browsers. Couldn't get it to play.
Thanks, mary-lou. I couldn't get that bitchute video to play, either, however. I did find this-- an interview with McKernan on rumble from a while ago. I have not listened to it, but from the description it sounds like it covers the same issue.
https://rumble.com/vz2sn7-podcast-episode-21-kevin-mckernan-on-pcr-tests-for-covid-diagnosis.html
Dr. Janci Lindsay spoke directly after Dr. Philipp Buckhaults at the South Carolina Senate. Here's her testimony, also well worth attending to:
SC Senate Hearing - Dr. Janci Lindsay
SC 4 FREEDOM, posted September 16, 2023
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mjQQ7kkj3Bs&t=41s
DESCRIPTION: "Dr. Janci Lindsay testifies before South Carolina Senate Medical Affairs Ad-Hoc Committee on DHEC."
Hat tip: https://jessicar.substack.com/p/sc-senate-hearing-dr-janci-lindsay
TRANSCRIPT
00:07
SENATOR TOM CORBIN: Next is Dr. Janci Lindsay. I hope you can—
DR. JANCI LINDSAY: I hope you realize what a hero this man is [referring to previous speaker, Dr. Phillip Buckhaults]*
SENATOR TOM CORBIN: Yes.
DR. JANCI LINDSAY: I have spoken with many scientists about checking for this months and months and months ago. None of them would do it. I spoke at the U.S Senate in December of 2022 about the risk of this being passed to our children because of it being reverse transcribed simply from the RNA, before we knew that there was DNA in the shots. As soon as I found out there was DNA in the shots, I went all over every social media platform I could get to and started ringing the alarm bell.
[Loud Music]
[to woman assisting with the set up of the audio visual presentation] Exactly, don't, you don't have to play that at this point. I have little time so I'm going to follow up to what he said, well just show the one, the one slide.
WOMAN ASSISTING WITH AUDIO VISUAL PRESENTATION: The one slide. OK.
DR. JANCI LINDSAY: The one VAERS slide.
So I disagree with Dr. Buckhaults in that I think that this is the most dangerous platform that has ever been released on mankind. That is very easy to see in the VAERS** database where you have more deaths in just the couple months after the roll-out than you have in the past 30 years for all the other vaccines combined.
[to woman assisting with audio visual presentation] You would have to shrink that and go up. So there we go.
[away from microphone, pointing to slide on screen which is off camera] So these are all the other vaccines for the past 30 years combined. This is what happened, sorry— [back at microphone], and this is what happened during covid to deaths from vaccines.
[SLIDE: Bar chart, reports of death following vaccine by year, 1990-2023.]
Do you see? We're at over 35,000 deaths. Typically you would get no more than 200 deaths in a year for all 30 vaccine— or for all of the vaccines combined.
This is the past 30 years of deaths from vaccines reported into the VEARS database. You've already heard earlier that this represents only 1 to 13 percent of the cases that are normally reported. This is a safety signal. This is a safety signal. This is the platform itself, OK?
In the clinical trials we saw deaths. We definitely had deaths. That was used in Process 1, without the contamination, OK? What may not have been clear is that the, the shots tested on the people in the clinical trials were vastly different than the shots tested or given to people released on the population. I'm short on time so I'm trying to fit this in. Basically, people were given in the clinical trial a clean shot. People, everybody else was given these contaminated shots. Every single vial that's been tested by every scientist around the world is contaminated with these plasmids.
And there can, just, some are contaminated when, when Kevin McKernan*** first tested the vials, he found that one of the vials contained up to about 30% of the nucleic acid material was in fact DNA. So this is not some residual contamination that's carrying over. This is significant contamination.
Why does that matter? Gene therapy was never brought to market even though it's been over 40 years in development because in the past it caused latent cancers that developed two to four years after these were given, because it caused lethal autoimmune reactions, even when you were producing human proteins, not viral proteins, not bacterial proteins that you are displaying on the surface of your cells.
