Thanks for this succinct description of what has happened Rebekah. Many of us who have had little to do with the law in our lives are flabbergasted at how the courts have behaved. We realise how little protection they afford us as citizen's. Irrespective of whether the technical evidence was correct or not, that measurements and analysis were not able to be presented in court, for what on the surface are administrative reasons, is terrifying.
Also it seems that it is money that controls justice, in the sense that only those with deep pockets have a chance in carrying through with seeking justice. The government has the deepest pocket it seems. We are proud of those in the legal profession who have had the courage to pursue this on behalf of us.
The Court rightfully and correctly rejected a matter for which the plaintiffs had no arguable case. For us to win cases in the Courts they need to be constructed skilfully.
Very timely. I was literally two minutes away from going to the local court to file an appeal against a traffic offense I just lost in the local court. The case, checked by two lawyers and considered bullet proof, hung on a crystal clear definition. The police made an obvious mistake and charged me with the wrong offence. But the judge sided with the police making such a bizarre illogical decision that the lawyers are totally flabbergasted . Never came across such a blatant disregard for the written code by a judge ever. He had the Fauci syndrom. He didnt apply tbe law, he was the law. There was no backup or logical explanation. He just ruled as he saw fit. I was shell-shocked. Not because I lost but how I lost. I was transported right back into the illogical random tyrannical world of the Covid response as well as the illogical random argumentation of radical trans activists. My first question after the loss was: How deep are the courts compromised? Is there any point to appeal? Obviously, that judge wasn't concerned to be laughed out of an appeal court. Thats ominous. Part of me just wants to appeal to find out how deep it goes. Another part is getting very careful. The judge gave me a relatively mild order, however, much harsher than my original ticket. You get punished for challenging the police. The appeal judge could be much harsher if I loose again but apparently there is the Parker rule which means he has to warn me if he thinks it might be harsher and I can withdraw the appeal. So I should be ok but what do I do if he doesn't care about the Parker rule? This article makes me believe in the saying that the fish stinks at the head first. Usually, the corruption of a culture or organisation is top down. I don't think I appeal today. I still have two weeks. Thanks for the great article.
Without going into details, unequal application of the law, even in small matters, is what happens at the end of empires. I know that's probably not a very satisfying answer but I get a lot of emails and know a lot of people, and judicial process is simply not being followed anymore.
Correction; I am a suspended doctor, and whilst i am not a lawyer I understand either are you, but regardless of who we are , surely we have the right to comment don’t we? And regardless, this non-lawyer asked the lawyers to do the right thing and advance a proper case and they chose not to. The High Court has found they were wrong now for the third time. It’s not the Courts fault they lost, it’s theirs.
I suggest you read the Arkmedic piece linked in the main article. 27 cases presented, all dismissed. To claim they were all constructed poorly would be almost impossible to back up.
Isn't it normal for a court to hear a case before deciding if it's been advanced properly? If courts can dismiss a case without even allowing any evidence to be presented, based on the personal biases of the judge or whatever bribes or threats they have happening in the background, do we actually have a justice system?
Don't agree. You don't consider the possibility that the court system is compromised and corrupted as has been happening in totalitaerian times before. It's a shocking, dark conclusion for a so-called democracy but I just had a tiny taste of it myself losing at court where the judge totally sided with the police turning a black and white crystal clear definition on its head, because he can and he doesn't seem to fear any negative outcome from an appeal court. Two lawyers considered the case bullet proof. Police made an obvious error charging me with the wrong offence. I wouldn't have taken it to court otherwise. There wasn't too much at stake for me paying the fine. But the error was so blatant obvious that it just seemed a formality. This ruling was in the same logic league as when an old man with a big beard claims he is a woman and can get pregnant.
Opining here: I am not a lawyer and don't fully understand the case Rebekah has written about, but I have seen lots of cases on the 'freedom' side of things poorly constructed or argued. Sometimes we are our own worst enemies - if I can use an example - particularly during what happened in the US with the 2020 election which I did follow closely (apples and boulders I know).
Yet, there is also the other argument that if the case fits the 'narrative,' then courts are more likely to overlook any inconsistencies in the case and construction in order to push it through, granting standing where they shouldn't etc. (demonstrating unequal justice/corruption).
I think both the above can be true because the judicial system (in every country) is politically motivated. The issue is that the Western world is suffering from an unequal application of justice, which happens during the decline of empires.
Having talked at length with Fam and Gillespie, I do not believe that this case was poorly constructed. This appears to be a clean cut case of procedural unfairness. I don't know the motive, but it's worth noting that the government has a LOT to lose should a case like this be heard in the High Court.
