Such weasle wording: "the benefits of vaccination are not considered to outweigh the potential harms".
What this means: "the harms outweigh the benefits".
What this means: their injection policies caused harm. They should be held accountable.
In fact they lied in saying the "vaccine" is safe, since they never had long-term data to support that claim. It is ALWAYS necessary to have long term data in order to evaluate net benefit, since many adverse events only manifest in the long term (e.g. cancer).
The health department also now says "Most people now only need 1 first dose of a COVID-19 vaccine as their primary course." So, they now acknowledge that 2 doses (followed by a 3rd just 3 months later) is a bad idea and a big overdose. This is a bit late for 95% of Australians?
I would say people are now fully vaccinated with just 1. This is mostly because the manufacturers don't want to have to test 2 doses of each new variant on the mice (or petri dishes) before rolling out to the world's population. It also aligns nicely with the booster roll-out campaigns. (However, they can always throw in a booster requirement for future coercion).
Probably, but initially you were 'unvaccinated' until 14 days after first jab, then you weren't 'fully vaccinated' until after 2 jabs, then after the first booster (and I can well remember Dr Norman Swan (on The Project I think), claiming it was 'always a 3 jab regime'). The BS changed as we went along.
Many thanks Rebekah. The intransigence of the "justice" system is only indicative of the institutionalised corruption pervading so many levels of our society. At least we're seeing change, however incremental. Hopefully it opens doors for legal accountability, but even that is after the event, when so many lives have been ended or perhaps worse, have catastrophically resulted in physical injury and incapacitation. I know the season has moved on and it's now June, but may the force be with you :)
Such weasle wording: "the benefits of vaccination are not considered to outweigh the potential harms".
What this means: "the harms outweigh the benefits".
What this means: their injection policies caused harm. They should be held accountable.
In fact they lied in saying the "vaccine" is safe, since they never had long-term data to support that claim. It is ALWAYS necessary to have long term data in order to evaluate net benefit, since many adverse events only manifest in the long term (e.g. cancer).
The health department also now says "Most people now only need 1 first dose of a COVID-19 vaccine as their primary course." So, they now acknowledge that 2 doses (followed by a 3rd just 3 months later) is a bad idea and a big overdose. This is a bit late for 95% of Australians?
Oh good spot, strange.
Interesting.... so most people who take just 1 dose will be officially unvaccinated, or has that changed too ?
I would say people are now fully vaccinated with just 1. This is mostly because the manufacturers don't want to have to test 2 doses of each new variant on the mice (or petri dishes) before rolling out to the world's population. It also aligns nicely with the booster roll-out campaigns. (However, they can always throw in a booster requirement for future coercion).
Probably, but initially you were 'unvaccinated' until 14 days after first jab, then you weren't 'fully vaccinated' until after 2 jabs, then after the first booster (and I can well remember Dr Norman Swan (on The Project I think), claiming it was 'always a 3 jab regime'). The BS changed as we went along.
In order to be 'granted' an I.D., you will need to be up to date with all the jabs and boosters they deem necessary.
Many thanks Rebekah. The intransigence of the "justice" system is only indicative of the institutionalised corruption pervading so many levels of our society. At least we're seeing change, however incremental. Hopefully it opens doors for legal accountability, but even that is after the event, when so many lives have been ended or perhaps worse, have catastrophically resulted in physical injury and incapacitation. I know the season has moved on and it's now June, but may the force be with you :)