Question that I ask everyone: how many seriously ill and deceased people did you know in 2020? And how many since then? Of course, most of these delusional idiots memory hole the actual facts. My mom claims to “not know a single person” that has a bad reaction. Yet her own brother couldn’t walk for 2 months and she was terrified to get her second shot. Another buddy has his two best childhood friends “die suddenly” In back to back weeks. But ask him about Covid and he’ll scream about masks and the Sturgis rally and how anti science Trump was.
By the end of winter 2020, we all knew multiple people who had covid but rarely knew somebody who actually got really sick from it. Most people had a bad cold and were over it in a couple days.
But by the end of 2022, we all know multiple people who got shots who can't seem to shake some illness or another.
Exactly Chiadrum, well put... I know way more injured and dead after their vaccine than I should, and I wouldn't say I had a large social circle. Unfortunately either I'm just one of those strategically placed people by random chance who know a lot with injuries or death, or these jabs ain't so safe... because the people I know who were injured (or died) weren't "antivaxxers" or even "vaccine hesitant", they've just wound up shocked by their serious side effects (or dead)...
I don't know any flu vaccine victims, although I now know this can happen, but all of a sudden | personally know four deaths (all clots, thrombotic stroke, another one unknown, found collapsed dead in garden a week after vax), in my brother's circle another four (he works in a large industry, the deaths are all brain haemorrhage or thrombotic stroke)... The the heart injuries, are everywhere, one at work (my old workplace, I didn't take the jab so I was given the flick, but this happened before they sacked me) he got confirmed vaccine induced pericarditis - on OH&S grounds alone that should have seen mandate dropped, a friend's nephew (can't work heart rate is all over the place, confirmed vax pericarditis), my friend's workplace, 5 myocarditis/ pericarditis in young male workers out of a total 1,900 workers, also his shift supervisors wife had a stroke and may never walk or be normal again... I could go on, I hear one every day... My mate's doctor (and friend) died of a stroke too, he's been on jab injuries had an intercranial haemorrhage... Dr Barry Schultz.
I do not know of a covid death, even a suspected one, or died "with" covid, not dismissing the fact that people did die of covid, but compared to vaccine injured, especially heart injuries, I'd say in personal experience, the bigger danger was in the syringe.
And this video I've been watching, I'm only 5 mins in, but by April 2020, "they", meaning world governments, KNEW covid was not as deadly as they made out...
But Trump gave him what he wanted? Please show him the proof. When they wefe plotting to release it he signed an executive order so less than a year later he could give him the experimental mrna biologic weapon that he loves. Then he gave him operation warp speed. If anyone was antiscience, it's all the democrats that said they wouldn't take it if he was President. Major gaslighting there, but people bought into it. Trump loves it, he considers himself the Grandfather of vaccines. Please help him so he knows who to vote for! Lol.
Excellent report... the take home message...natural immunity in a healthy individual breezed through a Covid infection... but did not breeze through a Covid injection.
Thank you for yet another enlightening read Rebekah.
Australia faced Omicron, a far less virulent strain. We faced it after >90% vaccinated, and having had two years to 'flatten the curve', prepare the health system, and investigate early treatment protocols - instead we banned them.
Any suggestion deaths were the result of Covid 19, as oppossed to government actions and inactions, is a gross and blatant lie. A gross lie built on a plethora of lies.
90 percent vaxed is a huge propaganda fear media lies so many Australian s Un vaxed .the grumberment will say anything to make the brainwashed fall for their pusilaminous transgender bullshit .unvaxedunmasked unmuzzled. Un afraid. Keep the pressure on..Never comply.
Thanks Rebekah. Lots of important references grouped together in a single article. I do not share your conclusions re. McCullough vs. Rancourt. It should be obvious to all by now that SARS-CoV2 was computer modelled and exists in silico only. Rancourt is well aware of this, even though up to now he hasn't said that outright. (Ditto for Yeadon, Fenton too I believe and numerous others.) However, he has stated clearly that there is no evidence of a SARS-CoV2 pandemic. Comparing supposed covid deaths with covid vax deaths is a ridiculous exercise. Nor is there any evidence that our bodies are producing spike protein as McCollough asserts, but simply the expression of non-specific anti-bodies untested against the many other known - let alone unknown - toxins contained in the shots.
The well-intentioned McCullough, Malone, Flemming, Dhand, Campbell etc are hooked into the fraudulent pseudo-science of virology, which underpins big pharma, allopathic medicine, and their significant income stream. Also, to mention, their significant ego's that cast a shadow over the medical minnows below them!
You are doing well, with those of us who are, at least to some extent 'awake'. Thanks.
I have to remind myself that the masses still believe that the Spanish 'flu' wiped out a 100 million people! In the unlikely event that man will be here in a 100 years' time, the masses will believe that covid-19 wiped out just as many. And they will be lining up for whatever regimen of shots the authorities of that day will have for them, and they will be thankful for the miracle wonder vaccines that are keeping them safe, while not connecting the dots that they are facilitating the lucrative sickness industry.
Tks for link. Am about to listen. I'm big fan of Eric and Patrick Henningsen. Eric's documentation of covid scam on an almost daily basis from the outset is impressive. Everyone should read it.