Having seen the case and other cases by Gillespie, his legal arguments are poorly thought out, lack a Constitutional basis and ignore processes of the Court in favour of likes and clicks and notoriety. It is unfortunate that misinformation continues to be spread. If you take a look at the initial case in the Federal Court, you will see the case lacked standing. His colleagues warned him of this. And yet they were silenced. In fact, when the issue of standing was brought to him prior to submission, he told his colleague to 'f .. off'. And now we are here, talking up his legitimacy. I have no doubt that the High Court is not operating as it should, and cases like the Babies case do nothing to expose that. In fact, all it does is make those of us seeking justice according to the processes of the Court, with arguments relating to jurisdiction and the Constitution, have to work harder to show the people that we are not all deluded and that some of us do have legitimate arguments.
Can someone kindly explain to me how all of this madness doesn’t violate the Nuremberg code? It’s a medical experiment under extreme coercion. What am I missing?
Rebekah is correct in a way. It is one pronged, but we have seen that the original jurisdiction of the High Court is not seemingly open to everyone, or indeed anyone bringing in legitimate arguments. We have also observed that the appellate jurisdiction is not necessarily open. What needs to occur to is to present cases to the High Court via the original and appellate jurisdictions including s40 matters too, and get public support. If you look to the wording of s40 of the Judiciary Act, it mentions 'significance to the public'. From my experience, the way the High Court is interpreting this is not matters that impact millions of Australians. Instead, they are interpreting it as matters that attract national interest. What Gillespie is doing - and others like AFL lawyers, is presenting poorly constructed cases that give the impression that the Courts are not functioning and there is no way to win. While it may be the case that the Court is difficult to access, my view is that we should be addressing this issue - access. To educate people - including yourself and the public at large about matters that need support and attention. Including Dr William Bay, Dr Mark Hobart, Ms Kiley in the VSC and other matters relating to our Constitution and the protections it affords.
If the Australian Federal AND High Court do not see fit to protect the most vulnerable and innocent subjects of this country then they MUST BE DISMISSED. In Scotland they are just now looking at the high number of children's death due to the vaccines. Every single judge must be mandated to attend every single innocent child's funeral.
I have seen the actual parents of dead children defending this insanity. “My child surely would have died from Covid anyway so it was worth the risk”. These mental patients actually believe this.
Correct, they should and so should all politicians. Isn't their exemption the obvious admission that they knew that something is fishy about the vaccines?
Not surprising in the least. When you read and absorb similar accounts from the US for example, you realise that whatever we think of as “The State” is entirely captured by anointed autocrats and experts whose sole purpose is to defend their own interests, if this is at the expense of the average “useless eater”, well then that’s just too bad. I recall listening to Gillespie explain the prior AVN court proceedings, and the frankly unethical way in which the courts have decided to prop up our regulators at any cost - apparently the continued perception of public trust in our institutions is more important than any number of individual grotesque decisions and policies said institutions enact on the unsuspecting public. As with the FWC, decent, principled individuals arguing from positions of truth and logic are deemed problematic and unworthy of equal treatment under the law, primarily because the institution has predetermined that anyone challenging the consensus (notwithstanding the question of who arrived at it and why) is by necessity undermining the principle of the law (or democracy, or free speech, or endangering grandma) itself … we are in very dangerous times indeed.
Apr 19, 2023·edited Apr 19, 2023Liked by Rebekah Barnett
Cross-posted and shared on Twitter. If we had a half decent Attorney General, he would intervene in defence of Babies who can't tell their parents when their Tinnitus starts driving them crazy.
So when the evidence is overwhelmingly in favour of suspending this failed product the response is simply to ignore the case regardless of how many babies it may harm. This country is gone...
"... drawing a parallel with the Nazification of the German judicial system during the Third Reich..." out on the patio/we sit/laugh and think/this is Australia 🇦🇺
Thanks for covering this important case Rebekah. I wonder if it will take a change in public perceptions and the May 11 'end of US pandemic' proper to see any shift in all this. Seem to be some good legal decisions happening in some US states but we don't hear about any of it at all in Australia do we.
Apr 20, 2023·edited Apr 20, 2023Liked by Rebekah Barnett
Oh my goodness just the person I wanted to contact. I don't have social media but I was thinking of you the other day. I wrote this because I was inspired by the letter you wrote at the Canberra protest - you gave "them" a few weeks of amnesty and they scoffed. I wrote a letter too. I have had no takers from the perpetrators, but a jabbed Australian wrote a magnificent letter.
In my view previous Court challenges have not addressed the Mechanisms of Causation, which is why I concentrate on the known harmful biochemical pathways involving the constituents and contaminants of the jabs. My only Legal qualification is in the Law of Negligence.
But even in the Federal Court, would the evidence presented still be of use for those of us opposed to these injections? That is, anything accepted in court cannot be "mis information" as it is sworn testimony and evidence.