Think about the logic of this. In traditional gene therapies, and these are gene therapies, they would be classified as gene therapies, in traditional gene therapies you send in a genetic message to make a missing protein. That protein is identical to the protein that should have been in your body, but you're missing. This time we're sending in a sequence and asking it to make a piece of a viral protein and we're displaying it on our cells and then our body is attacking it and killing those cells. It doesn't stay in your arm, they said it would stay in your arm, it goes to every single cell in your body, every tissue in your body, it goes to your brain, it goes to your bone marrow, where then your body is able to attack these cells.
It is not a healthy platform for this. There's a difference between using this technology for cancer or for fixing inborn errors and metabolism, as compared to using it in a vaccine. There you understand the risk. Here the risks were not told to people. What this DNA being present, what Phillip [Buckhaults] did not touch on, is that there are sequences within these plasmids— I personally feel that this is an intentional, I believe that there is nefarious intent.
And I'm going to tell you why, and it's something that he didn't touch on.
...continued in reply...
... contInued...
DR. JANCI LINDSAY: And I'm going to tell you why, and it's something that he didn't touch on. There are SV40 sequences [clears throat], excuse me, there are there are SV40 sequences within the plasmids that were not disclosed to the regulators. The SV40 sequences, if you'll recall, the SV40 virus was a contaminant of the polio vaccines. It is thought that that contamination of the virus, which is on—, oncogenic, caused many of the cancers for the next several decades from the people, in the people that receive these vaccines.
Now the whole the whole SV40 virus is not in the shots, but what is in the shots is a special sequence, it's called a nuclear localization sequence, which is in the shots to take the plasmid DNA directly to the nucleus of human cells. It is not needed to grow these in bacteria, you would not have to use this to grow it in bacteria for the purpose that they said it was for, to make lots of copies. This sequence takes the DNA to the nucleus of human cells where it can then be integrated or where, as Phillip said, it is most likely to be integrated.
So all this about there's no DNA in the shots, they will not go to the nucleus, they will not integrate with your DNA, is not true. And they knew it from the beginning because they knew the plasmids were there.
That's a problem.
There's also an SV40 promoter only designed to be expressed in human cells, not bacteria cells.
Now Phillip has checked in something he didn't say, which is good news for people— Dr. Buckhaults, I keep saying Phillip— which is good news for people, is that most of the sequences were broken. Had they been intact, and if there are any that are intact, and this is something he should have said, we have to check, they can infect the E. coli in your gut. That's what they're designed to do, to infect the E. co—, to, to infect E. coli, which means you can be a perpetual spike factory because they're self-replicating and they would self-replicate in the bacteria of your gut and then make spike over and over and over again.
That's a problem.
They also carry an antibiotic resistant gene cassette to kanamysin and neomycin. Kanamycin is the main antibiotic used to treat tuberculosis. Neomycin is another antibiotic that's widely used. People that receive these, if it transfects the E. coli in your gut, it can make the, your gut and other bacteria not just that, it can make them resistant to those antibiotics. That is a huge, huge risk. And it's something that's known for plasmids, it's something that they've, they're careful to make sure that you don't have these antibiotic resistance genes if they're making something that should go into gene therapy. And now it's here, now it's present.
I've worked for several months to try to get these shots recalled. Completely recalled. They're dangerous. Excuse me I need to get a drink of water but, um, they're dangerous we're injecting these in our kids. We don't inject contaminated medical products in our kids.
Something Dr. Buckhaults didn't touch on as well, is if there's that much plasmid in the shots, there's a very good chance that there's bacterial endotoxin in the shots, which means bacterial proteins which can cause anaphylaxis and even death. And that may be what caused some of the, the rapid deaths that occurred right after people got these shots.
There's so much more to touch on. We've seen massive cases of miscarriage and stillbirth. Normally during years we wouldn't see more than 25 cases of miscarriage or stillbirth for all the vaccines combined. In 2021 we saw 3,428 cases of stillbirth and miscarriage reported into the VAERS system. Remember, no more than, than 25 typically in a year is normal for all the vaccines combined.