Great interview. I'd love Henningsen to do a series with EC based on his covid chronology but this one is a perfect demonstration of how we humans have been destabilised to the point that billions of us believe we have somehow been infected with - and, more preposterous still, become transmitters of - a computer virus, thanks in large part to an absurd test matching a natural human sample to a computer code and culminating in maybe the first truly global "psychogenic" disease. (I had to look that one up!) Perfect "amorphous fantom" to terrify people. Eric's summary at the end, of a document from Dept of Homeland Security ~2007 is significant: mere news reports of chemical or biological agents can send people to the hospital by the 1000s with symptoms but absolutely no exposure to anything. Of course there's more to it than that but understanding PCR/"casedemic" is good place to start. Latest covid chronology (Jul23) here for anyone interested. https://chironreturn.org/chronology/
Thanks Rebekah for pulling all this together. I find it a confusing time with all the mounting adverse evidence at the same time as new boosters being recommended in the US for all 6 months and up.
Because they're deliberately trying to kill us Andrew.
This is not 'dolts botching shit' anymore.
Daily reminder:
Democide: The intentional killing of an unarmed or disarmed person by government agents acting in their authoritative capacity as a result of its government's policy, including by direct action, indifference, and neglect.
You cannot put your own morality on to them. They are killers and collaborators to the killing. The reasons for the killing and collaboration may vary, but the outcome is the same.
Thanks Rebekah - this would have taken a lot of effort to compile for all concerned (yourself included).
A lack of data is certainly not the issue.
Perhaps people will care once the voice is 'over' but by then I fear Blackrock will be busy burning the country to the ground and blaming it on 'climate change.'
I watched Dr McCullough's video and wow I pray they heard him loud and clear, these bioweapon injections are killing and maiming millions who take them. The spike protein is travelling from mother to babies thru breast milk which is killing them, there is ample evidence spike is what's harming people, labs have found it in the heart tissue of people. I hope every country leaves the WHO and trashes all the bioweapon injections.
As I mentioned in a previous comment, there is no evidence that our bodies are producing spike protein as McCollough asserts, but simply the expression of non-specific anti-bodies untested against the many other known - let alone unknown - toxins contained in the shots. No-one has isolated the spike protein directly through the blood or tissues nor claimed to have done so, not even the late Dr Burkehardt & team. The so-called western blot protocol also uses antibodies assumed to be produced in reaction to spike protein. Some elements of synthetic spike genome may be present due to recently discovered DNA plasmid contamination but the mRNA inducing spike protein is a myth. Their stupid experiment doesn't work as manufacturers claim & as parroted by McC et al (and their spike detox products are unlikely to work at all). There are plenty of other toxins in the shots to explain breast milk contamination. The only reason these top knobs are not speaking about this is because most of them are in favour of mRNA platform, tweaking it where necessary, for future vaccines, cancer treatments etc. Can't throw the baby out with the bathwater can we now?
I can't access article but a quick glance at abstracts shows studies cited by Makis use same methods to identify spike protein as those outlined above. If not, tell me what I missed please. I've wasted enough time over the years reading rubbish.
Sep 18, 2023·edited Sep 18, 2023Liked by Rebekah Barnett
‘Spikeopathy’ refers to the toxic effects of the spike protein, whether confered by the SARS-CoV-2 virus, or produced by gene codes in mRNA and adenovector DNA vaccines.
There is no comparison, none.
1 - SARS-CoV-2 is a respiratory, not bloodstream virus. Therefore, it does not travel very far along the vessels. The main damage is done by cleaved spikes entering the bloodstream, as well as the virus itself entering red blood cells. But this can only happen in severe infections, not generally to healthy people who will kill the virus before it enters the lower pulmonary tract (or those who were smart enough to gargle every day using h2o2 (1-3% food grade), urine or other virucide).
2- the LNPs go everywhere, very quickly, reaching places the virus could only dream of. Given there are 40/12 (Mod/Pf) trillion LNPs in a dose, coupled with the fact that we only have 4 trillion nucleated cells spells disaster.
3-Coronaviruses always mutate to a less-lethal versions, since the more lethal versions will kill off too many of their hosts in comparison. Massive waves of death after Omicron point to only one thing.
An excellent article, I commend you Rebecca for your courage and truth telling. I share all of the brilliant articles in all the platform I can and to friends and my farther who has developed an artierial fibrillation after these bloody deadly shots. This is going straight to X , my dad and substack, I don't have face book but I have nothing but huge respect for you for your Fantastic collegues .
My mother had a Moderna booster near the end Nov 2021, I took her in January 2022 for her annual check up at her GP surgery, it was then that she asked them to check out her pulse because it wasn't right in her opinion. It hadn't been normal since early December but she hadn't said anything because she didn't want to be a bother to anyone. We saw her breathlessness at times to be a sign of the winter months and when asked, she had put it down to that too.