We must never lose sight of the larger picture of the vile malignance we are fighting against.
There is an insidious global ruling class plot to enslave all life on earth behind all the madness and suffering inflicted on We the People.
CLIMATE CHANGE IS AN EVEN WORSE FRAUD THAN THE PLANSCAMDEMIC! SO-CALLED GREEN TECH IS A GIGANTIC SCAM! MINING AND MANUFACTURING 'GREEN' PRODUCTS NEEDS COAL, GAS AND OIL AND MINING RARE MINERALS IS MORE ENVIRONMENTALLY TOXIC AND DESTRUCTIVE THAN LEGACY PRODUCTS. SCREW YOUR DAMNED AGENDA!
How to fight back against this TOTAL SLAVERY!
RESIST! DO NOT COMPLY! DITCH THE DAMNED 'SMART' PHONES AND THE DAMNED QR CODES AND GO BACK TO LANDLINES OR FLIP PHONES AND USE CASH AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE! INSIST ON CASH! CBDC IS TOTAL SLAVERY!
Other than getting rid of nuclear weapons which I support 100% the rest of the anti-nuclear peace movement and CLIMATE CRISIS propaganda is parroting UN utter GARBAGE, a complete surrender to the ENSLAVEMENT AGENDA by the diabolical despots of Davos - ruling class criminals who lust for total power and control and all of whom should be tried and jailed for life and their malign organizations dismantled: the UN, the WEF, the IMF, the WHO, the BIS, NATO, Blackrock, Vanguard, The Rockefellers, the Rothschilds, The Bilderbergers, the CFR et al.
There is an evil predator globalist technocratic elite agenda of eugenics/depopulation/genocide using bioweapon poison jabs, war, geoengineering, EMF radiation, starvation and economic collapse - THE GREAT RESET/AGENDA 2030/4TH INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION to get rid of billions of 'useless eaters' and to use nano tech to turn the survivors into ROBOTIZED COMPLIANT SLAVES! WAKE UP AND RESIST! DO NOT COMPLY! These are psychopath megalomaniacs who want to play god by turning all life into digitized metaverse mechanistic synthetic biology to be manipulated by their AI algorithms. A more demonic sickening idea is nearly impossible to imagine!
APPALLED AND HORRIFIED AT INSANE TYRANNICAL PROTOCOLS THAT HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH HEALTH AND EVERYTHING TO DO WITH TOTALITARIAN CONTROL! REVERSE THIS NOW!
MAKE THE WORLD AND AMERICA 2019 (comparatively speaking), AND FREE AGAIN!
NO, I AM NOT AFRAID OF THE MORONIC SCARIANT SHMARIANT MONKEYSHINES! WAKE UP ALREADY!
TOTALLY CONDEMN BIDEN AND ALL OTHER POLS WHO HAVE NO POWER TO LAWLESSLY ACT LIKE AN EMPEROR OR DICTATOR AND DECREE JAB CROW 'SHOW ME YOUR PAPERS' FASCIST SEGREGATION/DISCRIMINATION/APARTHEID VIOLATIONS OF THE CONSTITUTION, THE NUREMBERG CODES AND EVERY CIVIL RIGHT IMAGINABLE.
NO GREEN NEW DEALS OR BUILD BACK BETTER FROM THE CRIMINAL TECHNOCRAT TYRANTS KLAUS SCHWAB AND HIS CRONIES FROM THE WORLD ECONOMIC FORUM.
STOP THE TERRIBLE TYRANNY OF THE TECHNOCRATS GLOBAL AGENDA OF TOTAL SURVEILLANCE AND CONTROL USING THE VIRUS AS EXCUSE AND PROPAGANDA TOOL!
NO MUZZLING STIFLING MASK MANDATES! NO FORCED VACCINES! END TORTUROUS DEVASTATING LOCK DOWNS NOW! I WANT MY LIFE BACK.
Great rant Amy! And this blog, about injustice/evil/malice of Oz kids getting jabbed - and legal jiggery-pokery too - is just part of it. You shone a light on the bigger picture.
I forwarded your comment to someone who, while very bright and 'gets' the covid scam, fails to comprehend the enormity of the unified evil (evil at root; the lower-level perpetrators (gubermunt, media, medical level) are mostly dumb/dumber foot soldiers who know little of what they do). It (your rant, my forwarding of it) will have little effect.
Your calls to resist will fall on deaf/stupid/uncomprehending ears. You really believe we'll go back to the 80's tech? Cash? You josh me, right? The public roll-over to the covidscam was the tipping point. A few thousand, even a few hundred 'Good Men' of note could have stopped it in its tracks. Didn't happen. They won.
