Contamination in mRNA Shots ‘Serious Regulatory Oversight’
A #plasmidgate update
My new story for Umbrella News pulls together a bunch of threads from the unfolding #plasmidgate story. If you’re not caught up, here’s the TLDR:
Multiple independent labs around the world have discovered plasmid DNA contamination in the mRNA Covid shots
It’s in amounts higher than regulatory limits
It’s not supposed to be there
There’s also an SV40 promoter in the Pfizer shots, which is a sequence used in gene therapies to drag material into the nucleus of the recipient’s cells
Health Canada has now also formally acknowledged the contamination, as well as the SV40 promoter on the Pfizer vaccine.
As well as the DNA contamination, there is a theoretical risk of endotoxin contamination - this remains to be proven. Australian Geoff Pain is expert on this.
Scientists, and especially oncologists, are concerned about the possibility of contamination leading to rare but serious side effects, including cardiac events, anaphylaxis, autoimmune issues, cancers and sudden death
There is also the risk that the contaminant DNA will integrate with the genome of the recipient
None of these effects have been proven in relationship with the contamination, but a new Canadian study of 27 mRNA vaccine vials (preprint) is the first to explore the connection. The authors found “a positive dose-response relationship was observed for the Pfizer lots based on qPCR estimation of residual DNA,” indicating that this is something that should be studied further.
Regulators applied DNA contamination limits applicable to traditional vaccines to these new mRNA vaccines. In doing so, they appear to have overlooked the fact that the contamination in the mRNA vaccines is being transported around the body - and into the cells - in lipid nanoparticle packages. Oops.
Read the full story, with links to primary sources:
Contamination in mRNA Shots ‘Serious Regulatory Oversight’
One of the scientists featured in this article, Dr. Phillip Buckhaults, has been backpedaling hard since his testimony in a South Carolina Senate hearing went viral. Dr. Buckhaults believes in the promises of mRNA technology and is very keen to play down the risks, though he maintains, as do the other scientists who have replicated Kevin McKernan’s OG plasmid DNA contamination findings, that there needs to be serious research into the possible effects of the contamination.
Earlier this week, he posted the below on X:
Apparently, vaxxed people are freaking out, flooding Dr. Buckhaults’s inbox with messages of fear and anxiety. This is a good reminder that, while this information may be purely interesting in an ‘appalled onlooker’ kind of way to the unvaxxed, it can be really scary for people who have taken the products to hear this information.
Some scientists, including Dr. Buckhaults, are of the view that because the prospect of hypothetical risks is scary and not yet proven unequivocally, the information should not be shared with the wider public.
I strongly disagree.
While the products in question are still being injected into people daily all over the world, this is an issue of informed consent. Some people may choose to wait for more information before receiving additional injections, and some may seek alternative treatments. Some will choose to run the gauntlet and receive the injections anyway. People should be given the opportunity to make this choice with the best available information at the time.
That said, when presenting this information, media (and people posting on social media) should strive for even-handedness. I think that the focus should be on informing people of the confirmed facts (DNA contamination) and theoretical risks (yet to be proven scientifically in relation to the mRNAs) for the purpose of facilitating informed consent.
I hope this article can be a sharable resource for anyone interested in finding out more about the topic - vaxxed or unvaxxed - in a way that is not sensational, and that clearly separates out the known facts from the hypothetical risks.
Read: Contamination in mRNA Shots ‘Serious Regulatory Oversight’
To support my work, make a one-off contribution to DDU via my Kofi account and/or subscribe. Thanks!
thank you Rebekah,
.. a few points
your bullet point 7 in the opening - there is no evidence the risk of various disease including cancers occurring from this synthetic DNA will be 'rare'
.. there is in fact an absence of evidence on the rates we should expect to see of various disease from this DNA, because to date no one has performed the proper genotoxicity and carcinogenicity studies
.. both Pfizer and Moderna were given free passes on these tests, tests we now desperately need
what is very definitely known is residual DNA after entering the nucleus, does cause innumerable genetic disorders, which is why there have been legal limits placed on the stuff dating back to the 1970s
you do not place industry limits on contamination and publish regulatory guidance if a risk is 'theroretical'
.. the rules have been in place because interefering with natural DNA with exogenous or synthetic DNA kills people, where no death or disease from DNA contamination is 'rare' when it should never have been there, nor is it rare to the person suffering the disease or death .. that disease or death is 100% real to them, not rare
some recent FDA guidance is here (the word 'plasmid' appears 68 times): https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2847045/
as for integration of this stuff
Buckhaults himself acknowledged in his South Carolina testimony the danger is very real because most of this DNA is linearised and as small fragments
.. so the whole plasmids (circular) DNA have been busted up into many many many smaller pieces .. 'truncated' is the science term
resulting in, as Buckhaults said, even greater chances of genomic integration, because there are many many more pieces floating around
McKernan and others are talking in terms of billions and possibly trillions of pieces of synthetic DNA in each shot being delivered right into cells, with a high number being attached to SV40 enhancer sequences, thereby ensuring they are shuttled directly into the nucleus within hours
this SV40 enhancer shuttling of genetic material into the nucleus of cells has been ongoing research dating back over 40 years
.. if you want to see some of the research, go to the following link, and towards the end of the page are Letters of Demand to the TGA and OGTR, and Pfizer and Moderna .. the Letters of Demand are almost identical .. download one and go to Schedule 1 in the letter which contains a bunch of science papers .. a very small collections of the 1,000 on the science of targeting cellular DNA - transfection/gene therapy:
https://amps.redunion.com.au/australian-court-covid19-drugs-gmo-pfizer-moderna-law
'gene therapy' and 'transfection' drugs research has been targeting the nucleus for decades, in order to insert new genes into genomes, or alter the expression of natural genomes
.. it is particularly nasty science that has had an equally long history of failure, particularly countless side-effects with cancer creation being right on top of the list
for those who do not know, until Covid-19 that was almost entirely the history behind Moderna - year after year of failed drug trials using LNPs and modRNAs, typically announcing yet more cancer as serious 'side-effects' or adverse events
basically, Moderna has been unsuccessfully at this technology for about a decade
as to that issue of integration .. the linear DNA in the products of Pfizer and Moderna is the same type studied in this paper:
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-023-33862-0
in short, 7-10% gets integrated with natural DNA, making that DNA no longer natural, but Transgenically modified .. never to be natural again
carpet bomb as McKernan says, a human with billions (possibly trillions) of pieces of this synthetic DNA, and you can bet your bottom dollar integration follows
.. not a 'risk' of integration .. just integration
that integration has been happening and has happened now in millions if not billions of humans since these Covid drugs were rolled out
this DNA has entered the nucleus of millions if not billions of humans
these humans are now different .. they have undergone Transgenesis
these humans have had their natural DNA interfered with, with untold numbers of genetic disorders and disease flowing from this fact
when this is occurring in millions if not billions of people, respectfully, the word 'rare' is inappropriate and wrong .. particularly to those millions (or billions) of people
after a global poisoning by contamination, we have entered a new and not-so-happy age of Transgenesis
.. and wait for the kids of parents coming in the nearby next generation, from parents whose sperm DNA is no longer natural, and whose eggs (Oocytes) are no longer natural
every integration and change to natural DNA will be different
.. so expect to see some wildly different outcomes
some wildly different kids, if they survive
this story has only just begun
Julian Gillespie
"Oopsie poopsie! Everybody makes mistakes!" -- governments around the world.