She actually had AF, her heart rate was over 170 but many beats are feeble. The surgery booked her immediately for a Cardiology referral, the referral had her covid vaccine dates, and manufacturers, I took her and the ECG read 170+, the nurse was very concerned and needed the cardiologist. We had to wait for him to arrive, my mum was laid resting and had been for 90 minutes when he eventually came and ran the ECG again, still it was over 170bpm. We left with Digoxin and Apixaban and had to return in a month to have an echocardiogram, when we came back the ECG showed still too high bpm, and a failed echocardiogram, we left with bisoprol to take with the other meds and another month to go back. Next visit bpm still over 140 and another echocardiogram that the technician said was unsuccessful.
Mum's still with us, the cardiologist wrote to her GP giving some diagnosis (with 2 failed echoes) and she just keeps taking the medications. She's now 83.
#1 the elderly are more inclined not to bother anyone when they are not well, the causation can be missed when they have waited weeks or months
#2 it's easy to gloss over an elderly fatality because of age
#3 Why was her covid vaccination record important enough to be written on the Cardiology referral?
I haven't taken her for any more boosters, we discussed this at great length and this was her decision.
This isn't just heart issues in the elderly stroke is high on the list and easy to be glossed over
After 70 years of superb cardiac health, after my booster (required by Canada) I developed Premature Ventricular Contractions. Sometimes my heart will skip every other beat for minutes at a stretch. Oh, and by the way, while on the Fully Vaccinated Cruise to Canada, my wife and I both caught a wicked bad case of covid. Some “vaccine”, eh?
Would you please indulge a swamped person by writing in simple terms their findings?
I’m way past point that I have no doubts whatsoever that we are under existential attack.
So forgive me for regarding further details on that score as akin to stamp collecting.
Where it comes to the virus question, I am satisfied that since there was no pandemic, there’s no need or even room for a circulating new pathogen (assuming somebody thinks such things are possible which, as I have said a number of times, I don’t, any more. My sources are Rancourt’s findings and the litany of failed attempted transmission experiments).
The public don’t even believe this much, though it can be economically demonstrated.
Attempting to convince them that no viruses exist is, in my limited experience, a lost cause. Even if true, if the public won’t engage with the currently alleged threat, such wider arguments are all but guaranteed to induce them to ignore everything else one might have badly wanted to communicate in the very short interaction you might be fortunate enough to get. In my case, I’ve had good results in persuading normies to stay away from gene-based injections, because my career path ploughs right through the middle of how design decisions are made in new projects.
If I’m way off beam, please just ignore this!
Like others, I’ve made my decisions about where I stand.
I have followed several of your comments since the start of the Covid period, and am full of admiration for your courageous approach to examining the evidence.
I have been an anti-vaxxer for over 40 years, so do not need to be persuaded that vaccines are harmful. The latest Covid vaccines seem to be only one more step on a well-trodden path. The anti-compulsory vaccination literature from 1869 onwards shows the sort of thing that convinced me:
When a friend alerted me to the news that a dreadful new disease, Covid-19, was advancing across the world, my first question was: “How many extra deaths has this caused?”. My friend assured me that this question was irrelevant because it was clear that the disease was extremely voracious. Also, he said, such statistics (which I now know are called 'excess mortality') were not available. So I was thrilled to see Denis Rancourt's first reports. I was reassured to find that such a highly qualified person was asking (and answering) exactly the question that I, as a layman, was asking.
However, despite my strong convictions, I always like to keep my eyes open for any evidence that goes against my prejudices (the 'black swans' of Karl Popper). This is why I paid particular attention to the critical remarks which Rebekah Barnett made in her excellent summary. Not having any expertise in science or statistics (I am a portrait painter) I depend very much on reading about disagreement between experts – who are far better placed to understand the issues than I am.
Rancourt mentioned Schellekens (2023) in his introduction, as one of a great many sources, and Rebekah Barnett mentioned the paper too.
“How do you explain the existence of data sets/analyses which seem to directly contradict Rancourt’s findings, such as this analysis of ACM across multiple countries in which the author finds the vaccines to have been beneficial?”
Her link led to:
Schellekens (2023): Philip Schellekens. /// Excess mortality and vaccination: How front-runners in the vaccination space compare across countries on excess mortality /// pandem-ic, updated August 10, 2023. https://pandem-ic.com/excess-mortality-and-vaccination/ (accessed 10 August 2023)
The first paragraph:
“The relationship between excess mortality and vaccination can be explored at different levels. Micro-level evidence suggests a strongly beneficial effect of vaccination on the risk of developing severe sickness or death following infection by the coronavirus. This post examines the relationship between excess mortality and vaccination at the macro level and explores the performance of front-runners across countries. It first takes a look at 3-month rolling averages for excess mortality and vaccination and then examines the cumulative numbers for the entire period of 2021 and 2022. It concludes with a discussion of the various confounding factors at play.”
The last paragraph:
“The simple bivariate cross-country correlations between excess mortality and vaccination should not be over-interpreted as many other factors are at play. Yet, as tentative as they are, the results do complement the finding from micro studies that show the beneficial effects of vaccination on avoiding severe pandemic outcomes (see for example here, here and here).”