We, Mankind, lost it then, possibly for an Age or two. (OK, I tend toward exaggeration: will say
2-3,000 thousand years be more acceptable? )
So, sadly Amy, forget about 'getting your life back'. 'Aint gonna happen. For you. For me. For us all. And don't start me on GPTChat and where that's going.
If I sound a little pessimistic - well, not really, more realistic.
There are no accidents in the Universe. We reap what we sew, every action has it's consequence and we are now - and about to - reap a few consequences. Enjoy!
PS I am not religious, in fact...Oh don't get me started...
Suggest Patel Patriot’s Devolution series on Substack
Or read by PGunnels on Rumble
The people had to experience some of what was planned for us but all is not lost
We come to the brink of the precipice because you can’t tell folk, we know this, haven’t we all tried for the last three years.
We had to see just how corrupt the autocracy and Polly puppets have become and we would have lost for sure, looking around at the sheeple compliance
we came back from the precipice- out of the masked lock downs and over policing, quarantine etc and it’s really sad people have been injured and killed from these experimental mandated jabs
This all happened and slowly the enormity of this is rolling out, bit by bit, the reality we watched is being brought to light
We are winning at the pace of discovery that 80+% of the sleepers can tolerate without sending them over the edge.
It's so admirable that people are still trying the courts after so many years and hundreds of cases being crushed by lawfare and judicial tyranny. This shows a willingness on our part to exhaust all peaceful avenues. This is how righteous people behave in the face of tyranny.
In 2023, Good People are still doing Good. The terminal state of tyranny occurrs when Good people are forced to do Bad. I believe we are quickly approaching that condition. People need to understand what is happening right now. Our children are being murdered and we are reaching an inflection point.
Yes, there are far too many 'Good Australians' just like the 'Good Germans' back in Nazi Germany.
We must remember: Good People Break Bad Laws, -it is our duty to do so.
By the way thanks for the substack that included the short animation 'Beyond the Reset'. It was actually quite haunting and confronting watching this short film - and the reality if enough people continue being 'Good Australians' on how this could end.
Hey you're very welcome. I was so surprised and delighted when the creator emailed me back. I caught him right before he went on the Alex Jones show so maybe I have the honour of being his first interview!
This is so rigged, the court is bought... It's not about protecting the citizen from exploitation any more, it's about ensuring the citizen can be exploited... Even worse failure to protect our future citizens, babies and children... Who has invaded our country and rewritten laws meant to protect us? (Several easy answers to this question, but it's so obvious, it's like they do not even care who can see it)...
The court is neither rigged nor bought. This case was lost because they didn’t bring a suitable plaintiff to Court three times (twice at the Federal level and once at the High Court level)
After you read Arkmedic's piece, please read the book 'Rigged' (previously 'Game of mates'). It does a great job of quantifying just how rigged the system is.
How do you think that these ‘countermeasures’ have been pushed on people for so long, despite the fact that they bypassed any efficacy and safety standards amongst many other things along the way.
Do you know if you bring the Constiution back into alignmemt there is remedy to remove politicians and judiciary that is beholden to foreign influence..and we can force any king back into alignment
Thanks for this succinct description of what has happened Rebekah. Many of us who have had little to do with the law in our lives are flabbergasted at how the courts have behaved. We realise how little protection they afford us as citizen's. Irrespective of whether the technical evidence was correct or not, that measurements and analysis were not able to be presented in court, for what on the surface are administrative reasons, is terrifying.
Also it seems that it is money that controls justice, in the sense that only those with deep pockets have a chance in carrying through with seeking justice. The government has the deepest pocket it seems. We are proud of those in the legal profession who have had the courage to pursue this on behalf of us.
From 1st hand experience, it is the deepest pockets that invariably 'get the best results' in the matter of 'justice'.
The Court rightfully and correctly rejected a matter for which the plaintiffs had no arguable case. For us to win cases in the Courts they need to be constructed skilfully.
Dr Bay I need to make note here that you are a doctor, not a legal practitioner.
You are welcome to contact me at [email protected] if you would like to make your case.
Very timely. I was literally two minutes away from going to the local court to file an appeal against a traffic offense I just lost in the local court. The case, checked by two lawyers and considered bullet proof, hung on a crystal clear definition. The police made an obvious mistake and charged me with the wrong offence. But the judge sided with the police making such a bizarre illogical decision that the lawyers are totally flabbergasted . Never came across such a blatant disregard for the written code by a judge ever. He had the Fauci syndrom. He didnt apply tbe law, he was the law. There was no backup or logical explanation. He just ruled as he saw fit. I was shell-shocked. Not because I lost but how I lost. I was transported right back into the illogical random tyrannical world of the Covid response as well as the illogical random argumentation of radical trans activists. My first question after the loss was: How deep are the courts compromised? Is there any point to appeal? Obviously, that judge wasn't concerned to be laughed out of an appeal court. Thats ominous. Part of me just wants to appeal to find out how deep it goes. Another part is getting very careful. The judge gave me a relatively mild order, however, much harsher than my original ticket. You get punished for challenging the police. The appeal judge could be much harsher if I loose again but apparently there is the Parker rule which means he has to warn me if he thinks it might be harsher and I can withdraw the appeal. So I should be ok but what do I do if he doesn't care about the Parker rule? This article makes me believe in the saying that the fish stinks at the head first. Usually, the corruption of a culture or organisation is top down. I don't think I appeal today. I still have two weeks. Thanks for the great article.
