Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Shane Pisani's avatar

Allow me to define the persecution of unvaxxed as sub-humans not deserving of citizenship, healthcare opportunity to work or travel or custody over their own children as "abuse content, revenge porn, and violent extremist content."The 'moderators' are active in using these on a daily basis, and use the guise of 'moderation' to silence, slander and censor those who oppose.

The Heffernan report suggests that the very people in charge of 'moderation' are in fact made up of a significant number of paedophiles, and the guise of 'moderation' is used a substantial amount to protect them, rather than to actually stop child pornography.

Perhaps then, the powers that be wish the Overton window to remain as: "When the Australian Government censors violent extremist content via the Department of Home Affairs, or child abuse content via the eSafety Commissioner, this is entirely appropriate."

or as a discussion on the nuances of the definition of "harm".

Rather than actual accountability for actual crimes being regularly committed.

I'm not saying those discussions are not valuable or well made. I am suggesting they are virtually irrelevant at this moment in time. Like discussing seatbelt safety while the terrorists are still flying the airplane.....

Expand full comment
Die Untermensche's avatar

This case in the US against the Biden government is exposing the depth of the suppression of free speech. It's worth reading in its entirety. The Australian government was following the model.

https://aaronkheriaty.substack.com/p/update-missouri-v-biden-part-1-by

Expand full comment
40 more comments...

No posts