This is what prompted my comment. It would be good to see an exchange between Rancourt and Schellekens. I imagine there may be several ways in which the apparent contradictions in their statements could be resolved, but, alas, I do not have the expertise to analyse their papers with the professional scrutiny that I believe is required.
With many thanks for your reply, and indeed, for your tremendous contributions to this debate.
Thank you both, Mike and Gareth, for this back and forth.
Mike, I agree with you that getting bogged down on the 'virus/no virus' debate can result in missing a narrow opportunity to drive home the main, most urgent point, which is 'stop the shots'.
I have listened to some of Dr Mark Bailey (but not other Dr Bailey yet) and have taken a look at a few other sources but am yet to come across anything that has really swayed me on the 'no virus' front. I read Rancourt's 'no pandemic' paper and while it appears to me that the actual virus itself did no more damage than a bad flu season (the rest being caused by deadly protocols, intervention measures, dodgy coding and the like), I have not then made the leap to - 'no virus.'
To people who are open to the idea but need convincing -
What one (or two or three) resources would you recommend that you think move the needle on this, or sufficiently answer the inevitable rebuttals?
For me, it was reading the old literature which showed that a person sick with a respiratory illness is not able to transmit their symptoms to another person.
Once I realised that, it became clear we had been lied to for many years. Furthermore, one of the lies was the virus model of acute respiratory diseases.
We don’t know what causes them, but it isn’t a virus as described.
"The jabbed who die in the first 14 days after injection are, astonishingly, classified as unvaccinated."
I have been following some of Prof Fenton's superb posts, but I do not think the 14 day fraud has anything to do with the statistics that Schelleken was considering. Schelleken, like Rancourt, confined himself to vaccine coverage and all-cause mortality - ignoring diagnosis of Covid entirely.
At least that is how it seems to me. I have looked through his paper a couple of times, and can see no mention of ' deaths by vaccination status' or anything similar.
In another of his posts he writes:
"Given the massive undercounting of the mortality toll both directly and indirectly attributed to COVID-19, excess mortality provides a useful way to get a glimpse of the true mortality toll.
Unfortunately, data on excess mortality are sparsely available: as of September 2021, only 84 countries release some sort of data (national or subnational; regular or one-off) on excess deaths. "
Like you, I feel the source of the apparent contradiction lies in some sort of miscounting, made either accidentally or on purpose; but I do not see how the 14 day error can come into this. Perhaps Schelleken has limited himself to too short a time period? Either way, his finding does look like the result of serious research, not an example of the usual pro-vax superficiality.
I feel the same. I have had a quick look at Rancourt's paper. It seems to make sense to me - as a non-expert; but Schellekens's paper looks far too difficult for me to understand. I find his bubbles much harder to think about than Rancourt's graphs. So I do hope that Rancourt or Fenton or some other numbers-wizard takes a look at this pretty soon, and can explain the apparent contradictions in a way that makes sense to me.
A recent paper by Parry et al on "Spikeopathy" cost over $4,600 to publish.
"Peer review" is hard to define. Did Einstein have many peers?
I have never had a paper rejected, but on one occasion a reviewer did not want my conference paper published because it contained a new idea! Pleased to say the Editor sent it to another anonymous reviewer who gave it enthusiastic support.
I choose to publish to Researchgate where 25,000,000 users are able to review and critically comment on my work. Most are polite and have the option of following and/or recommending any paper there. Unfortunately copyright assignments prevent me providing free copies for most of my journal outputs.
" and that therefore these deaths are Covid deaths, not vaccine deaths", Were they confirmed to be covid and how so? how about flu or bacterial pneumonia deaths?
Question that I ask everyone: how many seriously ill and deceased people did you know in 2020? And how many since then? Of course, most of these delusional idiots memory hole the actual facts. My mom claims to “not know a single person” that has a bad reaction. Yet her own brother couldn’t walk for 2 months and she was terrified to get her second shot. Another buddy has his two best childhood friends “die suddenly” In back to back weeks. But ask him about Covid and he’ll scream about masks and the Sturgis rally and how anti science Trump was.
By the end of winter 2020, we all knew multiple people who had covid but rarely knew somebody who actually got really sick from it. Most people had a bad cold and were over it in a couple days.
But by the end of 2022, we all know multiple people who got shots who can't seem to shake some illness or another.
Our sons ONLY had SIX coworkers die suddenly. And I guarantee that half of their office will be getting the latest safe and effective.
Denial is the first station on the road back to truth.
Exactly Chiadrum, well put... I know way more injured and dead after their vaccine than I should, and I wouldn't say I had a large social circle. Unfortunately either I'm just one of those strategically placed people by random chance who know a lot with injuries or death, or these jabs ain't so safe... because the people I know who were injured (or died) weren't "antivaxxers" or even "vaccine hesitant", they've just wound up shocked by their serious side effects (or dead)...