3,428 in 2021. In 2022 we saw 1,525 stillbirths and miscarriage. And in halfway through that year, the FDA, or the CDC said they would stop reporting on, they would stop making all their information public because they did not want to encourage vaccine hesitancy or misinformation or misinterpret—, misinterpretation of the data. So all of a sudden we saw what was, what was going like this [holds hand up, slant up], go like this [hand up, slant down] in February. That's artificial. We can't even trust the data coming out of the, the CDC anymore.
The FDA, the FDA knows about this contamination, they're not doing anything.
I'm sorry this is so rushed, I just wanted to address what Dr. Buckhaults was not able to. He and I have the same degrees, I have a degree in biochemistry and molecular biology and I'm a toxicologist and an expert witness as a profession nationally and internationally.
This is outrageous. I've never seen anything like this in my entire career. We have got to pull these shots and restrict them from our children. We cannot inject these into babies and children. These are contaminated, dangerous, lethal products. I don't agree with Dr. Buckhaults. But I believe that he's just seeing a lot of this data, I feel like he is where we were three years ago.
So that's basically [looks at wristwatch] if I don't leave now, I won't catch my plane. I may not catch it anyway. So.
SENATOR BILLY GARRETT: You had said earlier nefarious. You felt like this was more nefarious than Dr Burkhaults. In what sense are you saying that?
DR. JANCI LINDSAY: The SV40 sequences, they should not be there. They don't need to be there to grow this into bac—, to grow this in bacteria. I don't think it's an accident, they could have chosen another plasmid that did not have the SV40 sequences. If these sequences sit above an oncogene and, and they're promiscuous, that means they are likely to, to integrate in places more likely than other genetic inserts.
[taking a bottle of water] Thank you so much. [drinking water]
Then they can cause cancer. Insertional mutagenesis anyway causes cancer. And that's the risk, that's why gene therapies were not brought to market for so many years, because there was a risk of causing cancer from the insertional mutagenesis.
We never needed these vaccines. We had treatments that worked. One of our doctors here is going to tell you about that. Hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin, I can tell you, as a toxicologist, they are not toxic. They are, they are some of the safest drugs you can use.
I— There's no reason once the FDA found out about this contamination, OK? And we looked to see endotoxin levels, but they've got them all redacted. Why would you redact them if you were trying to be transparent? Why would you hold the data for 75 years, all of the clinical data for 75 years from these if you were trying to be transparent? Tell me why.
There is something very unusual going on here that is being done differently than it's ever been done before. We don't give experimental products to pregnant women. We don't give experimental products to babies that have a death profile like this. It's not done. It's never been done before.
Please protect your citizens. Please. I am begging you to protect your citizens. We've got to get one state to stand up and do the right thing. Do whatever you can so that other states will follow.
13:37
[END OF EXCERPT]
# # #
...continued...
...continued...
TRANSCRIBER'S NOTES
Speakers in order of appearance:
Dr. Janci Lindsay
https://www.toxicologysupport.com/about-us/
From that page: "Dr. Janci Chunn Lindsay is the Director of Toxicology and Molecular Biology for Toxicology Support Services, LLC. She holds a doctorate (PhD) in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology from the University of Texas Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center-Houston. Dr. Lindsay has extensive experience in analyzing the molecular profile of pharmacologic responses as they pertain to the dose/response relationship. Her expertise centers on evaluating the complex dynamics of toxicity, such as toxicant pharmacology, exposure route, host metabolism, and subsequent cellular effects as they relate to the contribution of specific substances to impairment, health risk, or human disease.
