With elections nearing in the Australian state of Tasmania, the Australian Medical Association (AMA) has weighed in, declaring the Liberal Party’s preselection of a Covid vaccine critic as “untenable.” “Liberal Party’s anti-vaccine doctor selection is a mistep,”
I live in Queensland so I cannot directly affect politcal matters in far off Tasmania, but I will be contacting my local MP for the federal electorate in which I live - who is a Liberal - as well as the Liberal-National Senators for Queensland, and will be telling them that if the Liberal Party removes Julie Sladdern from their ticket, then the Liberals will never get my vote again - or the votes of my extended family - and we are all traditional Liberal voters.
I think that the AMA has a bloody hide to try this on. It only goes to show how far they and their member doctors have fallen. I lost my best friend to heart failure about three weeks after he was injected with the toxic jab. There was no autopsy. He was extremely fit and had never had a history of cardiac disease. I cannot forgive the members of organisations such as the AMA for their refusal to put the interests of their patients first.
So sorry to hear about the loss of your friend. It seems to me that the AMA is very out of touch with how the general public perceives the medical establishment. I imagine the statement issued by Dr Barratt did Dr Sladden a favour.
For the benefit of North Americans, in Australia the ‘Liberal’ Party is the conservative Party - or at least it is supposed to be. Unlike in America, we in Australia retained the original meaning of the English word ‘liberal’, meaning that it stands for freedom and opposes collectivism.
I wish I had a politician like Dr Sladden to vote for. She clearly demonstrates a vital quality that is so obviously lacking in the vast majority of the cowardly, captured and corrupt collaborators of the powerful, parasitic puppet masters pulling the strings who are failing to represent us in our parliaments: integrity. However, I do wonder how she would fare in the suffocating embrace of a legacy mainstream political party and hope that her obvious fortitude sees her succeed.
Brilliant review, Rebekah. Dr Annette Barratt is a disgrace to medicine. Every day I am surprised by the seemingly endless depths these people will go to to prop up the flailing (to put it mildly) 'safe and effective' mantra. And despite the years gone by, I still cannot quite believe that my former colleagues continue to be so wilfully blind to the harms in which they have been, and continue to be, complicit. I urge Dr Barratt (and those like her) to reflect on the absurdity of her position, desist in attempted election meddling, and beg for the forgiveness of those who have been harmed as a direct result of medical 'advice', the likes of which she is still mindlessly imposing on people.
Rebekah – I noticed the link to your recent article on the Umbrella News website, so I followed it to see what you had to say. Congratulations for authoring such an easily understandable explanation of a complex topic. This is the sort of high-quality journalism that the people in the corporate media are no longer capable of producing – even if they were inclined to do so.
I first became aware of the critical importance of the phenomenon of ‘immune imprinting’ (aka the very Catholic-derived term ‘Original Antigenic Sin’) in 2021, from an interview with Dr Robert Malone on the ‘American Though Leaders’ segment of the Epoch Times website. I was able to get the general idea about what Dr Malone was describing – partly because I happened to have acquired a rudimentary understanding of the basics of physiology and biochemistry in the early 1960s - even though I am not a medical professional. But the trouble I then found was that it was impossible to explain it to other lay people – their eyes would just glaze over. However, your article in Umbrella News has solved that problem, even the headline alone gets the basic warning through - so well done! (I have now added myself to the mailing list for Umbrella News).
I was shocked at what your Umbrella News article revealed - namely the astonishing professional ignorance of the ‘health’ decision makers who have been calling the shots about the injectables. For the benefit of anyone reading this who is interested, the following eye-opening paragraphs are quoted directly from Rebekah’s Umbrella News article:
“The RACGP is the peak body for General Practitioners (GPs, similar to PCPs or family doctors in the US) in Australia, overseeing training and, and was a primary source of information for GPs during the pandemic and vaccine rollout.”
“Senator Gerard Rennick ….. commenting that “the medical profession has continued to promote boosters, knowing that viruses mutate. What’s your comment in regards to the failure to alert people to the risks of immune imprinting?”
“I’ve never heard of the word immune imprinting until you mentioned it,” responded Prof Morgan candidly.”