I don't know any flu vaccine victims, although I now know this can happen, but all of a sudden | personally know four deaths (all clots, thrombotic stroke, another one unknown, found collapsed dead in garden a week after vax), in my brother's circle another four (he works in a large industry, the deaths are all brain haemorrhage or thrombotic stroke)... The the heart injuries, are everywhere, one at work (my old workplace, I didn't take the jab so I was given the flick, but this happened before they sacked me) he got confirmed vaccine induced pericarditis - on OH&S grounds alone that should have seen mandate dropped, a friend's nephew (can't work heart rate is all over the place, confirmed vax pericarditis), my friend's workplace, 5 myocarditis/ pericarditis in young male workers out of a total 1,900 workers, also his shift supervisors wife had a stroke and may never walk or be normal again... I could go on, I hear one every day... My mate's doctor (and friend) died of a stroke too, he's been on jab injuries had an intercranial haemorrhage... Dr Barry Schultz.
I do not know of a covid death, even a suspected one, or died "with" covid, not dismissing the fact that people did die of covid, but compared to vaccine injured, especially heart injuries, I'd say in personal experience, the bigger danger was in the syringe.
And this video I've been watching, I'm only 5 mins in, but by April 2020, "they", meaning world governments, KNEW covid was not as deadly as they made out...
https://youtu.be/EVxOMmt_9N8?si=HFeujHjVnhQrtKr7
But Trump gave him what he wanted? Please show him the proof. When they wefe plotting to release it he signed an executive order so less than a year later he could give him the experimental mrna biologic weapon that he loves. Then he gave him operation warp speed. If anyone was antiscience, it's all the democrats that said they wouldn't take it if he was President. Major gaslighting there, but people bought into it. Trump loves it, he considers himself the Grandfather of vaccines. Please help him so he knows who to vote for! Lol.
https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/presidential-actions/executive-order-modernizing-influenza-vaccines-united-states-promote-national-security-public-health/
Excellent report... the take home message...natural immunity in a healthy individual breezed through a Covid infection... but did not breeze through a Covid injection.
Thank you for yet another enlightening read Rebekah.
Australia faced Omicron, a far less virulent strain. We faced it after >90% vaccinated, and having had two years to 'flatten the curve', prepare the health system, and investigate early treatment protocols - instead we banned them.
Any suggestion deaths were the result of Covid 19, as oppossed to government actions and inactions, is a gross and blatant lie. A gross lie built on a plethora of lies.
90 percent vaxed is a huge propaganda fear media lies so many Australian s Un vaxed .the grumberment will say anything to make the brainwashed fall for their pusilaminous transgender bullshit .unvaxedunmasked unmuzzled. Un afraid. Keep the pressure on..Never comply.
Thanks Rebekah. Lots of important references grouped together in a single article. I do not share your conclusions re. McCullough vs. Rancourt. It should be obvious to all by now that SARS-CoV2 was computer modelled and exists in silico only. Rancourt is well aware of this, even though up to now he hasn't said that outright. (Ditto for Yeadon, Fenton too I believe and numerous others.) However, he has stated clearly that there is no evidence of a SARS-CoV2 pandemic. Comparing supposed covid deaths with covid vax deaths is a ridiculous exercise. Nor is there any evidence that our bodies are producing spike protein as McCollough asserts, but simply the expression of non-specific anti-bodies untested against the many other known - let alone unknown - toxins contained in the shots.
Thanks Kerrylyn, I’m still mulling on some of these ideas ...
Mull on this while you're at it: https://odysee.com/@spacebusters:c9/A-Farewell-to-Virology-pt-1-Final:3 - even better, with your skillset, just read his papers, especially the expert edition.
The well-intentioned McCullough, Malone, Flemming, Dhand, Campbell etc are hooked into the fraudulent pseudo-science of virology, which underpins big pharma, allopathic medicine, and their significant income stream. Also, to mention, their significant ego's that cast a shadow over the medical minnows below them!
You are doing well, with those of us who are, at least to some extent 'awake'. Thanks.
I have to remind myself that the masses still believe that the Spanish 'flu' wiped out a 100 million people! In the unlikely event that man will be here in a 100 years' time, the masses will believe that covid-19 wiped out just as many. And they will be lining up for whatever regimen of shots the authorities of that day will have for them, and they will be thankful for the miracle wonder vaccines that are keeping them safe, while not connecting the dots that they are facilitating the lucrative sickness industry.
Yes I agree - Rebekah is a fantastic factual journo and you are right that it was computer modelled IMO.
Investigative journalist Eric Coppolino explains how it was computer modelled.
Very interesting
On Patrick Henningsen show, TNT radio
BTW Patrick is quite a good presenter.
https://tntradiolive.podbean.com/e/eric-coppolino-on-patrick-henningsen-show-14-september-2023/
Tks for link. Am about to listen. I'm big fan of Eric and Patrick Henningsen. Eric's documentation of covid scam on an almost daily basis from the outset is impressive. Everyone should read it.
Great interview. I'd love Henningsen to do a series with EC based on his covid chronology but this one is a perfect demonstration of how we humans have been destabilised to the point that billions of us believe we have somehow been infected with - and, more preposterous still, become transmitters of - a computer virus, thanks in large part to an absurd test matching a natural human sample to a computer code and culminating in maybe the first truly global "psychogenic" disease. (I had to look that one up!) Perfect "amorphous fantom" to terrify people. Eric's summary at the end, of a document from Dept of Homeland Security ~2007 is significant: mere news reports of chemical or biological agents can send people to the hospital by the 1000s with symptoms but absolutely no exposure to anything. Of course there's more to it than that but understanding PCR/"casedemic" is good place to start. Latest covid chronology (Jul23) here for anyone interested. https://chironreturn.org/chronology/
Thanks Rebekah for pulling all this together. I find it a confusing time with all the mounting adverse evidence at the same time as new boosters being recommended in the US for all 6 months and up.