Dr. Lindsay has over 30 years of scientific experience with an emphasis on the study of inhalation (pulmonary) toxicology involving pulmonary pathologies such as asthma, reactive airway disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), asbestosis, mesothelioma and pulmonary fibrosis—that may be claimed following chemical, drug, or particulate exposure. Dr. Lindsay also has experience in performing health risk assessments and evaluating the toxicological profile of a variety of consumer and industrial products, chemicals, biologics, genetic biologics and pollutants. Dr. Lindsay also has experience in analyzing and evaluating molecular markers of disease in the modern field of “Toxicogenomics”, particularly with respect to benzene and asbestos and differential drug metabolism dynamics."
Senator Tom Corbin (Republican, Greenville, District 5)
https://www.scstatehouse.gov/member.php?code=0402272679
Senator Billy Garrett (Republican, McCormick, District 10)
https://www.scstatehouse.gov/member.php?code=0638636287
Other notes:
* University of South Carolina Professor Dr. Phillip Buckhaults was the speaker just before Dr. Janci Lindsay. To view his testimony before the South Carolina Senate: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IEWHhrHiiTY&t=44s
Transcript: https://transcriberb.dreamwidth.org/105739.html
** VAERS is the official US government Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System.
https://vaers.hhs.gov/about.html
(Note: https://openvaers.com/covid-data provides VAERS data in a more reader-friendly presentation)
*** Kevin McKernan is microbiologist, CEO and founder of Medicinal Genomics
https://medicinalgenomics.com/team/kevin-mckernan/
His Substack is Anandamide at https://substack.com/@kevinmckernan
See various interviews with Kevin McKernan and discussion of his investigation:
"Contamination of mRNA Vaccine, the Threat of 'SV40'”
America Out Loud, Dr. Peter McCullough, August 14, 2023
https://www.americaoutloud.news/contamination-of-mrna-vaccine-the-threat-of-sv40/
"Contamination of mRNA COVID Products"
Host: Jessica Rose, Ph.D and Guest Kevin McKernan
March 24, 2023
https://live.childrenshealthdefense.org/chd-tv/shows/good-morning-chd/contamination-of-mrna-covid-products/
"The Man Who Found DNA Toxins in Pfizer & Moderna Vials"
Guest: Kevin McKernan 5/19/23 Conservative Review with Daniel Horowitz
https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-man-who-found-dna-toxins-in-pfizer-moderna-vials/id1065050908?i=1000613696167
"The Vax-Gene Files: An Accidental Discovery"
by Julie Sladden and Julian Gillespie, May 27, 2023
https://brownstone.org/articles/vax-gene-files-accidental-discovery/
Kevin McKernan Testifies Before the FDA
182nd Meeting of Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee
Open Public Hearing Session
U.S. Food and Drug Administration, livestream June 15, 2023
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gBOyPREXGh8
[4:58:45 - 5:03:02]
Transcript: https://transcriberb.dreamwidth.org/104315.html
Great interview and kudos to you for the reach that you are getting and the impact you are making.
Leaving aside the covid politics and the propaganda, it is simply unfathomable that those who designed, planned, promoted and mandated these genetic therapies could have done so in any more irresponsible and cavalier way if they had tried. Which leaves us all with Occam’s Razor and the path of least resistance here ... NONE of this was about covid, none of it was about Wuhan, none of it was about health, “saving” the vulnerable, getting back to normal ... it was, and always will have been, about a “Great Leap Forward” in medical experimentation using the entire world as a Petrie dish to figure out whether their new mRNA toy was adequate or viable as the new healthcare platform.
One could argue that perhaps there were positives to emerge from this, honest actors looking for advances in cancer treatments and the like may have overlooked the process in the hopes of miracle cures etc, maybe those who were prepared to break a few eggs to perfect the *all new* omelette recipe so to speak, but it’s unavoidable now that at best we could call this mass human experimentation.
You are being too kind to all the rottenness that makes up these gene witch's brew.
Hence the “at best” disclaimer ... at worst, we all can only guess at the worst excesses of the depravity, malevolence, fascism and worse behind this, at all of the bad actors and useful idiots involved at every level of the cabal, but there does come a point where saying such things becomes cliche, so I prefer on this occasion to stick closer to the topic at hand.