Sadly, your situation is not unique.
Say more. What have you heard?
Without going into details, unequal application of the law, even in small matters, is what happens at the end of empires. I know that's probably not a very satisfying answer but I get a lot of emails and know a lot of people, and judicial process is simply not being followed anymore.
Correction; I am a suspended doctor, and whilst i am not a lawyer I understand either are you, but regardless of who we are , surely we have the right to comment don’t we? And regardless, this non-lawyer asked the lawyers to do the right thing and advance a proper case and they chose not to. The High Court has found they were wrong now for the third time. It’s not the Courts fault they lost, it’s theirs.
I suggest you read the Arkmedic piece linked in the main article. 27 cases presented, all dismissed. To claim they were all constructed poorly would be almost impossible to back up.
Isn't it normal for a court to hear a case before deciding if it's been advanced properly? If courts can dismiss a case without even allowing any evidence to be presented, based on the personal biases of the judge or whatever bribes or threats they have happening in the background, do we actually have a justice system?
Yes, the normal procedure is to have at least a small hearing to give the plaintiffs the option of adjusting the case before it is remitted.
Yes because it is not at all possible the courts are manipulated and corrupted!!
They are just another company. Registered in the USA and illegal. UN puppets.
Don't agree. You don't consider the possibility that the court system is compromised and corrupted as has been happening in totalitaerian times before. It's a shocking, dark conclusion for a so-called democracy but I just had a tiny taste of it myself losing at court where the judge totally sided with the police turning a black and white crystal clear definition on its head, because he can and he doesn't seem to fear any negative outcome from an appeal court. Two lawyers considered the case bullet proof. Police made an obvious error charging me with the wrong offence. I wouldn't have taken it to court otherwise. There wasn't too much at stake for me paying the fine. But the error was so blatant obvious that it just seemed a formality. This ruling was in the same logic league as when an old man with a big beard claims he is a woman and can get pregnant.
Opining here: I am not a lawyer and don't fully understand the case Rebekah has written about, but I have seen lots of cases on the 'freedom' side of things poorly constructed or argued. Sometimes we are our own worst enemies - if I can use an example - particularly during what happened in the US with the 2020 election which I did follow closely (apples and boulders I know).
Yet, there is also the other argument that if the case fits the 'narrative,' then courts are more likely to overlook any inconsistencies in the case and construction in order to push it through, granting standing where they shouldn't etc. (demonstrating unequal justice/corruption).
I think both the above can be true because the judicial system (in every country) is politically motivated. The issue is that the Western world is suffering from an unequal application of justice, which happens during the decline of empires.
Having talked at length with Fam and Gillespie, I do not believe that this case was poorly constructed. This appears to be a clean cut case of procedural unfairness. I don't know the motive, but it's worth noting that the government has a LOT to lose should a case like this be heard in the High Court.
Having seen the case and other cases by Gillespie, his legal arguments are poorly thought out, lack a Constitutional basis and ignore processes of the Court in favour of likes and clicks and notoriety. It is unfortunate that misinformation continues to be spread. If you take a look at the initial case in the Federal Court, you will see the case lacked standing. His colleagues warned him of this. And yet they were silenced. In fact, when the issue of standing was brought to him prior to submission, he told his colleague to 'f .. off'. And now we are here, talking up his legitimacy. I have no doubt that the High Court is not operating as it should, and cases like the Babies case do nothing to expose that. In fact, all it does is make those of us seeking justice according to the processes of the Court, with arguments relating to jurisdiction and the Constitution, have to work harder to show the people that we are not all deluded and that some of us do have legitimate arguments.
Can someone kindly explain to me how all of this madness doesn’t violate the Nuremberg code? It’s a medical experiment under extreme coercion. What am I missing?
William what would have worked do you think?
Rebekah in my opinion we have to look outside of the box for solutions.
I agree. I'm a fan of the 'multi-prong' approach... courts are one prong, but hardly the only one.
