Covid vaccines and your DNA: What the science tells us (and what it doesn’t)
Recently, I reported on a new court case alleging that the mRNA Covid vaccines contain unlicenced genetically modified organisms (GMOs) which have the capacity to enter the cell nucleus and alter the recipient’s DNA. In the article, ‘Australian GP sues Pfizer and Moderna over unapproved GMOs in mRNA Covid vaccines’, I refer to three studies referenced in the case materials in support of this claim.
I sent the studies to the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) to ask if they had seen them, and if they intended to update date their official vaccine advice to reflect emerging findings.
I also asked Kevin McKernan, a genomics expert who discovered synthetic DNA contamination in the mRNA vaccines, what scientists should do next to prove or disprove the hypothesis that Covid vaccines contain elements that can enter the nucleus and alter DNA.
Find out what the TGA had to say, and what Kevin McKernan recommends as next steps, in my new article for Umbrella News:
Covid vaccines and your DNA: What the science tells us (and what it doesn’t)
If we learn anything from this article, it is that we are witnessing a complete inversion of the precautionary principle, which suggests that if there is potential for harm, caution should be exercised.
Regulators say there is ‘no evidence’ of all manner of safety concerns with the Covid drugs, but rarely (if ever?) offer evidence to disprove the concerns. Empty ‘debunks’ relying on expert opinion and undone science are a tacit admission that the regulators have flipped the onus of proof of safety onto the public, who must now prove harm before the regulator will act.
Moving at the speed of science which, until Pfizer rebranded it, was notoriously slow, it will be years until the range of potential harms can be properly assessed.
To support my work, make a one-off contribution to DDU via my Kofi account and/or subscribe. Thanks!
You nailed it Rebekah, bad enough scenario if these treatments were voluntary, and now these potential harms have surfaced, we're in the situation where almost everyone was forced to take this muck. Deliberate and willful negligence.
The smart money knew once the government were implicated in forcing a genetically harmful poison, they will never admit fault, and stupidly double down, hoping the problem will go away.
Thalidomide was withdrawn pretty quickly after correlation was too strong between birth defects and the drug... The mechanism of harm wasn't known till many years later... Yet no such caution here...
Great work Rebekah
DDU is the ONLY substack I read. I decided when the insanity unfolded and information overload doesn't help, to cut back even more on "news and comment" even though I have (almost) never owned a TV or listened to Money Slave Media (M$M). DDU to me, even though I thought of completely clearing the deck, remained the one that really tells me what I need to know and also gives me a good barometer of the resistance building potentials down under. It's also the only place I share my "pearls of wisdom" as we know where pearls belong and where they do not.
Thank you Rebekah for putting in the sincere and severe effort to do all the research, the consistency, the patience and perseverence ("Sabr" - a most extolled virtue!) as I know from over a decade of doing a very similar thing back in the day, it is a very rewarding effort but it also can come at great sacrifice to one's health and balance. I hope that your readers, all of us, will not be mere consumers but at the very least pass on these articles to others to read, and even better be more motivated to actually doing something (as you and some others clearly ARE doing) practical to build resistance.