Excellent. Thank you!
I listed the most important articles I’ve published at my Substack site and provided brief text explaining WHY I thought they were important. I’d love to see more Substack authors do the same thing. I think some of our “best stories” are missed or don’t get the attention they warrant.
https://billricejr.substack.com/p/these-are-the-most-important-articles?utm_source=profile&utm_medium=reader2
Yes, sometimes the titles and subtitles don't reveal the gems to be found when using the Substack search facility.
Such good work, Rebekah. So disturbing.
Sick of the greed that led to this tragedy.
Thanks for recording your conversation with Kevin. I've listened to a couple of his interviews and had to slow down the speed. What a pity he wasn't onto this earlier. Would have saved many lives potentially. Better late than never I suppose. Sorry to hear you were sick. Keep up the great work.
McKernan in 2020 - https://www.bitchute.com/video/NDaCSkWgG9ch/
Tks mary-lou - will watch.
Meanwhile, as if to prove that there are in fact medical people in Australia who are capable of comprehending that the Convid Scamdemic contains Chemical Engineering and Materials Science as subjects and not just Molecular Biology and Biochemistry and Medicine......Dr David Nixon in Brisbane beavers away at analysing blood and the contents of "vaccine" vials using dark and light-field microscopy. He is on Substack.
But who interviews him? Test question, btw: is injectable electronics a thing? Presumed answer: "no, we, (meaning McKernan, McCulloch, Kory, Cole, Malhotra, etc.) did not learn about it at med school or in our biochem or mol. biol degrees, so it cannot exist. And if it does, it is not our field, and so we cannot say anything about it."
But as the wiki article on Charles Lieber notes, "Scientific American named injectable electronics one of 2015's top ten world changing ideas.[65] Chemical & Engineering News called it "the most notable chemistry research advance of 2015"
Well, at least Dr Altman here on the Aust. Substack has referred to the central role played by the US Dept of Defense in this crime, although he does not mention the evidence furnished by Sasha Latypova and Katherine Watts by name.
Nor of course, the name of Dr Mihalcea or Drs Morgan and Giordano when it comes to nanotech.
The phrase "wliful blindness" occurs in the McKernan interview, ...yes, indeed.
You forgot to mention Prof. Ian F. Akyildiz, "These Covid Vaccines Are Nothing More Than Bio-Nano Machines, They Are Programmed And Then Injected Into The Body" https://rumble.com/v38na5i-august-17-2023.html - 1m 28s - 17Aug23 - nonvaxer420
full vid: https://www.bitchute.com/video/qOYT7bm8MEV0/
Yes thanks, I had not forgotten Akyildiz, I had just decided out of mercy to halt my list of persons who are evidently quite unknown and/or unmentioned here.
But then as Dr Mihalcea wrote on her Substack on 2. 10, "Some people question the credibility of our findings because they are not published in peer reviewed literature. My goal is not to be accepted by scientists or the establishment, as I have lost all faith and respect in them."
Makes you wonder when McKernan in the interview refers to the PCR test having been used at 35-40 cycles to show Covid infection on his way to mentioning the plasmid contamination shown up at 15 cycles. he behaves by omission as if Covid is a thing and as if 20 immunologists had not called in an open letter on Eurosurveillance to withdraw Drosten's publication there of his PCR test for Sars Cov 2 in Jan, 2020. They are still waiting for an answer.
And then we have the folks at COMUSAV, with their film Blue Truth https://www.bitchute.com/video/07rUgNbNCIjz/, showing beople and corpses emitting MAC addresses, which implies nanotech in the jabs.
The makers of the film are all Latin American doctors.
Of course, McKernan knows perfectly well using PCR to detect infections - let alone imaginary ones - is a total scam. However, identifying DNA-contaminated plasmids using PCR is the sort of thing it was designed for, so it seems valid in this instance. But yes, he's a hypocrite and well aware Drosten's a fraud and this whole thing is a scam. He didn't speak out about it beforehand because he's obviously in favour of mRNA technology whether for vaccine platforms, cancer treatment or whatever and probably invests in it heavily. His attitude seems to be that all will be fine if we just clean out the crap ... then start again.
