UK Gov has been strongly recommending the Pfizer (BioNTech) Covid vaccine to pregnant women (HERE)
But the toxicity conclusions on their own website state that there is not enough evidence to conclude that vaccine is safe for pregnant and breastfeeding women.(HERE)
UK Gov has known about the lack of evidence for safety since at least Nov 2021, per this archived version of the BioNTech summary page.
Reiner Fuellmich has finally got his case listed in the International Court of Justice (or Criminal Court) against 6 defendants which include Fauci, Bill Gates, Tedros, Bourla? Etc, alleging the vaccinations are a crime against humanity. Even if it fails the case will bring this tragedy into the public arena like nothing else can. And the list of witnesses...Malone, Cahill, van den Bossche, Yeardon...all the experts who have spoken out on the dangers of the vaccination. Look it up. His opening address to the court on Rumble is hard hitting. I agree many who are”invested” after getting the shots may put their head in the sand. But many more wont. I have followed him for over a year. Can’t believe he’s pulled it off.
Just been listening to a Dolores Cahill interview, where the big question appeared to be, how we move on from here. So many people have committed so many serious crimes, quite knowingly for some, most or all of the last two years, and cannot back out. If they admit fault now they will be legally liable. How does a doctor or a nurse "back out" of their pro vaccination stance up to an including giving the jab, given they are legally liable for all sorts of crimes related to unlawfully killing people? They need a pathway to be able to admit their crime in return for immunity from prosecution for that crime. If we cannot provide that legal immunity, they cannot back out. Their only two options are to continue to murder people, or to resign and change profession so that they at least are no longer killing their patients etc. Serious Catch 22.
I suppose a third option might be to claim ignorance, and make a show of resigning or taking a stand upon 'having received new information'. In fact that may legitimately what is happening for a number of professionals. Dr David Cartland talked on a recent podcast with James Delingpole about doctors and nurses turning grey when he shared his findings with them in the tea room. I think a lot of people would allow the mea culpa under those circumstances.
Covid vaccines are just more deadly that's all. Vaccines have been with us since the war criminals Edward Jenner and Louis Pasteur made them common. But read the newspapers of 19th C England when they were mandated and see how unpopular they were amongst the population. Or read up on how the poor of Milan nearly came to revolution over them. Or how the British used them to remove land assets from Indians in Mumbai and Chinese in Hong Kong. They've been acting like criminals for a long time.
I agree with this. We need to focus on the instigators and architects of this madness, and bring them to justice so they cannot continue or repeat this nightmare. And we cannot make the mistakes after WW2 where the US (and UK and others) actually spirited some of the chief Nazi doctors/scientists out of the country to avoid justice, so they could exploit their skills and knowledge themselves. That was a grotesque move, and a major error. Their technocratic, anti-human thinking embedded itself in the rest of the west and grew like a cancer, leading us to where we are today.
But like Nuremberg, we need to focus on the people who LED this. Nuremberg did not go after every citizen who reported a Jewish neighbour, or looked away when their colleagues and friends were taken away to camps. There is an argument that they should have, but it would have completely destroyed society and brought about an unending, escalating witch hunt, perhaps nearly as bad as the first atrocity as it gained momentum to search for 'witches' and 'burn' them as a cleansing ritual. We know during the witch trials how out of hand that got, suddenly there was a witch around every corner and the fervour and mania to hunt them grew and grew, until many villages had no women left.
I think we will have to be extremely magnanimous in our judgement of those who simply got swept up in the hysteria, or acted out of fear, or just obeyed. I strongly feel that the moral imperative is to focus on the actual criminals who architected and stoked this mania, herding the people like cattle, and misusing their authority.
There is a huge difference between enacting justice, and enacting vengeance. One is done in service of truth, the other in service of ego.
I appreciate the distinction between enacting justice vs. enacting vengeance. I'm a 'scorched earth' type myself and I have to check my ego when I feel that coming on. It can be productive when it's in service of justice, but in service of vengeance it's just toxic for everyone involved.
I am making the point that, if we want all those who have woken up to the harm being caused, to add and give more strength to our voices, then we have to give them immunity, so they can speak out safely. If we seek revenge, the system goes on as before, and this will continue until the human race is wiped out. If we want this to end, we have to be the "bigger people", and back away from revenge, as the only way that will allow the medical fraternity to reform.
the sheep wont work it out, this bloke seems like a decent hard working Australian, but if it hasn't clicked with this bloke it wont for the majority sadly
I don't think enough people care, the jabbed are only to eager to forget they jabbed up and just want to get on with it, if they managed to get away with not being injured etc they just ignore what's staring them in the face.
MO is if they don't know they have been duped by now they ain't going to work it out.
