The QoVAX study obviously didn't show how well the vaccines worked in a Covid-naive population, or how well they continued to work with multiple shots and infections. The results must not support the on going narrative that the 'safe and effective' shots saved more lives than they took. They are covering up so that the proof will never see the light of day.
I can only imagine how damning the results of that particular data collection is. As someone who treats people with the constellation of symptoms medically diagnosed as "long covid" - I can attest that this phenomenon is almost exclusively evident in the "vaccinated". Many victims of this act of government bioterrorism are aware that their symptoms are from the injections - yet medical health professionals continue to dismiss them or alternatively blame it on the infection not the injection.
True. Although, a large percentage of my patients chose to remain unvaccinated after being equipped with information and all the early research and data coming out of the US. As a matter of 'informed consent' - I thought it was essential that people were made aware that the injections were experimental, and had no geno-toxicity or reproductive toxicity studies. Furthermore, it has been observed pre-covid that vaccination has been correlated with immune dysfunction/auto-immunity and inflammatory conditions (including neuro-inflammatory conditions). I am fortunate to know a disproportionately large amount of unvaccinated people, none of whom died or were seriously afflicted with covid and none of whom have "long covid". This may not be statistically significant however is my personal observation.
Well, imagine how much worse it would have been for those people if they'd not been jabbed.
Many believe that, during the great plague, NSW's Health minister (Health Hazard) and QLD's Premier Palachook were only acting/speaking on orders - described as advice from their respective female CHOs. Many argue that they were innocent messengers ... that they were locked into a chain of command.
As a side issue, imagine if the Queensland University of Technology (QUT) had been called Queensland University of Information Technology.:)
But then, imagine if Curtin University of Technology (CUT) had been called Curtin University of New Technology.:)
Cross-referencing two articles today on academic fraud which is clearly intended to suppress scientific discovery and debate and strengthen the grip of vaccinophilic orthodoxy:
The silencing of scientific curiosity
Medical journals have became enforcers of orthodoxy - retracting genuine hypotheses while protecting proven fraud.
The authors are leading investigators and reporters of the COVID-19 pandemic debacle and all the questions of fraud and censorship which have arisen in its wake. Both are Australian women.
as one of many who have been covering the excessive synthetic DNA contamination in these products, one can only view with great suspicion the motives here
Kevin McKernan and others have been re-analysing just this type of data to confirm this contamination is extensive and within the blood and bodies of recipients
.. the QoVAX study data likely poses too much of a liability risk for showing how widespread the contamination is within the blood of Australians
as Kevin noted on X overnight:
"The Ryan et al data was contaminated with vaccine DNA. These were Australians.
Shortly after this is raised with the Australian government, there is a motion to destroy any other biobank that could measure the extent of the problem."
in short, closing down QoVAX and destroying the data is act of destroying the most definitive legally probative evidence showing Australians have been contaminated, which contamination is known to trigger cancers
we are watching a cover-up being blatantly conducted before our very eyes
One could make a cynical supposition as to the reason for the cancellation of the research & destruction of the samples, but that would be a 'conspiracy theory' wouldn't it?🥴🥰
It's a true mystery, indeed, unless of course the rollout was Not a success. Then the mystery is why Qld govt don't want us to know it was a flop!! Why would anyone want to keep giving people a concoction that has high risks and low benefits, if any at all( other than the financial benefits to the patent holders).
The QoVAX study obviously didn't show how well the vaccines worked in a Covid-naive population, or how well they continued to work with multiple shots and infections. The results must not support the on going narrative that the 'safe and effective' shots saved more lives than they took. They are covering up so that the proof will never see the light of day.
Nothing to see here-Disgusting action by the corrupt medical fraternity-Has MSM questioned this I wonder-betting NOT!
I can only imagine how damning the results of that particular data collection is. As someone who treats people with the constellation of symptoms medically diagnosed as "long covid" - I can attest that this phenomenon is almost exclusively evident in the "vaccinated". Many victims of this act of government bioterrorism are aware that their symptoms are from the injections - yet medical health professionals continue to dismiss them or alternatively blame it on the infection not the injection.
"almost exclusively evident in the vaccinated". Given that
95% of the adult population was vaxxed, this is not surprising.
True. Although, a large percentage of my patients chose to remain unvaccinated after being equipped with information and all the early research and data coming out of the US. As a matter of 'informed consent' - I thought it was essential that people were made aware that the injections were experimental, and had no geno-toxicity or reproductive toxicity studies. Furthermore, it has been observed pre-covid that vaccination has been correlated with immune dysfunction/auto-immunity and inflammatory conditions (including neuro-inflammatory conditions). I am fortunate to know a disproportionately large amount of unvaccinated people, none of whom died or were seriously afflicted with covid and none of whom have "long covid". This may not be statistically significant however is my personal observation.
APHRA directive of March 2021?
"First covid deaths were fully vaccinated"
Well, imagine how much worse it would have been for those people if they'd not been jabbed.
Many believe that, during the great plague, NSW's Health minister (Health Hazard) and QLD's Premier Palachook were only acting/speaking on orders - described as advice from their respective female CHOs. Many argue that they were innocent messengers ... that they were locked into a chain of command.
As a side issue, imagine if the Queensland University of Technology (QUT) had been called Queensland University of Information Technology.:)
But then, imagine if Curtin University of Technology (CUT) had been called Curtin University of New Technology.:)
😂
Coverup?
Seriously, how else do you explain the destruction of samples?
Streisand Effect is gonna kick in big time now.
Nice work on the follow up enquiries as well, your tenacity is outstanding.
Cross-referencing two articles today on academic fraud which is clearly intended to suppress scientific discovery and debate and strengthen the grip of vaccinophilic orthodoxy:
The silencing of scientific curiosity
Medical journals have became enforcers of orthodoxy - retracting genuine hypotheses while protecting proven fraud.
Maryanne Demasi PhD https://blog.maryannedemasi.com/p/the-silencing-of-scientific-curiosity
'Globally significant' Covid vaccine study biobank to be destroyed
The Queensland Government says there is "no longer a scientific and public health need" for this valuable biobank and linked data
Rebekah Barnett https://news.rebekahbarnett.com.au/p/globally-significant-covid-vaccine
The authors are leading investigators and reporters of the COVID-19 pandemic debacle and all the questions of fraud and censorship which have arisen in its wake. Both are Australian women.
thank you Rebekah,
as one of many who have been covering the excessive synthetic DNA contamination in these products, one can only view with great suspicion the motives here
Kevin McKernan and others have been re-analysing just this type of data to confirm this contamination is extensive and within the blood and bodies of recipients
.. the QoVAX study data likely poses too much of a liability risk for showing how widespread the contamination is within the blood of Australians
as Kevin noted on X overnight:
"The Ryan et al data was contaminated with vaccine DNA. These were Australians.
Shortly after this is raised with the Australian government, there is a motion to destroy any other biobank that could measure the extent of the problem."
https://x.com/Kevin_McKernan/status/1912481955985138088
in short, closing down QoVAX and destroying the data is act of destroying the most definitive legally probative evidence showing Australians have been contaminated, which contamination is known to trigger cancers
we are watching a cover-up being blatantly conducted before our very eyes
One could make a cynical supposition as to the reason for the cancellation of the research & destruction of the samples, but that would be a 'conspiracy theory' wouldn't it?🥴🥰
It's a true mystery, indeed, unless of course the rollout was Not a success. Then the mystery is why Qld govt don't want us to know it was a flop!! Why would anyone want to keep giving people a concoction that has high risks and low benefits, if any at all( other than the financial benefits to the patent holders).