“Dr Rose is unsurprised. “To be perfectly frank, unless GPs actively seek out immunological training, they will not have it,” she says. “There is also almost no training for GPs in vaccinology, which begs the question: Why are GPs giving so many vaccines without knowing basic concepts in immunology or vaccinology?”
What this means is that the so-called medical ‘experts’ & bureaucrats who have been advising the scientifically-illiterate political leaders about the response to the pandemic and the use of the experimental mRNA injectable genetic agents (they are not vaccines), simply do not have the professional medical knowledge-base to be giving advice or making decisions on such an important matter. I had previously come to the private conclusion that most of these senior ‘health’ people must have had criminal or sociopathic tendencies, but I can now see that that is probably not the case - they are just medical ignoramuses – that is, they are not competent to be holding those jobs.
As I understand it, the concept of ‘immune imprinting’ (from the overuse of vaccinations) has been known to the medical profession for quite some years – well predating the Covid era. If I as a layperson became aware of the problem of ‘immune imprinting’ three years ago (by assiduous knowledge gathering) – then why did Professor Morgan and the peak body for General Practitioners fail to do so? After all, they were the people who were administering the mRNA cocktail which has generated such high levels of serious adverse effects and significantly elevated death rates. In the high-risk industry in which I worked most of my life, this level of technical failure and incompetence would not have been tolerated. It would have been ruthlessly dealt with.
It is clear that these senior medical decision makers & administrators are not fit for the task they have been given. They need to be removed from office without delay before their defective knowledge kills and maims any more innocent victims.
As a final thought - there are some hero politicians in Australia who have braved scorn and opposition by standing up for the injured on this matter – Senators Gerard Rennick, Malcolm Roberts, and Ralph Babet come to mind. Australians should be forever grateful to these individuals.
Oh the irony , we need more MP s to grow a backbone.
Perhaps the truth never helped them decide before ,but as I always knew would happen public opinion will be the downfall of the government.
The spineless weasel s want to be able to sit in their offices in Canberra and if it means going against everything they have stood for in the last 3 years then of course they will .
I live in Queensland so I cannot directly affect politcal matters in far off Tasmania, but I will be contacting my local MP for the federal electorate in which I live - who is a Liberal - as well as the Liberal-National Senators for Queensland, and will be telling them that if the Liberal Party removes Julie Sladdern from their ticket, then the Liberals will never get my vote again - or the votes of my extended family - and we are all traditional Liberal voters.
I think that the AMA has a bloody hide to try this on. It only goes to show how far they and their member doctors have fallen. I lost my best friend to heart failure about three weeks after he was injected with the toxic jab. There was no autopsy. He was extremely fit and had never had a history of cardiac disease. I cannot forgive the members of organisations such as the AMA for their refusal to put the interests of their patients first.
So sorry to hear about the loss of your friend. It seems to me that the AMA is very out of touch with how the general public perceives the medical establishment. I imagine the statement issued by Dr Barratt did Dr Sladden a favour.
For the benefit of North Americans, in Australia the ‘Liberal’ Party is the conservative Party - or at least it is supposed to be. Unlike in America, we in Australia retained the original meaning of the English word ‘liberal’, meaning that it stands for freedom and opposes collectivism.
Good point, I meant to include this and forgot. Added just now.
f*ck the AMA
this is no time to be polite
.. they continue to remain silent on deaths and injuries from the C19 injectables
.. as an organisation they have failed First, Do No Harm, making the AMA untenable
f*ck the AMA
Tell us how you really feel Julian 😂
Bravo, Julian!
I wish I had a politician like Dr Sladden to vote for. She clearly demonstrates a vital quality that is so obviously lacking in the vast majority of the cowardly, captured and corrupt collaborators of the powerful, parasitic puppet masters pulling the strings who are failing to represent us in our parliaments: integrity. However, I do wonder how she would fare in the suffocating embrace of a legacy mainstream political party and hope that her obvious fortitude sees her succeed.
Dr Sladden has already been involved in politics in her role consulting to Russell Broadbent ... seems she’s got a handle on it!
Brilliant review, Rebekah. Dr Annette Barratt is a disgrace to medicine. Every day I am surprised by the seemingly endless depths these people will go to to prop up the flailing (to put it mildly) 'safe and effective' mantra. And despite the years gone by, I still cannot quite believe that my former colleagues continue to be so wilfully blind to the harms in which they have been, and continue to be, complicit. I urge Dr Barratt (and those like her) to reflect on the absurdity of her position, desist in attempted election meddling, and beg for the forgiveness of those who have been harmed as a direct result of medical 'advice', the likes of which she is still mindlessly imposing on people.