Reiner Fuellmich has finally got his case listed in the International Court of Justice (or Criminal Court) against 6 defendants which include Fauci, Bill Gates, Tedros, Bourla? Etc, alleging the vaccinations are a crime against humanity. Even if it fails the case will bring this tragedy into the public arena like nothing else can. And the list of witnesses...Malone, Cahill, van den Bossche, Yeardon...all the experts who have spoken out on the dangers of the vaccination. Look it up. His opening address to the court on Rumble is hard hitting. I agree many who are”invested” after getting the shots may put their head in the sand. But many more wont. I have followed him for over a year. Can’t believe he’s pulled it off.
Thanks, I didn't know about this.
Just been listening to a Dolores Cahill interview, where the big question appeared to be, how we move on from here. So many people have committed so many serious crimes, quite knowingly for some, most or all of the last two years, and cannot back out. If they admit fault now they will be legally liable. How does a doctor or a nurse "back out" of their pro vaccination stance up to an including giving the jab, given they are legally liable for all sorts of crimes related to unlawfully killing people? They need a pathway to be able to admit their crime in return for immunity from prosecution for that crime. If we cannot provide that legal immunity, they cannot back out. Their only two options are to continue to murder people, or to resign and change profession so that they at least are no longer killing their patients etc. Serious Catch 22.
I suppose a third option might be to claim ignorance, and make a show of resigning or taking a stand upon 'having received new information'. In fact that may legitimately what is happening for a number of professionals. Dr David Cartland talked on a recent podcast with James Delingpole about doctors and nurses turning grey when he shared his findings with them in the tea room. I think a lot of people would allow the mea culpa under those circumstances.
Covid vaccines are just more deadly that's all. Vaccines have been with us since the war criminals Edward Jenner and Louis Pasteur made them common. But read the newspapers of 19th C England when they were mandated and see how unpopular they were amongst the population. Or read up on how the poor of Milan nearly came to revolution over them. Or how the British used them to remove land assets from Indians in Mumbai and Chinese in Hong Kong. They've been acting like criminals for a long time.
Should we be generous? I don't know. How generous is a parent going to be if they lose their kids?
Yes, we have to be generous if we want to prevent future murders.
I agree with this. We need to focus on the instigators and architects of this madness, and bring them to justice so they cannot continue or repeat this nightmare. And we cannot make the mistakes after WW2 where the US (and UK and others) actually spirited some of the chief Nazi doctors/scientists out of the country to avoid justice, so they could exploit their skills and knowledge themselves. That was a grotesque move, and a major error. Their technocratic, anti-human thinking embedded itself in the rest of the west and grew like a cancer, leading us to where we are today.
But like Nuremberg, we need to focus on the people who LED this. Nuremberg did not go after every citizen who reported a Jewish neighbour, or looked away when their colleagues and friends were taken away to camps. There is an argument that they should have, but it would have completely destroyed society and brought about an unending, escalating witch hunt, perhaps nearly as bad as the first atrocity as it gained momentum to search for 'witches' and 'burn' them as a cleansing ritual. We know during the witch trials how out of hand that got, suddenly there was a witch around every corner and the fervour and mania to hunt them grew and grew, until many villages had no women left.
I think we will have to be extremely magnanimous in our judgement of those who simply got swept up in the hysteria, or acted out of fear, or just obeyed. I strongly feel that the moral imperative is to focus on the actual criminals who architected and stoked this mania, herding the people like cattle, and misusing their authority.
There is a huge difference between enacting justice, and enacting vengeance. One is done in service of truth, the other in service of ego.
I appreciate the distinction between enacting justice vs. enacting vengeance. I'm a 'scorched earth' type myself and I have to check my ego when I feel that coming on. It can be productive when it's in service of justice, but in service of vengeance it's just toxic for everyone involved.
Very well said.
If you're too generous they will just regroup in 10 years time.
Also nobody who loses their kids is going to be generous. It just isn't going to happen. And nor should it.
I am making the point that, if we want all those who have woken up to the harm being caused, to add and give more strength to our voices, then we have to give them immunity, so they can speak out safely. If we seek revenge, the system goes on as before, and this will continue until the human race is wiped out. If we want this to end, we have to be the "bigger people", and back away from revenge, as the only way that will allow the medical fraternity to reform.
On the plus side: this kinda evidence will sure look good in court one day
Once the sheep find out they have been duped there will be a shortage of pitchforks and torches
the sheep wont work it out, this bloke seems like a decent hard working Australian, but if it hasn't clicked with this bloke it wont for the majority sadly
https://www.redvoicemedia.com/video/2022/08/weve-been-so-busy-australian-funeral-director-reports-that-business-is-up-by-fifty-percent/ref/6/
I don't think enough people care, the jabbed are only to eager to forget they jabbed up and just want to get on with it, if they managed to get away with not being injured etc they just ignore what's staring them in the face.
MO is if they don't know they have been duped by now they ain't going to work it out.