13 Comments

I have now tried twice to sign this declaration, and each time it doesn't work: the confirmation email is met with the message: "Sorry! Invalid Confirmation URL"

I realise that this is not your website, Rebekah, but thought I ought report the problem in case others are having it also. I'd appreciate it being passed on.

Expand full comment

Thanks Barry I’ve passed this on to the organiser, hopefully it will be sorted ASAP 🤞

Expand full comment

The Declaration and confirmation email worked fine for me a few minutes ago, amid a flurry of new signatures, going by the count increase while signing.

Expand full comment

Thanks very much. It was not clear to me how to do that.

Expand full comment

I've now tried several more times, with the same non-results. I have tried different browsers and different versions of my email address, all with the same non-result. I have no idea what the problem is (but I am not having any other email or Internet problems). I have tried to contact them on the email on the DD site ([email protected]) but that too is unsuccessful, as my server says that it cannot find the user to deliver messages to it. Again, I realise it's not Rebekah's problem, but I'm reporting the difficulties in the hope that someone can fix them. It would be a shame if the numbers who have signed are diminished by technical glitches. I am of course reluctant to send the information to others until it is clearly working properly. I can see that the numbers of signatories are growing, so it is clearly functioning for some users. But not for me.

Expand full comment

I am pleased to report that I have now successfully signed the declaration, but only by using a gmail address that I very rarely use. [I don't think that this means that my regular email server was blocking anything, as I have had no trouble getting the request for confirmation email back at any stage.] Weird. There is still a problem that needs to be addressed by the DD people.

Expand full comment

Good to hear Barry!

Expand full comment

I accidentally deleted a chunk of my emails that contained Rebekah's reference to Mitch McConnell's recent comments on the polio vaccine but would like to respond to it here.

Mitch is purported to have said that he has observed, during the course of his life, a large number of lives saved by the polio vaccine.

I find this somewhat absurd. I mean, how does one OBSERVE a vaccine saving a life?

Next, I am trying to reconcile this with the put view that polio was the result of a toxin (DDT, perhaps) penetrating the spinal columns of infants through the intestinal wall, or some such ... not a 'virus'. Are the people who expound such conjectures deluded fools or deceivers?

Rebekah writes that the only 'polio' outbreaks we have had are due to the vaccine. Again, this does not sit well with the toxin thesis.

Lets assume there is such a thing as a 'polio virus' though. There are people who'd respond to Rebekah that these cases are inevitable collateral damage in the fight against polio, that they are very small in number compared to the number of vaccines issued and that the harms associated with the same are vastly outweighed by the benefits of the 'vaccine'.

Do viruses exist per se? Can we 'catch' (as in, contract from exposure to other people) colds or flus?

LINS

Expand full comment

I want Nuremberg II

Expand full comment

Mathew Crawford has an interesting take on this. I think people want better than Nuremberg 2.0 https://roundingtheearth.substack.com/p/stop-saying-nuremberg-20

Expand full comment

Aint gunna happen, buddy. I have recently seen a load of bollocks posted by C-team Youtubers to the effect that Gauci's imprisonment is imminent.:):):)

Expand full comment

No problems signing. It is so important that this is signed by many Aussies. Our human rights must be respected again by politicians and organizations that have denied them. Thank you for spreading this news Rebekah.

Expand full comment

I recently watched a video in which Carl Henighan (https://youtu.be/Ou_Ai6GwVq8?si=aug2vCia2iMswgul) is interviewed by a woman who seems to have a decent collection of questions in front of her and be all over the same. Sadly Carl (complete with his marvelous north UK accent) essentially expresses his disgust at the lack of science/maths employed to justify various government measures during the great plague. One question he did not properly dispose of, though, was the one of whether the vax significantly reduced covid-related hospitalisations - ultimately the strongest weapon of reasoning employed by governments across the western world. The issue vax efficacy remains unsolved.

Btw, don't hold your breath waiting for prosecutions of key covid players, btw. They will all hide behind the special emergency legislation and claim they acted under extreme pressure, making the best decisions possible given the science of the day. Gauci will NOT be going to prison - federal OR state.

Expand full comment