Almost an endorsement!
Rebekah – I noticed the link to your recent article on the Umbrella News website, so I followed it to see what you had to say. Congratulations for authoring such an easily understandable explanation of a complex topic. This is the sort of high-quality journalism that the people in the corporate media are no longer capable of producing – even if they were inclined to do so.
I first became aware of the critical importance of the phenomenon of ‘immune imprinting’ (aka the very Catholic-derived term ‘Original Antigenic Sin’) in 2021, from an interview with Dr Robert Malone on the ‘American Though Leaders’ segment of the Epoch Times website. I was able to get the general idea about what Dr Malone was describing – partly because I happened to have acquired a rudimentary understanding of the basics of physiology and biochemistry in the early 1960s - even though I am not a medical professional. But the trouble I then found was that it was impossible to explain it to other lay people – their eyes would just glaze over. However, your article in Umbrella News has solved that problem, even the headline alone gets the basic warning through - so well done! (I have now added myself to the mailing list for Umbrella News).
I was shocked at what your Umbrella News article revealed - namely the astonishing professional ignorance of the ‘health’ decision makers who have been calling the shots about the injectables. For the benefit of anyone reading this who is interested, the following eye-opening paragraphs are quoted directly from Rebekah’s Umbrella News article:
“The RACGP is the peak body for General Practitioners (GPs, similar to PCPs or family doctors in the US) in Australia, overseeing training and, and was a primary source of information for GPs during the pandemic and vaccine rollout.”
“Senator Gerard Rennick ….. commenting that “the medical profession has continued to promote boosters, knowing that viruses mutate. What’s your comment in regards to the failure to alert people to the risks of immune imprinting?”
“I’ve never heard of the word immune imprinting until you mentioned it,” responded Prof Morgan candidly.”
“Dr Rose is unsurprised. “To be perfectly frank, unless GPs actively seek out immunological training, they will not have it,” she says. “There is also almost no training for GPs in vaccinology, which begs the question: Why are GPs giving so many vaccines without knowing basic concepts in immunology or vaccinology?”
Source: https://umbrellanews.com.au/health/2024/02/sick-with-covid-again-you-could-be-suffering-from-immune-imprinting/
What this means is that the so-called medical ‘experts’ & bureaucrats who have been advising the scientifically-illiterate political leaders about the response to the pandemic and the use of the experimental mRNA injectable genetic agents (they are not vaccines), simply do not have the professional medical knowledge-base to be giving advice or making decisions on such an important matter. I had previously come to the private conclusion that most of these senior ‘health’ people must have had criminal or sociopathic tendencies, but I can now see that that is probably not the case - they are just medical ignoramuses – that is, they are not competent to be holding those jobs.
As I understand it, the concept of ‘immune imprinting’ (from the overuse of vaccinations) has been known to the medical profession for quite some years – well predating the Covid era. If I as a layperson became aware of the problem of ‘immune imprinting’ three years ago (by assiduous knowledge gathering) – then why did Professor Morgan and the peak body for General Practitioners fail to do so? After all, they were the people who were administering the mRNA cocktail which has generated such high levels of serious adverse effects and significantly elevated death rates. In the high-risk industry in which I worked most of my life, this level of technical failure and incompetence would not have been tolerated. It would have been ruthlessly dealt with.
It is clear that these senior medical decision makers & administrators are not fit for the task they have been given. They need to be removed from office without delay before their defective knowledge kills and maims any more innocent victims.
As a final thought - there are some hero politicians in Australia who have braved scorn and opposition by standing up for the injured on this matter – Senators Gerard Rennick, Malcolm Roberts, and Ralph Babet come to mind. Australians should be forever grateful to these individuals.
Oh the irony , we need more MP s to grow a backbone.
Perhaps the truth never helped them decide before ,but as I always knew would happen public opinion will be the downfall of the government.
The spineless weasel s want to be able to sit in their offices in Canberra and if it means going against everything they have stood for in the last 3 years then of course they will .
AMA is a Political Party now? :)
AMA is on a slippery slope...and is getting extremely slippery :)