Because they're deliberately trying to kill us Andrew.
This is not 'dolts botching shit' anymore.
Daily reminder:
Democide: The intentional killing of an unarmed or disarmed person by government agents acting in their authoritative capacity as a result of its government's policy, including by direct action, indifference, and neglect.
You cannot put your own morality on to them. They are killers and collaborators to the killing. The reasons for the killing and collaboration may vary, but the outcome is the same.
Welcome to the thunderdome.
"Dolts botching shit" would go in both directions -- but their 'mistakes' never do.
Copy you Big Screamer.
I fear our time on Substack is limited. Time to tell the people still asking 'why' that the time for questions has passed.
SC Senate Hearing - Dr. Janci Lindsay says "I believe there was nefarious intent" regarding the presence of SV40 in the DNA plasmid contamination.
https://youtu.be/mjQQ7kkj3Bs?t=298
Thanks Rebekah - this would have taken a lot of effort to compile for all concerned (yourself included).
A lack of data is certainly not the issue.
Perhaps people will care once the voice is 'over' but by then I fear Blackrock will be busy burning the country to the ground and blaming it on 'climate change.'
I'm sure there'll be a new emergency to fill the columns and screens...
I watched Dr McCullough's video and wow I pray they heard him loud and clear, these bioweapon injections are killing and maiming millions who take them. The spike protein is travelling from mother to babies thru breast milk which is killing them, there is ample evidence spike is what's harming people, labs have found it in the heart tissue of people. I hope every country leaves the WHO and trashes all the bioweapon injections.
As I mentioned in a previous comment, there is no evidence that our bodies are producing spike protein as McCollough asserts, but simply the expression of non-specific anti-bodies untested against the many other known - let alone unknown - toxins contained in the shots. No-one has isolated the spike protein directly through the blood or tissues nor claimed to have done so, not even the late Dr Burkehardt & team. The so-called western blot protocol also uses antibodies assumed to be produced in reaction to spike protein. Some elements of synthetic spike genome may be present due to recently discovered DNA plasmid contamination but the mRNA inducing spike protein is a myth. Their stupid experiment doesn't work as manufacturers claim & as parroted by McC et al (and their spike detox products are unlikely to work at all). There are plenty of other toxins in the shots to explain breast milk contamination. The only reason these top knobs are not speaking about this is because most of them are in favour of mRNA platform, tweaking it where necessary, for future vaccines, cancer treatments etc. Can't throw the baby out with the bathwater can we now?
https://makismd.substack.com/p/mrna-injury-series-spike-protein?utm_source=profile&utm_medium=reader2
I can't access article but a quick glance at abstracts shows studies cited by Makis use same methods to identify spike protein as those outlined above. If not, tell me what I missed please. I've wasted enough time over the years reading rubbish.
‘Spikeopathy’ refers to the toxic effects of the spike protein, whether confered by the SARS-CoV-2 virus, or produced by gene codes in mRNA and adenovector DNA vaccines.
There is no comparison, none.
1 - SARS-CoV-2 is a respiratory, not bloodstream virus. Therefore, it does not travel very far along the vessels. The main damage is done by cleaved spikes entering the bloodstream, as well as the virus itself entering red blood cells. But this can only happen in severe infections, not generally to healthy people who will kill the virus before it enters the lower pulmonary tract (or those who were smart enough to gargle every day using h2o2 (1-3% food grade), urine or other virucide).
2- the LNPs go everywhere, very quickly, reaching places the virus could only dream of. Given there are 40/12 (Mod/Pf) trillion LNPs in a dose, coupled with the fact that we only have 4 trillion nucleated cells spells disaster.
3-Coronaviruses always mutate to a less-lethal versions, since the more lethal versions will kill off too many of their hosts in comparison. Massive waves of death after Omicron point to only one thing.
https://evolutionaryhealthplan.info/#_Ref83404023
An excellent article, I commend you Rebecca for your courage and truth telling. I share all of the brilliant articles in all the platform I can and to friends and my farther who has developed an artierial fibrillation after these bloody deadly shots. This is going straight to X , my dad and substack, I don't have face book but I have nothing but huge respect for you for your Fantastic collegues .
This is long winded but, please bare with me.
My mother had a Moderna booster near the end Nov 2021, I took her in January 2022 for her annual check up at her GP surgery, it was then that she asked them to check out her pulse because it wasn't right in her opinion. It hadn't been normal since early December but she hadn't said anything because she didn't want to be a bother to anyone. We saw her breathlessness at times to be a sign of the winter months and when asked, she had put it down to that too.