Pitchforks have prongs
Rebekah is correct in a way. It is one pronged, but we have seen that the original jurisdiction of the High Court is not seemingly open to everyone, or indeed anyone bringing in legitimate arguments. We have also observed that the appellate jurisdiction is not necessarily open. What needs to occur to is to present cases to the High Court via the original and appellate jurisdictions including s40 matters too, and get public support. If you look to the wording of s40 of the Judiciary Act, it mentions 'significance to the public'. From my experience, the way the High Court is interpreting this is not matters that impact millions of Australians. Instead, they are interpreting it as matters that attract national interest. What Gillespie is doing - and others like AFL lawyers, is presenting poorly constructed cases that give the impression that the Courts are not functioning and there is no way to win. While it may be the case that the Court is difficult to access, my view is that we should be addressing this issue - access. To educate people - including yourself and the public at large about matters that need support and attention. Including Dr William Bay, Dr Mark Hobart, Ms Kiley in the VSC and other matters relating to our Constitution and the protections it affords.
If the Australian Federal AND High Court do not see fit to protect the most vulnerable and innocent subjects of this country then they MUST BE DISMISSED. In Scotland they are just now looking at the high number of children's death due to the vaccines. Every single judge must be mandated to attend every single innocent child's funeral.
I have seen the actual parents of dead children defending this insanity. “My child surely would have died from Covid anyway so it was worth the risk”. These mental patients actually believe this.
Every single judge should be mandated to receive the “vaccine”
They were exempt
Correct, they should and so should all politicians. Isn't their exemption the obvious admission that they knew that something is fishy about the vaccines?
Not surprising in the least. When you read and absorb similar accounts from the US for example, you realise that whatever we think of as “The State” is entirely captured by anointed autocrats and experts whose sole purpose is to defend their own interests, if this is at the expense of the average “useless eater”, well then that’s just too bad. I recall listening to Gillespie explain the prior AVN court proceedings, and the frankly unethical way in which the courts have decided to prop up our regulators at any cost - apparently the continued perception of public trust in our institutions is more important than any number of individual grotesque decisions and policies said institutions enact on the unsuspecting public. As with the FWC, decent, principled individuals arguing from positions of truth and logic are deemed problematic and unworthy of equal treatment under the law, primarily because the institution has predetermined that anyone challenging the consensus (notwithstanding the question of who arrived at it and why) is by necessity undermining the principle of the law (or democracy, or free speech, or endangering grandma) itself … we are in very dangerous times indeed.
Cross-posted and shared on Twitter. If we had a half decent Attorney General, he would intervene in defence of Babies who can't tell their parents when their Tinnitus starts driving them crazy.
Good point Geoff. Intervention mechanisms exist, even under the Crown (ha!)
So when the evidence is overwhelmingly in favour of suspending this failed product the response is simply to ignore the case regardless of how many babies it may harm. This country is gone...
This is a travesty. Our beautiful country has been corrupted and destroyed by greedy, evil psychopaths.
"... drawing a parallel with the Nazification of the German judicial system during the Third Reich..." out on the patio/we sit/laugh and think/this is Australia 🇦🇺
I heard Klaus Schwab speech where he said the WEF was the 4th Reich. Just once. Then it vanished. Wish now I recorded it. It's in the right location.
I wonder if it has been saved on Twitter. Send Elon a message.
Thanks for covering this important case Rebekah. I wonder if it will take a change in public perceptions and the May 11 'end of US pandemic' proper to see any shift in all this. Seem to be some good legal decisions happening in some US states but we don't hear about any of it at all in Australia do we.
Love your work Rebekah.
A real journo.
God bless.
Hoody
Oh my goodness just the person I wanted to contact. I don't have social media but I was thinking of you the other day. I wrote this because I was inspired by the letter you wrote at the Canberra protest - you gave "them" a few weeks of amnesty and they scoffed. I wrote a letter too. I have had no takers from the perpetrators, but a jabbed Australian wrote a magnificent letter.
The original post: https://vicparkpetition.substack.com/p/dear-australian-politicians-and-doctors
The letter: https://vicparkpetition.substack.com/p/to-my-unjabbed-heroes
"To my unjabbed heroes, a jabbed Australian speaks"
Hoody, thanks for standing up and providing leadership. This war is making heroes out of ordinary people. Don't give up.
Thanks Hoody!
In my view previous Court challenges have not addressed the Mechanisms of Causation, which is why I concentrate on the known harmful biochemical pathways involving the constituents and contaminants of the jabs. My only Legal qualification is in the Law of Negligence.
Disappointing result for sure.
But even in the Federal Court, would the evidence presented still be of use for those of us opposed to these injections? That is, anything accepted in court cannot be "mis information" as it is sworn testimony and evidence.
We must never lose sight of the larger picture of the vile malignance we are fighting against.
There is an insidious global ruling class plot to enslave all life on earth behind all the madness and suffering inflicted on We the People.