On COMUSAV film, yes I watched it long ago. Something that intrigues me is why we are no longer seeing magnets sticking to vaxxed individuals. Still MAC addresses though. You may know the Pfizer (Cominarty) formula was changed in October 2021 (when it was shown that their PBS buffer containing inorganic electrolytes were apparently highly toxic in a cationic nanoparticle system). If interested, see this vid by Prof/Dr. Gabriele Segalla https://vimeo.com/807279310 Segalla is independent research biochemist, specialist in chemistry of microemulsions and colloidal systems, author of Pandora's Vaccine.
Not so sure about Mihalcea. She's making people panic without offering viable solution (chelation therapy is expensive, needs to be repeated regularly and can be dangerous). She is also promoting the idea that vaxxed & unvaxxed have exactly same contamination in their blood, like we're all in the same boat which is obviously false as we know those dropping dead are mostly vaxxed. I am ready to acknowledge all the same that there may be no "purebloods" left.
Thanks v. much for the Segalla Vimeo ref.
I agree about Mihalcea.
Btw. given what the chemtrail geoeng. crowd say about the metals found in e.g. Rockies snowpack after aerial spraying, do you have an opinion about aluminium?
Because if aluminium as a metal is addressable by 5G or other DEWs on the Internet of (nanoteched) Bodies. flushing it out seems advisable.
And Mr. Aluminium, ex-chem prof. Dr Chris Exley (see his Substack) drinks and recommends 1l per day of a mineral water that has at least 30mg/l silicic acid.
In this way ,one can alleviate autism, Alzheimers, multiple sclerosis, etc. by urinating out the aluminium that has been bound by the slicic acid.
Exley has not (yet) tackled the subject of such drinking to counteract body aluminium as a 5G or DEW target, however.
@Mary-Lou: Dr Nixon has his own Substack too, called Nixonlab.
Yes I watched the interview he did with French journalist - brilliant. And I also noted his recommendation on silicon rich mineral water. I also wish he would tackle subjects you raise. Have you posed those questions to him directly? I have read that boron/borax helps eliminate toxic metals etc from the body. Good video here on the subject: https://rumble.com/vdczi5-a-solution-they-do-not-want-you-to-know.-by-dana-ashlie.html dating back to August 2019. It's not just about boron. Dana Ashlie interviews a guy called Terral. I learnt a lot from this. I'm about to watch it again to refresh my memory.
Mihalcea often presents Nixon's findings on her substack. not for the faint-hearted, quite horrifying actually.
As noted by commenter above, Dr Nixon is also on SS - Nixonlab.
Thanks for any pub of this unique subscription drive ... which is really trying to pound home the message that Substack READERS are the key to our ability to fight back against captured forces.
Can Substack readers increase the “paid” ratio of Substack writers to, say, 10 percent? Right now it’s about 1 to 4 percent paid. What we have is about 100 fairly well-known “Covid writers” taking on 40,000 salaried MSM “journalists” …. It’s the “1 percent of the 1 percent” who are actually subsidizing the world’s “freedom” writers.
https://billricejr.substack.com/p/substacks-paid-subscribers-are-the?utm_source=profile&utm_medium=reader2
Thanks very much for the plug.
I have written a book chapter for AMPS and will be talking about Endotoxin in Canberra.
Hope to have some exciting news around that time as various labs are looking at getting proper Endotoxin measurements done. All TGA lab test results so far are invalid due to LNPs interfering with standard Horseshoe Crab Blood assays.
https://geoffpain.substack.com/p/gain-through-pain-help-send-geoff
This so called vaccine was designed and implemented for one sole reason. To KILL .All involved need to be charged with genocide, and crimes against humanity.
When are the arrests going to start?