She actually had AF, her heart rate was over 170 but many beats are feeble. The surgery booked her immediately for a Cardiology referral, the referral had her covid vaccine dates, and manufacturers, I took her and the ECG read 170+, the nurse was very concerned and needed the cardiologist. We had to wait for him to arrive, my mum was laid resting and had been for 90 minutes when he eventually came and ran the ECG again, still it was over 170bpm. We left with Digoxin and Apixaban and had to return in a month to have an echocardiogram, when we came back the ECG showed still too high bpm, and a failed echocardiogram, we left with bisoprol to take with the other meds and another month to go back. Next visit bpm still over 140 and another echocardiogram that the technician said was unsuccessful.
Mum's still with us, the cardiologist wrote to her GP giving some diagnosis (with 2 failed echoes) and she just keeps taking the medications. She's now 83.
#1 the elderly are more inclined not to bother anyone when they are not well, the causation can be missed when they have waited weeks or months
#2 it's easy to gloss over an elderly fatality because of age
#3 Why was her covid vaccination record important enough to be written on the Cardiology referral?
I haven't taken her for any more boosters, we discussed this at great length and this was her decision.
This isn't just heart issues in the elderly stroke is high on the list and easy to be glossed over
After 70 years of superb cardiac health, after my booster (required by Canada) I developed Premature Ventricular Contractions. Sometimes my heart will skip every other beat for minutes at a stretch. Oh, and by the way, while on the Fully Vaccinated Cruise to Canada, my wife and I both caught a wicked bad case of covid. Some “vaccine”, eh?
Great summary. Many thanks!
Rancourt does include Schellekens (2023) in his list of references. It is a pity Rancourt does not say why he rejects Schellekens' conclusion.
Gareth,
I too don’t know of Schellekens (2023).
Would you please indulge a swamped person by writing in simple terms their findings?
I’m way past point that I have no doubts whatsoever that we are under existential attack.
So forgive me for regarding further details on that score as akin to stamp collecting.
Where it comes to the virus question, I am satisfied that since there was no pandemic, there’s no need or even room for a circulating new pathogen (assuming somebody thinks such things are possible which, as I have said a number of times, I don’t, any more. My sources are Rancourt’s findings and the litany of failed attempted transmission experiments).
The public don’t even believe this much, though it can be economically demonstrated.
Attempting to convince them that no viruses exist is, in my limited experience, a lost cause. Even if true, if the public won’t engage with the currently alleged threat, such wider arguments are all but guaranteed to induce them to ignore everything else one might have badly wanted to communicate in the very short interaction you might be fortunate enough to get. In my case, I’ve had good results in persuading normies to stay away from gene-based injections, because my career path ploughs right through the middle of how design decisions are made in new projects.
If I’m way off beam, please just ignore this!
Like others, I’ve made my decisions about where I stand.
Best wishes and thanks,
Mike
Reply to Mike Yeadon
Mike,
I have followed several of your comments since the start of the Covid period, and am full of admiration for your courageous approach to examining the evidence.
I have been an anti-vaxxer for over 40 years, so do not need to be persuaded that vaccines are harmful. The latest Covid vaccines seem to be only one more step on a well-trodden path. The anti-compulsory vaccination literature from 1869 onwards shows the sort of thing that convinced me:
https://informedparent.co.uk/archive-literaturebooks-3/
When a friend alerted me to the news that a dreadful new disease, Covid-19, was advancing across the world, my first question was: “How many extra deaths has this caused?”. My friend assured me that this question was irrelevant because it was clear that the disease was extremely voracious. Also, he said, such statistics (which I now know are called 'excess mortality') were not available. So I was thrilled to see Denis Rancourt's first reports. I was reassured to find that such a highly qualified person was asking (and answering) exactly the question that I, as a layman, was asking.
However, despite my strong convictions, I always like to keep my eyes open for any evidence that goes against my prejudices (the 'black swans' of Karl Popper). This is why I paid particular attention to the critical remarks which Rebekah Barnett made in her excellent summary. Not having any expertise in science or statistics (I am a portrait painter) I depend very much on reading about disagreement between experts – who are far better placed to understand the issues than I am.
Rancourt mentioned Schellekens (2023) in his introduction, as one of a great many sources, and Rebekah Barnett mentioned the paper too.
“How do you explain the existence of data sets/analyses which seem to directly contradict Rancourt’s findings, such as this analysis of ACM across multiple countries in which the author finds the vaccines to have been beneficial?”
Her link led to:
Schellekens (2023): Philip Schellekens. /// Excess mortality and vaccination: How front-runners in the vaccination space compare across countries on excess mortality /// pandem-ic, updated August 10, 2023. https://pandem-ic.com/excess-mortality-and-vaccination/ (accessed 10 August 2023)
The first paragraph:
“The relationship between excess mortality and vaccination can be explored at different levels. Micro-level evidence suggests a strongly beneficial effect of vaccination on the risk of developing severe sickness or death following infection by the coronavirus. This post examines the relationship between excess mortality and vaccination at the macro level and explores the performance of front-runners across countries. It first takes a look at 3-month rolling averages for excess mortality and vaccination and then examines the cumulative numbers for the entire period of 2021 and 2022. It concludes with a discussion of the various confounding factors at play.”