CLIMATE CHANGE IS AN EVEN WORSE FRAUD THAN THE PLANSCAMDEMIC! SO-CALLED GREEN TECH IS A GIGANTIC SCAM! MINING AND MANUFACTURING 'GREEN' PRODUCTS NEEDS COAL, GAS AND OIL AND MINING RARE MINERALS IS MORE ENVIRONMENTALLY TOXIC AND DESTRUCTIVE THAN LEGACY PRODUCTS. SCREW YOUR DAMNED AGENDA!
How to fight back against this TOTAL SLAVERY!
RESIST! DO NOT COMPLY! DITCH THE DAMNED 'SMART' PHONES AND THE DAMNED QR CODES AND GO BACK TO LANDLINES OR FLIP PHONES AND USE CASH AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE! INSIST ON CASH! CBDC IS TOTAL SLAVERY!
Other than getting rid of nuclear weapons which I support 100% the rest of the anti-nuclear peace movement and CLIMATE CRISIS propaganda is parroting UN utter GARBAGE, a complete surrender to the ENSLAVEMENT AGENDA by the diabolical despots of Davos - ruling class criminals who lust for total power and control and all of whom should be tried and jailed for life and their malign organizations dismantled: the UN, the WEF, the IMF, the WHO, the BIS, NATO, Blackrock, Vanguard, The Rockefellers, the Rothschilds, The Bilderbergers, the CFR et al.
There is an evil predator globalist technocratic elite agenda of eugenics/depopulation/genocide using bioweapon poison jabs, war, geoengineering, EMF radiation, starvation and economic collapse - THE GREAT RESET/AGENDA 2030/4TH INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION to get rid of billions of 'useless eaters' and to use nano tech to turn the survivors into ROBOTIZED COMPLIANT SLAVES! WAKE UP AND RESIST! DO NOT COMPLY! These are psychopath megalomaniacs who want to play god by turning all life into digitized metaverse mechanistic synthetic biology to be manipulated by their AI algorithms. A more demonic sickening idea is nearly impossible to imagine!
APPALLED AND HORRIFIED AT INSANE TYRANNICAL PROTOCOLS THAT HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH HEALTH AND EVERYTHING TO DO WITH TOTALITARIAN CONTROL! REVERSE THIS NOW!
MAKE THE WORLD AND AMERICA 2019 (comparatively speaking), AND FREE AGAIN!
NO, I AM NOT AFRAID OF THE MORONIC SCARIANT SHMARIANT MONKEYSHINES! WAKE UP ALREADY!
TOTALLY CONDEMN BIDEN AND ALL OTHER POLS WHO HAVE NO POWER TO LAWLESSLY ACT LIKE AN EMPEROR OR DICTATOR AND DECREE JAB CROW 'SHOW ME YOUR PAPERS' FASCIST SEGREGATION/DISCRIMINATION/APARTHEID VIOLATIONS OF THE CONSTITUTION, THE NUREMBERG CODES AND EVERY CIVIL RIGHT IMAGINABLE.
NO GREEN NEW DEALS OR BUILD BACK BETTER FROM THE CRIMINAL TECHNOCRAT TYRANTS KLAUS SCHWAB AND HIS CRONIES FROM THE WORLD ECONOMIC FORUM.
STOP THE TERRIBLE TYRANNY OF THE TECHNOCRATS GLOBAL AGENDA OF TOTAL SURVEILLANCE AND CONTROL USING THE VIRUS AS EXCUSE AND PROPAGANDA TOOL!
NO MUZZLING STIFLING MASK MANDATES! NO FORCED VACCINES! END TORTUROUS DEVASTATING LOCK DOWNS NOW! I WANT MY LIFE BACK.
https://wrenchinthegears.com
https://www.stopworldcontrol.com/
https://www.thelastamericanvagabond.com
https://pandemicfacts.info
https://wearehumanwearefree.org/7-days-campaign/
https://sonsoflibertymedia.com/covid-19-roadmap-12-step-plan-to-create-a-totalitarian-new-world-order-were-on-number-8-headed-towards-number-9/
https://questioningcovid.com
https://www.corbettreport.com/interview-1581-james-corbett-breaks-down-the-great-reset/
http://www.stopcp.com/GlobalResetPSYOP/GlobalResetPSYOPMindMap.html
https://everydayconcerned.net/2020/09/04/breaking-major-investigative-report-by-association-of-french-reserve-army-officers-finds-covid-19-pandemic-to-have-a-hidden-agenda-for-global-totalitarianism-nanotech-chipping-of-all-5g-irradia/
Pam Popper: https://makeamericansfreeagain.com
Del Bigtree: https://www.brighteon.com/channels/highwire
https://www.technocracy.news
Naomi Wolf: https://dailyclout.io
www.nojabforme.info
https://www.globalresearch.ca/we-must-awaken-from-corona-coma-reject-great-reset-robotic-technocracy-assert-common-humanity/5745213
Great rant Amy! And this blog, about injustice/evil/malice of Oz kids getting jabbed - and legal jiggery-pokery too - is just part of it. You shone a light on the bigger picture.