The last paragraph:
“The simple bivariate cross-country correlations between excess mortality and vaccination should not be over-interpreted as many other factors are at play. Yet, as tentative as they are, the results do complement the finding from micro studies that show the beneficial effects of vaccination on avoiding severe pandemic outcomes (see for example here, here and here).”
This is what prompted my comment. It would be good to see an exchange between Rancourt and Schellekens. I imagine there may be several ways in which the apparent contradictions in their statements could be resolved, but, alas, I do not have the expertise to analyse their papers with the professional scrutiny that I believe is required.
With many thanks for your reply, and indeed, for your tremendous contributions to this debate.
Best wishes,
Gareth
Thank you, that’s very clear.
I believe that resolution comes from data fraud.
The jabbed who die in the first 14 days after injection are, astonishingly, classified as unvaccinated.
It’s just a lie.
Professor Norman Fenton either has a website or a Substack.
He’s a “forensic statistician” or similar, I think officially a professor of risk analysis.
He has prepared several papers on the fraudulent claims of efficacy of the injections.
There might be yet more to it than that. But maybe not.
I don’t think there’s any reason to expect that the injections help anything except killing you.
Thank you both, Mike and Gareth, for this back and forth.
Mike, I agree with you that getting bogged down on the 'virus/no virus' debate can result in missing a narrow opportunity to drive home the main, most urgent point, which is 'stop the shots'.
I have listened to some of Dr Mark Bailey (but not other Dr Bailey yet) and have taken a look at a few other sources but am yet to come across anything that has really swayed me on the 'no virus' front. I read Rancourt's 'no pandemic' paper and while it appears to me that the actual virus itself did no more damage than a bad flu season (the rest being caused by deadly protocols, intervention measures, dodgy coding and the like), I have not then made the leap to - 'no virus.'
To people who are open to the idea but need convincing -
What one (or two or three) resources would you recommend that you think move the needle on this, or sufficiently answer the inevitable rebuttals?
Or a different way of coming at it -
What changed YOUR mind?
For me, it was reading the old literature which showed that a person sick with a respiratory illness is not able to transmit their symptoms to another person.
Once I realised that, it became clear we had been lied to for many years. Furthermore, one of the lies was the virus model of acute respiratory diseases.
We don’t know what causes them, but it isn’t a virus as described.
Thank you
"The jabbed who die in the first 14 days after injection are, astonishingly, classified as unvaccinated."
I have been following some of Prof Fenton's superb posts, but I do not think the 14 day fraud has anything to do with the statistics that Schelleken was considering. Schelleken, like Rancourt, confined himself to vaccine coverage and all-cause mortality - ignoring diagnosis of Covid entirely.
At least that is how it seems to me. I have looked through his paper a couple of times, and can see no mention of ' deaths by vaccination status' or anything similar.
In another of his posts he writes:
"Given the massive undercounting of the mortality toll both directly and indirectly attributed to COVID-19, excess mortality provides a useful way to get a glimpse of the true mortality toll.
Unfortunately, data on excess mortality are sparsely available: as of September 2021, only 84 countries release some sort of data (national or subnational; regular or one-off) on excess deaths. "
https://pandem-ic.com/the-global-picture-of-excess-deaths-is-disturbing/
Like you, I feel the source of the apparent contradiction lies in some sort of miscounting, made either accidentally or on purpose; but I do not see how the 14 day error can come into this. Perhaps Schelleken has limited himself to too short a time period? Either way, his finding does look like the result of serious research, not an example of the usual pro-vax superficiality.
Fair enough. I don’t know. I have to leave it to those well suited to this kind of work. Numbers were never my strength.
I feel the same. I have had a quick look at Rancourt's paper. It seems to make sense to me - as a non-expert; but Schellekens's paper looks far too difficult for me to understand. I find his bubbles much harder to think about than Rancourt's graphs. So I do hope that Rancourt or Fenton or some other numbers-wizard takes a look at this pretty soon, and can explain the apparent contradictions in a way that makes sense to me.
Love your work Rebekah, thank you 👍
A recent paper by Parry et al on "Spikeopathy" cost over $4,600 to publish.
"Peer review" is hard to define. Did Einstein have many peers?
I have never had a paper rejected, but on one occasion a reviewer did not want my conference paper published because it contained a new idea! Pleased to say the Editor sent it to another anonymous reviewer who gave it enthusiastic support.
I choose to publish to Researchgate where 25,000,000 users are able to review and critically comment on my work. Most are polite and have the option of following and/or recommending any paper there. Unfortunately copyright assignments prevent me providing free copies for most of my journal outputs.
Another amazing article 🙏
The economist's ACM data https://www.economist.com/graphic-detail/2021/05/13/how-we-estimated-the-true-death-toll-of-the-pandemic
This reminds me of Food Frequency Questionary, where all "data" is guesses. E .g. they fix demoghaphy to 2019, unlike your Queensland statistician.
Then they teach their model, filling the caps from neighbors.
Rgds JR
" and that therefore these deaths are Covid deaths, not vaccine deaths", Were they confirmed to be covid and how so? how about flu or bacterial pneumonia deaths?