I forwarded your comment to someone who, while very bright and 'gets' the covid scam, fails to comprehend the enormity of the unified evil (evil at root; the lower-level perpetrators (gubermunt, media, medical level) are mostly dumb/dumber foot soldiers who know little of what they do). It (your rant, my forwarding of it) will have little effect.
Your calls to resist will fall on deaf/stupid/uncomprehending ears. You really believe we'll go back to the 80's tech? Cash? You josh me, right? The public roll-over to the covidscam was the tipping point. A few thousand, even a few hundred 'Good Men' of note could have stopped it in its tracks. Didn't happen. They won.
We, Mankind, lost it then, possibly for an Age or two. (OK, I tend toward exaggeration: will say
2-3,000 thousand years be more acceptable? )
So, sadly Amy, forget about 'getting your life back'. 'Aint gonna happen. For you. For me. For us all. And don't start me on GPTChat and where that's going.
If I sound a little pessimistic - well, not really, more realistic.
There are no accidents in the Universe. We reap what we sew, every action has it's consequence and we are now - and about to - reap a few consequences. Enjoy!
PS I am not religious, in fact...Oh don't get me started...
Suggest Patel Patriot’s Devolution series on Substack
Or read by PGunnels on Rumble
The people had to experience some of what was planned for us but all is not lost
We come to the brink of the precipice because you can’t tell folk, we know this, haven’t we all tried for the last three years.
We had to see just how corrupt the autocracy and Polly puppets have become and we would have lost for sure, looking around at the sheeple compliance
we came back from the precipice- out of the masked lock downs and over policing, quarantine etc and it’s really sad people have been injured and killed from these experimental mandated jabs
This all happened and slowly the enormity of this is rolling out, bit by bit, the reality we watched is being brought to light
We are winning at the pace of discovery that 80+% of the sleepers can tolerate without sending them over the edge.
God wins Good wins Truth stand steady all ways
It's so admirable that people are still trying the courts after so many years and hundreds of cases being crushed by lawfare and judicial tyranny. This shows a willingness on our part to exhaust all peaceful avenues. This is how righteous people behave in the face of tyranny.
In 2023, Good People are still doing Good. The terminal state of tyranny occurrs when Good people are forced to do Bad. I believe we are quickly approaching that condition. People need to understand what is happening right now. Our children are being murdered and we are reaching an inflection point.
Yes, there are far too many 'Good Australians' just like the 'Good Germans' back in Nazi Germany.
We must remember: Good People Break Bad Laws, -it is our duty to do so.
By the way thanks for the substack that included the short animation 'Beyond the Reset'. It was actually quite haunting and confronting watching this short film - and the reality if enough people continue being 'Good Australians' on how this could end.
Hey you're very welcome. I was so surprised and delighted when the creator emailed me back. I caught him right before he went on the Alex Jones show so maybe I have the honour of being his first interview!
Great work and you may have to remind him of that if he hits BIG time.
Hahaha - it doesn't matter to me. I just want to avoid the camps.
This is so rigged, the court is bought... It's not about protecting the citizen from exploitation any more, it's about ensuring the citizen can be exploited... Even worse failure to protect our future citizens, babies and children... Who has invaded our country and rewritten laws meant to protect us? (Several easy answers to this question, but it's so obvious, it's like they do not even care who can see it)...
The court is neither rigged nor bought. This case was lost because they didn’t bring a suitable plaintiff to Court three times (twice at the Federal level and once at the High Court level)
After you read Arkmedic's piece, please read the book 'Rigged' (previously 'Game of mates'). It does a great job of quantifying just how rigged the system is.
The system is totally rigged and bought
How do you think that these ‘countermeasures’ have been pushed on people for so long, despite the fact that they bypassed any efficacy and safety standards amongst many other things along the way.
https://www.instagram.com/reel/CrNv756AdwK/?igshid=ZWIzMWE5ZmU3Zg==
Denied a heart, judge didn't want to hear, seeing a pattern?
Thank you Rebekah, I've shared your article: https://elylazar.substack.com/p/nothing-high-about-the-high-court?sd=pf
Australia. I guess it wants to be part of King Charles plan for eradication of the Homo sapiens. Never ever going back to visit that clown show.
Do you know if you bring the Constiution back into alignmemt there is remedy to remove politicians and judiciary that is beholden to foreign influence..and we can force any king back into alignment